Prevalence, clinical and molecular characteristics of early stage EGFR-mutated lung cancer in a real-life West-European cohort: Implications for adjuvant therapy

Perioperative Therapy in Oncogene-Driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Strategies and Unanswered Questions

Perioperative therapy has become a critical component in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in the era of precision medicine. Although molecular testing is standard in metastatic NSCLC, its incorporation into early-stage disease remains essential for guiding treatment decisions. Reflex molecular testing pathways are necessary to optimize tissue utilization and ensure timely results. However, liquid biopsies, although valuable in advanced disease, have limited sensitivity in early-stage NSCLC, reinforcing the need for tissue-based next-generation sequencing. Targeted therapies have revolutionized treatment for oncogene-driven NSCLC, with adjuvant osimertinib now standard for EGFR-mutant disease and ongoing investigations into ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, unanswered questions remain regarding the inclusion of perioperative TKI therapy, the role of molecular residual disease assessment, and whether specific TKIs offer greater benefit for high-risk subgroups. The role of immunotherapy (IO) in oncogene-driven NSCLC remains controversial. Although perioperative chemo-IO has demonstrated survival benefits in unselected NSCLC, its efficacy in EGFR, ALK, and other actionable alterations is unclear. Tumors harboring KRAS and BRAF mutations may respond better because of a more immune-inflamed microenvironment, and remains an active area of investigation. As the landscape of perioperative therapy continues to evolve, ongoing trials will help define the optimal integration of targeted therapies and IO in oncogene-driven NSCLC. Addressing these unanswered questions will be crucial in refining treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.

Frequency of targetable genetic alterations in resectable lung adenocarcinoma: Results from the LORD project

There is still limited data on the prevalence of actionable molecular alterations in patients with early-stage resectable lung adenocarcinoma and prior studies reported important differences across geographic locations, demographic and pathologic characteristics. The tumors of 1,603 French Canadian patients with pathologically confirmed lung adenocarcinoma were interrogated using a 50-gene next-generation sequencing panel. The goal was to assess the prevalence of genetic alterations in eleven guideline-based oncogenic genes in resectable lung adenocarcinoma. Age, sex, pathological stage, smoking history and predominant histologic patterns were associated with molecular subtypes defined by oncogenic drivers. Age at surgery for the 1,603 patients was 65 ± 8 and includes 61 % of females, 6 % of patients without a smoking history and 70 % of stage I. The overall prevalence of targetable alterations for approved and investigational therapies was 65.9 % and 56.7 % of patients had tumors harboring at least one variant of strong clinical significance (tier I of the AMP/ASCO/CAP categorization). The most frequently mutated genes were KRAS (45.3 %), EGFR (11.5 %) and BRAF (3.9 %). MET exon 14 skipping alterations were identified in 47 patients (2.9 %) and oncogenic fusions in ALK, ROS1, RET and MET were found in 1.7 % of cases. As expected, EGFR activating mutations were associated with patients who never smoked, females, earlier disease stages, with more lepidic/acinar and less solid predominant patterns. Quasi similar but inverted relationships with clinico-pathological features were observed in one third of patients (n = 534) free of molecular alterations characterized by more males, patients who smoked, with later stage diagnosis and with more solid and less lepidic/acinar adenocarcinomas. This study highlights the epidemiology of guideline-based targetable alterations in French-Canadian patients with resectable lung adenocarcinoma. The large proportion of patients eligible for targeted therapies will have important impact on oncological practices in the current era of neoadjuvant and perioperative treatments.

EGFR mutation testing across the osimertinib clinical program

OBJECTIVES

EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including osimertinib, have revolutionized EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment; therefore, early identification of EGFR mutations is essential. We report post-hoc analyses of pooled EGFR mutation tissue testing across osimertinib clinical trials, highlighting testing challenges and supporting best practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pooled central Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test data from nine global osimertinib NSCLC clinical trials were analyzed by specimen type, disease stage, and geographical region for specimen adequacy for testing and valid test results.

