Congenital hyperinsulinism due to mutations in HNF1A

Neonatal hypoglycaemia in the offsprings of parents with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)

INTRODUCTION

Neonatal hypoglycaemia is the most common metabolic disorder of various causes, relatively rare being MODY (Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young).

CONTENT

Data search of relevant articles focused on hypoglycaemia in carriers of selected MODY gene mutations published from 2007 to 2022 was performed in databases Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane and UptoDate based on key words: 'hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia', 'congenital hyperinsulinism', 'MODY', 'HNF4A mutation', 'HNF1A mutation'.

SUMMARY

Loss of function of HNF4A and HNF1A genes comprises approximately to 5.9 % of diazoxide responsive hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia, which may appear in 15 % HNF4A mutation carriers. A typical finding of HNF4A mutation carriers with neonatal hypoglycaemia was a birth weight above 4000 g or above 97th percentile.

OUTLOOK

Although mutations in MODY genes represent a rare cause of neonatal hypoglycaemia, they should be considered in the differential diagnosis, particularly in cases of persistent hypoglycaemia requiring intensive care.

Monogenic Diabetes: A Comprehensive Overview and Therapeutic Management of Subtypes of Mody

BACKGROUND

Monogenic diabetes often occurs as a result of single-gene mutations. The illness is minimally affected by environmental and behavioral factors, and it constitutes around one to five percent of all cases of diabetes.

METHODS

Newborn diabetes mellitus (NDM) and maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) are the predominant causes of monogenic diabetes, accounting for a larger proportion of cases, while syndromic diabetes represents a smaller percentage. MODY, a group of inherited non-autoimmune diabetes mellitus disorders, is quite common. However, it remains frequently misdiagnosed despite increasing public awareness. The condition is characterized by insulin resistance, the development of diabetes at a young age (before 25 years), mild high blood sugar levels, inheritance in an autosomal dominant pattern, and the preservation of natural insulin production.

RESULTS

Currently, there are 14 distinct subtypes of MODY that have been identified. Each subtype possesses distinct characteristics in terms of their frequency, clinical symptoms, severity of diabetes, related complications, and response to medicinal interventions. Due to the clinical similarities, lack of awareness, and high expense of genetic testing, distinguishing between type I (T1D) and type II diabetes mellitus (T2D) can be challenging, resulting in misdiagnosis of this type of diabetes. As a consequence, a significant number of individuals are being deprived of adequate medical attention. Accurate diagnosis enables the utilization of novel therapeutic strategies and enhances the management of therapy in comparison to type II and type I diabetes.

CONCLUSION

This article offers a concise overview of the clinical subtypes and characteristics of monogenic diabetes. Furthermore, this article discusses the various subtypes of MODY, as well as the process of diagnosing, managing, and treating the condition. It also addresses the difficulties encountered in detecting and treating MODY.

Case report: A novel HNF1A variant linked to gestational diabetes, congenital hyperinsulinism, and diazoxide hypersensitivity

Diazoxide (DZX) remains the first-line medication for the treatment of prolonged and persistent forms of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (HH). In nearly 40%-50% of cases of HH, the genetic mechanism is unidentified. Almost half of the infants with permanent or genetic causes are DZX sensitive, but hypersensitivity to DZX is extremely rare, and the mechanism is poorly understood. Here, we report for the first time a case of DZX hypersensitivity in a neonate with HH who inherited a novel HNF1A variant from the mother. A term, male large-for-gestational-age infant of a diabetic mother presented with early onset of severe, recurrent hypoglycemia. Critical blood samples when hypoglycemic confirmed HH. Diazoxide was initiated at conventional doses of 5 mg/kg/day, which resulted in hyperglycemia (blood glucose, 16.6 mmol/L) within 48 h. Glucose infusion was rapidly weaned off. DZX was withheld and eventually stopped. Following 3 days of milk feeds alone with a normal glucose profile, suspecting a resolution of HH, he underwent a 6-h fasting study and passed. While on glucose monitoring in the hospital, he again developed hypoglycemic episodes, and the critical blood samples confirmed HH. DZX was restarted at a lower dose of 3 mg/kg/day, which required further down-titration to 0.7 mg/kg/day before steady euglycemia was obtained. No more episodes of hypo- or hyperglycemia occurred, and he passed a safety fasting study before discharge. Molecular genetic testing identified a novel HNF1A mutation in the mother-child dyad, whereas the father tested negative. We concluded that the HH phenotype due to this novel HNF1A mutation can be mutation specific and require a very low dose of DZX. Clinicians should observe closely for the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state while initiating DZX therapy.

Molecular mechanism of HNF-1A-mediated HNF4A gene regulation and promoter-driven HNF4A-MODY diabetes

Monogenic diabetes is a gateway to precision medicine through molecular mechanistic insight. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1A (HNF-1A) and HNF-4A are transcription factors that engage in crossregulatory gene transcription networks to maintain glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic β cells. Variants in the HNF1A and HNF4A genes are associated with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Here, we explored 4 variants in the P2-HNF4A promoter region: 3 in the HNF-1A binding site and 1 close to the site, which were identified in 63 individuals from 21 families of different MODY disease registries across Europe. Our goal was to study the disease causality for these variants and to investigate diabetes mechanisms on the molecular level. We solved a crystal structure of HNF-1A bound to the P2-HNF4A promoter and established a set of techniques to probe HNF-1A binding and transcriptional activity toward different promoter variants. We used isothermal titration calorimetry, biolayer interferometry, x-ray crystallography, and transactivation assays, which revealed changes in HNF-1A binding or transcriptional activities for all 4 P2-HNF4A variants. Our results suggest distinct disease mechanisms of the promoter variants, which can be correlated with clinical phenotype, such as age of diagnosis of diabetes, and be important tools for clinical utility in precision medicine.

