Response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in acral melanoma: A nationwide cohort study

First-line checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic acral lentiginous melanoma compared to other types of cutaneous melanoma: A multicenter study from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG

BACKGROUND

Melanoma is the main cause of skin cancer-related death. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has improved the prognosis in recent years. However, subtypes of melanoma differ in their response. Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) has a worse prognosis compared to cutaneous melanoma other than ALM (CM) and is therefore of particular relevance.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of CPI in first-line treatment of patients with advanced ALM compared CM.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic ALM (n = 45) or CM (n = 328) who received first-line CPI therapy from the multicenter prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG. Study endpoints were best overall response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

ALM patients had significantly higher rates of ulcerated tumors, loco regional metastases and fewer BRAF-mutated tumors compared to CM patients. Combined CPI was administered in 48.9 % ALM patients and 39.3 % of CM patients, while the remaining patients received PD-1 monotherapy. OS trended to be shorter in patients with ALM (18.1 vs. 43.8 months, p = 0.10) with no significant differences in PFS (7.0 vs. 11.5 months, p = 0.21). In patients with CM, median OS with combined CPI was not reached, whereas the median OS after PD-1 monotherapy was 37.8 months (p = 0.22). Conversely, in patients with ALM, OS with combined CPI was 17.8 months, compared to 26 months with PD-1 monotherapy (p = 0.15). There were no significant differences in BOR between patients with ALM or CM.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of this real-world cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma showed a trend towards poorer survival outcomes upon first-line treatment with CPI in ALM compared to cutaneous melanoma of other subtypes.

Comprehensive Profiling of Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Reveals Downregulated Immune Activation Compared to Cutaneous Melanoma

Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is a rare and insufficiently understood subtype of melanoma lacking in effective treatment options. Recent work has demonstrated that the response of ALM to immune checkpoint blockade is inferior to that of cutaneous melanoma (CM). Here we performed bulk genomic and transcriptomic sequencing of tumor tissue from 28 ALM and 5692 CM cases. Similar to prior studies, ALM was associated with a significantly lower incidence of point mutations, including in the TERT promoter and BRAF, but increased numbers of gene amplifications, notably of CCND1, HMGA2, and MDM2. Reactome pathway analysis revealed enhancement of keratinization and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. Overall immunogenicity was decreased in ALM, which possessed lower IFNγ (p < 0.001) and T-cell inflammatory (p = 0.03) pathway scores than CM. Despite higher computationally inferred levels of myeloid dendritic cells (p = 0.006), neoantigen load independent of predicted HLA binding affinity was lower (p < 0.01) in ALM versus CM. Assessment of classical and nonclassical HLA mRNA levels revealed upregulation of HLA-G, suggesting alternative ALM immune evasion pathways in the setting of lower PD-L1 expression (p = 0.005). Additional research is needed to better understand and therapeutically target signaling networks in the ALM tumor microenvironment.

Adjuvant Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy Versus Observation for Stage III Acral Melanoma of the Sole: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japanese Patients

PURPOSE

Adjuvant anti-PD-1 (adj PD-1) antibodies are extensively used to improve survival in patients with resected melanoma. Clinical trials on adj PD-1 antibodies have revealed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS); however, few of these trials have included patients with acral melanoma (AM).

METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from Japanese patients who underwent resection of stage III sole AM between 2014 and 2021. Survival outcomes, including RFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between patients without adjuvant therapy (OBS group) and those receiving adj PD-1 group.

RESULTS

This study included 139 patients (OBS: 79; adj PD-1: 60), with a median follow-up of 2.6 years. The baseline characteristics were comparable, except for age and nodal metastasis. No significant differences in survival were observed between the OBS and adj PD-1 groups (3-year RFS: 36.7% v 27.5%, P = .13; 3-year DMFS: 51.0% v 45.3%, P = .51; 3-year OS: 65.3% v 67.4%, P = .45). Multivariate analysis showed no survival benefit of adj PD-1 (RFS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.25, P = .29; DMFS: HR, 1.03, P = .89; and OS: HR, 0.69, P = .23). Each survival outcome after propensity score matching confirmed no significant difference between the matched OBS group (n = 52) and adj PD-1 group (n = 52; 3-year RFS: 34.3% v 25.9%, P = .22; 3-year DMFS: 45.6% v 46.5%, P = .85; 3-year OS: 60.7% v 68.9%, P = .29).

CONCLUSION

Adj PD-1 did not improve the prognosis in sole AM. However, further studies are essential to evaluate the efficacy of the adj anti-PD-1 antibody in AM.

