Cabazitaxel activity in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with and without DNA damage repair defects

Cell-free DNA aneuploidy score as a dynamic early response marker in prostate cancer

Cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for response evaluation in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The current study evaluated the modified fast aneuploidy screening test-sequencing system (mFast-SeqS), a quick, tumor-agnostic and affordable ctDNA assay that requires a small input of DNA, to generate a genome-wide aneuploidy (GWA) score in mCRPC patients, and correlated this to matched metastatic tumor biopsies. In this prospective multicenter study, GWA scores were evaluated from blood samples of 196 mCRPC patients prior to treatment (baseline) with taxanes (docetaxel and cabazitaxel) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI; abiraterone and enzalutamide), and from 74 mCRPC patients at an early timepoint during treatment (early timepoint; median 21 days). Z-scores per chromosome arm were tested for their association with tumor tissue genomic alterations. We found that a high tumor load in blood (GWAhigh) at baseline was associated with poor response to ARSI [HR: 2.63 (95% CI: 1.86-3.72) P < 0.001] but not to taxanes. Interestingly, GWAhigh score at the early timepoint was associated with poor response to both ARSIs [HR: 6.73 (95% CI: 2.60-17.42) P < 0.001] and taxanes [2.79 (95% CI: 1.34-5.78) P = 0.006]. A significant interaction in Cox proportional hazards analyses was seen when combining GWA status and type of treatment (at baseline P = 0.008; early timepoint P = 0.018). In summary, detection of ctDNA in blood by mFast-SeqS is cheap, fast and feasible, and could be used at different timepoints as a potential predictor for outcome to ARSI and taxane treatment in mCRPC.

The role of Cabazitaxel in Patients With Castration-Resistant and Osseous Metastases Prostate Cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Study: Cabazitaxel in mCRPC patients with osseous metastases

BACKGROUND

Cabazitaxel is an effective treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients previously exposed to docetaxel and novel hormonal treatments. Understanding the molecular biology of mCRPC disease and taking into account the several approved treatment options, biomarkers are needed to guide decision making including cabazitaxel treatment.

METHODS

Cababone was a phase II translational study that attempted to identify predictors of cabazitaxel efficacy. mCRPC with documented bone metastases were enrolled prospectively and treated with cabazitaxel 25mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Prostate cancer biopsies, bone marrow aspirates and blood samples were collected for translational research.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled and 59 received treatment according to protocol. Six-month progression free survival (PFS) rate was 47% (95% CI: 33% - 59%) and 12-month Overall Survival (OS) rate was 70% (95% CI: 56% - 80%). Patients with reactive hematopoiesis had improved PFS and OS with cabazitaxel treatment. Mutations in HRR genes were detected in 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in cabazitaxel efficacy were noted according to mutational status of HRR genes analyzed. No new safety issues were detected. In conclusion, CabaBone confirmed efficacy of cabazitaxel in mCRPC patients including the subgroup of patients with HRR mutations. Reactive hematopoiesis in bone marrow biopsies was related to improved survival warranting further investigation of bone biomarkers as predictors of cabazitaxel efficacy.

Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors Have Comparable Efficacy with Platinum Chemotherapy in Patients with BRCA-positive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Testing for mutations in Breast Cancer Gene 1/2 (BRCA) has emerged as a novel decision-making tool for clinicians. Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring pathogenic BRCA mutations can benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and platinum treatments, whereas the impact of the mutation on sensitivity to cabazitaxel and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligand therapy is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of PARPi, platinum, cabazitaxel, and PSMA-ligand therapies in BRCA-positive mCRPC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Databases were queried in February 2022. We performed data synthesis by using both proportional and individual patient data. For prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% decrease from baseline [PSA50]) evaluation, we pooled event rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival analyses with individual patient data were performed with the mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model and single-arm random-effect analysis, providing pooled medians.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We included 23 eligible studies with 901 BRCA-positive mCRPC patients. PSA50 response rates for PARPi and platinum were 69% (CI: 53-82%), and 74% (CI: 49-90%), respectively. Analyses of OS data showed no difference between PARPi and platinum treatments (hazard ratio: 0.86; CI: 0.49-1.52; p = 0.6). The single-arm OS and PFS analyses revealed similarities among different PARPis; pooled PFS and OS medians were 9.7 mo (CI: 8.1-12.5) and 17.4 mo (CI: 12.7-20.1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data revealed that different PARPis were similarly effective in terms of PFS and OS. Moreover, we found that PARPi and platinum therapy were comparable in terms of PSA50 response rate and OS, highlighting that platinum is a valid treatment option for BRCA-positive mCRPC patients. However, prospective interventional studies comparing these agents are essential to provide a higher level of evidence.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this report, we found that different poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors had similar efficacy, and platinum was a valid treatment option in BRCA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

CABA-V7: a prospective biomarker selected trial of cabazitaxel treatment in AR-V7 positive prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with positive AR-V7 expression in their circulating tumour cells (CTCs) rarely derive benefit from abiraterone and enzalutamide.

