1
|
Prezado Y, Grams M, Jouglar E, Martínez-Rovira I, Ortiz R, Seco J, Chang S. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10TR02. [PMID: 38648789 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, E-15706, Spain
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Michael Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Emmanuel Jouglar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology, F-75005, Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, E-08193, Cerdanyola del Valle`s (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States of America
| | - Joao Seco
- Division of Biomedical physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sha Chang
- Dept of Radiation Oncology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, United States of America
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolin State University, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martello SE, Xia J, Kusunose J, Hacker BC, Mayeaux MA, Lin EJ, Hawkes A, Singh A, Caskey CF, Rafat M. Ultrasound Imaging Enables Longitudinal Tracking of Vascular Changes that Correlate with Immune Response After Radiotherapy. bioRxiv 2024:2023.08.04.552076. [PMID: 37577718 PMCID: PMC10418282 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.04.552076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Background While immunotherapy shows great promise in patients with triple negative breast cancer, many will not respond to treatment. Radiotherapy has the potential to prime the tumor-immune microenvironment for immunotherapy. However, predicting response is difficult due to tumor heterogeneity across patients, which necessitates personalized medicine strategies that incorporate tumor tracking into the therapeutic approach. Here, we investigated the use of ultrasound (US) imaging of the tumor vasculature to monitor the tumor response to treatment. Methods We utilized ultrafast power doppler US to longitudinally track the vascular response to radiotherapy. We used 4T1 (metastatic) and 67NR (non-metastatic) breast cancer models to determine if US measurements corroborate conventional histological analysis of tumor vessels. To evaluate the effects of radiation, tumor volume and vascular index were calculated using US, and the correlation between vascular changes and immune cell infiltration was determined. Results US tumor measurements and the quantified vascular response to radiation were confirmed with caliper measurements and immunohistochemistry staining, respectively, demonstrating a proof-of-principle method for non-invasive vascular monitoring. Additionally, we found significant infiltration of CD8 + T cells into irradiated tumors 10 days after radiation, which followed a sustained decline in vascular index and an increase in splenic CD8 + T cells that was first observed 1 day post-radiation. Conclusions Our findings reveal that ultrafast power doppler US can evaluate changes in tumor vasculature that are indicative of shifts in the tumor-immune microenvironment. This work may lead to improved patient outcomes through observing and predicting response to therapy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Reaz F, Traneus E, Bassler N. Tuning spatially fractionated radiotherapy dose profiles using the moiré effect. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8468. [PMID: 38605022 PMCID: PMC11009409 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55104-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (SFRT) has demonstrated promising potential in cancer treatment, combining the advantages of reduced post-radiation effects and enhanced local control rates. Within this paradigm, proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) was suggested as a new treatment modality, possibly producing superior normal tissue sparing to conventional proton therapy, leading to improvements in patient outcomes. However, an effective and convenient beam generation method for pMBRT, capable of implementing various optimum dose profiles, is essential for its real-world application. Our study investigates the potential of utilizing the moiré effect in a dual collimator system (DCS) to generate pMBRT dose profiles with the flexibility to modify the center-to-center distance (CTC) of the dose distribution in a technically simple way.We employ the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations tool to demonstrate that the angle between the two collimators of a DCS can significantly impact the dose profile. Varying the DCS angle from 10∘ to 50∘ we could cover CTC ranging from 11.8 mm to 2.4 mm, respectively. Further investigations reveal the substantial influence of the multi-slit collimator's (MSC) physical parameters on the spatially fractionated dose profile, such as period (CTC), throughput, and spacing between MSCs. These findings highlight opportunities for precision dose profile adjustments tailored to specific clinical scenarios.The DCS capacity for rapid angle adjustments during the energy transition stages of a spot scanning system can facilitate dynamic alterations in the irradiation profile, enhancing dose contrast in normal tissues. Furthermore, its unique attribute of spatially fractionated doses in both lateral directions could potentially improve normal tissue sparing by minimizing irradiated volume. Beyond the realm of pMBRT, the dual MSC system exhibits remarkable versatility, showing compatibility with different types of beams (X-rays and electrons) and applicability across various SFRT modalities.Our study illuminates the dual MSC system's potential as an efficient and adaptable tool in the refinement of pMBRT techniques. By enabling meticulous control over irradiation profiles, this system may expedite advancements in clinical and experimental applications, thereby contributing to the evolution of SFRT strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fardous Reaz
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | | | - Niels Bassler
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eling L, Verry C, Balosso J, Flandin I, Kefs S, Bouchet A, Adam JF, Laissue JA, Serduc R. Neurologic Changes Induced by Whole-Brain Synchrotron Microbeam Irradiation: 10-Month Behavioral and Veterinary Follow-Up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00372-9. [PMID: 38462014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Novel radiation therapy approaches have increased the therapeutic efficacy for malignant brain tumors over the past decades, but the balance between therapeutic gain and radiotoxicity remains a medical hardship. Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy, an innovative technique, deposes extremely high (peak) doses in micron-wide, parallel microbeam paths, whereas the diffusing interbeam (valley) doses lie in the range of conventional radiation therapy doses. In this study, we evaluated normal tissue toxicity of whole-brain microbeam irradiation (MBI) versus that of a conventional hospital broad beam (hBB). METHODS AND MATERIALS Normal Fischer rats (n = 6-7/group) were irradiated with one of the two modalities, exposing the entire brain to MBI valley/peak doses of 0/0, 5/200, 10/400, 13/520, 17/680, or 25/1000 Gy or to hBB doses of 7, 10, 13, 17, or 25 Gy. Two additional groups of rats received an MBI valley dose of 10 Gy coupled with an hBB dose of 7 or 15 Gy (groups MBI17* and MBI25*). Behavioral parameters were evaluated for 10 months after irradiation combined with veterinary observations. RESULTS MBI peak doses of ≥680 Gy caused acute toxicity and death. Animals exposed to hBB or MBI dose-dependently gained less weight than controls; rats in the hBB25 and MBI25* groups died within 6 months after irradiation. Increasing doses of MBI caused hyperactivity but no other detectable behavioral alterations in our tests. Importantly, no health concerns were seen up to an MBI valley dose of 17 Gy. CONCLUSIONS While acute toxicity of microbeam exposures depends on very high peak doses, late toxicity mainly relates to delivery of high MBI valley doses. MBI seems to have a low impact on normal rat behavior, but further tests are warranted to fully explore this hypothesis. However, high peak and valley doses are well tolerated from a veterinary point of view. This normal tissue tolerance to whole-brain, high-dose MBI reveals a promising avenue for microbeam radiation therapy, that is, therapeutic applications of microbeams that are poised for translation to a clinical environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Eling
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UA7 Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, France.
| | - Camille Verry
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Maquis du Grésivaudan, La Tronche, France
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Maquis du Grésivaudan, La Tronche, France
| | - Isabelle Flandin
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Maquis du Grésivaudan, La Tronche, France
| | - Samy Kefs
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Maquis du Grésivaudan, La Tronche, France
| | - Audrey Bouchet
- INSERM U1296, Radiation: Defense, Health, Environment, Lyon, France
| | - Jean François Adam
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UA7 Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Maquis du Grésivaudan, La Tronche, France
| | | | - Raphael Serduc
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UA7 Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Maquis du Grésivaudan, La Tronche, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Song CW, Terezakis S, Park WY, Paek SH, Kim MS, Cho LC, Griffin RJ. Preferential Tumor Vascular Damage Is the Common Antitumor Mechanism of High-Dose Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy: SABR, Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy, and FLASH Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:701-704. [PMID: 37196835 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Chang W Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | - Stephanie Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Woo-Yoon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea
| | - Sun-Ha Paek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - L Chinsoo Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Robert J Griffin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Samalens L, Courivaud C, Adam JF, Barbier EL, Serduc R, Depaulis A. Innovative minimally invasive options to treat drug-resistant epilepsies. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023:S0035-3787(23)01038-X. [PMID: 37798162 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite the regular discovery of new molecules, one-third of epileptic patients are resistant to antiepileptic drugs. Only a few can benefit from resective surgery, the current gold standard. Although effective in 50-70% of cases, this therapy remains risky, costly, and can be associated with long-term cognitive or neurological side effects. In addition, patients are increasingly reluctant to have a craniotomy, emphasizing the need for new less invasive therapies for focal drug-resistant epilepsies. Here, we review different minimally invasive approaches already in use in the clinic or under preclinical development to treat drug-resistant epilepsies. Localized thermolesion of the epileptogenic zone has been developed in the clinic using high-frequency thermo-coagulations or magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser or ultrasounds. Although less invasive, they have not yet significantly improved the outcomes when compared with resective surgery. Radiosurgery techniques have been used in the clinic for the last 20years and have proven efficiency. However, their efficacy is not better than resective surgery, and various side effects have been reported as well as the potential risk of sudden unexpected death associated with epilepsy. Recently, a new strategy of radiosurgery has emerged using synchrotron-generated X-ray microbeams: microbeam radiation therapy (MRT). The low divergence and high-flux of the synchrotron beams and the unique tolerance to MRT by healthy brain tissues, allows a precise targeting of specific brain regions with minimal invasiveness and limited behavioral or functional consequences in animals. Antiepileptic effects over several months have been recorded in animal models, and histological and synaptic tracing analysis suggest a reduction of neuronal connectivity as a mechanism of action. The possibility of transferring this approach to epileptic patients is discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Samalens
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, 38000 Grenoble, France; Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm, UA7, STROBE, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - C Courivaud
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - J-F Adam
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm, UA7, STROBE, 38000 Grenoble, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - E L Barbier
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - R Serduc
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm, UA7, STROBE, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - A Depaulis
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, 38000 Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tubin S, Vozenin M, Prezado Y, Durante M, Prise K, Lara P, Greco C, Massaccesi M, Guha C, Wu X, Mohiuddin M, Vestergaard A, Bassler N, Gupta S, Stock M, Timmerman R. Novel unconventional radiotherapy techniques: Current status and future perspectives - Report from the 2nd international radiation oncology online seminar. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100605. [PMID: 36910025 PMCID: PMC9996385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
•Improvement of therapeutic ratio by novel unconventional radiotherapy approaches.•Immunomodulation using high-dose spatially fractionated radiotherapy.•Boosting radiation anti-tumor effects by adding an immune-mediated cell killing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Tubin
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Corresponding author.