Combined programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 blockade in an international cohort of patients with acral lentiginous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Combination immune checkpoint blockade targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) leads to high response rates and improved survival in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma (CM). Less is known about the efficacy of this combination in acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of combination immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 in a diverse, real-world population of patients with ALM.

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective study analysed patients with histologically confirmed ALM treated with a combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors between 2010 and 2022. The primary objective of the study was the objective response rate (ORR) as per the RECIST criteria. The secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 109 patients with advanced ALM treated with combined PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade in any line of treatment were included. The majority of patients had stage IV disease (n = 81; 74.3%). The ORR for the entire cohort was 18.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6-26.9], with 9 (8.3%) complete and 11 (10.1%) partial responses. A further 22 patients (20.2%) had stable disease, and the disease control rate was 38.5%. Median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.25-5.62), while median OS was 17 months (95% CI 12.4-23.1). Ninety-five patients (87.2%) had a treatment-related adverse event, with 40.4% (n = 44/109) experiencing at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.04), ≥ 2 lines of prior treatment (P = 0.03) and Asian ethnicity (P = 0.04) were associated with worse OS, while Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was associated with better OS (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade is less effective for ALM than for CM, despite similar toxicity. In particular, Asian patients appear to derive less benefit from this regimen. Novel treatment approaches are needed for this rare melanoma subtype.

Single-cell profiling of acral melanoma infiltrating lymphocytes reveals a suppressive tumor microenvironment

Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is the most common melanoma subtype in non-Caucasians. Despite advances in cancer immunotherapy, current immune checkpoint inhibitors remain unsatisfactory for ALM. Hence, we conducted comprehensive immune profiling using single-cell phenotyping with reactivity screening of the T cell receptors of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) in ALM. Compared with cutaneous melanoma, ALM showed a lower frequency of tumor-reactive CD8 clusters and an enrichment of regulatory T cells with direct tumor recognition ability, suggesting a suppressive immune microenvironment in ALM. Tumor-reactive CD8 TILs showed heterogeneous expression of coinhibitory molecules, including KLRC1 (NKG2A), in subpopulations with therapeutic implications. Overall, our study provides a foundation for enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapy in ALM.

Brief Communication: Treatment Outcomes for Advanced Melanoma of Unknown Primary Compared With Melanoma With Known Primary

SUMMARY

Most patients with advanced melanomas have a known primary site [melanoma of known primary (MKP)]. However, 2%-9% of patients are diagnosed with melanoma metastasis of unknown primary (MUP). As MUP and MKP have similar UV-induced mutations and molecular signatures, it is proposed that the primary tumor has regressed completely in patients with MUP. As regression of the primary tumor could be indicative of enhanced recognition of melanoma antigens, we hypothesize that patients with advanced MUP have a better outcome compared with MKP.Patients with advanced MUP from 10 German university hospitals were retrospectively analyzed and matched with MKP based on the type of systemic treatment (BRAF and MEK inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy, combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitor therapy) therapy line (first or second line) and AJCC stage (IIIC, IV M1a-M1d). Three hundred thirty-seven patients with MUP were identified, and 152 treatments with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, 142 treatments with PD-1 inhibitors, and 101 treatments with BRAF and MEK inhibitors were evaluated. Median time to treatment failure was significantly prolonged in patients with MUP treated with PD-1 monotherapy (17 mo, 95% CI: 9-25, P = 0.002) compared with MKP (5 mo, 95% CI: 3.4-6.6), as well as in MUP treated with combined PD-1 and CTLA-4 therapy (11 mo, 95% CI: 4.5-17.5, P < 0.0001) compared with MKP (4 mo, 95% CI: 2.9-5.1) Occurrence of immune-related adverse events and time to treatment failure for patients with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was similar in MKP and MUP. In our multicentre collective, patients with MUP have better outcomes under immunotherapy compared with MKP.

Adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 in acral melanoma: A nationwide study

Previous studies demonstrated limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable acral melanoma (AM); it remains unclear how this translates to the adjuvant setting. This study investigates clinical outcomes of acral compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection. All stages III-IV AM and CM patients receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection between 2018 and 2022 were included from the prospective nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. We analyzed recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). A multivariable Cox regression analysis of RFS was performed to adjust for potential confounders. We included 1958 (86 AM and 1872 CM) patients. At baseline, AM patients more frequently had KIT mutations, higher disease stages, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and fewer BRAF and NRAS mutations. Median RFS was 14.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5-29.3) in AM and 37.4 months (95% CI: 34.6 to not reached) in CM (p = .002). After correcting for potential confounders, AM remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HRadj 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07-2.17; p = .019). Two-year DMFS tended to be worse for AM than for CM: 64.5% versus 79.7% (p = .050). Two-year OS was significantly lower in AM (71.5% vs. 84.3%; p = .027). The results of this study suggest a poorer outcome of adjuvant-treated AM compared to CM. Studies assessing the added value of adjuvant treatment in AM are needed. Future research should investigate alternative treatment strategies to improve outcomes of high-risk AM.

