1
|
Nordstrand MA, Lea D, Søreide JA. Incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): An updated systematic review of population-based reports from 2010 to 2023. J Neuroendocrinol 2025; 37:e70001. [PMID: 39933712 DOI: 10.1111/jne.70001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2024] [Revised: 12/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025]
Abstract
There is a general perception that the incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has been increasing. Nevertheless, reports of actual population-based studies are scarce, and pertinent data from some geographical regions still need to be available. In this systematic literature review of population-based studies, we aimed to evaluate the available data to provide updated figures on the incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Guided by the PRISMA 2020 statement reporting items for systematic reviews, this study conducted a systematic search using Ovid in the bibliographic databases Embase, Medline, and Web of Science Core Collection. Only incidence-reporting studies were included. In total, 847 articles were identified, and through a strict evaluation process using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, we found 19 papers that reported the general incidence of GEP-NENs from all sites. In addition, we considered another 15 papers that focused on the epidemiologic aspects of single-organ studies. While the incidence rates of GEP-NEN vary across similar countries, the general incidence of GEP-NEN has been increasing worldwide in recent decades. The incidence of GEP-NENs has increased worldwide over the last two decades, and reliable figures from new regions add to this pattern. Nevertheless, variations in the classification, grading, and reporting of GEP-NENs in various studies make direct comparisons difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dordi Lea
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Freund MR, Emile SH, Horesh N, Garoufalia Z, Gefen R, Wexner SD. The importance of surgical resection in the management of rectal sarcoma: A national cancer database analysis of 133 cases. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:647-654. [PMID: 36756950 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Rectal sarcomas (RS) are rare malignant tumors with a very poor prognosis. This study aimed to assess the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of RS in the United States. METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019 of patients with a diagnosis of RS. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and its predictors. RESULTS 133 RS patients (39.1% female) with a mean age of 65.7 ± 15.6 years were included in the study. Mean tumor size was 6.1 ± 3 cm. The crude OS rate was 22.5% and median survival duration was 10.1 (IQR: 3.2-21) months. Factors associated with an improved OS on were private insurance (HR = 0.23, p = 0.001) and undergoing surgery (HR 0.23, p < 0.001), Factors associated with poor survival were age (HR 1.02, p = 0.005), male sex (HR 2.27, p = 0.001), Charlson score of 3 (HR 5.17, p = 0.003), and positive resection margins (HR: 2.64, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that male sex (HR 2.16, p = 0.04) and positive resection margins (HR 2.31, p = 0.03) were predictors of poor survival whereas surgery was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.321, p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: RS is a very rare rectal malignancy with an even poorer prognosis than previously reported. However, undergoing surgery with curative intent while obtaining negative margins may confer better OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Freund
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA; Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sameh Hany Emile
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA; Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Nir Horesh
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA; Department of Surgery and Transplantations, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Zoe Garoufalia
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Rachel Gefen
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bogveradze N, Snaebjornsson P, Grotenhuis BA, van Triest B, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. MRI anatomy of the rectum: key concepts important for rectal cancer staging and treatment planning. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:13. [PMID: 36652149 PMCID: PMC9849549 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01348-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
A good understanding of the MRI anatomy of the rectum and its surroundings is pivotal to ensure high-quality diagnostic evaluation and reporting of rectal cancer. With this pictorial review, we aim to provide an image-based overview of key anatomical concepts essential for treatment planning, response evaluation and post-operative assessment. These concepts include the cross-sectional anatomy of the rectal wall in relation to T-staging; differences in staging and treatment between anal and rectal cancer; landmarks used to define the upper and lower boundaries of the rectum; the anatomy of the pelvic floor and anal canal, the mesorectal fascia, peritoneum and peritoneal reflection; and guides to help discern different pelvic lymph node stations on MRI to properly stage regional and non-regional rectal lymph node metastases. Finally, this review will highlight key aspects of post-treatment anatomy, including the assessment of radiation-induced changes and the evaluation of the post-operative pelvis after different surgical resection and reconstruction techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nino Bogveradze
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,Department of Radiology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brechtje A. Grotenhuis
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Baukelien van Triest
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J. Lahaye
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L. Beets
- grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Doenja M. J. Lambregts
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|