| | - M.C. Vozenin
- Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Radiation Oncology Service, Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Y. Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
| | - M. Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, Darmstadt 64291, Germany
- Technsiche Universität Darmstadt, Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - K.M. Prise
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - P.C. Lara
- Canarian Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Roque University Hospital & Fernando Pessoa Canarias University, C/Dolores de la Rocha 9, Las Palmas GC 35001, Spain
| | - C. Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasilia, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal
| | - M. Massaccesi
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C. Guha
- Montefiore Medical Center Radiation Oncology, 111 E 210th St, New York, NY, United States
| | - X. Wu
- Executive Medical Physics Associates, 19470 NE 22nd Road, Miami, FL 33179, United States
| | - M.M. Mohiuddin
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, 4455 Weaver Pkwy, Warrenville, IL 60555, United States
| | - A. Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - N. Bassler
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Gupta
- The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - M. Stock
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
| | - R. Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Inwood Road Dallas, TX 2280, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bertho A, Iturri L, Brisebard E, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Ortiz R, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Lamirault C, Ramasamy G, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. Evaluation of the Role of the Immune System Response After Minibeam Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:426-439. [PMID: 35985455 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an innovative technique that uses a spatial dose modulation. The dose distribution consists of high doses (peaks) in the path of the minibeam and low doses (valleys). The underlying biological mechanism associated with MBRT efficacy remains currently unclear and thus we investigated the potential role of the immune system after treatment with MBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Rats bearing an orthotopic glioblastoma cell line were treated with 1 fraction of high dose conventional radiation therapy (30 Gy) or 1 fraction of the same mean dose in MBRT. Both immunocompetent (F344) and immunodeficient (Nude) rats were analyzed in survival studies. Systemic and intratumoral immune cell population changes were studied with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2 and 7 days after the irradiation. RESULTS The absence of response of Nude rats after MBRT suggested that T cells were key in the mode of action of MBRT. An inflammatory phenotype was observed in the blood 1 week after irradiation compared with conventional irradiation. Tumor immune cell analysis by flow cytometry showed a substantial infiltration of lymphocytes, specifically of CD8 T cells and B cells in both conventional and MBRT-treated animals. IHC revealed that MBRT induced a faster recruitment of CD8 and CD4 T cells. Animals that were cured by radiation therapy did not suffer tumor growth after reimplantation of tumoral cells, proving the long-term immunity response generated after a high dose of radiation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that MBRT can elicit a robust antitumor immune response in glioblastoma while avoiding the high toxicity of a high dose of conventional radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaig Bertho
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
| | - Lorea Iturri
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | | | - Marjorie Juchaux
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Gabriel Ramasamy
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France; Inserm U1288, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Oncologie, Institut Curie, PSL University, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schneider T, Fernandez-Palomo C, Bertho A, Fazzari J, Iturri L, Martin OA, Trappetti V, Djonov V, Prezado Y. Combining FLASH and spatially fractionated radiation therapy: The best of both worlds. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:169-177. [PMID: 35952978 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) and spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) are two new therapeutical strategies that use non-standard dose delivery methods to reduce normal tissue toxicity and increase the therapeutic index. Although likely based on different mechanisms, both FLASH-RT and SFRT have shown to elicit radiobiological effects that significantly differ from those induced by conventional radiotherapy. With the therapeutic potential having been established separately for each technique, the combination of FLASH-RT and SFRT could therefore represent a winning alliance. In this review, we discuss the state of the art, advantages and current limitations, potential synergies, and where a combination of these two techniques could be implemented today or in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | | | - Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Jennifer Fazzari
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lorea Iturri
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Olga A Martin
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Verdiana Trappetti
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jaekel F, Bräuer-Krisch E, Bartzsch S, Laissue J, Blattmann H, Scholz M, Soloviova J, Hildebrandt G, Schültke E. Microbeam Irradiation as a Simultaneously Integrated Boost in a Conventional Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Protocol. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23158319. [PMID: 35955454 PMCID: PMC9368396 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT), an experimental high-dose rate concept with spatial fractionation at the micrometre range, has shown a high therapeutic potential as well as good preservation of normal tissue function in pre-clinical studies. We investigated the suitability of MRT as a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) in conventional whole-brain irradiation (WBRT). A 174 Gy MRT SIB was administered with an array of quasi-parallel, 50 µm wide microbeams spaced at a centre-to-centre distance of 400 µm either on the first or last day of a 5 × 4 Gy radiotherapy schedule in healthy adult C57 BL/6J mice and in F98 glioma cell cultures. The animals were observed for signs of intracranial pressure and focal neurologic signs. Colony counts were conducted in F98 glioma cell cultures. No signs of acute adverse effects were observed in any of the irradiated animals within 3 days after the last irradiation fraction. The tumoricidal effect on F98 cell in vitro was higher when the MRT boost was delivered on the first day of the irradiation course, as opposed to the last day. Therefore, the MRT SIB should be integrated into a clinical radiotherapy schedule as early as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Jaekel
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
| | - Elke Bräuer-Krisch
- Biomedical Beamline ID 17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), 38043 Grenoble, France;
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiooncology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany;
- Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Jean Laissue
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland;
| | | | - Marten Scholz
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
| | - Julia Soloviova
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Centre, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
| | - Elisabeth Schültke
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schneider T. Technical aspects of proton minibeam radiation therapy: Minibeam generation and delivery. Phys Med 2022; 100:64-71. [PMID: 35750002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that combines the normal tissue sparing of sub-millimetric, spatially fractionated beams with the improved ballistics of protons. This may allow a safe dose escalation in the tumour and has already proven to provide a remarkable increase of the therapeutic index for high-grade gliomas in animal experiments. One of the main challenges in pMBRT concerns the generation of minibeams and the implementation in a clinical environment. This article reviews the different approaches for generating minibeams, using mechanical collimators and focussing magnets, and discusses the technical aspects of the implementation and delivery of pMBRT.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim M, Hwang UJ, Park K, Kim D, Kim HS, Choi SH, Jeong JH, Shin D, Lee SB, Kim JY, Kim TH, Baek HJ, Kim H, Kim K, Kim SS, Lim YK. Dose Profile Modulation of Proton Minibeam for Clinical Application. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2888. [PMID: 35740553 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) using multislit collimator (MSC) and scatterers has been proposed to spare healthy tissues and organs on the beam path and beyond the Bragg peak. An MSC that was much thicker than the maximum range of the proton beam could provide a sufficiently high peak-to-valley dose ratio at the patient’s skin, and the scatterers could actively convert the spatially fractionated proton beam to a uniform and broad beam in tumors by changing their thickness. The combination of the MSC and the scatterers can be a good solution for implementing pMBRT in clinical proton therapy facilities. Abstract The feasibility of proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) using a multislit collimator (MSC) and a scattering device was evaluated for clinical use at a clinical proton therapy facility. We fabricated, through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, not only an MSC with a high peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) at the entrance of the proton beam, to prevent radiation toxicity, but also a scattering device to modulate the PVDR in depth. The slit width and center-to-center distance of the diverging MSC were 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm at the large end, respectively, and its thickness and available field size were 100 mm and 76 × 77.5 mm2, respectively. Spatially fractionated dose distributions were measured at various depths using radiochromic EBT3 films and also tested on bacterial cells. MC simulation showed that the thicker the MSC, the higher the PVDR at the phantom surface. Dosimetric evaluations showed that lateral dose profiles varied according to the scatterer’s thickness, and the depths satisfying PVDR = 1.1 moved toward the surface as their thickness increased. The response of the bacterial cells to the proton minibeams’ depth was also established, in a manner similar to the dosimetric pattern. Conclusively, these results strongly suggest that pMBRT can be implemented in clinical centers by using MSC and scatterers.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ortiz R, De Marzi L, Prezado Y. Preclinical dosimetry in proton minibeam radiation therapy: robustness analysis and guidelines. Med Phys 2022; 49:5551-5561. [PMID: 35621386 PMCID: PMC9544651 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy approach that has shown a significant increase in the therapeutic window in glioma‐bearing rats compared to conventional proton therapy. The dosimetry of pMBRT is challenging and error prone due to the submillimetric beamlet sizes used. The aim of this study was to perform a robustness analysis on the setup parameters utilized in current preclinical trials and provide guidelines for reproducible dosimetry. The results of this work are intended to guide upcoming implementations of pMBRT worldwide, as well as pave the way for future clinical implementations. Methods Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data were used to evaluate the impact of variations in setup parameters and uncertainties in collimator specifications on lateral pMBRT dose distributions. The value of each parameter was modified individually to evaluate their effect on dose distributions. Experimental dosimetry was performed by means of high‐resolution detectors, that is, radiochromic films, the IBA Razor and the Microdiamond detector. New guidelines were proposed to optimize the experimental setup in pMBRT studies and perform reproducible dosimetry. Results The sensitivity of dose distributions to uncertainties and variations in setup parameters was quantified. Quantities that define pMBRT lateral profiles (i.e., the peak‐to‐valley dose ratio [PVDR], peak and valley doses, and peak width) are significantly influenced by small‐scale fluctuations in several of those parameters. The setup implemented at the Orsay proton therapy center for pMBRT irradiation was optimized to increase PVDRs and peak symmetry. In addition, we proposed guidelines to perform accurate and reproducible dosimetry in preclinical studies. Conclusions This study revealed the importance of adopting guidelines and protocols tailored to the distinct dose delivery method and dose distributions in pMBRT. This new methodology leads to reproducible dosimetry, which is imperative in preclinical trials. The results and guidelines presented in this manuscript can ease the initiation of pMBRT investigations in other centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, 91898, France.,Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kundapur V, Mayer M, Auer RN, Alexander A, Weibe S, Pushie MJ, Cranmer-Sargison G. Is Mini Beam Ready for Human Trials? Results of Randomized Study of Treating De-Novo Brain Tumors in Canines Using Linear Accelerator Generated Mini Beams. Radiat Res 2022; 198:162-171. [PMID: 35536992 DOI: 10.1667/rade-21-00093.