Safety and efficacy of nivolumab, an anti-PD1 immunotherapy, in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma, after failure or intolerance to sonic Hedgehog inhibitors: UNICANCER AcSé NIVOLUMAB trial

Updates in Management of Locally and Regionally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a slow-growing skin cancer that tends to remain localized but that can occasionally grow extensively and penetrate deeper tissues (locally advanced BCC [laBCC]). The first line of treatment for laBCC is surgical excision, but when resection is not possible systemic therapies such as Hedgehog pathway inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors are indicated. The management of laBCC relies on a multidisciplinary team approach; the goals of treatment include local control, palliation of symptoms, achieving acceptable cosmetic results, and reduce the risk of recurrence.

Basal Cell Carcinoma: An Old Friend with Multiple Faces

BCC is the most prevalent form of skin cancer, characterized by diverse clinical and pathological subtypes ranging from indolent to highly aggressive forms. While the majority of BCC cases are treated effectively with surgery or local therapies, locally advanced BCC (laBCC) and metastatic BCC (mBCC) pose significant therapeutic challenges. Recent advances in HHIs and immunotherapy have transformed the treatment landscape in such cases. However, resistance and intolerance to these treatments necessitate alternative approaches, including chemotherapy. Platinum-based agents such as cisplatin and carboplatin have shown limited efficacy but remain viable options in rapidly progressive cases. Among the therapeutic innovations to be explored, further lines of immunotherapy as well as combination therapies involving immunotherapy and targeted therapy have been proposed. This review synthesizes the current understanding about BCC subtypes, risk stratification, and emerging treatments, with a particular focus on laBCC and mBCC.

Dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in metastatic basal cell carcinoma

We report the basal cell cancer (BCC) cohort of the SWOG/NCI 1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART), a phase II prospective, multicenter basket trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Sixteen patients with advanced/metastatic BCC were evaluable. The ORR was 31% (95% CI, 19-50%), and the 12-month OS, 75% (95% CI, 57-100%). Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 3.3-NA). Of 15 patients evaluable for clinical benefit, five partial responses (PRs) and five stable disease >6 months (total = 10/15 (66.7%)) were seen. The most common toxicities included fatigue (37.5%), pruritis (31.3%), and diarrhea (25%). In patients with advanced/metastatic BCC, ipilimumab and nivolumab produced an ORR of 31% and prolonged (>6 months) PFS in 73% of patients, with seven PFS/iPFS of >1 year, including one with prior anti-PD-1. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02834013 (Registered 7/15/2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02834013 ).

An updated review of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cutaneous oncology: Beyond melanoma

Over the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been established as an integral component of the contemporary anticancer armamentarium. In dermatology, ICIs are most established as treatment of advanced melanoma. However, emerging evidence has demonstrated that their utility in cutaneous oncology extends to a variety of other non-melanoma malignancies. This review provides an update of the evidence from clinical trials, real world analyses, and translational research over the last three years in cutaneous malignancies beyond melanoma. Special focus is presented on areas warranting further evaluation - including populations underrepresented in or excluded from clinical trials; new and emerging treatment scenarios beyond patients with metastatic disease; novel combination approaches; and the urgent need for reliable predictive biomarkers to identify predictors of response. Collaboration between oncologists, dermatologists and dermatological surgeons is essential to progress our understanding and treatment of patients with advanced cutaneous malignancies.

S2k guideline basal cell carcinoma of the skin (update 2023)

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor in the fair-skinned population and its incidence continues to rise. An update of the S2k guideline with the participation of all specialist societies familiar with the clinical picture and previous literature research is of great importance for the quality of care for affected patients. In addition to epidemiology, diagnostics and histology are discussed. After risk stratification, therapy is divided into topical, systemic and radiation therapy. Surgical removal remains the treatment of first choice in most cases. The approval of anti-PD1 inhibitors for locally advanced and metastatic tumors has opened up a new option in second-line therapy (after hedgehog inhibitors).

Immunotherapy in Basal Cell Carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent of all cancers, with an increasing incidence. The first line therapy is surgical excision, but topical therapies can be used in low-risk superficial BCCs, while the more advanced, unresectable, or metastatic BCCs benefit from systemic therapies with hedgehog inhibitors and immunotherapy. The purpose of this review is to highlight local and systemic immunotherapies and their efficacy in the management of BCCs. Local therapies can be considered in superficial and low-risk nodular BCCs, with imiquimod frequently used for its antitumor and immunoregulatory properties. Imiquimod alone demonstrated higher histological clearance rates, but patients treated with imiquimod experienced more adverse events than ones treated with other therapies. Imiquimod can be used as an adjuvant before Mohs micrographic surgery and can also be combined with other local therapies, like curettage, electrodesiccation, cryosurgery, and photodynamic therapy, with some treatment methods yielding results comparable with the surgery. Interferons and Interleukin-2 were evaluated in a small number of studies with different results. Systemic immunotherapies with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors showed inconsistent results in patients with advanced BCCs, being effective in some patients that progressed on or were intolerant to hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHI).

Therapeutic Advances in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of cancer with an estimated 3.6 million cases diagnosed annually in the US alone. While most cases are treatable with low recurrence rates, 1-10% progress to an advanced stage which can behave aggressively, leading to local destruction and posing substantial challenges in management. The pathogenesis often involves dysregulation of the patched/hedgehog protein family, a pivotal pathway targeted by recently approved therapies. Furthermore, the role of immunotherapy is evolving in this type of tumor as we learn more about tumor microenvironment dynamics. In recent years, there have been advancements in the therapeutic landscape of advanced BCC, offering patients new hope and options for managing this complex and potentially life-threatening condition. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of this disease, including the risk factors, underlying pathogenesis, current treatment options of advanced disease, and the ongoing exploration and development of novel therapies.

