Assessment of clinically relevant dose distributions in pelvic IOERT using Gafchromic EBT3 films

Shielding disc backscatter calculations in intraoperative radiotherapy using a Monte Carlo simulation based on the method of energy spectra reconstruction

The study focuses on validating and applying a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation model to backscatter calculations from the shielding discs used during intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT), particularly in breast cancer treatments. The MC model is developed based on dosimetric data collected under reference conditions and validated by measurements with EBT4 Gafchromic films in a water phantom. The study investigates the dose distributions for 6, 9, and 12 MeV electron beams formed by a mobile AQURE accelerator, comparing scenarios with and without a surgical stainless steel shielding disc. While the shielding disc effectively reduces radiation doses behind it, the backscatter significantly increases doses in tissues immediately in front of the disc. Specifically, the dose at 1 mm in front of the disc increases by 19.8%, 18.4%, and 17.5% were observed for 6, 9, and 12 MeV beams, respectively. The validated MC model provides an accurate tool for predicting dose distributions in complex geometries, enabling improved treatment planning and safety in IOERT applications. The findings underscore the need to consider backscatter effects when shielding discs are used in IOERT. The study suggests further optimization of shielding disc design, potentially incorporating biocompatible, low-Z materials to mitigate backscatter.

First clinical application of image-guided intraoperative electron radiation therapy with real time intraoperative dose calculation in recurrent rectal cancer: technical procedure

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a radiation technique applying a single fraction with a high dose during surgery. We report the first abdomino-pelvic application of an image-guided intraoperative electron radiation therapy with intraoperative real time dose calculation based on the individual intraoperative patient anatomy. A patient suffering from locoregionally recurrent rectal cancer after treatment with neoadjuvant re-chemoradiation was chosen for this approach. After surgical removal of the recurrence, an adequate IORT applicator was placed as usual. A novel mobile imaging device (ImagingRing, MedPhoton) was positioned around the patient covering the region to be treated with the IORT-applicator in place. It allowed the acquisition of three-dimensional intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography images suitable for dose calculation using an automated scaling (heuristic object and head scatter as well as hardening corrections) of Hounsfield units. After image acquisition confirmed the correct applicator position, the images were transferred to our treatment planning system for intraoperative dose calculation. Treatment could be accomplished using the calculated dose distribution. We herein describe the details of the procedure including necessary adjustments in the typically used IORT equipment and work flow. We further discuss the pros and cons of this new approach generally overcoming a decade long limitation of IORT procedures as well as future perspectives regarding IORT treatments.

Enabling ultra-high dose rate electron beams at a clinical linear accelerator for isocentric treatments

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiotherapy delivery with ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) has consistently produced normal tissue sparing while maintaining efficacy for tumour control in preclinical studies, known as the FLASH effect. Modified clinical electron linacs have been used for pre-clinical studies at reduced source-surface distance (SSD) and novel intra-operative devices are becoming available. In this context, we modified a clinical linac to deliver 16 MeV UHDR electron beams with an isocentric setup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The first Varian TrueBeam (SN 1001) was clinically operative between 2009-2022, it was then decommissioned and converted into a research platform. The 18 MeV electron beam was converted into the experimental 16 MeV UHDR. Modifications were performed by Varian and included a software patch, thinner scattering foil and beam tuning. The dose rate, beam characteristics and reproducibility were measured with electron applicators at SSD = 100 cm.

RESULTS

The dose per pulse at isocenter was up to 1.28 Gy/pulse, corresponding to average and instantaneous dose rates up to 256 Gy/s and 3⋅105 Gy/s, respectively. Beam characteristics were equivalent between 16 MeV UHDR and conventional for field sizes up to 10x10cm2 and an overall beam reproducibility within ± 2.5% was measured.

CONCLUSIONS

We report on the first technical conversion of a Varian TrueBeam to produce 16 MeV UHDR electron beams. This research platform will allow isocenter experiments and deliveries with conventional setups up to field sizes of 10x10 cm2 within a hospital environment, reducing the gap between preclinical and clinical electron FLASH investigations.