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The main challenge in treating malignant brain neoplasms lies in eradicating the tumor while minimizing treatment-related damage. Conventional radiation treatments are associated with considerable side effects. Synchrotron generated micro-beam radiation (SMBRT) has shown to preserve brain architecture while killing tumor cells, however physical characteristics and limited facility access restrict its use. We have created a new clinical device which produces mini beams on a linear accelerator, to provide a new type of treatment called mini-beam radiation therapy (MBRT). The objective of this study is to compare the treatment outcomes of linear accelerator based MBRT versus standard radiation treatment (SRT), to evaluate the tumor response and the treatment-related changes in the normal brain with respect to each treatment type. Pet dogs with de-novo brain tumors were accrued for treatment. Dogs were randomized between standard fractionated stereotactic (9 Gy in 3 fractions) radiation treatment vs. a single fraction of MBRT (26 Gy mean dose). Dogs were monitored after treatment for clinical assessment and imaging. When the dogs were euthanized, a veterinary pathologist assessed the radiation changes and tumor response. We accrued 16 dogs, 8 dogs in each treatment arm. In the MBRT arm, 71% dogs achieved complete pathological remission. The radiation-related changes were all confined to the target region. Structural damage was not observed in the beam path outside of the target region. In contrast, none of the dogs in control group achieved remission and the treatment related damage was more extensive. Therapeutic superiority was observed with MBRT, including both tumor control and the normal structural preservation. The MBRT findings are suggestive of an immune related mechanism which is absent in standard treatment. These findings together with the widespread availability of clinical linear accelerators make MBRT a promising research topic to explore further treatment and clinical trial opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Kundapur
- Radiation Oncology, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N4H4
| | - M Mayer
- Veterinary Radiation Oncology, Department of Small Animal clinical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 0W8
| | - R N Auer
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 0W8
| | - A Alexander
- Radiation Physics, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N4H4
| | - S Weibe
- Department of Clinical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 0W8
| | - M J Pushie
- Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 0W8
| | - G Cranmer-Sargison
- Radiation Physics, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N4H4
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Keshmiri S, Brocard S, Serduc R, Adam JF. A high resolution dose calculation engine for x-ray microbeams radiation therapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:3999-4017. [PMID: 35342953 PMCID: PMC9322281 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a treatment modality based on spatial fractionation of synchrotron generated x-rays into parallel, high dose, microbeams of a few microns width. MRT is still an under-development radiosurgery technique for which, promising preclinical results on brain tumors and epilepsy encourages its clinical transfer. PURPOSE A safe clinical transfer of MRT needs a specific treatment planning system (TPS) that provides accurate dose calculations in human patients, taking into account the MRT beams properties (high dose gradients, spatial fractionation, polarization effects). So far, the most advanced MRT treatment planning system, based on a hybrid dose calculation algorithm, is limited to a macroscopic rendering of the dose and does not account for the complex dose distribution inherent to MRT if delivered as conformal irradiations with multiple incidences. For overcoming these limitations, a multi-scale full Monte-Carlo calculation engine called penMRT has been developed and benchmarked against two general purpose Monte Carlo codes: penmain based on PENELOPE and Gate based on Geant4. METHODS PenMRT, is based on the PENELOPE (2018) Monte Carlo (MC) code, modified to take into account the voxelized geometry of the patients (CT-scans) and offering an adaptive micrometric dose calculation grid independent to the CT size, location and orientation. The implementation of the dynamic memory allocation in penMRT, makes the simulations feasible within a huge number of dose scoring bins. The possibility of using a source replication approach to simulate arrays of microbeams, and the parallelization using OpenMPI have been added to penMRT in order to increase the calculation speed for clinical usages. This engine can be implemented in a TPS as a dose calculation core. RESULTS The performance tests highlight the reliability of penMRT to be used for complex irradiation conditions in MRT. The benchmarking against a standard PENELOPE code did not show any significant difference for calculations in centimetric beams, for a single microbeam and for a microbeam array. The comparisons between penMRT and Gate as an independent MC code did not show any difference in the beam paths, whereas in valley regions, relative differences between the two codes rank from 1 to 7.5% which are probably due to the differences in physics lists that are used in these two codes. The reliability of the source replication approach has also been tested and validated with an underestimation of no more than 0.6% in low dose areas. CONCLUSIONS Good agreements (a relative difference between 0 to 8%) were found when comparing calculated peak to valley dose ratio (PVDR) values using penMRT, for irradiations with a full microbeam array, with calculated values in the literature. The high-resolution calculated dose maps obtained with penMRT are used to extract differential and cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and analyze treatment plans with much finer metrics regarding the irradiation complexity. To our knowledge, these are the first high-resolution dose maps and associated DVHs ever obtained for cross-fired microbeams irradiation, which is bringing a significant added value to the field of treatment planning in spatially fractionated radiation therapy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sylvan Brocard
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - Raphaël Serduc
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, Grenoble, 38000, France.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - Jean-François Adam
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, Grenoble, 38000, France.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble, 38000, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Moghaddasi L, Reid P, Bezak E, Marcu LG. Radiobiological and Treatment-Related Aspects of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:3366. [PMID: 35328787 PMCID: PMC8954016 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The continuously evolving field of radiotherapy aims to devise and implement techniques that allow for greater tumour control and better sparing of critical organs. Investigations into the complexity of tumour radiobiology confirmed the high heterogeneity of tumours as being responsible for the often poor treatment outcome. Hypoxic subvolumes, a subpopulation of cancer stem cells, as well as the inherent or acquired radioresistance define tumour aggressiveness and metastatic potential, which remain a therapeutic challenge. Non-conventional irradiation techniques, such as spatially fractionated radiotherapy, have been developed to tackle some of these challenges and to offer a high therapeutic index when treating radioresistant tumours. The goal of this article was to highlight the current knowledge on the molecular and radiobiological mechanisms behind spatially fractionated radiotherapy and to present the up-to-date preclinical and clinical evidence towards the therapeutic potential of this technique involving both photon and proton beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leyla Moghaddasi
- Department of Medical Physics, Austin Health, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia;
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia;
| | - Paul Reid
- Radiation Health, Environment Protection Authority, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
| | - Eva Bezak
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia;
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Loredana G. Marcu
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
- Faculty of Informatics and Science, University of Oradea, 1 Universitatii Str., 410087 Oradea, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Johnson TR, Bassil AM, Williams NT, Brundage S, Kent CL, Palmer G, Mowery YM, Oldham M. An investigation of kV mini-GRID spatially fractionated radiation therapy: dosimetry and preclinical trial. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac508c. [PMID: 35100573 PMCID: PMC9167045 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac508c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To develop and characterize novel methods of extreme spatially fractionated kV radiation therapy (including mini-GRID therapy) and to evaluate efficacy in the context of a pre-clinical mouse study.Approach. Spatially fractionated GRIDs were precision-milled from 3 mm thick lead sheets compatible with mounting on a 225 kVp small animal irradiator (X-Rad). Three pencil-beam GRIDs created arrays of 1 mm diameter beams, and three 'bar' GRIDs created 1 × 20 mm rectangular fields. GRIDs projected 20 × 20 mm2fields at isocenter, and beamlets were spaced at 1, 1.25, and 1.5 mm, respectively. Peak-to-valley ratios and dose distributions were evaluated with Gafchromic film. Syngeneic transplant tumors were induced by intramuscular injection of a soft tissue sarcoma cell line into the gastrocnemius muscle of C57BL/6 mice. Tumor-bearing mice were randomized to four groups: unirradiated control, conventional irradiation of entire tumor, GRID therapy, and hemi-irradiation (half-beam block, 50% tumor volume treated). All irradiated mice received a single fraction of 15 Gy.Results. High peak-to-valley ratios were achieved (bar GRIDs: 11.9 ± 0.9, 13.6 ± 0.4, 13.8 ± 0.5; pencil-beam GRIDs: 18.7 ± 0.6, 26.3 ± 1.5, 31.0 ± 3.3). Pencil-beam GRIDs could theoretically spare more intra-tumor immune cells than bar GRIDs, but they treat less tumor tissue (3%-4% versus 19%-23% area receiving 90% prescription, respectively). Bar GRID and hemi-irradiation treatments significantly delayed tumor growth (P < 0.05), but not as much as a conventional treatment (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in tumor growth delay between GRID and hemi-irradiation.Significance. High peak-to-valley ratios were achieved with kV grids: two-to-five times higher than values reported in literature for MV grids. GRID irradiation and hemi-irradiation delayed tumor growth, but neither was as effective as conventional whole tumor uniform dose treatment. Single fraction GRID therapy could not initiate an anti-cancer immune response strong enough to match conventional RT outcomes, but follow-up studies will evaluate the combination of mini-GRID with immune checkpoint blockade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America,Authors to whomany correspondence should be addressed. , and
| | - Alex M Bassil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Nerissa T Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Simon Brundage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Collin L Kent
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Greg Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America,Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America,Authors to whomany correspondence should be addressed. , and
| | - Mark Oldham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America,Authors to whomany correspondence should be addressed. , and
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
AbstractSpatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) challenges some of the classical dogmas in conventional radiotherapy. The highly modulated spatial dose distributions in SFRT have been shown to lead, both in early clinical trials and in small animal experiments, to a significant increase in normal tissue dose tolerances. Tumour control effectiveness is maintained or even enhanced in some configurations as compared with conventional radiotherapy. SFRT seems to activate distinct radiobiological mechanisms, which have been postulated to involve bystander effects, microvascular alterations and/or immunomodulation. Currently, it is unclear which is the dosimetric parameter which correlates the most with both tumour control and normal tissue sparing in SFRT. Additional biological experiments aiming at parametrizing the relationship between the irradiation parameters (beam width, spacing, peak-to-valley dose ratio, peak and valley doses) and the radiobiology are needed. A sound knowledge of the interrelation between the physical parameters in SFRT and the biological response would expand its clinical use, with a higher level of homogenisation in the realisation of clinical trials. This manuscript reviews the state of the art of this promising therapeutic modality, the current radiobiological knowledge and elaborates on future perspectives.
