The effects of antibiotics on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer differ based on PD-L1 expression

Antibiotic use during radical surgery in stage I-III colorectal cancer: correlation with outcomes?

AIMS

Accumulating evidence indicates that the use of antibiotics (ATBs) in cancer patients is potentially correlated with patient prognosis. Interestingly, the use of these agents is not uncommon in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients during surgery; however, their prognostic value in the clinic has never been addressed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on ATB use during surgery, including the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and the number of categories, were collected. Differences in the clinical data between the low and high cDDD subgroups and between subgroups with ≤ 4 and >4 categories. Additionally, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among these subgroups and the specific categories were compared. Finally, a Cox proportional hazard model was used to validate the risk factors for the outcome.

RESULTS

The number of categories, rather than the cDDD, was a significant predictor of both DFS (P = 0.043) and OS (P = 0.039). Patients with obstruction are more likely to have a high cDDD, whereas older patients are more likely to have multiple categories. There were no significant differences in the DFS (log rank = 1.36, P = 0.244) or OS (log rank = 0.40, P = 0.528) between patients in the low- and high-cDDD subgroups, whereas patients with ≤ 4 categories had superior DFS (log rank = 9.92, P = 0.002) and OS (log rank = 8.30, P = 0.004) compared with those with >4 categories. Specifically, the use of quinolones was harmful to survival (DFS: log rank = 3.67, P = 0.055; OS: log rank = 5.10, P = 0.024), whereas the use of macrolides was beneficial to survival (DFS: log rank = 12.26, P < 0.001; OS: log rank = 9.77, P = 0.002). Finally, the number of categories was identified as an independent risk factor for both DFS (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.35-3.11, P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.14-2.90, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The cDDD of ATBs during surgery in stage I-III CRC patients did not correlate with outcome; however, patients in multiple categories or a specific category are likely to have inferior survival. These results suggest that particular caution should be taken when selecting ATBs for these patients in the clinic.

The impact of antibiotic use in gastrointestinal tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved overall survival in patients with different cancer types. However, treatment efficacy varies between patients depending on several factors. Recent research suggested that antibiotic-induced dysbiosis can impair ICI efficacy. Here we review the impact of antibiotic use in clinical outcome of patients with gastrointestinal cancer treated with ICI.

Methods

This is a systematic review and utilized a thorough search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, EB-SCO, Web of Science of studies published till September 2023. The aim of the study is to determine the association between antibiotic use and ICI treatment efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal cancers (GI). We utilized a meta-analysis of the association between the use of antibiotics and overall survival and progression-free survival.

Results

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 2,214 patients. The most common type of cancers was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The majority of the studies were retrospective, and one was collective of clinical trials. The use of antibiotics was associated with decreased both overall survival [haz-ard ratio (HR) 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 2.63] and progression-free survival [HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.29, 2.54].

Conclusion

The use of antibiotics may affect clinical outcomes in patients with GI cancers treated with ICI. Further prospective studies are needed to improve the understanding of this phenomenon.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023462172.

Impacts of probiotics on the efficacies of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The relationships between the therapeutic effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the intestinal flora have attracted increasing attention. However, the effects of oral probiotics on the efficacies of ICIs used to treat non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear. We investigated the effects of probiotics on the efficacies of ICIs in patients treated with and without chemotherapy. We investigated patients with advanced NSCLC on ICI monotherapy or combination ICI and chemotherapy using the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Immunotherapy Database (OLCSG-ID) and the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Immunochemotherapy Database (OLCSG-ICD). In total, 927 patients (482 on ICI monotherapy, 445 on an ICI + chemotherapy) were enrolled. Most were male, of good performance status, smokers, and without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations. Probiotics were administered to 19% of patients on ICI monotherapies and 17% of those on ICIs + chemotherapy. Of the former patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the probiotics group (PFS 7.9 vs. 2.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, p < .001; OS not attained vs. 13.1 months, HR 0.45, p < .001). Among patients receiving ICI and chemotherapy, there were no significant differences in PFS between those on probiotics and not but OS was significantly better in the probiotics group (PFS 8.8 vs. 8.6 months, HR 0.89, p = .43; OS not attained vs. 22.6 months, HR 0.61, p = .03). Patients on probiotics experienced better outcomes following ICI treatment.