RESULTS

Across 4,864 biopsies and 2,402 resections, 91% were adequate for testing, of which 95% of biopsies and 99% of resections had valid test results. Of biopsies, 12% were inadequate for testing (mainly due to insufficient tumor content [42%] and insufficient tissue volume [35%]) and 3% of resections were inadequate (insufficient tumor content [55%] and incorrect specimen preparation [12%]). Inadequacy varied by disease stage, from 3% in resectable stage IA2-IIIA to 10%-15% in first and second/later-line advanced/metastatic settings, and 16% in unresectable stage III. Test success rates among adequate specimens ranged from 93% (unresectable stage III) to 99% (resectable stage IA2-IIIA). Data were similar by geography.

DISCUSSION

Most tissue specimens were adequate for EGFR testing. Inadequacy was commonly due to insufficient tissue volume or tumor content and higher in biopsies versus resections, and unresectable stage III and first-line advanced/metastatic versus other disease stages. Based on these controlled trial data, pre-analytic variables of tissue specimens are a major driver of testing success; hence maintaining optimal conditions from sample collection to biomarker analysis, as well as improving tissue-sampling techniques is critical to increase testing success rates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT01802632, NCT02094261, NCT02151981, NCT02296125, NCT04035486, NCT02511106, NCT05120349, NCT03521154, NCT04351555.

Molecular characterization of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma presenting as subsolid nodules in a real-life European cohort

OBJECTIVES

Subsolid nodules emerged as frequent radiological variants of lung adenocarcinoma. Radiological features including solid-component prevalence and larger tumour dimensions prompt tumoral invasiveness guiding prognosis and management. Thus, we aimed to clarify the molecular grounds that dictate these radiological appearances and clinical behaviour in a real-life European-cohort. Additionally, following the growing interest toward targeted-therapies in early-stage diseases, we aimed to present real-life epidemiological data of actionable mutations in these patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-centre study, targeted next-generation sequencing was performed continuatively in all the resected subsolid lung adenocarcinomas in the period between May 2016 and December 2023. Clinico-radiological data were collected. The genetic landscape of our real-life European subsolid adenocarcinoma population is defined. Common and actionable mutations (frequency > 5%) relation to key clinico-radiological features are evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 156 subsolid adenocarcinomas were analysed. KRAS-mutations, mostly KRAS p.G12C, were the most prevalent followed by EGFR, including 25% uncommon EGFR-mutations, TP53 and MET mutations. Amongst the clinico-radiological variables, KRAS-mutations and KRAS p.G12C-mutation were associated to smoking history (≥ 20 pack/years), aggressive histologic subtype and higher consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR). Moreover, KRAS-mutated nodules had faster tumour-doubling-time. Conversely, EGFR-mutations were associated to female sex and lower CTR. The latter not being confirmed in common EGFR-mutations. Additionally, in common EGFR-mutated nodules, aggressive histological components were rarer.

CONCLUSION

Our study presents the molecular profile of subsolid lung adenocarcinoma in a real-life European-cohort. KRAS-mutations were the most prevalent, and were related to smoking history, higher CTR and faster growth. Conversely, common EGFR-mutations were rarer than expected and unrelated to smoking history and radiological features.

EGFR status assessment using reflex testing targeted next-generation sequencing for resected non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