Collapse
|
19
|
Schültke E. Flying rats and microbeam paths crossing: the beauty of international interdisciplinary science. Int J Radiat Biol 2022; 98:466-473. [PMID: 34995153 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.2024293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) is a still experimental radiotherapy approach. Two combined parameters contribute to an excellent normal tissue protection and an improved control of malignant tumors in small animal models, compared to conventional radiotherapy: dose deposition at a high dose rate and spatial fractionation at the micrometre level. The international microbeam research community expects to see clinical MRT trials within the next ten years.Physics-associated research is still widely regarded as a male domain. Thus, the question was asked whether this is reflected in the scientific contributions to the field of microbeam radiotherapy. METHOD A literature search was conducted using Pubmed, Semantic Scholar and other sources to look specifically for female contributors to the field of microbeam radiotherapy development. CONCLUSION The original idea for MRT was patented in 1994 by an all-male research team. In approximately 50% of all publications related to microbeam radiotherapy, however, either the first or the senior author is a woman. The contribution of those women who have been driving the development of both technical and biomedical aspects of MRT in the last two decades is highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Schültke
- Department of Radooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bertho A, Iturri L, Prezado Y. Radiation-induced immune response in novel radiotherapy approaches FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology 2022; 376:37-68. [PMID: 36997269 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The last several years have revealed increasing evidence of the immunomodulatory role of radiation therapy. Radiotherapy reshapes the tumoral microenvironment can shift the balance toward a more immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive microenvironment. The immune response to radiation therapy appears to depend on the irradiation configuration (dose, particle, fractionation) and delivery modes (dose rate, spatial distributions). Although an optimal irradiation configuration (dose, temporal fractionation, spatial dose distribution, etc.) has not yet been determined, temporal schemes employing high doses per fraction appear to favor radiation-induced immune response through immunogenic cell death. Through the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and the sensing of double-stranded DNA and RNA breaks, immunogenic cell death activates the innate and adaptive immune response, leading to tumor infiltration by effector T cells and the abscopal effect. Novel radiotherapy approaches such as FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies (SFRT) strongly modulate the dose delivery method. FLASH-RT and SFRT have the potential to trigger the immune system effectively while preserving healthy surrounding tissues. This manuscript reviews the current state of knowledge on the immunomodulation effects of these two new radiotherapy techniques in the tumor, healthy immune cells and non-targeted regions, as well as their therapeutic potential in combination with immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Prezado Y. Proton minibeam radiation therapy: a promising therapeutic approach for radioresistant tumors. C R Biol 2021; 344:409-420. [DOI: 10.5802/crbiol.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
22
|
Wright MD, Romanelli P, Bravin A, Le Duc G, Brauer-Krisch E, Requardt H, Bartzsch S, Hlushchuk R, Laissue JA, Djonov V. Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Microbeam Radiotherapy Provides Superior Normal Tissue Sparing in Rat Lung Compared to Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy. Cureus 2021; 13:e19317. [PMID: 35223216 PMCID: PMC8864723 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Conventional radiotherapy is a widely used non-invasive form of treatment for many types of cancer. However, due to a low threshold in the lung for radiation-induced normal tissue damage, it is of less utility in treating lung cancer. For this reason, surgery is the preferred treatment for lung cancer, which has the detriment of being highly invasive. Non-conventional ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy is currently of great interest in the radiotherapy community due to demonstrations of reduced normal tissue toxicity in lung and other anatomy. This study investigates the effects of FLASH microbeam radiotherapy, which in addition to ultra-high dose rate incorporates a spatial segmentation of the radiation field, on the normal lung tissue of rats. With a focus on fibrotic damage, this work demonstrates that FLASH microbeam radiotherapy provides an order of magnitude increase in normal tissue radio-resistance compared to FLASH radiotherapy. This result suggests FLASH microbeam radiotherapy holds promise for much improved non-invasive control of lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Wright
- Ginzton Technology Center, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA.,Research & Development Center, Avail Medical Devices, Roseville, USA
| | | | - Alberto Bravin
- Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, FRA
| | - Geraldine Le Duc
- Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, FRA.,Pharmaceutics, NH TherAguix, Lyon, FRA
| | - Elke Brauer-Krisch
- Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, FRA
| | - Herwig Requardt
- Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, FRA
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, DEU.,Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, DEU
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Smyth LML, Crosbie JC, Sloggett C, Rogers PAW, Donoghue JF. Spatially Fractionated X-Ray Microbeams Elicit a More Sustained Immune and Inflammatory Response in the Brainstem than Homogenous Irradiation. Radiat Res 2021; 196:355-365. [PMID: 34270776 DOI: 10.1667/rade-20-00082.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a preclinical irradiation technique which could be used to treat intracranial malignancies. The goal of this work was to discern differences in gene expression and the predicted regulation of molecular pathways in the brainstem after MRT versus synchrotron broad-beam radiation therapy (SBBR). Healthy C57BL/6 mice received whole-head irradiation with median acute toxic doses of MRT (241 Gy peak dose) or SBBR (13 Gy). Brains were harvested 4 and 48 h postirradiation and RNA was extracted from the brainstem. RNA-sequencing was performed to identify differentially expressed genes (false discovery rate < 0.01) relative to nonirradiated controls and significantly regulated molecular pathways and biological functions were identified (Benjamini-Hochberg corrected P < 0.05). Differentially expressed genes and regulated pathways largely reflected a pro-inflammatory response 4 h after both MRT and SBBR which was sustained at 48 h postirradiation for MRT. Pathways relating to radiation-induced viral mimicry, including HMGB1, NF-κB and interferon signaling cascades, were predicted to be uniquely activated by MRT. Local microglia, as well as circulating leukocytes, including T cells, were predicted to be activated by MRT. Our findings affirm that the transcriptomic signature of MRT is distinct from broad-beam radiotherapy, with a sustained inflammatory and immune response up to 48 h postirradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lloyd M L Smyth
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Clare Sloggett
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Peter A W Rogers
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Jacqueline F Donoghue
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jelgersma C, Senger C, Kluge AK, Janas A, Nieminen-Kelhä M, Kremenetskaia I, Mueller S, Brandenburg S, Loebel F, Tinhofer I, Conti A, Budach V, Vajkoczy P, Acker G. Establishment and Validation of CyberKnife Irradiation in a Syngeneic Glioblastoma Mouse Model. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3416. [PMID: 34298631 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides precise high-dose irradiation of intracranial tumors. However, its radiobiological mechanisms are not fully understood. This study aims to establish CyberKnife SRS on an intracranial glioblastoma tumor mouse model and assesses the early radiobiological effects of radiosurgery. Following exposure to a single dose of 20 Gy, the tumor volume was evaluated using MRI scans, whereas cellular proliferation and apoptosis, tumor vasculature, and immune response were evaluated using immunofluorescence staining. The mean tumor volume was significantly reduced by approximately 75% after SRS. The precision of irradiation was verified by the detection of DNA damage consistent with the planned dose distribution. Our study provides a suitable mouse model for reproducible and effective irradiation and further investigation of radiobiological effects and combination therapies of intracranial tumors using CyberKnife. Abstract CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (CK-SRS) precisely delivers radiation to intracranial tumors. However, the underlying radiobiological mechanisms at high single doses are not yet fully understood. Here, we established and evaluated the early radiobiological effects of CK-SRS treatment at a single dose of 20 Gy after 15 days of tumor growth in a syngeneic glioblastoma-mouse model. Exact positioning was ensured using a custom-made, non-invasive, and trackable frame. One superimposed target volume for the CK-SRS planning was created from the fused tumor volumes obtained from MRIs prior to irradiation. Dose calculation and delivery were planned using a single-reference CT scan. Six days after irradiation, tumor volumes were measured using MRI scans, and radiobiological effects were assessed using immunofluorescence staining. We found that CK-SRS treatment reduced tumor volume by approximately 75%, impaired cell proliferation, diminished tumor vasculature, and increased immune response. The accuracy of the delivered dose was demonstrated by staining of DNA double-strand breaks in accordance with the planned dose distribution. Overall, we confirmed that our proposed setup enables the precise irradiation of intracranial tumors in mice using only one reference CT and superimposed MRI volumes. Thus, our proposed mouse model for reproducible CK-SRS can be used to investigate radiobiological effects and develop novel therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
|
25
|
Steel H, Brüningk SC, Box C, Oelfke U, Bartzsch SH. Quantification of Differential Response of Tumour and Normal Cells to Microbeam Radiation in the Absence of FLASH Effects. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3238. [PMID: 34209502 PMCID: PMC8268803 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) is a preclinical method of delivering spatially-fractionated radiotherapy aiming to improve the therapeutic window between normal tissue complication and tumour control. Previously, MRT was limited to ultra-high dose rate synchrotron facilities. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro effects of MRT on tumour and normal cells at conventional dose rates produced by a bench-top X-ray source. Two normal and two tumour cell lines were exposed to homogeneous broad beam (BB) radiation, MRT, or were separately irradiated with peak or valley doses before being mixed. Clonogenic survival was assessed and compared to BB-estimated surviving fractions calculated by the linear-quadratic (LQ)-model. All cell lines showed similar BB sensitivity. BB LQ-model predictions exceeded the survival of cell lines following MRT or mixed beam irradiation. This effect was stronger in tumour compared to normal cell lines. Dose mixing experiments could reproduce MRT survival. We observed a differential response of tumour and normal cells to spatially fractionated irradiations in vitro, indicating increased tumour cell sensitivity. Importantly, this was observed at dose rates precluding the presence of FLASH effects. The LQ-model did not predict cell survival when the cell population received split irradiation doses, indicating that factors other than local dose influenced survival after irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Steel
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK; (C.B.); (U.O.)
| | - Sarah C. Brüningk
- Machine Learning & Computational Biology, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland;
- Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics (SIB), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Carol Box
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK; (C.B.); (U.O.)
