Landscape of neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Trends in the Management of Small HER2-Positive Breast Cancers

BACKGROUND

The treatment approach for small HER2-positive (+) breast cancers seeks to optimize efficacy while minimizing potential overtreatment and associated toxicities. This study aims to evaluate recent trends in treatment patterns for small HER2+ tumors.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HER2+, cT1, cN0/pN0 breast cancer treated at a single institution from January 2018 to December 2022 were included. Clinicopathological, treatment, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were included. Mean age was 63 (± 12.0) years. T category included cT1a in 12.1% (n = 25), cT1b in 28.0% (n = 58), and cT1c in 57.5% (n = 119), while 2.4% (n = 5) had clinical T1 category without further specification. Moreover, 74.4% (n = 154) were hormone receptor positive. Also, 66.7% (n = 138) received adjuvant therapy, 12.6% (n = 26) received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT), and 12.1% (n = 25) received no systemic therapy. Administered regimens included: trastuzumab monotherapy in 6.1% (n = 10), taxane/trastuzumab in 55.5% (n = 91), taxane/carboplatin/trastuzumab in 18.9% (n = 31), and taxane/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab in 15.2% (n = 25). In the 26 patients who received NAT, pathological complete response (pCR) was noted in 69.2% (n = 18). Overall, use of NAT increased from 2018 (7.1%) to 2021 (30.2%) and then decreased in 2022 (9.1%). The overall mastectomy rate was 35.3% (n = 73). Young age and multiple tumors were associated with a higher rate of mastectomy (age p < 0.001; multiple tumors p = 0.006). Upstaging of clinically node-negative patients occurred in 14.1% of patients at surgery.

CONCLUSION

The treatment for cT1N0 HER2+ breast cancers includes primary surgery with adjuvant HER2-targeted therapy in combination with chemotherapy. Primary surgery may allow for an opportunity to deescalate adjuvant therapy with no impact on surgical plan.

Perioperative Considerations of Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Treatments

Neoadjuvant treatment is increasingly being used in patients with breast cancer. Understanding the effects of neoadjuvant agents in the perioperative setting is crucial as it can affect morbidity. Understanding how these agents should be used to maximize optimal time to surgery is crucial as delays can negatively affective cancer outcomes. This review aims to discuss the perioperative considerations surgeons should be aware of prior to scheduling surgery for patients receiving chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy.

The optimal neoadjuvant treatment strategy for HR+/HER2 + breast cancer: a network meta-analysis

The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy varies significantly with hormone receptor (HR) status for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer (BC). Despite extensive research on HER2 + BC, the optimal neoadjuvant strategy for HR+/HER2 + BC remains inconclusive. This study aimed to identify the optimal neoadjuvant regimen for HR+/HER2 + BC treatment. We conducted a systematic search for trials comparing neoadjuvant regimens for HR+/HER2 + BC and a network meta-analysis. Odds ratios for pathological complete response (pCR) and hazard ratios for event-free survival (EFS) were calculated. Treatment regimens were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. 20 trials with 2809 patients were included. In pCR analysis, three neoadjuvant regimens sequentially ranked at the top, namely those comprising T-DM1, pertuzumab with trastuzumab, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor with trastuzumab, demonstrating significantly higher pCR rates than monotherapies. In EFS analysis, pertuzumab with trastuzumab ranked the first while T-DM1 containing regimen ranked the last. Anthracycline-free regimens showed a marginally higher pCR rate than anthracycline-containing regimens, while carboplatin-containing regimens demonstrated a numerically higher pCR rate than carboplatin-free regimens. Significant heterogeneity was observed in endocrine therapy analysis, which may be caused by different strategies for incorporating endocrine therapy. In conclusion, trastuzumab plus pertuzumab stands out as the optimal neoadjuvant HER2-targeting regimen for HR+/HER2 + BC Furthermore, anthracycline-free carboplatin-containing chemotherapy emerges as a promising combination treatment. Further investigation is required to clarify the role of endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2 + BC to guide its clinical application.

An exploration of the optimal combination chemotherapy regimen based on neoadjuvant therapy containing pyrotinib for HER2-positive breast cancer: A multicenter real-world study

BACKGROUND

The combination of pyrotinib (Py) with cytotoxic agents proved to be effective in early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen is unknown. This study attempts to explore it from real-world research data.