Clinical Characteristics and Special Considerations in the Management of Rare Melanoma Subtypes

Rare histologic subtypes of melanoma, including acral, mucosal, uveal, and desmoplastic melanomas, only make up 5% of all diagnosed melanomas and are often underrepresented in large, randomized trials. Recent advancements in systemic therapy have shown marked improvement in pathologic response rates, improving progression-free and overall survival among cutaneous melanoma patients, but there are limited data to demonstrate improved survival among rarer subtypes of melanoma. Acral melanoma has a poor response to immunotherapy and is associated with worse survival. Mucosal melanoma has a large variability in its presentation, a poor prognosis, and a low mutational burden. Uveal melanoma is associated with a high rate of liver metastasis; recent adoption of infusion and perfusion therapies has demonstrated improved survival among these patients. Desmoplastic melanoma, a high-risk cutaneous melanoma, is associated with high locoregional recurrence rates and mutational burden, suggesting this melanoma may have enhanced response to immunotherapy. While these variants of melanoma represent distinct disease entities, this review highlights the clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment recommendations for each of these rare melanomas and highlights the utility of modern therapies for each of them.

A prediction model for response to immune checkpoint inhibition in advanced melanoma

Predicting who will benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in patients with advanced melanoma is challenging. We developed a multivariable prediction model for response to ICI, using routinely available clinical data including primary melanoma characteristics. We used a population-based cohort of 3525 patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma treated with anti-PD-1-based therapy. Our prediction model for predicting response within 6 months after ICI initiation was internally validated with bootstrap resampling. Performance evaluation included calibration, discrimination and internal-external cross-validation. Included patients received anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n = 2366) or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 1159) in any treatment line. The model included serum lactate dehydrogenase, World Health Organization performance score, type and line of ICI, disease stage and time to first distant recurrence-all at start of ICI-, and location and type of primary melanoma, the presence of satellites and/or in-transit metastases at primary diagnosis and sex. The over-optimism adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64-0.66). The range of predicted response probabilities was 7%-81%. Based on these probabilities, patients were categorized into quartiles. Compared to the lowest response quartile, patients in the highest quartile had a significantly longer median progression-free survival (20.0 vs 2.8 months; P < .001) and median overall survival (62.0 vs 8.0 months; P < .001). Our prediction model, based on routinely available clinical variables and primary melanoma characteristics, predicts response to ICI in patients with advanced melanoma and discriminates well between treated patients with a very good and very poor prognosis.

Recent advances in tyrosine kinase inhibitors VEGFR 1-3 for the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Increasing evidence from preclinical and clinical studies suggests the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in melanoma progression, response to therapy, and overall survival. Moreover, the discovery of the potential involvement of the VEGF pathway in resistance to immunotherapy has led to new clinical trials with VEGFR inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

We have reviewed recent literature, mainly published within the last 5 years, on VEGFR-targeted treatments for advanced melanoma, including mucosal, acral, and uveal melanoma. The VEGFR inhibitors were used as a single therapy or combined with either immunotherapy or chemotherapy, and they were employed in treatment for KIT-mutated cutaneous melanoma and for patients with brain metastases.

EXPERT OPINION

Trials involving monotherapy have been unsuccessful in demonstrating meaningful efficacy. Despite some activity, the combination of VEGFR-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with ICI-resistant melanoma, the combination did not significantly improve outcomes compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy in the first-line settings. On the contrary, some patients with mucosal, acral or KIT-mutant melanoma may benefit from TKI-based therapies. Further studies focused on biomarker discovery and randomized trials are necessary to better understand the role of VEGFR1-3 as a therapeutic target in melanoma.

Outcomes of patients with resected stage III/IV acral or mucosal melanoma, treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 based therapy

IMPORTANCE

Acral (AM) and mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare subtypes with a poor prognosis. In those with advanced disease, anti-PD-1 (PD1) therapy has reduced activity compared to that seen in non-acral cutaneous melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of adjuvant PD1 in resected AM or MM.