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK; (C.B.); (U.O.)
| | - Stefan H. Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany;
- Helmholtz Centre Munich, Institute for Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wala K, Szlasa W, Saczko J, Rudno-Rudzińska J, Kulbacka J. Modulation of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability by Activating Adenosine A2 Receptors in Oncological Treatment. Biomolecules 2021; 11:biom11050633. [PMID: 33923147 PMCID: PMC8146369 DOI: 10.3390/biom11050633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The blood–brain barrier (BBB) plays an important protective role in the central nervous system and maintains its homeostasis. It regulates transport into brain tissue and protects neurons against the toxic effects of substances circulating in the blood. However, in the case of neurological diseases or primary brain tumors, i.e., gliomas, the higher permeability of the blood-derived substances in the brain tissue is necessary. Currently applied methods of treatment for the primary brain neoplasms include surgical removal of the tumor, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Despite the abovementioned treatment methods, the prognosis of primary brain tumors remains bad. Moreover, chemotherapy options seem to be limited due to low drug penetration into the cancerous tissue. Modulation of the blood–brain barrier permeability may contribute to an increase in the concentration of the drug in the CNS and thus increase the effectiveness of therapy. Interestingly, endothelial cells in cerebral vessels are characterized by the presence of adenosine 2A receptors (A2AR). It has been shown that substances affecting these receptors regulate the permeability of the BBB. The mechanism of increasing the BBB permeability by A2AR agonists is the actin-cytoskeletal reorganization and acting on the tight junctions. In this case, the A2AR seems to be a promising therapy target. This article aims to assess the possibility of increasing the BBB permeability through A2AR agonists to increase the effectiveness of chemotherapy and to improve the results of cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamila Wala
- Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Pasteura 1, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland; (K.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Wojciech Szlasa
- Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Pasteura 1, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland; (K.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Jolanta Saczko
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 211A, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland;
| | - Julia Rudno-Rudzińska
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Medical University Hospital, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland;
| | - Julita Kulbacka
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 211A, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-784-06-92
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lamirault C, Brisebard E, Patriarca A, Juchaux M, Crepin D, Labiod D, Pouzoulet F, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Le Dudal M, Hardy D, De Marzi L, Dendale R, Jouvion G, Prezado Y. Spatially Modulated Proton Minibeams Results in the Same Increase of Lifespan as a Uniform Target Dose Coverage in F98-Glioma-Bearing Rats. Radiat Res 2021; 194:715-723. [PMID: 32991712 DOI: 10.1667/rade-19-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new approach in proton radiotherapy, by which a significant increase in the therapeutic index has already been demonstrated in RG2 glioma-bearing rats. In the current study we investigated the response of other types of glioma (F98) and performed a comparative evaluation of tumor control effectiveness by pMBRT (with different levels of dose heterogeneity) versus conventional proton therapy. The results of our study showed an equivalent increase in the lifespan for all evaluated groups (conventional proton irradiation and pMBRT) and no significant differences in the histopathological analysis of the tumors or remaining brain tissue. The reduced long-term toxicity observed with pMBRT in previous evaluations at the same dose suggests a possible use of pMBRT to treat glioma with less side effects while ensuring the same tumor control achieved with standard proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Lamirault
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Elise Brisebard
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Laboratoire d'Histopathologie, VetAgro-Sup, Université de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, Lyon, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Delphine Crepin
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Marine Le Dudal
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Histologie, Embryologie et Anatomie Pathologique, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - David Hardy
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Pathophysiology of Pediatric Genetic Diseases, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, UF Génétique Moléculaire, Paris, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mazal A, Vera Sanchez JA, Sanchez-Parcerisa D, Udias JM, España S, Sanchez-Tembleque V, Fraile LM, Bragado P, Gutierrez-Uzquiza A, Gordillo N, Garcia G, Castro Novais J, Perez Moreno JM, Mayorga Ortiz L, Ilundain Idoate A, Cremades Sendino M, Ares C, Miralbell R, Schreuder N. Biological and Mechanical Synergies to Deal With Proton Therapy Pitfalls: Minibeams, FLASH, Arcs, and Gantryless Rooms. Front Oncol 2021; 10:613669. [PMID: 33585238 PMCID: PMC7874206 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.613669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has advantages and pitfalls comparing with photon therapy in radiation therapy. Among the limitations of protons in clinical practice we can selectively mention: uncertainties in range, lateral penumbra, deposition of higher LET outside the target, entrance dose, dose in the beam path, dose constraints in critical organs close to the target volume, organ movements and cost. In this review, we combine proposals under study to mitigate those pitfalls by using individually or in combination: (a) biological approaches of beam management in time (very high dose rate “FLASH” irradiations in the order of 100 Gy/s) and (b) modulation in space (a combination of mini-beams of millimetric extent), together with mechanical approaches such as (c) rotational techniques (optimized in partial arcs) and, in an effort to reduce cost, (d) gantry-less delivery systems. In some cases, these proposals are synergic (e.g., FLASH and minibeams), in others they are hardly compatible (mini-beam and rotation). Fixed lines have been used in pioneer centers, or for specific indications (ophthalmic, radiosurgery,…), they logically evolved to isocentric gantries. The present proposals to produce fixed lines are somewhat controversial. Rotational techniques, minibeams and FLASH in proton therapy are making their way, with an increasing degree of complexity in these three approaches, but with a high interest in the basic science and clinical communities. All of them must be proven in clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Sanchez-Parcerisa
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Sedecal Molecular Imaging, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Udias
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Samuel España
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Victor Sanchez-Tembleque
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Mario Fraile
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma Bragado
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. U. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. U. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria Gordillo
- Department of Applied Physics, U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Center for Materials Microanalysis, (CMAM), U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaston Garcia
- Center for Materials Microanalysis, (CMAM), U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gagliardi FM, Franich RD, Geso M. Nanoparticle dose enhancement of synchrotron radiation in PRESAGE dosimeters. J Synchrotron Radiat 2020; 27:1590-1600. [PMID: 33147183 DOI: 10.1107/s1600577520012849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The physical absorbed dose enhancement by the inclusion of gold and bismuth nanoparticles fabricated into water-equivalent PRESAGE dosimeters was investigated. Nanoparticle-loaded water-equivalent PRESAGE dosimeters were irradiated with superficial, synchrotron and megavoltage X-ray beams. The change in optical density of the dosimeters was measured using UV-Vis spectrophotometry pre- and post-irradiation using a wavelength of 630 nm. Dose enhancement was measured for 5 nm and 50 nm monodispersed gold nanoparticles, 5-50 nm polydispersed bismuth nanoparticles, and 80 nm monodispersed bismuth nanoparticles at concentrations from 0.25 mM to 2 mM. The dose enhancement was highest for the 95.3 keV mean energy synchrotron beam (16-32%) followed by the 150 kVp superficial beam (12-21%) then the 6 MV beam (2-5%). The bismuth nanoparticle-loaded dosimeters produced a larger dose enhancement than the gold nanoparticle-loaded dosimeters in the synchrotron beam for the same concentration. For the superficial and megavoltage beams the dose enhancement was similar for both species of nanoparticles. The dose enhancement increased with nanoparticle concentration in the dosimeters; however, there was no observed nanoparticle size dependence on the dose enhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank M Gagliardi
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, The Alfred, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
| | - Rick D Franich
- School of Science, RMIT University, La Trobe Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| | - Moshi Geso
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yan H, Sun W, Mruthyunjaya P, Beadle B, Yu W, Kanwal B, MacDonald CA, Liu W. Dosimetry modeling of focused kV x‐ray radiotherapy for wet age‐related macular degeneration. Med Phys 2020; 47:5123-5134. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Huagang Yan
- School of Biomedical Engineering Capital Medical University Beijing100069 China
| | - Weiyuan Sun
- Department of Physics University at AlbanySUNY Albany NY12222 USA
| | - Prithvi Mruthyunjaya
- Department of Ophthalmology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA94305 USA
| | - Beth Beadle
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA94305 USA
| | - Weihong Yu
- Department of Ophthalmology Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases Peking Union Medical College HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences Beijing100730 China
| | - Bushra Kanwal
- Center for High Energy Physics University of the Punjab Lahore Pakistan