Evolving insights into the improvement of adoptive T-cell immunotherapy through PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in the clinical spectrum of lung cancer

Undeniably, cancer immunotherapies have expanded the spectrum of cancer treatment, however, some patients do not respond to immunotherapies. This scenario is no different for lung cancer, whose two main types, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), still pose a serious clinical challenge. Adoptive T-cell therapies (ATC), which primarily include cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy and γδ-T-cell therapy, strengthen the patient's immune system in combating cancer. Combining ATC with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) further enhances the effectiveness of this approach to eradicate cancer. With a particular emphasis on CIK cell therapy, which recently completed 30 years, we highlight the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in NSCLC and SCLC. Besides, we provide insights into the potential synergies of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with adoptive T-cell immunotherapy in reshaping the treatment paradigm for lung cancer.

Correlation of distribution characteristics and dynamic changes of gut microbiota with the efficacy of immunotherapy in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The effects of gut microbiota and metabolites on the responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been studied. However, their effects on EGFR-mutated (EGFR +) NSCLC remain unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively recorded the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with advanced EGFR + NSCLC and assessed potential associations between the use of antibiotics or probiotics and immunotherapy efficacy. Fecal samples were collected at baseline, early on-treatment, response and progression status and were subjected to metagenomic next-generation sequencing and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses to assess the effects of gut microbiota and metabolites on immunotherapy efficacy.

RESULTS

The clinical data of 74 advanced EGFR + NSCLC patients were complete and 18 patients' fecal samples were dynamically collected. Patients that used antibiotics had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (mPFS, 4.8 vs. 6.7 months; P = 0.037); probiotics had no impact on PFS. Two dynamic types of gut microbiota during immunotherapy were identified: one type showed the lowest relative abundance at the response time point, whereas the other type showed the highest abundance at the response time point. Metabolomics revealed significant differences in metabolites distribution between responders and non-responders. Deoxycholic acid, glycerol, and quinolinic acid were enriched in responders, whereas L-citrulline was enriched in non-responders. There was a significant correlation between gut microbiota and metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antibiotics weakens immunotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced EGFR + NSCLC. The distribution characteristics and dynamic changes of gut microbiota and metabolites may indicate the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced EGFR + NSCLC.

Association of antibiotic exposure with survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically shifted the therapeutic paradigm of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Antibiotic (ATB) exposure before or during ICI therapy can harm the integrity of the gut microbiome and lead to intestinal dysbiosis, which has a profoundly negative impact on the treatment response for various malignancies. Whether this is applicable to ES-SCLC remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC who were treated with ICI-based immunotherapies from July 2019 to December 2020 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, China. Outcomes with the use of ATBs before or after the first infusion of ICI, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analyses were also conducted using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients were included, among whom 41 (19.2%) received ATBs within 2 months before or after the first initiation of ICI therapy and were assigned to the ATB group. The ATB group showed a shorter median PFS (4.3 vs. 6.3 months; HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.97-2.11; p = 0.043) and a significantly shorter median OS (6.9 vs. 13 months; HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.98-2.20; p = 0.033) than the non-ATB group. In the multivariate analysis, ATB exposure was markedly associated with worse PFS (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.03-2.09, p = 0.035) and OS (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.01-2.11, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that ATB exposure was significantly associated with worse survival in ES-SCLC patients who received ICI therapy.

Gut microbiota in cancer: insights on microbial metabolites and therapeutic strategies

In recent years, the role of gut microbiota in cancer treatment has attracted substantial attention. It is now well established that gut microbiota and its metabolites significantly contribute to the incidence, treatment, and prognosis of various cancers. This review provides a comprehensive review on the pivotal role of gut microbiota and their metabolites in cancer initiation and progression. Furthermore, it evaluates the impact of gut microbiota on the efficacy and associated side effects of anticancer therapies, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, thus emphasizing the clinical importance of gut microbiota reconstitution in cancer treatment.