In vivodosimetry in cancer patients undergoing intraoperative radiation therapy

In vivodosimetry (IVD) is an important tool in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to detect major errors by assessing differences between expected and delivered dose and to record the received dose by individual patients. Also, in intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), IVD is highly relevant to register the delivered dose. This is especially relevant in low-risk breast cancer patients since a high dose of IORT is delivered in a single fraction. In contrast to EBRT, online treatment planning based on intraoperative imaging is only under development for IORT. Up to date, two commercial treatment planning systems proposed intraoperative ultrasound or in-room cone-beam CT for real-time IORT planning. This makes IVD even more important because of the possibility for real-time treatment adaptation. Here, we summarize recent developments and applications of IVD methods for IORT in clinical practice, highlighting important contributions and identifying specific challenges such as a treatment planning system for IORT. HDR brachytherapy as a delivery technique was not considered. We add IVD for ultrahigh dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy that promises to improve the treatment efficacy, when compared to conventional radiotherapy by limiting the rate of toxicity while maintaining similar tumour control probabilities. To date, FLASH IORT is not yet in clinical use.

Implementation of pencil beam redefinition algorithm (PBRA) for intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) treatment planning

PURPOSE

Similar to other radiation therapy techniques, intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) can benefit from an online treatment planning system (TPS). Among all the analytical electron dose calculation algorithms, pencil beam redefinition algorithm (PBRA) has shown an acceptable accuracy in inhomogeneities. The input dataset for PBRA includes electron planar fluence, mean direction and root mean square (RMS) spread about the mean direction which had been introduced based on the conventional linear accelerator geometry in former studies. Herein, three methods for implementing PBRA for IOERT system are presented.

METHODS

The initialization parameters were identified using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of a dedicated IOERT system equipped with a cylindrical 10 cm applicator, irradiating a water phantom. Phase space distribution of electrons was recorded on a plane below the applicator. The input dataset was extracted for 2 × 2 mm² pixels and energy bin width of 1 MeV.

RESULTS

PBRA was implemented with three initialization methods and compared to MC. The 3D gamma analysis of the algorithm with the Formula method, which was in best agreement with MC in a simple water phantom, showed passing rates of more than 99 % for all nominal energies and it was 97.1 % for 8 MeV in the presence of protecting disk and irregular surface. Implementing PBRA on CUDA C++ resulted in 5 s run time for 8 MeV nominal energy in a water phantom.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement between PBRA dose calculation and MC is promising for the development of an intraoperative TPS for IOERT.

Treatment Planning in Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT): Where Should We Go?

As opposed to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), treatment planning systems (TPS) dedicated to intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) were not subject to radical modifications in the last two decades. However, new treatment regimens such as ultrahigh dose rates and combination with multiple treatment modalities, as well as the prospected availability of dedicated in-room imaging, call for important new features in the next generation of treatment planning systems in IORT. Dosimetric accuracy should be guaranteed by means of advanced dose calculation algorithms, capable of modelling complex scattering phenomena and accounting for the non-tissue equivalent materials used to shape and compensate electron beams. Kilovoltage X-ray based IORT also presents special needs, including the correct description of extremely steep dose gradients and the accurate simulation of applicators. TPSs dedicated to IORT should also allow real-time imaging to be used for treatment adaptation at the time of irradiation. Other features implemented in TPSs should include deformable registration and capability of radiobiological planning, especially if unconventional irradiation schemes are used. Finally, patient safety requires that the multiple features be integrated in a comprehensive system in order to facilitate control of the whole process.

Optimized method for in vivo dosimetry with small films in pelvic IOERT for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Intra-Operative Electron Radiation Therapy (IOERT) is used to treat rectal cancer at our institution, and in vivo measurements with Gafchromic EBT3® films were introduced as quality assurance. The purpose of this work was to quantify the uncertainties associated with digitization of very small EBT3 films irradiated simultaneously, in order to optimize in vivo dosimetry for IOERT.

METHODS

Film samples of different sizes - M1 (5×5cm²), M2 (1.5×1.5 cm²), M3 (1.0×1.5 cm²) and M4 (0.75×1.5 cm²) - were used to quantify typical variations (uncertainties) due to scanner fluctuations, misalignment, film inhomogeneity, long-term effect of film cutting, small rotations, film curling, edge effects and the influence of opaque templates. Fitting functions and temporal validity of sensitometric curves were also assessed.

RESULTS

Film curling, intra-film variability and scanner fluctuations are important effects that need to be minimized or considered in the uncertainty budget. Small rotations, misalignments and film cutting have little or no influence on the readings. Most fitting functions perform well, but the quantity used for dose quantification determines over- or under-valuation of dose in the long term. Edge effects and the influence of opaque templates need to be well understood, to allow optimization of methodology to the intended purpose.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method allows practical and simultaneous digitization of up to ten small irradiated film samples, with an experimental uncertainty of 1%.

