Dosimetric effect by shallow air cavities in high energy electron beams

Investigating the Effect of Air Cavities of Sinuses on the Radiotherapy Dose Distribution Using Monte Carlo Method

BACKGROUND

Considering that some vital organs exist in the head and neck region, the treatment of tumors in this area is a crucial task. The existence of air cavities, namely sinuses, disrupt the radiotherapy dose distribution. The study aims to analyze the effect of maxillary, frontal, ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses on radiotherapy dose distribution by Monte Carlo method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In order to analyze the effect of the cavities on dose distribution, the maxillary, frontal, ethmoid and sphenoid sinus cavities were simulated with (3×3.2×2) cm³, (2×2×3.2) cm³, (1×1×1.2) cm³ and (1×1×2) cm³ dimensions.

RESULTS

In the analysis of the dose distribution caused by cavities, some parameters were observed, including: inhomogeneity of dose distribution in the cavities, inhomogeneity of dose on the edges of the air cavities and dispersion of the radiations after the air cavity. The amount of the dose in various situations showed differences: before the cavity a 0.64% and a 2.76% decrease, a 12.06% and a 17.17% decrease in the air zone, and a 2.25% and a 5.9% increase after the cavity.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that a drop in dose before the air cavities and in the air zone occurs due to the lack of scattered radiation. Furthermore, the rise in dose was due to the passage of more radiation from the air cavity and dose deposition after the air cavity. The changes in dose distribution are dependent on the cavity size and depth. As a result, this has to be noted in the treatment planning and MU calculations of the patient.

Evaluation of dose calculations with inhomogeneity correction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophagus cancer

BACKGROUND

Differences often exist in the dose calculation accuracy caused by using different dose calculation algorithms in non-uniform tissues.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of dose calculation with inhomogeneity correction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by comparing dose calculated in Monaco with measurements in lung-chest phantom for esophagus cancer treatments.

METHODS

Finite size pencil beam (FSPB) and X-ray voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) were used respectively for IMRT dose recalculations. Ten IMRT plans were recalculated and measured in the chest-lung phantom. The dose measurements using the Gafchromic ® (EBT3) dosimetry films were validated with open fields in the interfaces of materials with various physical densities. The accuracy of dose calculations was then evaluated by both point dose comparison and Gamma analysis against the film measurements.

RESULTS

For regular open fields, the discrepancies of the point doses were less than 3.0% and 2.0% between measurement and calculations by FSPB and XVMC, respectively. For 6 MV IMRT plans, the average passing rates based on 3% /3 mm Gamma criteria were 82.8±1.0% and 96.4±0.7% for FSPB and XVMC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The XVMC algorithms more accurate in IMRT dose calculations with inhomogeneity correction for esophagus cancer.

An assessment on the use of RadCalc to verify Raystation Electron Monte Carlo plans

Large differences in monitor units have been observed when RadCalc, a pencil-beam-algorithm based software, is used to verify clinical electron plans from Raystation, a Monte-Carlo-algorithm based planning system. To investigate the problem, a number of clinical plans as well as test plans were created and calculated in both systems, with the resultant monitor units compared. The results revealed that differences between the two systems are significant when the geometry includes inhomogeneities and curved surfaces. The RadCalc pencil-beam-algorithm fails to handle such complexities, particularly in the presence of surface curvature. The error is not negligible and cannot be easily corrected for. It is concluded that RadCalc is not adequate to verify electron Monte Carlo plans from Raystation when complex geometry is involved and alternative methods should be developed.