DESIGN

An international, retrospective cohort study SETTING: Data up to November 2021 collected from 20 centres across 10 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and ninety four patients with resected stage III or IV1 AM or MM who received adjuvant PD1 were included and compared to matched patients from the Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) database using a propensity score matching analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

RESULTS

Forty five of 139 (32%) AM and 9 of 55 (16%) MM patients completed adjuvant therapy. The main reason for early treatment cessation in both groups was disease recurrence: 51 (37%) and 30 (55%) in the AM and MM groups, respectively. In the AM group adjuvant PD1 was associated with a longer RFS [HR-0.69 (0.52-0.92, p = 0.0127)], DMFS [HR0.58 (0.38-0.89, p = 0.0134)] and OS [HR of 0.59 (0.38-0.92, p-value 0.0196)] when compared to the historical cohort. In the MM group there was no statistical difference in RFS [HR1.36 (0.69-2.68,p-value 0.3799], DMFS or OS.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

After adjuvant PD1, both AM and MM have a high risk of recurrence. Our data suggests a benefit to using adjuvant PD1 therapy in resected AM but not in resected MM. Additional studies to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant PD1 for MM are needed.

Efficacy of salvage therapies for advanced acral melanoma after anti-PD-1 monotherapy failure: a multicenter retrospective study of 108 Japanese patients

Background

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy is one of the standard systemic therapies for advanced melanoma; however, the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies after PD-1 monotherapy failure (PD-1 MF), particularly in acral melanoma (AM), the main clinical melanoma type in Japanese patients, is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies in Japanese patients with AM after PD-1 MF.

Patients and methods

The study included 108 patients with advanced AM (palm and sole, 72; nail apparatus, 36) who underwent salvage systemic therapy at 24 Japanese institutions. We mainly assessed the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Thirty-six (33%) patients received ipilimumab, 23 (21%) received nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivo/ipi), 10 (9%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 4 (4%) received BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), and the remaining 35 (32%) continued with PD-1 monotherapy after disease progression. The ORRs in the ipilimumab, nivo/ipi, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and BRAFi/MEKi groups were 8, 17, 0, and 100%, respectively. The nivo/ipi group showed the longest OS (median, 18.9 months); however, differences in ORR, PFS, and OS between the groups were insignificant. The OS in the nivo/ipi group was higher in the palm and sole groups than in the nail apparatus group (median: not reached vs. 8.7 months, p < 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that nail apparatus melanoma independently predicted unfavorable PFS and OS (p = 0.006 and 0.001). The total OS (from PD-1 monotherapy initiation to death/last follow-up) was insignificant between the groups.

Conclusion

Nivo/ipi was not more effective than cytotoxic chemotherapy and ipilimumab after PD-1 MF in patients with advanced AM. The prognosis after PD-1 MF would be poorer for nail apparatus melanoma than for palm and sole melanoma.

Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib and Temozolomide as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Acral Melanoma: The CAP 03 Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Acral melanoma, known for low tumor mutation burden, responds poorly to immunotherapy. A standard therapy is still lacking.

Objective

To investigate the activity and safety of camrelizumab (an anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody) plus apatinib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor) and temozolomide as first-line treatment in patients with advanced acral melanoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this single-arm, single-center, phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial, patients with treatment-naive unresectable stage III or IV acral melanoma were enrolled at Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute between June 4, 2020, and August 24, 2021. The data cutoff date was April 10, 2022.

Interventions

Patients received 4-week cycles of intravenous camrelizumab, 200 mg, every 2 weeks; oral apatinib 250 mg, once daily; and intravenous temozolomide, 200 mg/m2, once daily on days 1 to 5 until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was objective response rate as assessed by investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Secondary end points included progression-free survival, time to response, duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety.

Results

A total of 50 patients (32 men [64%]; median age, 57 years [IQR, 52-62 years]) were enrolled and received treatment. The median follow-up duration was 13.4 months (IQR, 9.6-16.2 months). The objective response rate was 64.0% (32 of 50; 95% CI, 49.2%-77.1%). The median time to response and duration of response were 2.7 months (IQR, 0.9-2.9 months) and 17.5 months (95% CI, 12.0 to not reached), respectively. The disease control rate was 88.0% (44 of 50; 95% CI, 75.7%-95.5%). The estimated median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI, 10.6 to not reached). The median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were increased gamma-glutamyltransferase levels (15 [30%]), decreased neutrophil count (11 [22%]), increased conjugated bilirubin levels (10 [20%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase levels (10 [20%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this nonrandomized clinical trial suggest that camrelizumab plus apatinib and temozolomide may be a potential first-line treatment option for patients with advanced acral melanoma, which warrants further validation in a randomized clinical trial.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04397770.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy for advanced acral and mucosal melanoma