EGFR status assessment is mandatory for adjuvant decision-making of resected stage IB-IIIA non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). It is questionable whether single-gene RT-PCR versus next-generation sequencing (NGS) should be used for this evaluation. Moreover, co-occurring mutations have an impact on tumor behavior and may influence future therapeutic decision-making. We aimed to describe the clinico-pathological and molecular features, as well as the prognostic factors of resected EGFR-mutant NS-NSCLC evaluated with reflex NGS and RT-PCR, so as to compare the results of the two methods. We retrospectively included and collected data from patients with resected EGFR-mutant NS-NSCLC diagnosed in our institution between 2005 and 2024. Additional cases from another center were included. Tumors were analyzed using targeted NGS and RT-PCR. A total of 153 patients were selected. The median follow-up after surgery was 22 months. The positive percent agreement of RT-PCR compared to NGS for the detection of an EGFR mutation was 88%. Common single EGFR mutations (L858R/del19) were observed in 117/153 (77%) cases; 22/153 (14%) and 14/153 (9%) cases had uncommon single and compound EGFR mutations, respectively. 63/153 (41%) patients had a co-occurring mutation, including a TP53 mutation in 43/63 (68%) co-mutated patients. EGFR/TP53-mutant tumors were associated with positive PD-L1 expression compared to EGFR-mutant/TP53-wild-type tumors (62% vs 39%; p = 0.006). Shorter median event-free survival (EFS) in patients with an EGFR exon 18 mutation and those with TP53 exon 7 co-mutation was recorded. The EGFR status should be systematically evaluated using targeted NGS reflex testing for resected NS-NSCLC since future therapeutic decision-making could soon consider integrating the presence of co-occurring mutations.

Osimertinib in the Treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Early and Locally Advanced Stages of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was dramatically revolutionized by the introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical practice, both in advanced and locally advanced/early stages. The present work focuses on osimertinib use in locally advanced and early NSCLC stages. Phase 3 clinical trials have supported the use of osimertinib as the new standard of care, both in the adjuvant setting and in locally advanced disease. The ADAURA study reported an overall survival (OS) advantage for adjuvant osimertinib in completely resected stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutant tumors, while the LAURA study proved a statistically significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and a delay of central nervous system metastasis development in EGFR-mutant patients treated with osimertinib maintenance after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, data on osimertinib's efficacy are conflicting; therefore, the Neo-ADAURA study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant osimertinib alone or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIB NSCLC and common EGFR mutations. We discuss several issues that need to be clarified, such as the efficacy of the drug on uncommon mutations, the long-term impact on survival, and the management of resistance mechanisms. Moreover, we report the studies that are trying to identify potential biomarkers of response, such as the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), with the aim of selecting patients who will benefit most from osimertinib.

Perioperative immunotherapy for patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Unexpected potential benefits

Given that immunotherapy has resulted in a significant overall survival (OS) benefit in advanced-stage disease, it is of notable interest to determine the effectiveness of these agents in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The potential exists for the immunotherapeutic approach in early-stage NSCLC to mirror the paradigm seen in advanced NSCLC, wherein survival enhancements have notably benefited the majority of patients. However, their performance in early-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant NSCLC is controversial. In the limited studies that included patients with EGFR mutation status, we found unexpected, good survival benefits of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in resectable EGFR-positive NSCLC, which is controversial with those in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. It is possible because of the shift toward immunosuppression that the immune environment undergoes during tumor progression. In the early disease stages, the anti-tumor immune response can be activated with fewer hindrances. In the context of EGFR mutant tumors, intratumor genetic heterogeneity can generate treatment-sensitive and -resistant subclones. The subclonality of the resistant subclone is pivotal in therapy response, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) selectively controlling EGFR-mutant cell proliferation and "competitive release" potentially explaining lower pathological responses in adjuvant TKIs trials. This review delves into emerging data on perioperative treatment modalities for early-stage EGFR mutant NSCLC, exploring unique mechanisms and predictive biomarkers to guide perioperative management strategies.

Prevalence of EGFR Mutations in Patients With Resected Stages I to III NSCLC: Results From the EARLY-EGFR Study

INTRODUCTION

There is limited literature on the prevalence of EGFR mutations in early stage NSCLC. EARLY-EGFR (NCT04742192), a cross-sectional study, determined the prevalence of EGFR mutations in early stage NSCLC.

METHODS

This noninterventional, real-world study enrolled consecutive patients with resected stages IA to IIIB (American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition) NSCLC from 14 countries across Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa. The primary end point was prevalence of EGFR mutations and secondary end points included prevalence of EGFR mutation subtypes and treatment patterns.