METHODS

Information was collected from patients with early-stage HER2-positive BC from 23 centers across the country. They were categorized into the anthracycline group (A group) and non-anthracycline group (non-A group). Patients in the non-A group were further categorized into the platinum group and non-platinum group and the short-cycle (≤4 cycles) taxane group and long-cycle (>4 cycles) taxane group. Total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0) and breast pathological complete response (bpCR, ypT0/is) rates were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were enrolled. Postoperative pathology indicated a tpCR rate of 36.8 %, a bpCR rate of 42.1 % in the A group, the non-A group had a tpCR rate of 47.8 %, and a bpCR rate of 53.6 %, with P-values of 0.273 and 0.254, respectively. In the long-cycle taxane group, the tpCR and bpCR rates were 60.8 % and 66.7 %, respectively. In the short-cycle taxane group, the tpCR and bpCR rates were 11.1 % and 16.7 %, respectively (both P<0.001). The platinum group had higher tpCR rate (62.9 % vs. 32.4 %, respectively; P = 0.011) and bpCR rate (65.7 % vs. 41.2 %, respectively; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

As for a neoadjuvant therapy regimen with Py, an anthracycline-free regimen is feasible. Besides, platinum-containing, long-cycle taxane regimens appear to achieve superior efficacy under anthracycline-removed conditions.

Neoadjuvant inetetamab and pertuzumab with taxanes and carboplatin (TCbIP) In locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer: a prospective cohort study with propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Inetetamab is the first domestically developed innovative anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in China, proven effective and safe in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. However, its efficacy and safety in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remain to be validated.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inetetamab combined with pertuzumab, taxanes, and carboplatin (TCbIP) in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive LABC, comparing it to data from patients treated with the TCbHP regimen (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab, taxanes, and carboplatin) using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR). Adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), and near-pCR were key secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients with clinical stage IIA-IIIC HER2-positive LABC were prospectively enrolled and treated with the TCbIP regimen. The tpCR rate among 28 patients who completed surgery was 60.7%, comparable to and slightly higher than the TCbHP group in PSM (60.7% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.510). The ORR was 96.4%, and the DCR reached 100.0%. The most common ≥ grade 3 AE was neutropenia (21.4% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.350). No significant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed, and no patient withdrew from treatment due to AEs.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy with TCbIP showed good efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-positive LABC and might be another promising option for neoadjuvant treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05749016 (registration date: Nov 01, 2021).

Safety and efficacy analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab, trastuzumab and standard chemotherapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer: real-world data from NeoPowER study

BACKGROUND

The addition of pertuzumab (P) to trastuzumab (H) and standard chemotherapy (CT) as neoadjuvant treatment (NaT) for patients with HER2 + breast cancer (BC), has shown to increase the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, without main safety concerns. The aim of NeoPowER trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of P + H + CT in a real-world population.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of stage II-III, HER2 + BC patients treated with NaT: who received P + H + CT (neopower group) in 5 Emilia Romagna institutions were compared with an historical group who received H + CT (control group). The primary endpoint was the safety, secondary endpoints were pCR rate, DRFS and OS and their correlation to NaT and other potential variables.

RESULTS

260 patients were included, 48% received P + H + CT, of whom 44% was given anthraciclynes as part of CT, compared to 83% in the control group. The toxicity profile was similar, excluding diarrhea more frequent in the neopower group (20% vs. 9%). Three patients experienced significant reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), all receiving anthracyclines. The pCR rate was 46% (P + H + CT) and 40% (H + CT) (p = 0.39). The addition of P had statistically correlation with pCR only in the patients receiving anthra-free regimens (OR = 3.05,p = 0.047). Preoperative use of anthracyclines (OR = 1.81,p = 0.03) and duration of NaT (OR = 1.18,p = 0.02) were statistically related to pCR. 12/21 distant-relapse events and 14/17 deaths occurred in the control group. Patients who achieve pCR had a significant increase in DRFS (HR = 0.23,p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding neoadjuvant P to H and CT is safe. With the exception of diarrhea, rate of adverse events of grade > 2 did not differ between the two groups. P did not increase the cardiotoxicity when added to H + CT, nevertheless in our population all cardiac events occurred in patients who received anthracycline-containing regimens. Not statistically significant, higher pCR rate is achievable in patients receiving neoadjuvant P + H + CT. The study did not show a statistically significant correlation between the addition of P and long-term outcomes.