Acral melanoma (AM) and mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare clinical subtypes of melanoma. AM and MM are etiologically, biologically, and molecularly distinct from cutaneous melanoma (CM). Despite the recent development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of advanced CMs, the true therapeutic efficacy of ICIs for these rare subtypes remains unclear. Since these subtypes are rare, especially in the Caucasian population, their biological features and corresponding novel therapies are underexplored than those of CM. Even in the larger phase III clinical trials for ICIs, the sample size of patients with AM and MM is limited. Consequently, establishment of standard of care for advanced AM and MM has been challenging. This review covers current update and overview on clinical efficacy of ICIs and ICI-based therapy for advanced AM and MM, based mainly on the reported clinical trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective studies, to provide a better understanding of the current landscape of this field. In addition, we discuss the future direction of treatment for those rare clinical subtypes, focusing on issues relevant to dermatology and medical oncology.

Analyzing the relationship between the efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors and cumulative sun damage in Japanese patients with advanced BRAF wild-type nonacral cutaneous melanoma: A retrospective real-world, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy (PD1) or anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy (PD1 +CTLA4) for melanoma is affected by its clinical subtype. The amount of tumor mutation burden (TMB) caused by cumulative sun damage (CSD) is occasionally used to explain this; however, their relationship in Japanese nonacral cutaneous melanoma (NACM) is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the ICI efficacy and its relationship with CSD of the primary lesion in Japanese patients with NACM.

METHODS

Japanese patients with advanced BRAF wild-type NACM who received first-line ICIs were recruited. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and the degree of solar elastosis (SE) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients (PD1 group 113 and PD1 +CTLA4 group 33) were included. No significant differences in ORR were observed between the PD1 and PD1 +CTLA4 groups (35 % vs. 36 %; P = 0.67) or PFS and OS (median PFS 6.1 months vs. 8.5 months; P = 0.46, median OS 28.1 months vs. not reached; P = 0.59). Multivariate survival analysis revealed that PD1 +CTLA4 did not prolong the PFS and OS. The SE score had no effect on either PFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI efficacy was not as high as those reported in Western countries, and PD1 +CTLA4 did not present better clinical efficacy compared to PD1. Indicators of CSD did not serve as a predictor for clinical advantage. These findings may partially support the theory that ICI efficacy is affected by CSD; however, other unrecognized factors may also exist.

Prognostic value of genetic aberrations and tumor immune microenvironment in primary acral melanoma

BACKGROUND

Acral melanoma (AM) is the most common subtype in Chinese melanoma patients with a very poor prognosis. However, our understanding of the disease pathogenesis and molecular landscape is limited by the few studies that have been conducted. Here, we profiled the clinical characteristics, mutational landscapes and tumor immune microenvironment of AM patients to gain insights into disease characteristics and potential treatment strategies.

METHODS

A total of 90 AM patients were enrolled and their tissue samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing and multiplexed immunohistochemistry tests. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze the prognostic potential of various genetic aberrations and immune cell compositions in AM.

RESULTS

The median disease-free survival was 21.3 months and estimated median overall survival (OS) was 60 months. More advanced stages, older ages and thickness of greater than 4 mm were associated with worse prognosis in AM patients (HR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.25-5.29, p = 0.01; HR = 2.77, 95% CI 1.22-6.28, p = 0.02; HR = 3.43, 95% CI 1.51-7.82, p < 0.01, respectively), while patients who received post-surgical treatments had better survival (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.76, p = 0.01). The most frequently altered genes included BRAF (14.5%), KIT (16.9%), NRAS (12%), NF1 (10.8%), APC (7.2%), and ARID2 (6%). Copy number variations (CNV) were commonly found in CCND1 (19.3%), CDK4 (19.3%), MDM2 (14.5%) and FGF19 (12%). CDK4 amplifications was independently associated with shorter OS in AM patients (HR = 3.61, 95% CI 1.38-9.46, p = 0.01). CD8 ⁺ T cells (p < 0.001) and M1 macrophages (p = 0.05) were more highly enriched in the invasive margin than in the tumor center. Patients with higher levels of M1 macrophage infiltration in the invasive margin derived markedly longer OS (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.95, p = 0.03). Interestingly, in CDK4-amplified patients, there tended to be a low level of M1 macrophage infiltration in the invasive margin (p = 0.06), which likely explains the poor prognosis in such patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provided a comprehensive portrait of the clinicopathological features, genetic aberrations and tumor microenvironment profiles in AM patients and identified candidate prognostic factors, which may facilitate development of additional therapeutic options and better inform clinical management of AM patients. Based on these prognostic factors, further studies should focus on enhancing the infiltration of M1 macrophages, especially in CDK4-amplified AM patients.

