Interventions targeting LGBTQIA+ populations to advance health equity

Barriers and Nursing Strategies in Oncology Care for LGBTQIA+ People: A Scoping Review

LGBTQIA+ individuals with cancer face significant challenges in their interactions with nurses, which can negatively affect the quality of care, treatment adherence, and access to healthcare. Barriers such as implicit biases, discrimination, and inadequate communication skills contribute to these disparities, alongside a lack of nursing education on gender and sexual diversity. Despite the recognized role of nurses in reducing health inequalities, knowledge about effective strategies to overcome these barriers remains fragmented. This scoping review aims to identify and categorize the main barriers affecting the nurse-patient relationship in oncology and to explore evidence-based nursing interventions that promote equitable and inclusive care. A systematic literature search was conducted between January and February 2025 in PUBMED, SCOPUS, and Web of Science, including studies published in the last 10 years. Study management was performed using Zotero (version 6.0.30), and quality assessment was conducted with the JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. Two independent reviewers screened the studies, resolving discrepancies through discussion and consensus. This review follows the PRISMA-ScR checklist and the JBI scoping review methodology. The findings will provide insights into the primary barriers, highlight effective nursing interventions, and identify gaps in education and clinical guidelines, contributing to the development of more inclusive oncology care practices.

LGBTQIA+ cultural competency in healthcare education programs: A scoping review

AIM/OBJECTIVE

To explore and summarise existing literature concerning strategies for increasing LGBTQIA+ cultural and clinical competency in healthcare education programs.

BACKGROUND

Cultural and systemic changes in countries are needed to address the pervasive health disparities facing the LGBTQIA+ population. Understanding current global LGBTQIA+ content in education programs is pivotal for informing future curriculum development and producing culturally competent clinicians who can then undertake the creation clinical competency standards.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

METHODS

CINAHL, Ovid, Clinical key, Medline and PubMed were searched between October 2023 and August 2024. The review followed the JBI critical appraisal tools and methodological approach to scoping reviews.

RESULTS

Twenty-five papers met eligibility criteria. Four themes emerged: (i) Significant Gains in Knowledge and Cultural Competency through LGBTQIA+ Training, (ii) Identified Gaps and the Need for Standardisation in LGBTQIA+ Healthcare Education (iii) The Role of Faculty Development and Community Engagement in Effective LGBTQIA+ Curriculum Integration and (iv) Addressing Intersecting Identities and Health Disparities for LGBTQIA+ Populations.

CONCLUSION

The presence of gaps in training, particularly concerning gender identity and intersectionality, highlights the need for standardised curricula and faculty development.

Considering the interconnected nature of social identities in neuroimaging research

Considerable heterogeneity exists in the expression of complex human behaviors across the cognitive, personality and mental health domains. It is increasingly evident that individual variability in behavioral expression is substantially affected by sociodemographic factors that often interact with life experiences. Here, we formally address the urgent need to incorporate intersectional identities in neuroimaging studies of behavior, with a focus on research in mental health. We highlight how diverse sociodemographic factors influence the study of psychiatric conditions, focusing on how interactions between those factors might contribute to brain biology and illness expression, including prevalence, symptom burden, help seeking, treatment response and tolerance, and relapse and remission. We conclude with a discussion of the considerations and actionable items related to participant recruitment, data acquisition and data analysis to facilitate the inclusion and incorporation of diverse intersectional identities in neuroimaging.

Who needs education on LGBTQIA+ healthcare inclusion?

The topic of education on healthcare needs and equity of care for LGBTQIA+ populations is an extremely current issue. There is a demand for education on these topics not only from medical and other health sciences students but also from established healthcare professionals. Given this widespread educational deficiency, it is natural to ask whether the teaching class is prepared to satisfy these requests or in turn needs training on these issues and above all whether it is capable of transmitting attention and sensitivity on the issues of inclusion and equality in needs of healthcare.

24-Hour Movement Behaviors of LGBTQA+ Young People: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The movement behaviors of LGBTQA+ young people, who encounter specific health, and other, challenges are not well understood. This systematic review examines the 24-hour movement behaviors of LGBTQA+ young people compared with population estimates of meeting the 24-hour movement guidelines.

METHODS

Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to January 2024. Observational studies published in English and reporting quantitative data for physical activity, sedentary behavior, or sleep duration for LGBTQA+ individuals <24 years old were included. Data were narratively synthesized for children/adolescents (<18 years) and young adults (18-24 years), guided by the Cochrane Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies were included; 46 were of "fair" quality and 37 were conducted in the United States. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep outcomes were reported in 46, 11, and 14 studies, respectively. Ninety unique LGBTQA+ terms were identified. Based on outcomes reported in ≥1 study, and compared to population estimates, LGBTQA+ young people were less likely to meet aerobic physical activity and strength/resistance training guidelines. LGBTQA+ children/adolescents were less likely to meet the sleep guidelines. Young adults demonstrated similar adherence to sleep guidelines as population estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our results suggest that LGBTQA+ young people have suboptimal 24-hour movement behaviors; in some cases, worse than population estimates. Utilization of more robust measures of exposure and outcome variables is recommended, with a focus on sleep and sedentary behavior.