Pooled analysis of NeoCARH and NeoCART trials: patient-reported outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving platinum-based or anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Anthracycline-based or platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy belongs to the standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer (EBC) that is either triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2 +). Currently, there is a paucity of data comparing their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

Triple-negative or HER2 + EBC from our two prospective randomized controlled trials, neoCARH and neoCART, were divided into two groups based on the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens they received: anthracycline-based or platinum-based group. HRQoL was the exploratory endpoint in these two trials, which was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Core30 and Breast23 questionnaires. The primary variable of interest was the C30 summary score (C30-SumSc). Assessments were carried out at baseline, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 1 year and 2 years after diagnosis.

RESULTS

The mean questionnaires' compliance rate was 95.0%. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 210 patients had evaluable HRQoL data, the mean least square change from baseline for the platinum-based group was - 15.997 (95% confidence interval (CI): - 17.877 to - 14.117), and it was - 20.156 (95% CI: - 22.053 to - 18.258) for the anthracycline-based group (difference: 4.159, 95% CI: 1.462 to 6.855, P = 0.003, minimal important difference = 3). For the majority of the domains of interest assessed by the C30 and BR23 questionnaires, the platinum-based group demonstrated superior outcomes in comparison to the anthracycline-based group.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving platinum-based or anthracycline-based regimens both experienced worsened HRQoL after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, the former provided relatively better HRQoL compared with the latter.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03140553. Registered 4 May 2017 (neoCARH). NCT03154749. Registered 16 May 2017 (neoCART).

Fertility and reproductive concerns related to the new generation of cancer drugs and the clinical implication for young individuals undergoing treatments for solid tumors

The treatment landscape of solid tumors has changed markedly in the last years. Molecularly targeted treatments and immunotherapies have been implemented and have, in many cancers, lowered the risk of relapse and prolonged survival. Patients with tumors harboring specific targetable molecular alterations or mutations are often of a younger age, and hence future fertility and family building can be important concerns in this group. However, there are great uncertainties regarding the effect of the new drugs on reproductive functions, including fertility, pregnancy and lactation and how young patients with cancers, both women and men should be advised. The goal with this review is to gather the current knowledge regarding oncofertility and the different novel therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, small molecules and monoclonal antibody targeted therapies. The specific circumstances and reproductive concerns in different patient groups where novel treatments have been broadly introduced are also discussed, including those with melanoma, lung, breast, colorectal and gynecological cancers. It is clear, that more awareness is needed regarding potential drug toxicity on reproductive tissues, and it is of essence that individuals are informed based on current expertise and on available fertility preservation methods.

Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analyses

Background

In recent years, novel therapies targeting specific molecular pathways and immunotherapies have exhibited promising outcomes for treating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Our work aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of these emerging treatment regimens for this disease.

Material and methods

We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials their inception to August 2023 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The quality of eligible RCTs was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, version 2 (RoB2). Investigated outcomes encompassed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), pathologic complete remission (pCR), and adverse events (AEs). They were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% conference intervals (CI) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI.

Results

Our analysis identified a total of 28 RCTs suitable for inclusion in the NMA. Regarding the PFS, all these treatment regimens exhibited comparable effectiveness. In terms of OS, Capecitabine+Trastuzumab, Lapatinib+Trastuzumab and Pyrotinib+Capecitabine exhibited better effect compared to other treatments. Regarding pCR and AEs, all these treatment regimens exhibited comparable effectiveness, especially Lapatinib+Trastuzumab and Pyrotinib+Capecitabine.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the prominent role of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in treating HER2-positive breast cancer. The efficacy of trastuzumab-containing regimens was superior to other treatment options, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Based on these findings, trastuzumab-containing regimens emerge as a preferable and recommended choice in clinical practice for managing HER2-positive breast cancer.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023414348.