CT radiomics compared to a clinical model for predicting checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Predicting checkpoint inhibitors treatment outcomes in melanoma is a relevant task, due to the unpredictable and potentially fatal toxicity and high costs for society. However, accurate biomarkers for treatment outcomes are lacking. Radiomics are a technique to quantitatively capture tumour characteristics on readily available computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the added value of radiomics for predicting clinical benefit from checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma in a large, multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Patients who received first-line anti-PD1±anti-CTLA4 treatment for advanced cutaneous melanoma were retrospectively identified from nine participating hospitals. For every patient, up to five representative lesions were segmented on baseline CT, and radiomics features were extracted. A machine learning pipeline was trained on the radiomics features to predict clinical benefit, defined as stable disease for more than 6 months or response per RECIST 1.1 criteria. This approach was evaluated using a leave-one-centre-out cross validation and compared to a model based on previously discovered clinical predictors. Lastly, a combination model was built on the radiomics and clinical model.

RESULTS

A total of 620 patients were included, of which 59.2% experienced clinical benefit. The radiomics model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.607 [95% CI, 0.562-0.652], lower than that of the clinical model (AUROC=0.646 [95% CI, 0.600-0.692]). The combination model yielded no improvement over the clinical model in terms of discrimination (AUROC=0.636 [95% CI, 0.592-0.680]) or calibration. The output of the radiomics model was significantly correlated with three out of five input variables of the clinical model (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The radiomics model achieved a moderate predictive value of clinical benefit, which was statistically significant. However, a radiomics approach was unable to add value to a simpler clinical model, most likely due to the overlap in predictive information learned by both models. Future research should focus on the application of deep learning, spectral CT-derived radiomics, and a multimodal approach for accurately predicting benefit to checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced melanoma.

Gradient differences of immunotherapy efficacy in metastatic melanoma related to sunlight exposure pattern: A population-based study

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized metastatic melanoma (MM) treatment in just a few years. Ultraviolet (UV) in sunlight is the most significant environmental cause of melanoma, which is considered to be the main reason for tumor mutation burden (TMB) increase in melanoma. High TMB usually predicts that PD-1 inhibitors are effective. The sunlight exposure pattern of MM might be a clinical feature that matches TMB. The relationship between sunlight exposure patterns and immunotherapy response in MM is unclear. This study aims to investigate the correlation between sunlight exposure patterns and immunotherapy response in MM and establish nomograms that predict 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate.

Methods

We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and enrolled MM cases from 2005-2016. According to the advent of ICIs in 2011, the era was divided into the non-ICIs era (2005-2010) and the ICIs era (2011-2016). Patients were divided into three cohorts according to the primary site sunlight exposure patterns: head and neck in the first cohort, trunk arms and legs in the second cohort, and acral sites in the third cohort. We compared survival differences for each cohort between the two eras, performed stratified analysis, established nomograms for predicting 3- and 5-year OS rate, and performed internal validation.

Results

Comparing the survival difference between the ICIs and non-ICIs era, head and neck melanoma showed the greatest improvement in survival, with 3- and 5-year OS rate increasing by 10.2% and 9.1%, respectively (P=0.00011). In trunk arms and legs melanoma, the 3- and 5-year OS rate increased by 4.6% and 3.9%, respectively (P<0.0001). There is no improvement in survival in acral melanoma (AM) between the two eras (P=0.78). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration graphs show good discrimination and accuracy of nomograms. Decision curve analysis (DCA) suggests good clinical utility of nomograms.

Conclusions

Based on the classification of sunlight exposure patterns, there is a gradient difference in immunotherapy efficacy for MM. The degree of sunlight exposure is positively correlated with immunotherapy response. The nomograms are sufficiently accurate to predict 3- and 5-year OS rate for MM, allowing for individualized clinical decisions for future clinical work.

