1307 Transfer and transition of children with heart disease: What is the evidence?

Attitude toward and current practice of transfer and transition of adolescents with congenital heart disease in the United States of America and Europe

The objective of this study was to explore the current practice and attitudes of pediatric cardiologists in the United States and Europe on the transfer and transition of children with congenital heart disease (CHD). A survey among pediatric cardiology programs in the United States and Europe was undertaken. Sixty-nine centers completed and returned the 61-item questionnaire that was specifically devised for this survey. Of 69 participating centers, 74% reported that they transfer their patients to adult-focused care. When a center transfers its patients, 80% transfer them to a formalized Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program. The median age of transfer is 18 years. Comorbidities, pregnancy, and patient/family request to leave pediatric cardiology were identified as initiators for transfer. Complexity of the heart defect was relatively less important when deciding whether to transfer patients. Only one-third of the centers that transfer their patients provide a structured preparation for patients and family. Development of a formal transition program is planned at 59% of the centers that transfer patients. In conclusion, timely transfer and a structured transition process of children with CHD are not implemented in all pediatric cardiology programs. Health-care providers working in pediatric cardiology should make their transfer policies explicit and transition programs ought to be developed.

Expectations and experiences of adolescents with congenital heart disease on being transferred from pediatric cardiology to an adult congenital heart disease program

PURPOSE

To investigate the expectations and experiences of adolescents on transferring from a pediatric cardiology program to an adult congenital heart disease program.

METHODS

A qualitative, phenomenologic study was conducted, in which semi-structured, in-depth interviews were performed with 14 adolescents (aged 15-17 years) with congenital heart disease. Interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using procedures described by Colaizzi.

RESULTS

The study identified six themes that characterized adolescents' views of the transfer process: leaving pediatric cardiology was viewed as normal; leaving behind familiar surroundings; a positive wait-and-see attitude toward the adult congenital heart disease program; adjusting to a new environment; a need for better information; and a shift in roles between the adolescent and his parents.

CONCLUSION

Although adolescents with congenital heart disease have a positive attitude toward transferring to an adult congenital heart disease program, they identified aspects of the transfer that healthcare professionals need to address. Patients and their families should be prepared for the transfer by informing them about the adult program and its healthcare providers. A formal transition program can play a role in this respect.

Implementation of transition programs can prevent another lost generation of patients with congenital heart disease

Congenital heart disease is the most frequently occurring birth defect. To date, more than 90% of the children born with a heart defect reach adulthood. Since many patients are prone to residua and sequelae, lifelong specialized care is required. However, studies indicate that about one-half to three-quarters of the patients are lost to follow-up when they have grown up. This has resulted in a virtual lost generation. Lapse of care is associated with significant morbidity. Therefore, implementation of strategies to prevent patients from failing to continue regular follow-up is critical. It is argued that transition programs that inform patients about the rationale for ongoing follow-up and that teach them how to navigate the medical system can avoid another lost generation.