The Effects of Antibiotics on the Development and Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

There have been studies on antibiotic use concerning lung cancer and its potential impact on carcinogenesis and microbiome. However, subsequent research has failed to support these associations consistently. In terms of the potential carcinogenic of antibiotics on lung cancer, the available evidence has not been sufficient to draw any definitive conclusions. Maintaining immune homeostasis and preventing pathogen invasion is critically dependent on the microbiome. The subtle balance of the body microbiota, including the lungs, is susceptible to disruption by antibiotic use. There is an association between disruptions of the lung microbiome and respiratory diseases, including lung cancer, and decreased efficacy of treatments. Patients with lung cancer are often indicated for antibiotic treatment due to respiratory infections or other comorbidities. Pulmonary infections in the area of undetected lung tumors are not uncommon. They can be an early sign of malignancy, which may explain the association between antibiotic use and lung cancer diagnosis. Antibiotic use can also affect the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Studies suggest that antibiotic use can impair the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in lung cancer patients, particularly around the time when treatment is initiated. These findings require further study, understanding underlying mechanisms, and identifying microbiota signatures associated with treatment response.

The Gut Microbiome from a Biomarker to a Novel Therapeutic Strategy for Immunotherapy Response in Patients with Lung Cancer

The gastrointestinal microbiome has been shown to play a key role in determining the responses to cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and CAR-T. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), increasing evidence suggests that a microbiome composition signature is associated with clinical response to ICIs as well as with the development of immune-related adverse events. In support of this, antibiotic (ATB)-related dysbiosis has been consistently linked with the deleterious impact of ICI response, shortening the overall survival (OS) among patients on ATBs prior to ICI initiation. In parallel, several preclinical experiments have unravelled various strategies using probiotics, prebiotics, diet, and fecal microbiota transplantation as new therapeutic tools to beneficially shift the microbiome and enhance ICI efficacy. These approaches are currently being evaluated in clinical trials and have achieved encouraging preliminary results. In this article, we reviewed the recent studies on the gut microbiome as a potential biomarker and an adjuvant therapy to ICIs in NSCLC patients.

The impact of the gut microbiome on tumor immunotherapy: from mechanism to application strategies

Immunotherapy is one of the fastest developing areas in the field of oncology. Many immunological treatment strategies for refractory tumors have been approved and marketed. Nevertheless, much clinical and preclinical experimental evidence has shown that the efficacy of immunotherapy in tumor treatment varies markedly among individuals. The commensal microbiome mainly colonizes the intestinal lumen in humans, is affected by a variety of factors and exhibits individual variation. Moreover, the gut is considered the largest immune organ of the body due to its influence on the immune system. In the last few decades, with the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques and in-depth research, the view that the gut microbiota intervenes in antitumor immunotherapy through the immune system has been gradually confirmed. Here, we review important studies published in recent years focusing on the influences of microbiota on immune system and the progression of malignancy. Furthermore, we discuss the mechanism by which microbiota affect tumor immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT), and strategies for modulating the microbial composition to facilitate the antitumor immune response. Finally, opportunity and some challenges are mentioned to enable a more systematic understanding of tumor treatment in the future and promote basic research and clinical application in related fields.

Impact of concomitant medications on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: an umbrella review

Introduction

Cancer is a major global health concern, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer a promising treatment option for cancer patients. However, the efficacy of ICIs can be influenced by various factors, including the use of concomitant medications.

Methods

We searched databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the impact of concomitant medications on ICIs efficacy, published from inception to January 1, 2023. We evaluated the methodological quality of the included meta-analyses, and re-synthesized data using a random-effects model and evidence stratification.