How do I diagnose Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young in my patients?

Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) is a monogenic form of diabetes diagnosed in young individuals that lack the typical features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The genetic subtype of MODY determines the most effective treatment and this is the driver for MODY genetic testing in diabetes populations. Despite the obvious clinical and health economic benefits, MODY is significantly underdiagnosed with the majority of patients being inappropriately managed as having type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Low detection rates result from the difficulty in identifying patients with a likely diagnosis of MODY from the high background population of young onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes, compounded by the lack of MODY awareness and education in diabetes care physicians. MODY diagnosis can be improved through (1) access to education and training, (2) the use of sensitive and specific selection criteria based on accurate prediction models and biomarkers to identify patients for testing, (3) the development and mainstream implementation of simple criteria-based selection pathways applicable across a range of healthcare settings and ethnicities to select the most appropriate patients for genetic testing and (4) the correct use of next generation sequencing technology to provide accurate and comprehensive testing of all known MODY and monogenic diabetes genes. The creation and public sharing of educational materials, clinical and scientific best practice guidelines and genetic variants will help identify the missing patients so they can benefit from the more effective clinical care that a genetic diagnosis brings.

Report of Prolonged Neonatal Hypoglycemia in Three Infants of Mothers With Variants in HNF1A

Background/Objective

Genetic variants in hepatic nuclear factor 1α (HNF1A) cause maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). We sought to examine whether HNF1A MODY variants also cause neonatal hypoglycemia.

Case Report

We present 3 infants with variants in HNF1A shared with their mothers. The infants experienced neonatal hypoglycemia, 2 extending beyond 1 year and the third resolving by 28 days, and all were large for gestational age (birth weights of >99th percentile). In 2 cases, genetic testing for neonatal hypoglycemia revealed pathogenic variants in HNF1A; 1 mother was previously diagnosed with HNF1A MODY, and the other's genetic testing and ultimate MODY diagnosis were prompted by her child's hypoglycemia workup. In the third case, the infant's persistent hypoglycemia prompted genetic testing, revealing an HNF1A variant of uncertain significance, which was then identified in the mother.

Discussion

Genetic variants causing HNF1A MODY have not been definitively linked to neonatal hypoglycemia or fetal overgrowth in utero. MODY caused by HNF1A is clinically similar to that caused by HNF4A, for which a causal relationship with neonatal hypoglycemia is more certain. Case reports have previously implicated variants in HNF1A in congenital hyperinsulinism; however, these cases have generally not been in families with MODY. The cases presented here suggest that HNF1A variants causing MODY may also cause neonatal hypoglycemia.

Conclusion

Although confounding factors make the assessment of neonatal hypoglycemia challenging, these cases offer potential support for single genetic variants in HNF1A causing both MODY and neonatal hypoglycemia, with associated fetal overgrowth in utero.

Monogenic diabetes mellitus and clinical implications of genetic diagnosis

Monogenic diabetes mellitus, which is diabetes caused by a defect in a single gene that is associated with β cell function or insulin action, accounts for 1% to 6% of all pediatric diabetes cases. Accurate diagnosis is important, as the effective treatment differs according to genetic etiology in some types of monogenic diabetes: high-dose sulfonylurea treatment in neonatal diabetes caused by activating mutations in KCNJ11 or ABCC8; low-dose sulfonylurea treatment in HNF1A/HNF4A-diabetes; and no treatment in GCK diabetes. Monogenic diabetes should be suspected by clinicians for certain combinations of clinical features and laboratory results, and approximately 80% of monogenic diabetes cases are misdiagnosed as type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes. Here, we outline the types of monogenic diabetes and the clinical implications of genetic diagnosis.

Monogenic diabetes: a gateway to precision medicine in diabetes

Monogenic diabetes refers to diabetes mellitus (DM) caused by a mutation in a single gene and accounts for approximately 1%-5% of diabetes. Correct diagnosis is clinically critical for certain types of monogenic diabetes, since the appropriate treatment is determined by the etiology of the disease (e.g., oral sulfonylurea treatment of HNF1A/HNF4A-diabetes vs. insulin injections in type 1 diabetes). However, achieving a correct diagnosis requires genetic testing, and the overlapping of the clinical features of monogenic diabetes with those of type 1 and type 2 diabetes has frequently led to misdiagnosis. Improvements in sequencing technology are increasing opportunities to diagnose monogenic diabetes, but challenges remain. In this Review, we describe the types of monogenic diabetes, including common and uncommon types of maturity-onset diabetes of the young, multiple causes of neonatal DM, and syndromic diabetes such as Wolfram syndrome and lipodystrophy. We also review methods of prioritizing patients undergoing genetic testing, and highlight existing challenges facing sequence data interpretation that can be addressed by forming collaborations of expertise and by pooling cases.