| | | | - Wu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA94305 USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Burger K, Urban T, Dombrowsky AC, Dierolf M, Günther B, Bartzsch S, Achterhold K, Combs SE, Schmid TE, Wilkens JJ, Pfeiffer F. Technical and dosimetric realization of in vivo x-ray microbeam irradiations at the Munich Compact Light Source. Med Phys 2020; 47:5183-5193. [PMID: 32757280 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE X-ray microbeam radiation therapy is a preclinical concept for tumor treatment promising tissue sparing and enhanced tumor control. With its spatially separated, periodic micrometer-sized pattern, this method requires a high dose rate and a collimated beam typically available at large synchrotron radiation facilities. To treat small animals with microbeams in a laboratory-sized environment, we developed a dedicated irradiation system at the Munich Compact Light Source (MuCLS). METHODS A specially made beam collimation optic allows to increase x-ray fluence rate at the position of the target. Monte Carlo simulations and measurements were conducted for accurate microbeam dosimetry. The dose during irradiation is determined by a calibrated flux monitoring system. Moreover, a positioning system including mouse monitoring was built. RESULTS We successfully commissioned the in vivo microbeam irradiation system for an exemplary xenograft tumor model in the mouse ear. By beam collimation, a dose rate of up to 5.3 Gy/min at 25 keV was achieved. Microbeam irradiations using a tungsten collimator with 50 μm slit size and 350 μm center-to-center spacing were performed at a mean dose rate of 0.6 Gy/min showing a high peak-to-valley dose ratio of about 200 in the mouse ear. The maximum circular field size of 3.5 mm in diameter can be enlarged using field patching. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that we can perform in vivo microbeam experiments at the MuCLS with a dedicated dosimetry and positioning system to advance this promising radiation therapy method at commercially available compact microbeam sources. Peak doses of up to 100 Gy per treatment seem feasible considering a recent upgrade for higher photon flux. The system can be adapted for tumor treatment in different animal models, for example, in the hind leg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Burger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany.,Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Theresa Urban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany.,Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Annique C Dombrowsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany
| | - Martin Dierolf
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Benedikt Günther
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany
| | - Klaus Achterhold
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany
| | - Thomas E Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany.,Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Franz Pfeiffer
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, 81675, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Griffin RJ, Prise KM, McMahon SJ, Zhang X, Penagaricano J, Butterworth KT. History and current perspectives on the biological effects of high-dose spatial fractionation and high dose-rate approaches: GRID, Microbeam & FLASH radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200217. [PMID: 32706989 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The effects of various forms of ionising radiation are known to be mediated by interactions with cellular and molecular targets in irradiated and in some cases non-targeted tissue volumes. Despite major advances in advanced conformal delivery techniques, the probability of normal tissue complication (NTCP) remains the major dose-limiting factor in escalating total dose delivered during treatment. Potential strategies that have shown promise as novel delivery methods in achieving effective tumour control whilst sparing organs at risk involve the modulation of critical dose delivery parameters. This has led to the development of techniques using high dose spatial fractionation (GRID) and ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) which have translated to the clinic. The current review discusses the historical development and biological basis of GRID, microbeam and FLASH radiotherapy as advanced delivery modalities that have major potential for widespread implementation in the clinic in future years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Griffin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Kevin M Prise
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jose Penagaricano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Centre, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Karl T Butterworth
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kallio P, Jokinen E, Högström J, Das S, Heino S, Lähde M, Brodkin J, Korhonen EA, Alitalo K. Blocking Angiopoietin-2 Promotes Vascular Damage and Growth Inhibition in Mouse Tumors Treated with Small Doses of Radiation. Cancer Res 2020; 80:2639-2650. [PMID: 32312835 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-0497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abnormal vasculature in tumors leads to poor tissue perfusion and cytostatic drug delivery. Although drugs inducing vascular normalization, for example, angiopoietin-2 (Ang2)-blocking antibodies, have shown promising results in preclinical tumor models, clinical studies have so far shown only little efficacy. Because Ang2 is known to play a protective role in stressed endothelial cells, we tested here whether Ang2 blocking could enhance radiation-induced tumor vascular damage. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with anti-Ang2 antibodies every 3 or 4 days starting 3 days before 3 × 2 Gy or 4 × 0.5 Gy whole-body or tumor-focused radiation. Combination treatment with anti-Ang2 and radiation improved tumor growth inhibition and extended the survival of mice with melanoma or colorectal tumors. Single-cell RNA-sequencing revealed that Ang2 blocking rescued radiation-induced decreases in T cells and cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage. In addition, anti-Ang2 enhanced radiation-induced apoptosis in cultured endothelial cells. In vivo, combination treatment decreased tumor vasculature and increased tumor necrosis in comparison with tumors treated with monotherapies. These results suggest that a combination of Ang2-blocking antibodies with radiation increases tumor growth inhibition and extends the survival of tumor-bearing mice. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings offer a preclinical rationale for further testing of the use of radiation in combination with Ang2-blocking antibodies to improve the overall outcome of cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauliina Kallio
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Elina Jokinen
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jenny Högström
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Suvendu Das
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sarika Heino
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marianne Lähde
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jefim Brodkin
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Emilia A Korhonen
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Wihuri Research Institute, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kari Alitalo
- Translational Cancer Medicine Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. .,iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Wihuri Research Institute, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Dombrowsky AC, Burger K, Porth AK, Stein M, Dierolf M, Günther B, Achterhold K, Gleich B, Feuchtinger A, Bartzsch S, Beyreuther E, Combs SE, Pfeiffer F, Wilkens JJ, Schmid TE. A proof of principle experiment for microbeam radiation therapy at the Munich compact light source. Radiat Environ Biophys 2020; 59:111-120. [PMID: 31655869 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-019-00816-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT), a preclinical form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy, uses an array of microbeams of hard synchrotron X-ray radiation. Recently, compact synchrotron X-ray sources got more attention as they provide essential prerequisites for the translation of MRT into clinics while overcoming the limited access to synchrotron facilities. At the Munich compact light source (MuCLS), one of these novel compact X-ray facilities, a proof of principle experiment was conducted applying MRT to a xenograft tumor mouse model. First, subcutaneous tumors derived from the established squamous carcinoma cell line FaDu were irradiated at a conventional X-ray tube using broadbeam geometry to determine a suitable dose range for the tumor growth delay. For irradiations at the MuCLS, FaDu tumors were irradiated with broadbeam and microbeam irradiation at integral doses of either 3 Gy or 5 Gy and tumor growth delay was measured. Microbeams had a width of 50 µm and a center-to-center distance of 350 µm with peak doses of either 21 Gy or 35 Gy. A dose rate of up to 5 Gy/min was delivered to the tumor. Both doses and modalities delayed the tumor growth compared to a sham-irradiated tumor. The irradiated area and microbeam pattern were verified by staining of the DNA double-strand break marker γH2AX. This study demonstrates for the first time that MRT can be successfully performed in vivo at compact inverse Compton sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annique C Dombrowsky
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Karin Burger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
- Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Ann-Kristin Porth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Marlon Stein
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Dierolf
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
- Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Benedikt Günther
- Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Klaus Achterhold
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
- Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gleich
- Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Annette Feuchtinger
- Research Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
- German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (dktk), Technical University Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Franz Pfeiffer
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
- Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiobiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Thomas E Schmid
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fernandez-Palomo C, Fazzari J, Trappetti V, Smyth L, Janka H, Laissue J, Djonov V. Animal Models in Microbeam Radiation Therapy: A Scoping Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12030527. [PMID: 32106397 PMCID: PMC7139755 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) is an innovative approach in radiation oncology where a collimator subdivides the homogeneous radiation field into an array of co-planar, high-dose beams which are tens of micrometres wide and separated by a few hundred micrometres. OBJECTIVE This scoping review was conducted to map the available evidence and provide a comprehensive overview of the similarities, differences, and outcomes of all experiments that have employed animal models in MRT. METHODS We considered articles that employed animal models for the purpose of studying the effects of MRT. We searched in seven databases for published and unpublished literature. Two independent reviewers screened citations for inclusion. Data extraction was done by three reviewers. RESULTS After screening 5688 citations and 159 full-text papers, 95 articles were included, of which 72 were experimental articles. Here we present the animal models and pre-clinical radiation parameters employed in the existing MRT literature according to their use in cancer treatment, non-neoplastic diseases, or normal tissue studies. CONCLUSIONS The study of MRT is concentrated in brain-related diseases performed mostly in rat models. An appropriate comparison between MRT and conventional radiotherapy (instead of synchrotron broad beam) is needed. Recommendations are provided for future studies involving MRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Fazzari
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (C.F.-P.); (J.F.); (V.T.); (J.L.)
| | - Verdiana Trappetti
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (C.F.-P.); (J.F.); (V.T.); (J.L.)
| | - Lloyd Smyth
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, 3057 Parkville, Australia;
| | - Heidrun Janka
- Medical Library, University Library Bern, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland;
| | - Jean Laissue
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (C.F.-P.); (J.F.); (V.T.); (J.L.)