Results

We included 23 publications, comprising 11 concomitant medications and 112 associations. Class II-IV evidence suggested that antibiotics have a negative impact on ICIs efficacy. However, ICIs efficacy against melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was not affected, this effect was related to the exposure window (class IV). Class III evidence suggested that proton pump inhibitors have a negative impact on ICIs efficacy; nevertheless, the efficacy against melanoma and renal cell carcinoma was not affected, and the effect was related to exposure before the initiation of ICIs therapy (class II). Although class II/III evidence suggested that steroids have a negative impact, this effect was not observed when used for non-cancer indications and immune-related adverse events (class IV). Class IV evidence suggested that opioids reduce ICIs efficacy, whereas statins and probiotics may improve ICIs efficacy. ICIs efficacy was not affected by histamine 2 receptor antagonists, aspirin, metformin, β-blockers, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that the use of antibiotics, PPIs, steroids, and opioids has a negative impact on the efficacy of ICIs. However, this effect may vary depending on the type of tumor, the timing of exposure, and the intended application. Weak evidence suggests that statins and probiotics may enhance the efficacy of ICIs. Aspirin, metformin, β-blockers, and NSAIDs do not appear to affect the efficacy of ICIs. However, caution is advised in interpreting these results due to methodological limitations.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO,identifier, CRD42022328681.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Limited information on anticancer therapy for super-elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer is available. Immune checkpoint inhibitors offer long-term survival to elderly patients aged ≥65 years with non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in more elderly patients are not well understood.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients aged ≥85 years with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer at nine centers using the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group-Immunotherapy Database.

RESULTS

Among 531 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors, 16 were aged ≥85 years (median, 86.5 years; range, 85-93 years). Many had high programmed death-ligand 1 expression and received pembrolizumab as first-line therapy. The objective response rate, median progression-free survival, and median survival time were 25% (95% confidence interval: 1-49), 2.8 months (95% confidence interval: 1.7-4.5), and not reached (95% confidence interval: 4.7-not reached), respectively. Moreover, the 4-year overall survival rate was 60.8% (95% confidence interval: 29.3-81.7), and a long-lasting effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors was observed even in patients aged ≥85 years. The incidence of immune-related and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events was 32% and 6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients aged ≥85 years were acceptable. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may be a treatment option for patients aged ≥85 years.

Hyperprogressive disease during PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

The occurrence of markedly accelerated tumor growth during immunotherapy is considered a new mode of progression called hyperprogressive disease (HPD) and its impact on pancreatic cancer (PC) patients receiving immunotherapy is unknown. In this study, we described and explored the incidence, prognosis and predictors of HPD in patients with advanced PC treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological data from 104 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were treated with PD-1 inhibitors at our institution during 2015-2020 and identified 10 (9.6%) patients with HPD. Overall survival (OS) was significantly poorer in patients with HPD compared to patients with progressive disease (PD) (median OS: 5.6 vs. 3.6 months, p < .01). Clinicopathological factors associated with the occurrence of HPD included smoking, metastatic sites >2, liver metastasis, antibiotic therapy within 21 days before immunotherapy (Abx B21), hemoglobin (Hb) level <110 g/L, and PD-1 inhibitor treatment line >2. Subgroup analysis showed that high levels of CA19-9 at baseline were associated with the development of subsequent HPD (p = .024) and a worse prognosis (mOS:16.2 months vs. 6.1 months, p < .01). Our study demonstrated that HPD may occur in PC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors and is associated with several clinicopathological characteristics and poor prognosis. The baseline tumor marker CA19-9 may be one of the early predictors of HPD development in PC patients receiving immunotherapy.

Vitamin D Status Is Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy and Immune-related Adverse Event Severity in Lung Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Vitamin D (VitD) is potentially immunomodulatory, so here we aimed to explore the relationships between serum VitD levels, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels were quantified before and after ICI treatment in prospectively enrolled patients with advanced lung cancers. Of 77 enrolled patients, 29 developed 42 irAEs. Baseline 25(OH)D levels of partial response (PRs) patients were significantly higher than non-PR patients (19.39±7.16 vs. 16.28±5.99 ng/mL, P =0.04). The area under the curve of 25(OH)D >15.73 ng/mL to identify PR was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.51-0.76, P =0.047), and baseline 25(OH)D levels >15.73 ng/mL (odds ratio: 2.93, 95% CI, 1.10-7.79, P =0.03) and prior targeted therapy (odds ratio: 0.30, 95% CI, 0.10-0.92, P =0.04) were independent predictors of PR as best efficacy by multivariable logistic regression. With respect to irAEs, baseline 25(OH)D levels were higher in grade 1 irAE patients than in grade 2/3/4 irAE patients (20.07±8.64 vs. 15.22±2.30 ng/mL, P =0.02). However, the area under the curve was only 0.56 (95% CI, 0.42-0.70, P =0.39) for a baseline 25(OH)D of 20.99 ng/mL for predicting irAE occurrence. There was a direct monotonic relationship and U-shaped relationship between baseline 25(OH)D levels and ICI efficacy and irAE occurrence, respectively. Overall survival was significantly different between VitD sufficient, insufficient, and deficient patients (log-rank P =0.01), which remained after adjustment in Cox proportional hazards regression models. Baseline 25(OH)D levels seem to be associated with ICI efficacy and prognosis, it might be helpful to assess the baseline VitD status, and supplementation with VitD might bring some benefit to enhance ICI efficacy and reduce moderate-severe irAEs.