RESULTS

Of 601 patients (median [range] age: 62.0 [30.0-86.0] y) enrolled, 52.7% were females and 64.2% were nonsmokers. Most had stages IA to IB NSCLC (64.1%) and adenocarcinoma (98.7%). Overall prevalence of EGFR mutations was 51.0%; most reported exon 19 deletions (48.5%) followed by exon 21 L858R mutations (34.0%). Women had a higher EGFR mutation rate than men (64.0% versus 36.4%). Compared with no EGFR mutations, patients with EGFR mutations were more likely to be nonsmokers (35.1% versus 60.9%) and have stage I NSCLC than stages II and III NSCLC (54.8% versus 47.3% and 35.6%). Systemic adjuvant therapy was planned in 33.8% of the patients with stages IB to IIIB disease and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in 6.8%. Age above or equal to 60 years, females, and Asians were found to have a significantly (p < 0.05) higher odds of EGFR mutations, whereas smoking history and stage III disease had lower odds of EGFR mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The EARLY-EGFR study provides an overview of EGFR mutations and subtype prevalence in patients with early stage NSCLC. The study highlights the limited adherence to treatment guidelines suggesting an unmet need for improved adjuvant therapy.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Timeliness of Clinical Care Pathway for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Austria: The PRATER Retrospective Study

This was a retrospective study of the profile and initial treatments of adults diagnosed with early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during January 2018-December 2021 at 16 leading hospital institutions in Austria, excluding patients enrolled in clinical trials. In total, 319 patients were enrolled at a planned ~1:1:1 ratio across StI:II:III. Most tested biomarkers were programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1; 58% expressing), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS; 22% positive), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; 18% positive). Of 115/98/106 StI/II/III patients, 82%/85%/36% underwent surgery, followed by systemic therapy in 9%/45%/47% of those [mostly chemotherapy (ChT)]. Unresected treated StIII patients received ChT + radiotherapy [43%; followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 39% of those], ICI ± ChT (35%), and ChT-alone/radiotherapy-alone (22%). Treatment was initiated a median (interquartile range) of 24 (7-39) days after histological confirmation, and 55 (38-81) days after first medical visit. Based on exploratory analyses of all patients newly diagnosed with any stage NSCLC during 2018-2021 at 14 of the sites (N = 7846), 22%/10%/25%/43% had StI/II/III/IV. The total number was not significantly different between pre-COVID-19 (2018-2019) and study-specific COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods, while StI proportion increased (21% vs. 23%; p = 0.012). Small differences were noted in treatments. In conclusion, treatments were aligned with guideline recommendations at a time which preceded the era of ICIs and targeted therapies in the (neo)adjuvant setting.

The radiological characteristics, tertiary lymphoid structures, and survival status associated with EGFR mutation in patients with subsolid nodules like stage I-II LUAD

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) recommended for the patients with subsolid nodule in early lung cancer stage is not routinely. The clinical value and impact in patients with EGFR mutation on survival outcomes is further needed to be elucidated to decide whether the application of EGFR-TKIs was appropriate in early lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) stage appearing as subsolid nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The inclusion of patients exhibiting clinical staging of IA-IIB subsolid nodules. Clinical information, computed tomography (CT) features before surgical resection and pathological characteristics including tertiary lymphoid structures of the tumors were recorded for further exploration of correlation with EGFR mutation and prognosis.

RESULTS

Finally, 325 patients were enrolled into this study, with an average age of 56.8 ± 9.8 years. There are 173 patients (53.2%) harboring EGFR mutation. Logistic regression model analysis showed that female (OR = 1.944, p = 0.015), mix ground glass nodule (OR = 2.071, p = 0.003, bubble-like lucency (OR = 1.991, p = 0.003) were significant risk factors of EGFR mutations. Additionally, EGFR mutations were negatively correlated with TLS presence and density. Prognosis analysis showed that the presence of TLS was associated with better recurrence-free survival (RFS)(p = 0.03) while EGFR mutations were associated with worse RFS(p = 0.01). The RFS in patients with TLS was considerably excel those without TLS within EGFR wild type group(p = 0.018). Multivariate analyses confirmed that EGFR mutation was an independent prognostic predictor for RFS (HR = 3.205, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

In early-phase LUADs, subsolid nodules with EGFR mutation had specific clinical and radiological signatures. EGFR mutation was associated with worse survival outcomes and negatively correlated with TLS, which might weaken the positive impact of TLS on prognosis. Highly attention should be paid to the use of EGFR-TKI for further treatment as agents in early LUAD patients who carrying EGFR mutation.