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (C.F.-P.); (J.F.); (V.T.); (J.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +41-31-631-8432
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Potez M, Bouchet A, Flaender M, Rome C, Collomb N, Grotzer M, Krisch M, Djonov V, Balosso J, Brun E, Laissue JA, Serduc R. Synchrotron X-Ray Boost Delivered by Microbeam Radiation Therapy After Conventional X-Ray Therapy Fractionated in Time Improves F98 Glioma Control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:360-369. [PMID: 32088292 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is based on the spatial fractionation of the incident, highly collimated synchrotron beam into arrays of parallel microbeams depositing several hundred grays. It appears relevant to combine MRT with a conventional treatment course, preparing a treatment scheme for future patients in clinical trials. The efficiency of MRT delivered after several broad-beam (BB) fractions to palliate F98 brain tumors in rats in comparison with BB fractions alone was evaluated in this study. METHODS AND MATERIALS Rats bearing 106 F98 cells implanted in the caudate nucleus were irradiated by 5 fractions in BB mode (3 × 6 Gy + 2 × 8 Gy BB) or by 2 boost fractions in MRT mode to a total of 5 fractions (3 × 6 Gy BB + MRT 2 × 8 Gy valley dose; peak dose 181 Gy [50/200 μm]). Tumor growth was evaluated in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging follow-up at T-1, T7, T12, T15, T20, and T25 days after radiation therapy and by histology and flow cytometry. RESULTS MRT-boosted tumors displayed lower cell density and cell proliferation compared with BB-irradiated tumors. The MRT boost completely stopped tumor growth during ∼4 weeks and led to a significant increase in median survival time, whereas tumors treated with BB alone recurred within a few days after the last radiation fraction. CONCLUSIONS The first evidence is presented that MRT, delivered as a boost of conventionally fractionated irradiation by orthovoltage broad x-ray beams, is feasible and more efficient than conventional radiation therapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Potez
- Inserm UA7, Rayonnement synchrotron pour la recherche médicale (STROBE), Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Audrey Bouchet
- Inserm UA7, Rayonnement synchrotron pour la recherche médicale (STROBE), Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Institute of Anatomy, Group Tomographic and Clinical Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Mélanie Flaender
- Inserm UA7, Rayonnement synchrotron pour la recherche médicale (STROBE), Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Claire Rome
- Team Functional NeuroImaging and Brain Perfusion, Inserm, France; Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France
| | - Nora Collomb
- Team Functional NeuroImaging and Brain Perfusion, Inserm, France; Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France
| | - Michael Grotzer
- Department of Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Krisch
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, Group Tomographic and Clinical Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Inserm UA7, Rayonnement synchrotron pour la recherche médicale (STROBE), Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Emmanuel Brun
- Inserm UA7, Rayonnement synchrotron pour la recherche médicale (STROBE), Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Raphaël Serduc
- Inserm UA7, Rayonnement synchrotron pour la recherche médicale (STROBE), Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mazal A, Prezado Y, Ares C, de Marzi L, Patriarca A, Miralbell R, Favaudon V. FLASH and minibeams in radiation therapy: the effect of microstructures on time and space and their potential application to protontherapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190807. [PMID: 32003574 PMCID: PMC7066940 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
After years of lethargy, studies on two non-conventional microstructures in time and space of the beams used in radiation therapy are enjoying a huge revival. The first effect called “FLASH” is based on very high dose-rate irradiation (pulse amplitude ≥106 Gy/s), short beam-on times (≤100 ms) and large single doses (≥10 Gy) as experimental parameters established so far to give biological and potential clinical effects. The second effect relies on the use of arrays of minibeams (e.g., 0.5–1 mm, spaced 1–3.5 mm). Both approaches have been shown to protect healthy tissues as an endpoint that must be clearly specified and could be combined with each other (e.g., minibeams under FLASH conditions). FLASH depends on the presence of oxygen and could proceed from the chemistry of peroxyradicals and a reduced incidence on DNA and membrane damage. Minibeams action could be based on abscopal effects, cell signalling and/or migration of cells between “valleys and hills” present in the non-uniform irradiation field as well as faster repair of vascular damage. Both effects are expected to maintain intact the tumour control probability and might even preserve antitumoural immunological reactions. FLASH in vivo experiments involving Zebrafish, mice, pig and cats have been done with electron beams, while minibeams are an intermediate approach between X-GRID and synchrotron X-ray microbeams radiation. Both have an excellent rationale to converge and be applied with proton beams, combining focusing properties and high dose rates in the beam path of pencil beams, and the inherent advantage of a controlled limited range. A first treatment with electron FLASH (cutaneous lymphoma) has recently been achieved, but clinical trials have neither been presented for FLASH with protons, nor under the minibeam conditions. Better understanding of physical, chemical and biological mechanisms of both effects is essential to optimize the technical developments and devise clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC, University Paris-Sud and Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France
| | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France.,Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France
| | | | - Vincent Favaudon
- Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schneider T, De Marzi L, Patriarca A, Prezado Y. Advancing proton minibeam radiation therapy: magnetically focussed proton minibeams at a clinical centre. Sci Rep 2020; 10:1384. [PMID: 31992757 PMCID: PMC6987213 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58052-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that has proven to significantly increase dose tolerances and sparing of normal tissue. It uses very narrow proton beams (diameter ≤1 mm), roughly one order of magnitude smaller than state-of-the-art pencil beams. The current implementation of pMBRT with mechanical collimators is suboptimal as it is inflexible, decreases efficiency and produces additional secondary neutrons. As a potential solution, we explore in this article minibeam generation through magnetic focussing and investigate possibilities for the integration of such a technique at existing clinical centres. For this, a model of the pencil beam scanning (PBS) nozzle and beam at the Orsay Proton Therapy Centre was established and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine its focussing capabilities. Moreover, various modifications of the nozzle geometry were considered. It was found that the PBS nozzle in its current state is not suitable for magnetic minibeam generation. Instead, a new, optimised nozzle design has been proposed and conditions necessary for minibeam generation were benchmarked. In addition, dose simulations in a water phantom were performed which showed improved dose distributions compared to those obtained with mechanical collimators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, 91405, Orsay, France. .,Université de Paris, IJCLab, 91405, Orsay, France.
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Flynn S, Price T, Allport PP, Silvestre Patallo I, Thomas R, Subiel A, Bartzsch S, Treibel F, Ahmed M, Jacobs-Headspith J, Edwards T, Jones I, Cathie D, Guerrini N, Sedgwick I. Evaluation of a pixelated large format CMOS sensor for x-ray microbeam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2019; 47:1305-1316. [PMID: 31837272 PMCID: PMC7078942 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Current techniques and procedures for dosimetry in microbeams typically rely on radiochromic film or small volume ionization chambers for validation and quality assurance in 2D and 1D, respectively. Whilst well characterized for clinical and preclinical radiotherapy, these methods are noninstantaneous and do not provide real time profile information. The objective of this work is to determine the suitability of the newly developed vM1212 detector, a pixelated CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) imaging sensor, for in situ and in vivo verification of x-ray microbeams. METHODS Experiments were carried out on the vM1212 detector using a 220 kVp small animal radiation research platform (SARRP) at the Helmholtz Centre Munich. A 3 x 3 cm2 square piece of EBT3 film was placed on top of a marked nonfibrous card overlaying the sensitive silicon of the sensor. One centimeter of water equivalent bolus material was placed on top of the film for build-up. The response of the detector was compared to an Epson Expression 10000XL flatbed scanner using FilmQA Pro with triple channel dosimetry. This was also compared to a separate exposure using 450 µm of silicon as a surrogate for the detector and a Zeiss Axio Imager 2 microscope using an optical microscopy method of dosimetry. Microbeam collimator slits with range of nominal widths of 25, 50, 75, and 100 µm were used to compare beam profiles and determine sensitivity of the detector and both film measurements to different microbeams. RESULTS The detector was able to measure peak and valley profiles in real-time, a significant reduction from the 24 hr self-development required by the EBT3 film. Observed full width at half maximum (FWHM) values were larger than the nominal slit widths, ranging from 130 to 190 µm due to divergence. Agreement between the methods was found for peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), peak to peak separation and FWHM, but a difference in relative intensity of the microbeams was observed between the detectors. CONCLUSIONS The investigation demonstrated that pixelated CMOS sensors could be applied to microbeam radiotherapy for real-time dosimetry in the future, however the relatively large pixel pitch of the vM1212 detector limit the immediate application of the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Flynn
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Medical Physics Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK
| | - Tony Price
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Medical Physics Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK
| | - Philip P Allport
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Ileana Silvestre Patallo
- Medical Physics Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK.,UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6AG, UK
| | - Russell Thomas
- Medical Physics Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK
| | - Anna Subiel
- Medical Physics Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Helmholtz Centre Munich, Institute for Radiation Medicine, Munich, 85764, Germany.,School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 80333, Germany
| | - Franziska Treibel
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 80333, Germany
| | - Mabroor Ahmed
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 80333, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Iain Sedgwick
- Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, OX11 0QX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
De Marzi L, Nauraye C, Lansonneur P, Pouzoulet F, Patriarca A, Schneider T, Guardiola C, Mammar H, Dendale R, Prezado Y. Spatial fractionation of the dose in proton therapy: Proton minibeam radiation therapy. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:677-681. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
41
|
Pellicioli P, Bartzsch S, Donzelli M, Krisch M, Bräuer-Krisch E. High resolution radiochromic film dosimetry: Comparison of a microdensitometer and an optical microscope. Phys Med 2019; 65:106-113. [PMID: 31450120 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Microbeam radiation therapy is a developing technique that promises superior tumour control and better normal tissue tolerance using spatially fractionated X-ray beams only tens of micrometres wide. Radiochromic film dosimetry at micrometric scale was performed using a microdensitometer, but this instrument presents limitations in accuracy and precision, therefore the use of a microscope is suggested as alternative. The detailed procedures developed to use the two devices are reported allowing a comparison. METHODS Films were irradiated with single microbeams and with arrays of 50 µm wide microbeams spaced by a 400 µm pitch, using a polychromatic beam with mean energy of 100 keV. The film dose measurements were performed using two independent instruments: a microdensitometer (MDM) and an optical microscope (OM). RESULTS The mean values of the absolute dose measured with the two instruments differ by less than 5% but the OM provides reproducibility with a standard deviation of 1.2% compared to up to 7% for the MDM. The resolution of the OM was determined to be ~ 1 to 2 µm in both planar directions able to resolve pencil beams irradiation, while the MDM reaches at the best 20 µm resolution along scanning direction. The uncertainties related to the data acquisition are 2.5-3% for the OM and 9-15% for the MDM. CONCLUSION The comparison between the two devices validates that the OM provides equivalent results to the MDM with better precision, reproducibility and resolution. In addition, the possibility to study dose distributions in two-dimensions over wider areas definitely sanctions the OM as substitute of the MDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Pellicioli