Recent advances in microfluidic-based cancer immunotherapy-on-a-chip strategies

Despite several extraordinary improvements in cancer immunotherapy, its therapeutic effectiveness against many distinct cancer types remains mostly limited and requires further study. Different microfluidic-based cancer immunotherapy-on-a-chip (ITOC) systems have been developed to help researchers replicate the tumor microenvironment and immune system. Numerous microfluidic platforms can potentially be used to perform various on-chip activities related to early clinical cancer immunotherapy processes, such as improving immune checkpoint blockade therapy, studying immune cell dynamics, evaluating cytotoxicity, and creating vaccines or organoid models from patient samples. In this review, we summarize the most recent advancements in the development of various microfluidic-based ITOC devices for cancer treatment niches and present future perspectives on microfluidic devices for immunotherapy research.

Updated analysis of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma

The efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab (N + I) combination therapy for Japanese patients with advanced unresectable melanoma was re-evaluated in clinical practice. One hundred Japanese patients with advanced melanoma were included. The overall response rate was 24%; complete response (CR), 6%; partial response, 18%. The response rates were 33.3% in the systemic therapy-naïve and 15.4% in the prior-treatment groups, and 16.1% for patients who were treated with first-line anti-programmed death 1 antibody monotherapy followed by second-line N + I therapy after progression of the disease. The response rate for cutaneous melanoma was 32.7%, and 47.8% in the naïve group. Response rates for non-acral, acral, and mucosal melanoma were 34.9%, 25%, and 16.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 3.25 months (6.5 and 2.5 months in the naïve and prior-treatment groups, respectively). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.5 months (25.25 and 7.5 months in the naïve and prior-treatment groups, respectively). There were no significant differences in PFS or OS for patients with non-acral, acral, or mucosal melanoma. The 3-year PFS and OS were both 100% in patients who achieved CR with combination therapy. Adverse events occurred in 89% and were grade three or higher in 56% of cases. Although direct comparisons cannot be made due to different patient backgrounds, N + I combination therapy in Japanese patients in clinical practice tended to be inferior when compared to global study and non-Asian patients in clinical practice. The highest response rate was in the cutaneous melanoma therapy-naïve group. The best tumor response was associated with survival outcome, and the PFS and OS were good in cases where CR was obtained. The proportion of grade three and four adverse events was as high as that in the global study.

Systemic Therapy in Advanced Nodular Melanoma versus Superficial Spreading Melanoma: A Nation-Wide Study of the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry

Nodular melanoma (NM) is associated with a higher locoregional and distant recurrence rate compared with superficial spreading melanoma (SSM); it is unknown whether the efficacy of systemic therapy is limited. Here, we compare the efficacy of immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) in advanced NM to SSM. Patients with advanced stage IIIc and stage IV NM and SSM treated with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD-1, or BRAF/MEKi in the first line, were included from the prospective Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. The primary objectives were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 1086 NM and 2246 SSM patients were included. DMFS was significantly shorter for advanced NM patients at 1.9 years (CI 95% 0.7−4.2) compared with SSM patients at 3.1 years (CI 95% 1.3−6.2) (p < 0.01). Multivariate survival analysis for immunotherapy and BRAF/MEKi demonstrated a hazard ratio for immunotherapy of 1.0 (CI 95% 0.85−1.17) and BRAF/MEKi of 0.95 (CI 95% 0.81−1.11). A shorter DMFS for NM patients developing advanced disease compared with SSM patients was observed, while no difference was observed in the efficacy of systemic immunotherapy or BRAF/MEKi between NM and SSM patients. Our results suggests that the worse overall survival of NM is mainly driven by propensity of metastatic outgrowth of NM after primary diagnosis.

Efficacy comparison between anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy as first-line immunotherapy for advanced acral melanoma: A retrospective, multicenter study of 254 Japanese patients

BACKGROUND

Although anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy (PD-1) is commonly used to treat advanced acral melanoma (AM), its efficacy is limited. Further, data on the efficacy of PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 antibody (PD-1+CTLA-4) for the treatment of AM are limited. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of PD-1+CTLA-4 and PD-1 in the treatment of Japanese patients with advanced AM.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients with advanced AM who were treated with PD-1 or PD-1+CTLA-4 as first-line immunotherapy in 24 Japanese institutions between 2014 and 2020. Treatment efficacy focussing on the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In total, 254 patients (palm and sole melanoma [PSM], n = 180; nail apparatus melanoma [NAM], n = 74) were included. Among the patients with PSM, the ORR (19% vs. 31%; P = 0.44), PFS (5.9 vs. 3.2 months; P = 0.74), and OS (23.1 vs. not reached; P = 0.55) did not differ significantly between the PD-1 and PD-1+CTLA-4 groups. Among the patients with NAM, the ORR (61% vs. 10%; P < 0.001) was significantly higher and PFS was longer (6.4 vs. 3.8 months; P = 0.10) in the PD-1+CTLA-4 group than in the PD-1 group. Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that PD-1+CTLA-4 is an independent predictor of a favourable PFS in patients with NAM (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of PD-1+CTLA-4 is not superior to that of PD-1 for the treatment of advanced PSM. However, PD-1+CTLA-4 may be more efficacious than PD-1 for the treatment of advanced NAM.