Potential role of gut microbes in the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoints inhibitors

In recent years, Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been extensively used in the treatment of a variety of cancers. However, the response rates ranging from 13% to 69% depending on the tumor type and the emergence of immune-related adverse events have posed significant challenges for clinical treatment. As a key environmental factor, gut microbes have a variety of important physiological functions such as regulating intestinal nutrient metabolism, promoting intestinal mucosal renewal, and maintaining intestinal mucosal immune activity. A growing number of studies have revealed that gut microbes further influence the anticancer effects of tumor patients through modulation of the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Currently, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) have been developed relatively mature and suggested as an important regulator in order to enhance the efficacy of treatment. This review is dedicated to exploring the impact of differences in flora composition on the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors as well as to summarizing the current progress of FMT.

Role of the gut microbiota in anticancer therapy: from molecular mechanisms to clinical applications

In the past period, due to the rapid development of next-generation sequencing technology, accumulating evidence has clarified the complex role of the human microbiota in the development of cancer and the therapeutic response. More importantly, available evidence seems to indicate that modulating the composition of the gut microbiota to improve the efficacy of anti-cancer drugs may be feasible. However, intricate complexities exist, and a deep and comprehensive understanding of how the human microbiota interacts with cancer is critical to realize its full potential in cancer treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarize the initial clues on molecular mechanisms regarding the mutual effects between the gut microbiota and cancer development, and to highlight the relationship between gut microbes and the efficacy of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and cancer surgery, which may provide insights into the formulation of individualized therapeutic strategies for cancer management. In addition, the current and emerging microbial interventions for cancer therapy as well as their clinical applications are summarized. Although many challenges remain for now, the great importance and full potential of the gut microbiota cannot be overstated for the development of individualized anti-cancer strategies, and it is necessary to explore a holistic approach that incorporates microbial modulation therapy in cancer.

Pretreatment with antibiotics is associated with reduced therapeutic response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

Alterations in microbial composition of gut microbiota due to antibiotics (ATB) may lead to resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aimed to assess the impact of ATB use on therapeutic response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 105 patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as a primary systemic therapy from prospectively-registered, multicenter, cohorts. Nineteen patients who received prior ATB were included in the ATB (+) group; 86 patients who did not receive prior ATB were included in the ATB (-) group. The therapeutic outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Most of the patients' baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The objective response rates according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) (30.1% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.143) and modified RECIST (mRECIST) (44.6% vs. 27.8%; p = 0.190) were not significantly different between the ATB (-) and ATB (+) groups. The disease control rates were higher in the ATB (-) group than in the ATB (+) group according to RECIST v1.1 (74.7% vs. 44.4%; p = 0.012) and mRECIST (78.3% vs. 50.0%; p = 0.020). Prior ATB use was found to be independently associated with radiological progressive disease of the first therapeutic assessment. The median progression-free survival according to RECIST v1.1 (9.1 months vs. 3.0 months; p = 0.049) and mRECIST (9.1 months vs. 3.0 months; p = 0.036), and overall survival (not reached vs. 11.4 months; p = 0.015) were longer in the ATB (-) group than in the ATB (+) group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior ATB use was associated with reduced therapeutic responses in patients with HCC receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Antibiotic Treatment is an Independent Poor Risk Factor in NSCLC But Not in Melanoma Patients Who had Received Anti-PD-1/L1 Monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic treatment may reduce the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy by disrupting gut microbiome. We aimed to study the association of antibiotics and survival outcomes in advanced cutaneous melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 222 melanoma and 199 NSCLC patients had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy in 5 Finnish hospitals between January 2014 and December 2020. Clinical characteristics, antibiotic and corticosteroid treatment, and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected from hospital and national medical records.

