6-Methylpurine derived sugar modified nucleosides: Synthesis and in vivo antitumor activity in D54 tumor expressing M64V-Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase

Single tryptophan Y160W mutant of homooligomeric E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase implies that dimers forming the hexamer are functionally not equivalent

E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase is a homohexamer, which structure, in the apo form, can be described as a trimer of dimers. Earlier studies suggested that ligand binding and kinetic properties are well described by two binding constants and two sets of kinetic constants. However, most of the crystal structures of this enzyme complexes with ligands do not hold the three-fold symmetry, but only two-fold symmetry, as one of the three dimers is different (both active sites in the open conformation) from the other two (one active site in the open and one in the closed conformation). Our recent detailed studies conducted over broad ligand concentration range suggest that protein–ligand complex formation in solution actually deviates from the two-binding-site model. To reveal the details of interactions present in the hexameric molecule we have engineered a single tryptophan Y160W mutant, responding with substantial intrinsic fluorescence change upon ligand binding. By observing various physical properties of the protein and its various complexes with substrate and substrate analogues we have shown that indeed three-binding-site model is necessary to properly describe binding of ligands by both the wild type enzyme and the Y160W mutant. Thus we have pointed out that a symmetrical dimer with both active sites in the open conformation is not forced to adopt this conformation by interactions in the crystal, but most probably the dimers forming the hexamer in solution are not equivalent as well. This, in turn, implies that an allosteric cooperation occurs not only within a dimer, but also among all three dimers forming a hexameric molecule.

Synthesis of 9-(6-Deoxy-α-L-Talofuranosyl)-6-Methylpurine and 9-(6-Deoxy-β-D-Allofuranosyl)-6-Methylpurine Nucleosides

6-Methylpurine (MeP) is a cytotoxic adenine analog that does not exhibit selectivity when administered systemically and could be very useful in a gene therapy approach to cancer treatment involving Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP). 9-(6-Deoxy-β-D-allofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine [methyl(allo)-MePR, 18] and 9-(6-deoxy-α-L-talofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine [methyl(talo)-MePR, 21] were synthesized as potential prodrugs for MeP in the E. coli PNP/prodrug cancer gene therapy approach. The detailed syntheses of [methyl(allo)-MePR] and [methyl(talo)-MePR] are described. The glycosyl donors, 1,2-di-O-acetyl-3,5-di-O-benzyl-α-D-allofuranose (12) and 1-O-acetyl-3-O-benzyl-2,5-di-O-benzoyl-α-L-talofuranose (16) were prepared from 1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-α-D-glucofuranose (4) in nine and eleven steps, respectively. Vorbrüggen coupling of the latter glycosyl donors with 6-methylpurine (3), followed by deprotection of the sugar hydroxyl groups, gave the title compounds in good overall yields. © 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of 6-methylpurine Basic Protocol 2: Preparation of the D-allofuranose derivative (12) Basic Protocol 3: Preparation of 6-deoxy-α-L-talofuranoside Basic Protocol 4: Preparation of methyl(allo)-MePR (18) Basic Protocol 5: Preparation of methyl(talo)-MePR (21).

Use of E. coli Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase in the Treatment of Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

The selective expression of non-human genes in tumor tissue to activate non-toxic compounds (Gene Directed Prodrug Enzyme Therapy, GDEPT) is a novel strategy designed for killing tumor cells in patients with little or no systemic toxicity. Numerous non-human genes have been evaluated, but none have yet been successful in the clinic.

METHODS

Unlike human purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), E. coli PNP accepts adenine containing nucleosides as substrates, and is therefore able to selectively activate non-toxic purine analogs in tumor tissue. Various in vitro and in vivo assays have been utilized to evaluate E. coli PNP as a potential activating enzyme.

RESULTS

We and others have demonstrated excellent in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity with various GDEPT strategies utilizing E. coli PNP to activate purine nucleoside analogs. A phase I clinical trial utilizing recombinant adenoviral vector for delivery of E. coli PNP to solid tumors followed by systemic administration of fludarabine phosphate (NCT01310179; IND# 14271) has recently been completed. In this trial, significant anti-tumor activity was demonstrated with negligible toxicity related to the therapy. The mechanism of cell kill (inhibition of RNA and protein synthesis) is distinct from all currently used anticancer drugs and all experimental compounds under development. The approach has demonstrated excellent ability to kill neighboring tumor cells that do not express E. coli PNP, is active against non-proliferating and proliferating tumors cells (as well as tumor stem cells, stroma), and is therefore very effective against solid tumors with a low growth fraction.

CONCLUSION

The unique attributes distinguish this approach from other GDEPT strategies and are precisely those required to mediate significant improvements in antitumor therapy.

6-Methylpurine derived sugar modified nucleosides: Synthesis and evaluation of their substrate activity with purine nucleoside phosphorylases

6-Methylpurine (MeP) is cytotoxic adenine analog that does not exhibit selectivity when administered systemically, and could be very useful in a gene therapy approach to cancer treatment involving Escherichia coli PNP. The prototype MeP releasing prodrug, 9-(β-d-ribofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine, MeP-dR has demonstrated good activity against tumors expressing E. coli PNP, but its antitumor activity is limited due to toxicity resulting from the generation of MeP from gut bacteria. Therefore, we have embarked on a medicinal chemistry program to identify non-toxic MeP prodrugs that could be used in conjunction with E. coli PNP. In this work, we report on the synthesis of 9-(6-deoxy-β-d-allofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine (3) and 9-(6-deoxy-5-C-methyl-β-d-ribo-hexofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine (4), and the evaluation of their substrate activity with several phosphorylases. The glycosyl donors; 1,2-di-O-acetyl-3,5-di-O-benzyl-α-d-allofuranose (10) and 1-O-acetyl-3-O-benzyl-2,5-di-O-benzoyl-6-deoxy-5-C-methyl-β-d-ribohexofuran-ose (15) were prepared from 1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropylidine-α-d-glucofuranose in 9 and 11 steps, respectively. Coupling of 10 and 15 with silylated 6-methylpurine under Vorbrüggen glycosylation conditions followed conventional deprotection of the hydroxyl groups furnished 5'-C-methylated-6-methylpurine nucleosides 3 and 4, respectively. Unlike 9-(6-deoxy-α-l-talo-furanosyl)-6-methylpurine, which showed good substrate activity with E. coli PNP mutant (M64V), the β-d-allo-furanosyl derivative 3 and the 5'-di-C-methyl derivative 4 were poor substrates for all tested glycosidic bond cleavage enzymes.