Breast cancer during pregnancy-The oncologist's point of view

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed during or directly after pregnancy. Differences in pathogenesis and prognosis identify two distinct patient groups, those with breast cancer during pregnancy and those with postpartum breast cancer which, for reasons not completely understood, is associated with worse outcomes. Compared with breast cancer in the non-pregnant patient, several limitations in terms of both local and systemic therapy are applied to limit fetal harm. Treatment is nevertheless delivered with curative intent, therefore avoiding harmful delays in therapy initiation, unnecessary therapy de-escalation or chemotherapy dose modifications is strongly recommended. In this short commentary, we briefly review current evidence and treatment guidelines and provide recommendations for optimal oncologic management of pregnancy-related breast cancer.

Transaxillary Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Not: A Comparative Study with Analysis of Surgical Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

In most cases, transaxillary single-port endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (E-NSM-IIBR) is conducted in patients with early-stage breast cancer, ensuring surgical safety while achieving improved breast aesthetics. However, whether E-NSM-IIBR is appropriate in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to report the surgical safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of breast cancer patients who underwent E-NSM-IIBR with NAC in comparison to those who did not receive NAC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent E-NSM-IIBR with or without NAC at a single center between January 2021 and July 2022. Patient demographics, postoperative complications, and PROs evaluated using the BREAST-Q version 2.0 questionnaire were compared between the two groups. Factors associated with PROs at 9 months after surgery were assessed with linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients who underwent E-NSM-IIBR were included in the study, with 27 patients receiving NAC and 65 patients not receiving NAC. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. The BREAST-Q version 2.0 questionnaire was completed by 24 out of 27 patients (88.9%) in the NAC group and 59 out of 65 patients (90.8%) in the non-NAC group at 9 months after surgery. The patient-reported outcomes in various domains of the BREAST-Q did not show a significant difference between the two cohorts. The results of the multiple linear regression analysis indicated that in the both groups age (β = - 0.985, 95% CI - 1.598 to - 0.371, p = 0.003 in the NAC group; β = - 0.510, - 1.011 to - 0.009, p = 0.046 in the non-NAC group) and rippling (β = - 21.862, - 36.768 to - 6.955, p = 0.006 in the NAC group; β = - 7.787, - 15.151 to - 0.423, p = 0.039 in the non-NAC group) significantly impacted the patients' satisfaction with breasts, and PMRT was negatively associated with patients' physical well-being of chest (β = - 13.813, - 26.962 to - 0.664, p = 0.040 in the NAC group; β = - 18.574, - 30.661 to - 6.487, p = 0.003 in the non-NAC group). Our findings revealed that patients with larger implant volumes had higher scores in psychosocial well-being (β = 0.082, 0.001 to 0.162, p = 0.047), whereas implant displacement (β = - 14.937, - 28.175 to - 1.700, p=0.028) had a negative impact on patients' psychological well-being in the non-NAC group. However, our results did not demonstrate any significant influencing factors on patients' psychosocial well-being within the NAC group.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary experiences confirm that E-NSM-IIBR is a safe option for selected patients even after NAC, with favorable patient-reported outcomes comparable with those in the primary surgery setting. The postoperative long-term outcomes of patients who undergo radiation therapy after NAC merit further investigation in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Exploring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Predictive Models, Radiomic, and Pathological Markers in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Breast cancer retains its position as the most prevalent form of malignancy among females on a global scale. The careful selection of appropriate treatment for each patient holds paramount importance in effectively managing breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plays a pivotal role in the comprehensive treatment of this disease. Administering chemotherapy before surgery, NACT becomes a powerful tool in reducing tumor size, potentially enabling fewer invasive surgical procedures and even rendering initially inoperable tumors amenable to surgery. However, a significant challenge lies in the varying responses exhibited by different patients towards NACT. To address this challenge, researchers have focused on developing prediction models that can identify those who would benefit from NACT and those who would not. Such models have the potential to reduce treatment costs and contribute to a more efficient and accurate management of breast cancer. Therefore, this review has two objectives: first, to identify the most effective radiomic markers correlated with NACT response, and second, to explore whether integrating radiomic markers extracted from radiological images with pathological markers can enhance the predictive accuracy of NACT response. This review will delve into addressing these research questions and also shed light on the emerging research direction of leveraging artificial intelligence techniques for predicting NACT response, thereby shaping the future landscape of breast cancer treatment.