RESULTS

There were 32% of melanoma and 31% of NSCLC patients who had received antibiotic treatment (ABT) 3 months before to 1 month after the first anti-PD-1/L1 antibody infusion. In survival analyses, early antibiotic treatment was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (ABT 19.2 [17.6-43.7] vs. no ABT 35.6 [29.3-NA] months, P = .033) but not with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (ABT 5.8 [3.0-12.6] vs. no ABT 10.2 [7.7-15.3] months, P = .3) in melanoma patients and with inferior OS (ABT 8.6 [6.4-12.3] vs. no ABT 18.5 [15.1-21.6] months, P < .001) and PFS (ABT 2.8 [2.1-4.5] vs. no ABT 5.6 [4.4-8.0] months, P = .0081) in NSCLC patients. In multivariable analyses, ABT was not an independent risk-factor for inferior OS and PFS in melanoma but was associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12 [1.37-3.28]) and PFS (HR 1.65 [1.10-2.47]) in NSCLC after adjusted for other risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Early ABT was an independent poor risk factor in NSCLC patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy but not in melanoma patients. The weight of ABT as a poor risk factor might depend on other prognostic factors in different cancers.

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the impact of antibiotic use on the clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have considerably improved patient outcomes in various cancer types, but their efficacy remains poorly predictable among patients. The intestinal microbiome, whose balance and composition can be significantly altered by antibiotic use, has recently emerged as a factor that may modulate ICI efficacy. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the impact of antibiotics on the clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with ICIs.

Methods

PubMed and major oncology conference proceedings were systematically searched to identify all studies reporting associations between antibiotic use and at least one of the following endpoints: Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Progressive Disease (PD) Rate. Pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS, and pooled Odds Ratios (ORs) for ORR and PD were calculated. Subgroup analyses on survival outcomes were also performed to investigate the potential differential effect of antibiotics according to cancer types and antibiotic exposure time windows.

Results

107 articles reporting data for 123 independent cohorts were included, representing a total of 41,663 patients among whom 11,785 (28%) received antibiotics around ICI initiation. The pooled HRs for OS and PFS were respectively of 1.61 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.48-1.76] and 1.45 [95% CI 1.32-1.60], confirming that antibiotic use was significantly associated with shorter survival. This negative association was observed consistently across all cancer types for OS and depending on the cancer type for PFS. The loss of survival was particularly strong when antibiotics were received shortly before or after ICI initiation. The pooled ORs for ORR and PD were respectively of 0.59 [95% CI 0.47-0.76] and 1.86 [95% CI 1.41-2.46], suggesting that antibiotic use was significantly associated with worse treatment-related outcomes.

Conclusion

As it is not ethically feasible to conduct interventional, randomized, controlled trials in which antibiotics would be administered to cancer patients treated with ICIs to demonstrate their deleterious impact versus control, prospective observational studies and interventional trials involving microbiome modifiers are crucially needed to uncover the role of microbiome and improve patient outcomes. Such studies will reduce the existing publication bias by allowing analyses on more homogeneous populations, especially in terms of treatments received, which is not possible at this stage given the current state of the field. In the meantime, antibiotic prescription should be cautiously considered in cancer patients receiving ICIs.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42019145675.

The Effect of Pleural Effusion on Prognosis in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Immunochemotherapy: A Retrospective Observational Study

Objectives: Combined immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pleural effusion (PE) is associated with poor outcomes among patients with NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy. However, minimal data exists on PE for patients undergoing combined ICI and chemotherapy. Therefore, we investigated how PE affects survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC undergoing this combined therapy. Methods: We identified patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy and ICI therapy from the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group−Immune Chemotherapy Database (OLCSG−ICD) between December 2018 and December 2020; the OLCSG−ICD includes the clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC from 13 institutions. Then, we analyzed the treatment outcomes based on the presence of PE. Results: We identified 478 patients who underwent combined ICI therapy and chemotherapy; 357 patients did not have PE, and 121 patients did have PE. Patients with PE had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those without PE (median PFS: 6.2 months versus 9.1 months; p < 0.001; median OS: 16.4 months versus 27.7 months; p < 0.001). The negative effect of PE differed based on the patient’s programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status; with the effect being more evident in patients with high PD-L1 expression. In addition, PFS and OS did not differ between patients who did and did not undergo bevacizumab treatment; thus, bevacizumab-containing regimens did not improve the survival outcomes for patients with PE. Conclusion: PE is associated with poor outcomes among patients with NSCLC undergoing combined ICI therapy and chemotherapy.