DESIGN

We performed a prospective, multicenter, single arm phase II clinical trial (CABA-V7) in mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy.

OBJECTIVE

In this trial, we investigated whether cabazitaxel treatment resulted in clinically meaningful PSA response rates in patients with positive CTC-based AR-V7 expression and collected liquid biopsies for genomic profiling.

RESULTS

Cabazitaxel was found to be modestly effective, with only 12% of these patients obtaining a PSA response. Genomic profiling revealed that CTC-based AR-V7 expression was not associated with other known mCRPC-associated alterations. CTC-based AR-V7 status and dichotomised CTC counts were observed as independent prognostic markers at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

AR-V7 positivity predicted poor overall survival (OS). However, cabazitaxel-treated AR-V7 positive patients and those lacking AR-V7 positivity, who received cabazitaxel as standard of care, appeared to have similar OS. Therefore, despite the low response rate, cabazitaxel may still be an effective treatment in this poor prognosis, AR-V7 positive patient population.

Factors influencing survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer therapy

INTRODUCTION

The number of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is expecting to increase due to the long-life expectancy of those with advanced disease who are also more commonly diagnosed today because of stage migration. Several compounds are available for treating these patients.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed currently available treatments for mCRPC, their mechanism of action and resistance and we explored possible predictors of treatment success useful to predict survival in mCRPC patients.

EXPERT OPINION

A combination of molecular, clinical, pathological, and imaging features is necessary to correctly estimate patients' risk of death. The combination of these biomarkers may allow clinicians to tailor treatments based on cancer history and patients' features. The search of predictive biomarkers remains an unmet medical need for most patients with mCRPC.

PARP Inhibition, a New Therapeutic Avenue in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Up to 25% of patients with metastatic prostate cancer present with germline or somatic DNA damage repair alterations, some of which are associated with aggressive disease and poor outcomes. New data have brought poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors into sharp focus in the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Olaparib improved survival after at least one new hormonal therapy (NHT) in a cohort of patients harboring BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM mutations in the PROfound trial, while rucaparib, talazoparib and niraparib demonstrated compelling activity in phase II trials. While patients with prostate cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations may derive greatest benefit of PARP inhibition, the magnitude of benefit seems much lower in the context of most other homologous recombination gene mutations. Several PARP inhibitors are currently developed in combination with conventional therapy, including chemotherapy, NHT, and alpha-particle emitters, at different disease stages. Herein, we review the rationale for PARP inhibition in patients with prostate cancer, discuss the impact of PARP inhibitors on outcomes, and explore underlying challenges for future developments.

Implications of DNA damage repair alterations for the management of prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we summarize the prevalence of alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes in prostate cancer, their clinical significance, the therapeutic strategies developed to take advantage of the impaired tumour ability to repair DNA and the diagnostic approaches available to identify patients likely to benefit from DDR-targeting agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

DDR alterations are more frequent in metastatic than in localized prostate cancer and some of them associate with aggressive disease whereas the significance of others remain unclear. The most appropriate management approach for DDR-defective prostate cancer patients is unknown. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of different poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with BRCA1/2 alterations, although there may be other DDR alterations that sensitize patients to these drugs. Multiple strategies to target DDR defects are being investigated, including PARPi in combination, platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy, both in earlier and late disease stages. Optimization of molecular testing is paramount for the implementation of precision oncology in prostate cancer.

SUMMARY

Certain DDR defects present in prostate cancer have prognostic and therapeutic implications whereas the significance of other DDR alterations is yet to be elucidated.

The role of genetic testing in prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an overview of the current role of genetic testing in prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have uncovered few but highly penetrant rare pathogenic mutations (RPMs), in genes, such as BRCA2, with strong prostate cancer risk and outcomes associations. Over 260 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have also been identified, each associated with small incremental prostate cancer risk and when combined in a polygenic risk score (PRS), they provide strong prostate cancer risk prediction but do not seem to predict outcomes. Tumor tissue sequencing can also help identify actionable somatic mutations in many patients with advanced prostate cancer and inform on their risk of harboring a germline pathogenic mutation.

SUMMARY

RPM testing, PRS testing, and tumor sequencing all have current and/or potential future roles in personalized prostate cancer care.