Treatment of locally advanced and metastatic basosquamous carcinoma, navigating among sonic hedgehog pathway inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy: A case series and literature review

Locally advanced (laBSCs) and metastatic basosquamous carcinomas (mBSCs) represent a therapeutic challenge. By definition, these forms are not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy, but according to literature reports, sonic hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs), anti-programmed death 1 receptor antibodies (anti-PD-1), and other treatment approaches involving chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy have been used. This work features 5 real-life cases of advanced BSCs, treated at the Dermato-Oncology Unit of Trieste (Maggiore Hospital, University of Trieste). In addition, a review of the current treatment options reported in the literature for laBSC and mBSC is provided, collecting a total of 17 patients. According to these preliminary data, HHIs such as sonidegib and vismodegib could represent a safe and effective first line of treatment, while the anti-PD-1 cemiplimab may be useful as a second-line option. Chemotherapy and combined approaches involving surgery and radiotherapy have been also reported to be suitable in some patients.

Atrioventricular block in patients with hyperthyroidism: a narrative review

Atrioventricular block (AVB) is a rare cardiac manifestation of hyperthyroidism (HTH). The scientific literature contains multiple reports of AVB in patients with HTH, ranging from subclinical to overt HTH and even thyroid storm. However, much remains unknown about the true prevalence, clinical course, optimal management, and outcomes of AVB in patients with HTH. Such patients are possibly overtreated with pacemakers because of a lack of understanding that AVB might be secondary to the hyperthyroid state and thus reversible. This narrative review discusses the pathophysiology of AVB in patients with HTH in the context of the available evidence.

Non-Surgical Therapeutic Strategies for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is a globally prevalent skin disease, with basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma accounting for 99% of NMSC cases. While surgical excision is the most common approach, numerous non-surgical therapies have rapidly advanced in recent years. In cases of low-risk NMSC, alongside surgical excision, priority should be given to physical therapy and photodynamic therapy. Physical therapy modalities, exemplified by electrodessication and curettage, emerge as safe and efficacious alternatives. In juxtaposition, photodynamic therapy, albeit relatively more costly, assumes preference for patients exhibiting heightened cosmetic concerns owing to the scarring risks inherent to physical therapy and surgical excision. Notably, the combination of curettage and photodynamic therapy has exhibited remarkable efficacy in the treatment of nodular basal cell carcinoma. Additionally, for elderly patients who may be intolerant to stimulation, modified photodynamic therapy offers an almost painless option. When surgery is unavoidable, photodynamic therapy can be a valuable adjunct, allowing for a more conservative surgical approach, either before or after the procedure. Radiotherapy holds a prominent role in comprehensive treatment strategies, especially for patients ineligible for surgical intervention or those with lesions precluding further surgical measures. In cases of NMSC exhibiting perineural invasion or lymphovascular involvement, adjunctive radiotherapy is advised; however, potential adverse effects necessitate careful consideration. For advanced NMSC cases where surgery and physical therapy fall short, immunotherapy provide viable solutions. Systemic therapy employing Hedgehog pathway inhibitors can be considered for patients with distant metastatic basal cell carcinoma, despite its low incidence, or individuals with locally advanced lesions who are not surgical candidates, or those encountering recurrences after resection and radiotherapy. However, close monitoring of disease progression and adverse reactions is crucial. In this evolving landscape of NMSC treatment, personalized and multidisciplinary approaches are key, ensuring optimal outcomes while prioritizing patient safety and satisfaction.

Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment

For patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), including locally advanced or metastatic BCC not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy, hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHI) vismodegib and sonidegib are approved as first-line systemic treatment. Results from clinical trials highlight that the overall discontinuation rate of HHI treatment varies from 88% to 92% with vismodegib and is approximately 92% with sonidegib, and half of patients will discontinue HHI after approximately 8 to 12 months. The main factors weighing in on the decision to discontinue HHI include efficacy (tumor response), adverse events and patient decision. In clinical practice, some of the patients that stop HHI may be re-evaluated if the tumor becomes amenable to surgery, or restart HHI at a later time, while others will need to switch to immunotherapy, depending on the reasons for HHI discontinuation. In this review, we revisit the therapeutic decisions considering a switch from HHI to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 agent cemiplimab and we highlight the place of cemiplimab in the therapeutic ladder for patients with advanced BCC. We discuss the evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 agents as second-line systemic monotherapy, or in combination with other treatments, and the emergence of checkpoint immunotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment.

The association of cemiplimab plus sonidegib for synchronous cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Two case reports

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) are the most frequent cancers in humans, with cumulative ultraviolet radiation exposure, aging, and immunodepression as the main risk factors. In most cases, these malignancies arise in the head and neck area, and they can be treated with locoregional therapies. A minority of cases require systemic therapy. Currently, Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors (i.e., vismodegib and sonidegib) have been approved for advanced BCC, while the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab has been approved as a first-line treatment for cSCC and as a second-line treatment for BCC. Nevertheless, there is a clinical need for an effective and safe systemic therapies for advanced synchronous (syn) BCC/cSCC not amenable to local treatments. International guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for patients affected by this condition, and no case reports on the full-dose association of these medications have been previously reported. Here, we present the cases of two elderly patients affected by synBCC/cSCC of the head and neck, who received combined therapy with cemiplimab and sonidegib at full dose and standard schedule, achieving remarkable clinical benefit and long-term responses, without major adverse events. The instance of a feasible treatment for patients with advanced synBCC/cSCC will become increasingly frequent with the advancement of life expectancy in the global population, and the synergistic activity of targeted therapies and immunotherapy-administered either in association or sequentially-deserves to be further explored.