Identification of Malassezia globosa as a Gastric Fungus Associated with PD-L1 Expression and Overall Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Microbiotas affected the prognosis of cancer patients by regulating programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. However, the relationship between gastric fungi and PD-L1 expression is still unclear in gastric cancer (GC). We aimed at exploring the association of gastric fungi with PD-L1 expression and overall survival in GC.

METHODS

A total of 61 GC patients were divided into the two groups based on the PD-L1 combined positive scores (CPS). Fungal profiling was performed by internal transcribed spacer rDNA sequencing, and the survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

We observed a taxonomic difference of fungi between the PD-L1-High (CPS ≥ 10) and PD-L1-Low group (CPS < 10) by principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) (P = 0.014 for Bray-Curtis and P = 0.042 for Jaccard). Malassezia had a higher abundance in the PD-L1-High group compared to the PD-L1-Low group (P = 0.045). Malassezia globosa elevated significantly in the PD-L1-High group. GC patients with PD-L1 low expression and low abundance of Malassezia globosa had a longer overall survival (OS) than others (P = 0.047). Malassezia globosa was associated with PD-L1 expression (Odds Ratio = 3.509, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.056-11.656, P = 0.040). Malassezia globosa was associated with the tumor size (P = 0.031) and PD-L1 status (P = 0.024). GC patients with a high abundance of Malassezia globosa had shorter OS than others (P = 0.028). Malassezia globosa was an independent factor (Hazard Ratio = 3.080, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.140-8.323, P = 0.027) for OS after adjusting for tumor stage. Malassezia globosa was figured out to be associated with- fatty acid and lipid biosynthesis and degradation via LIPASYN pathway. Conclusions. Malassezia globosa was identified as a PD-L1 expression-associated gastric fungus and associated with OS of GC patients, which calls for more studies to further explore its potential in PD-L1/PD-1 targeted immunotherapy.

The impact of antibiotic use on clinical features and survival outcomes of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Nowadays, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the essential immunotherapies for cancer patients. However, the impact of antibiotic (ATB) use on cancer patients treated with ICIs remains controversial.

Methods

Our research included retrospective studies and a randomized clinical trial (RCT) with cancer patients treated with ICIs and ATB, from the public database of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, clinical trials, and JAMA. The survival outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Meanwhile, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and subgroup analyses were performed to determine the concrete association between ATB use and the prognosis of cancer patients treated in ICIs.

Results

Our results revealed that ATB use was associated with poor survival outcomes, including OS (HR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.68–2.25, p <0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.53–2.19, p <0.001). The subgroup analysis learned about the association between ATB use and the prognosis of cancer patients with ICI treatment, including 5 cancer types, 3 kinds of ICI, 5 different ATP windows, broad-spectrum ATB class, and ECOG score. ATB treatment was associated with poor OS of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), esophageal cancer (EC), and melanoma (MEL) in patients treated in ICIs, while non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were associated with poor PFS. Meanwhile, it was strongly related to the ICI type and ATB window. Furthermore, it is firstly mentioned that the use of broad-spectrum ATB class was strongly associated with poor PFS.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our meta-analysis indicated that ATB use was significantly associated with poor OS and PFS of cancer patients treated with ICI immunotherapy, especially for patients with ATB use in the period of (−60 days; +30 days) near the initiation of ICI treatment. Also, different cancer types and the ICI type can also impact the survival outcome. This first reveals the strong relationship between the broad-spectrum ATB class and poor PFS. Still, more studies are needed for further study.

