Applicability of the modified CHA2DS2-VASc score for stroke risk stratification in Caucasian atrial fibrillation patients

Should atrial fibrillation be considered a vascular disease? The need for a comprehensive vascular approach

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) cannot be considered an isolated disease. Patients with AF should be managed using a comprehensive approach that is not limited to stroke prevention.

AREAS COVERED

In this manuscript, the potential role of AF as a vascular disease that is managed as part of a holistic approach was reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

The residual risk of stroke in patients with AF reaches 1-2% annually, despite appropriate anticoagulation therapy. Additionally, patients with AF may develop cognitive impairment through stroke-independent pathways. Furthermore, patients with AF may have a higher risk of developing atherosclerotic vascular disease in various vascular beds and chronic kidney disease; conversely, patients with atherosclerotic disease may have an increased risk of developing AF. AF should be considered a truly systemic vascular disease, since it brings together several hemodynamic and systemic changes, including inflammation, oxidative stress, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic systems, as well as a prothrombotic state and endothelial dysfunction. In this regard, patients with AF should be treated based on a holistic approach that is not limited to oral anticoagulation but includes complete vascular protection.

Another possible determinant for ischemic stroke with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation other than conventional oral anticoagulant treatment: The relationship between whole blood viscosity and stroke☆

OBJECTIVES

Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) still experience ischemic stroke despite recommended medications and this could be the consequence of increased whole blood viscosity (WBV). We evaluated the predictive value of WBV for stroke in patients with NVFA despite receiving oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy.

METHODS

One thousand and forty-three NVAF patients on OAC medication were followed up for median 36.13 ± 18.31 months. WBV was calculated according to the validated de Simone's formula.

RESULTS

WBV was significantly higher in stroke group when compared to non-stroke group at both low shear rate (LSR) and high shear rate (HSR). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated an independent association between WBV and stroke when adjusted for other risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

WBV appears to be a profitable predictor of ischemic stroke in patients with NVAF receiving OAC.