- The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ID17 Biomedical Beamline, Grenoble, France; Inserm UA7 STROBE, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France; Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
| | - S Bartzsch
- Helmholtz-Centre Munich, Institute of Innovative Radiation Therapy, Munich, Germany; Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department for Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Germany
| | - M Donzelli
- The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ID17 Biomedical Beamline, Grenoble, France; ICR - The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Krisch
- The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ID17 Biomedical Beamline, Grenoble, France
| | - E Bräuer-Krisch
- The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ID17 Biomedical Beamline, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ocadiz A, Livingstone J, Donzelli M, Bartzsch S, Nemoz C, Kefs S, Pellicioli P, Giraud J, Balosso J, Krisch M, Bräuer-krisch E, Serduc R, Adam J. Film dosimetry studies for patient specific quality assurance in microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med 2019; 65:227-37. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.09.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
43
|
Potez M, Fernandez-Palomo C, Bouchet A, Trappetti V, Donzelli M, Krisch M, Laissue J, Volarevic V, Djonov V. Synchrotron Microbeam Radiation Therapy as a New Approach for the Treatment of Radioresistant Melanoma: Potential Underlying Mechanisms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:1126-1136. [PMID: 31461675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a method that spatially distributes the x-ray beam into several microbeams of very high dose (peak dose), regularly separated by low-dose intervals (valley dose). MRT selectively spares normal tissues, relative to conventional (uniform broad beam [BB]) radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS To evaluate the effect of MRT on radioresistant melanoma, B16-F10 murine melanomas were implanted into mice ears. Tumors were either treated with MRT (407.6 Gy peak; 6.2 Gy valley dose) or uniform BB irradiation (6.2 Gy). RESULTS MRT induced significantly longer tumor regrowth delay than did BB irradiation. A significant 24% reduction in blood vessel perfusion was observed 5 days after MRT, and the cell proliferation index was significantly lower in melanomas treated by MRT compared with BB. MRT provoked a greater induction of senescence in melanoma cells. Bio-Plex analyses revealed enhanced concentration of monocyte-attracting chemokines in the MRT group: MCP-1 at D5, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, IL12p40, and RANTES at D9. This was associated with leukocytic infiltration at D9 after MRT, attributed mainly to CD8 T cells, natural killer cells, and macrophages. CONCLUSIONS In light of its potential to disrupt blood vessels that promote infiltration of the tumor by immune cells and its induction of senescence, MRT could be a new therapeutic approach for radioresistant melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Potez
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Audrey Bouchet
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine, INSERM UA7, 71 rue des Martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | | | - Mattia Donzelli
- Biomedical Beamline ID17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France; Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Krisch
- Biomedical Beamline ID17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean Laissue
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vladislav Volarevic
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Molecular Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Schneider T, Patriarca A, Prezado Y. Improving the dose distributions in minibeam radiation therapy: Helium ions vs protons. Med Phys 2019; 46:3640-3648. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- IMNC‐UMR 8165 CNRS Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities 15 rue Georges Clemenceau Orsay Cedex 91405France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie PSL Research University Centre de protonthrapie d’Orsay Campus universitaire btiment 101 Orsay 91898France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC‐UMR 8165 CNRS Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities 15 rue Georges Clemenceau Orsay Cedex 91405France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shi L, Liu P, Wu J, Ma L, Zheng H, Antosh MP, Zhang H, Wang B, Chen W, Wang X. The effectiveness and safety of X-PDT for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2019; 14:2027-2043. [PMID: 31165659 DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2019-0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To clarify the effectiveness and safety of x-ray-activated photodynamic therapy (X-PDT) for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma. Materials & methods: Copper-cysteamine nanoparticles were used as a photosensitizer of X-PDT. The dark toxicity and cytotoxicity were studied in vitro. Tumor volume, microvessel density and acute toxicity of mice were evaluated in vivo. Results: Without x-ray irradiation, copper-cysteamine nanoparticles were nontoxic for keratinocyte cells. XL50 cells (SCC) were more sensitive to X-PDT than B16F10 cells (melanoma). X-PDT successfully inhibited the growth of SCC in vivo (p < 0.05), while the B16F10 melanoma was resistant. Microvessel density in SCC tissue was remarkably reduced (p < 0.05). No obvious acute toxicity reaction was observed. Conclusion: X-PDT is a safe and effective treatment for SCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Shi
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200443, PR China
| | - Pei Liu
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200443, PR China
| | - Jing Wu
- Department of Computer Science & Statistics, University of Rhode Island, 9 Greenhouse Rd, Kingston, RI 02881, USA
| | - Lun Ma
- Department of Physics, the University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019-0059, USA
| | - Han Zheng
- Department of Physics, the University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019-0059, USA
| | - Michael P Antosh
- Physics Department, University of Rhode Island, 2 Lippitt Rd, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.,Institute for Brain & Neural Systems, Brown University, 184 Hope St, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Haiyan Zhang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200443, PR China
| | - Bo Wang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200443, PR China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Physics, the University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019-0059, USA
| | - Xiuli Wang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200443, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Meyer J, Eley J, Schmid TE, Combs SE, Dendale R, Prezado Y. Spatially fractionated proton minibeams. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180466. [PMID: 30359081 PMCID: PMC6541186 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Extraordinary normal tissue response to highly spatially fractionated X-ray beams has been explored for over 25 years. More recently, alternative radiation sources have been developed and utilized with the aim to evoke comparable effects. These include protons, which lend themselves well for this endeavour due to their physical depth dose characteristics as well as corresponding variable biological effectiveness. This paper addresses the motivation for using protons to generate spatially fractionated beams and reviews the technological implementations and experimental results to date. This includes simulation and feasibility studies, collimation and beam characteristics, dosimetry and biological considerations as well as the results of in vivo and in vitro studies. Experimental results are emerging indicating an extraordinary normal tissue sparing effect analogous to what has been observed for synchrotron generated X-ray microbeams. The potential for translational research and feasibility of spatially modulated proton beams in clinical settings is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juergen Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie, Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Montay-Gruel P, Bouchet A, Jaccard M, Patin D, Serduc R, Aim W, Petersson K, Petit B, Bailat C, Bourhis J, Bräuer-Krisch E, Vozenin MC. X-rays can trigger the FLASH effect: Ultra-high dose-rate synchrotron light source prevents normal brain injury after whole brain irradiation in mice. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:582-588. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
49
|
Prezado Y, Jouvion G, Patriarca A, Nauraye C, Guardiola C, Juchaux M, Lamirault C, Labiod D, Jourdain L, Sebrie C, Dendale R, Gonzalez W, Pouzoulet F. Proton minibeam radiation therapy widens the therapeutic index for high-grade gliomas. Sci Rep 2018; 8:16479. [PMID: 30405188 PMCID: PMC6220274 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34796-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy which has already shown a remarkable reduction in neurotoxicity as to compared with standard proton therapy. Here we report on the first evaluation of tumor control effectiveness in glioma bearing rats with highly spatially modulated proton beams. Whole brains (excluding the olfactory bulb) of Fischer 344 rats were irradiated. Four groups of animals were considered: a control group (RG2 tumor bearing rats), a second group of RG2 tumor-bearing rats and a third group of normal rats that received pMBRT (70 Gy peak dose in one fraction) with very heterogeneous dose distributions, and a control group of normal rats. The tumor-bearing and normal animals were followed-up for 6 months and one year, respectively. pMBRT leads to a significant tumor control and tumor eradication in 22% of the cases. No substantial brain damage which confirms the widening of the therapeutic window for high-grade gliomas offered by pMBRT. Additionally, the fact that large areas of the brain can be irradiated with pMBRT without significant side effects, would allow facing the infiltrative nature of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France.
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue du Docteur Roux, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, F-91898, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, F-91898, Orsay, France
| | - Consuelo Guardiola
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- IR4M, UMR8081, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- IR4M, UMR8081, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, F-91898, Orsay, France
| | - Wilfredo Gonzalez
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
De Marzi L, Patriarca A, Nauraye C, Hierso E, Dendale R, Guardiola C, Prezado Y. Implementation of planar proton minibeam radiation therapy using a pencil beam scanning system: A proof of concept study. Med Phys 2018; 45:5305-5316. [PMID: 30311639 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is an innovative approach that combines the advantages of minibeam radiation therapy with the more precise ballistics of protons to further reduce the side effects of radiation. One of the main challenges of this approach is the generation of very narrow proton pencil beams with an adequate dose-rate to treat patients within a reasonable treatment time (several minutes) in existing clinical facilities. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing pMBRT by combining the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique with the use of multislit collimators. This proof of concept study of pMBRT with a clinical system is intended to guide upcoming biological experiments. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations (TOPAS v3.1.p2) were used to design a suitable multislit collimator to implement planar pMBRT for conventional pencil beam scanning settings. Dose distributions (depth-dose curves, lateral profiles, Peak-to-Valley Dose Ratio (PVDR) and dose-rates) for different proton beam energies were assessed by means of Monte Carlo simulations and experimental measurements in a water tank using commercial ionization chambers and a new p-type silicon diode, the IBA RAZOR. An analytical intensity-modulated dose calculation algorithm designed to optimize the weight of individual Bragg peaks composing the field was also developed and validated. RESULTS Proton minibeams were then obtained using a brass multislit collimator with five slits measuring 2 cm × 400 μm in width with a center-to-center distance of 4 mm. The measured and calculated dose distributions (depth-dose curves and lateral profiles) showed a good agreement. Spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBP) and homogeneous dose distributions around the target were obtained by means of intensity modulation of Bragg peaks, while maintaining spatial fractionation at shallow depths. Mean dose-rates of 0.12 and 0.09 Gy/s were obtained for one iso-energy layer and a SOBP conditions in the presence of multislit collimator. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing pMBRT on a PBS system. It also confirms the reliability of RAZOR detector for pMBRT dosimetry. This newly developed experimental methodology will support the design of future preclinical research with pMBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Eric Hierso
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Consuelo Guardiola
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS, Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS, Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| |
Collapse
|