The gut microbiome, immune check point inhibition and immune-related adverse events in non-small cell lung cancer

Systemic treatment options for patients with lung cancer have expanded in recent years, with a number of immunotherapeutic strategies now in our treatment armamentarium. Toxicity of and resistance to treatment hold a major stake in lung cancer morbidity and mortality. Herein, we summarise the background, current evidence and potential mechanisms underlying the role of the commensal gut microbiota in immunotherapy outcomes such as response and toxicity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Modeling the effect of gut microbiome on therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors against cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to be highly successful against some solid metastatic malignancies, but only for a subset of patients who show durable clinical responses. The overall patient response rate is limited due to the interpatient heterogeneity. Preclinical and clinical studies have recently shown that the therapeutic responses can be improved through the modulation of gut microbiome. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In this paper, we explored the effect of favorable and unfavorable gut bacteria on the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1 against cancer by modeling the tumor-immune-gut microbiome interactions, and further examined the predictive markers of responders and non-responders to anti-PD-1. The dynamics of the gut bacteria was fitted to the clinical data of melanoma patients, and virtual patients data were generated based on the clinical patient survival data. Our simulation results show that low initial growth rate and low level of favorable bacteria at the initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy are predictive of non-responders, while high level of favorable bacteria at the initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy is predictive of responders. Simulation results also confirmed that it is possible to promote patients' response rate to anti-PD-1 by manipulating the gut bacteria composition of non-responders, whereby achieving long-term progression-free survival.

Gut microbiota-drug interactions in cancer pharmacotherapies: implications for efficacy and adverse effects

INTRODUCTION

The gut microbiota is involved in host physiology and health. Reciprocal microbiota-drug interactions are increasingly recognized as underlying some individual differences in therapy response and adverse events. Cancer pharmacotherapies are characterized by a high degree of interpatient variability in efficacy and side effect profile and recently, the microbiota has emerged as a factor that may underlie these differences.

AREAS COVERED

The effects of cancer pharmacotherapy on microbiota composition and function are reviewed with consideration of the relationship between baseline microbiota composition, microbiota modification, antibiotics exposure and cancer therapy efficacy. We assess the evidence implicating the microbiota in cancer therapy-related adverse events including impaired gut function, cognition and pain perception. Finally, potential mechanisms underlying microbiota-cancer drug interactions are described, including direct microbial metabolism, and microbial modulation of liver metabolism and immune function. This review focused on preclinical and clinical studies conducted in the last 5 years.

EXPERT OPINION

Preclinical and clinical research supports a role for baseline microbiota in cancer therapy efficacy, with emerging evidence that the microbiota modification may assist in side effect management. Future efforts should focus on exploiting this knowledge towards the development of microbiota-targeted therapies. Finally, a focus on specific drug-microbiota-cancer interactions is warranted.

Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with lung neuroendocrine carcinoma receiving platinum agents plus etoposide

BACKGROUND

The clinical utility of prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients receiving platinum agents plus etoposide for neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is unknown.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with NEC who received platinum agents plus etoposide were retrospectively evaluated. The occurrence of severe neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) and efficacy of chemotherapy were compared between patients who did (G-CSF group) and did not receive prophylactic G-CSF (non-G-CSF group).

RESULTS

Among 58 patients, 51 (87.9%) and 7 (12.1%) had small-cell lung cancer and large-cell NEC, respectively, and 24 (41.4%) and 34 (58.6%) received cisplatin and carboplatin, respectively. The G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups included 32 and 26 patients, respectively. The non-G-CSF group displayed significantly higher rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia {88.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 69.8% - 97.6%] vs. 56.2% [95% CI = 37.7% - 73.6%], P = 0.009} and FN [50.9% (95% CI = 30% - 70%) vs. 18.8% (95% CI = 7.2% - 36.4%), P = 0.023] than the G-CSF group. In multivariate analysis, non-G-CSF was an independent risk factor for grade 3-4 neutropenia and FN. The rate of treatment delay was significantly higher in the non-G-CSF group (69.2% vs. 31.2%, P = 0.001). The relative dose intensity was significantly higher in the G-CSF group (86.7% vs. 74.1%, P < 0.001). The overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NEC receiving platinum agents plus etoposide, prophylactic G-CSF significantly reduced the risks of severe neutropenia and FN.