Advanced Acral Melanoma Therapies: Current Status and Future Directions

Melanoma is one of the deadliest malignancies. Its incidence has been significantly increasing in most countries in recent decades. Acral melanoma (AM), a peculiar subgroup of melanoma occurring on the palms, soles, and nails, is the main subtype of melanoma in people of color and is extremely rare in Caucasians. Although great progress has been made in melanoma treatment in recent years, patients with AM have shown limited benefit from current therapies and thus consequently have worse overall survival rates. Achieving durable therapeutic responses in this high-risk melanoma subtype represents one of the greatest challenges in the field. The frequency of BRAF mutations in AM is much lower than that in cutaneous melanoma, which prevents most AM patients from receiving treatment with BRAF inhibitors. However, AM has more frequent mutations such as KIT and CDK4/6, so targeted therapy may still improve the survival of some AM patients in the future. AM may be less susceptible to immune checkpoint inhibitors because of the poor immunogenicity. Therefore, how to enhance the immune response to the tumor cells may be the key to the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced AM. Anti-angiogenic drugs, albumin paclitaxel, or interferons are thought to enhance the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Combination therapies based on the backbone of PD-1 are more likely to provide greater clinical benefits. Understanding the molecular landscapes and immune microenvironment of AM will help optimize our combinatory strategies.

Vitamin D metabolism pathway polymorphisms are associated with efficacy and safety in patients under anti-PD-1 inhibitor therapy

AIM

Vitamin D (VitD) signaling has been increasingly investigated for its role in stimulating the innate and adaptive immune systems and suppressing inflammatory responses. Therefore, we examined the associations between VitD-related genetic polymorphisms, plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 13 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VitD metabolic pathway genes were genotyped in 343 cancer patients receiving ICI treatment using the MassARRAY platform. In 65 patients, the associations between plasma 25(OH)D levels and ICI treatment outcomes were investigated further.

RESULTS

We found that the CYP24A1 rs6068816TT and rs2296241AA genotypes were significantly higher in patients who responded to ICIs. Furthermore, patients with higher plasma 25(OH)D levels had a better treatment response. The distribution of allele and genotype frequencies showed that three SNPs (rs10877012, rs2762934, and rs8018720) differed significantly between patients who had immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and those who did not. There was no statistically significant relationship between plasma 25(OH)D levels and the risk of irAEs.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our findings showed that genetic variations in the VitD metabolism pathway were associated with ICI treatment outcomes, and VitD supplementation may be useful in improving ICI treatment efficacy.

BRAF and NRAS Mutation Status and Response to Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

Little is known about the effect of specific gene mutations on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with advanced melanoma treated with first-line anti-PD-1 or ipilimumab-nivolumab between 2012 and 2021 in the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry were included in this cohort study. Objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to BRAF and NRAS status. A multivariable Cox model was used to analyze prognostic factors associated with PFS and OS.

RESULTS

In total, 1764 patients received anti-PD-1 and 759 received ipilimumab-nivolumab. No significant differences in PFS were found in the anti-PD-1 cohort. In the ipilimumab-nivolumab cohort, median PFS was significantly higher for BRAF-mutant melanoma (9.9 months; 95% CI, 6.8 to 17.2) compared with NRAS-mutant (4.8 months; 95% CI, 3.0 to 7.5) and double wild-type (5.3 months; 95% CI, 3.6 to 7.1). In multivariable analysis, BRAF-mutant melanoma was significantly associated with a lower risk of progression or death in the ipilimumab-nivolumab cohort. Median OS was significantly higher for BRAF-mutant melanoma compared with NRAS-mutant and double wild-type melanoma for both immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens.

CONCLUSION

Ipilimumab-nivolumab-treated patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma display improved PFS and OS compared with patients with NRAS-mutant and double wild-type melanoma. BRAF mutation status is a factor to consider while choosing between mono and dual checkpoint inhibition in advanced melanoma.