Perioperative Treatment Strategies in EGFR-Mutant Early-Stage NSCLC: Current Evidence and Future Challenges

Treatment with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib is considered a new standard in patients with completely resected stage I to IIIA NSCLC harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation. This therapeutic approach significantly prolonged the disease-free survival and the overall survival versus placebo and revealed a significant role in preventing the occurrence of brain metastases. However, many unanswered questions remain, including the optimal duration of this therapy, whether all patients benefit from adjuvant osimertinib, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this population. Indeed, there is a renewed interest in neoadjuvant strategies with targeted therapies in resectable NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers. In light of these considerations, we discuss the past and current treatment options, and the clinical challenges that should be addressed to optimize the treatment outcomes in this patient population.

TARGET: A Phase II, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of 5-Year Adjuvant Osimertinib in Completely Resected EGFR-Mutated Stage II to IIIB NSCLC Post Complete Surgical Resection

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib is a central nervous system (CNS)-active, third generation, irreversible, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations, with demonstrated efficacy in EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present the rationale and design for TARGET (NCT05526755), which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5 years of adjuvant osimertinib in patients with completely resected EGFRm stage II to IIIB NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TARGET is a phase II, multinational, open-label, single-arm study. Adults aged ≥18 years (Taiwan ≥20 years), with resected stage II to IIIB NSCLC are eligible; prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed. Eligible patients must have locally confirmed common (exon 19 deletion or L858R) or uncommon (G719X, L861Q, and/or S768I) EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutations, alone or in combination. Patients will receive osimertinib 80 mg once daily for 5 years or until disease recurrence, discontinuation or death. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort). Secondary endpoints include: investigator-assessed DFS at 3 and 4 years; overall survival at 3, 4, and 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort); DFS at 3, 4, and 5 years (uncommon EGFR mutations cohort); safety and tolerability, type of recurrence and CNS metastases (both cohorts). Exploratory endpoints include: tissue/plasma concordance; analysis of circulating molecules in plasma samples using different profiling approaches to detect minimal residual disease; incidence and change over time of incidental pulmonary nodules.

RESULTS

TARGET is currently recruiting, and completion is expected in 2029.

Distinguishing EGFR mutant subtypes in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer using the presence status of ground glass opacity and final histologic classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The progression of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is closely related to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status. The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate the relationship between EGFR mutation status and demographic, imaging, and ultimately pathologic features in patients with NSCLC.

Methods

A complete literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to discover articles published by May 15, 2023 that were eligible. The relationship between EGFR mutation status and specific demographic, imaging, and ultimately pathologic features in patients with NSCLC was evaluated using pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs was the appropriate statistic to summarize standard deviations (SDs) means for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 9 studies with 1789 patients were included in this analysis. The final findings suggested that patients with a greater age, female gender, and non-smoking status would have a relatively higher incidence of EGFR mutations. Additionally, the risk of EGFR mutations increased with larger tumor diameter, tumor imaging presentation of mixed ground glass opacity (mGGO), and tumor pathological findings of minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) or invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). Significantly, malignancies presenting as MIA are more likely to contain L858R point mutations (OR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.04-3.13; p = 0.04) rather than exon 19 deletions (OR = 1.81; 95% CI: 0.95-3.44; p = 0.07).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed that imaging parameters and histological classifications of pulmonary nodules may be able to predict stage IA NSCLC genetic changes.