Intraoperative computed tomography imaging for dose calculation in intraoperative electron radiation therapy: Initial clinical observations

In intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) the energy of the electron beam is selected under the conventional assumption of water-equivalent tissues at the applicator end. However, the treatment field can deviate from the theoretic flat irradiation surface, thus altering dose profiles. This patient-based study explored the feasibility of acquiring intraoperative computed tomography (CT) studies for calculating three-dimensional dose distributions with two factors not included in the conventional assumption, namely the air gap from the applicator end to the irradiation surface and tissue heterogeneity. In addition, dose distributions under the conventional assumption and from preoperative CT studies (both also updated with intraoperative data) were calculated to explore whether there are other alternatives to intraoperative CT studies that can provide similar dose distributions. The IOERT protocol was modified to incorporate the acquisition of intraoperative CT studies before radiation delivery in six patients. Three studies were not valid to calculate dose distributions due to the presence of metal artefacts. For the remaining three cases, the average gamma pass rates between the doses calculated from intraoperative CT studies and those obtained assuming water-equivalent tissues or from preoperative CT studies were 73.4% and 74.0% respectively. The agreement increased when the air gap was included in the conventional assumption (98.1%) or in the preoperative CT images (98.4%). Therefore, this factor was the one mostly influencing the dose distributions of this study. Our experience has shown that intraoperative CT studies are not recommended when the procedure includes the use of shielding discs or surgical retractors unless metal artefacts are removed. IOERT dose distributions calculated under the conventional assumption or from preoperative CT studies may be inaccurate unless the air gap (which depends on the surface irregularities of the irradiated volume and on the applicator pose) is included in the calculations.

Electron radiotherapy (IOERT) for applications outside of the breast: Dosimetry and influence of tissue inhomogeneities

PURPOSE

The purpose of study is to investigate the dosimetry of electron intraoperative radiotherapy (IOERT) of the Intraop Mobetron 2000 mobile LINAC in treatments outside of the breast. After commissioning and external validation of dosimetry, we report in vivo results of measurements for treatments outside the breast in a large patient cohort, and investigate if the presence of inhomogeneities can affect in vivo measurements.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Applicator factors and profile curves were measured with a stereotactic diode. The applicators factors of the 6 cm flat and beveled applicators were also confirmed with radiochromic films, parallel-plate ion chamber and by an external audit performed with ThermoLuminescent Dosimeters (TLDs). The influence of bone on dose was investigated by using radiochromic films attached to an insert equivalent to cortical bone, immersed in the water phantom. In vivo dosimetry was performed on 126 patients treated with IOERT using metal oxide-silicon semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) placed on the tumor bed.

RESULTS

Relatively small differences were found among different detectors for measurements of applicator factors. In the external audit, the agreement with the TLD was mostly within ±0.2%. The largest increase of dose due to the presence of cortical bone insert was +6.0% with energy 12 MeV and 3 cm applicator. On average, in vivo dose was significantly (+3.1%) larger than prescribed dose.

CONCLUSION

IOERT in applications outside the breast results in low discrepancies between in vivo and prescribed doses, which can be also explained with the presence of tissue inhomogeneity.

Surface scanning for 3D dose calculation in intraoperative electron radiation therapy

Background

Dose calculations in intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) rely on the conventional assumption of water-equivalent tissues at the applicator end, which defines a flat irradiation surface. However, the shape of the irradiation surface modifies the dose distribution. Our study explores, for the first time, the use of surface scanning methods for three-dimensional dose calculation of IOERT.

Methods

Two different three-dimensional scanning technologies were evaluated in a simulated IOERT scenario: a tracked conoscopic holography sensor (ConoProbe) and a structured-light three-dimensional scanner (Artec). Dose distributions obtained from computed tomography studies of the surgical field (gold standard) were compared with those calculated under the conventional assumption or from pseudo-computed tomography studies based on surfaces.

Results

In the simulated IOERT scenario, the conventional assumption led to an average gamma pass rate of 39.9% for dose values greater than 10% (two configurations, with and without blood in the surgical field). Results improved when considering surfaces in the dose calculation (88.5% for ConoProbe and 92.9% for Artec).

Conclusions

More accurate three-dimensional dose distributions were obtained when considering surfaces in the dose calculation of the simulated surgical field. The structured-light three-dimensional scanner provided the best results in terms of dose distributions. The findings obtained in this specific experimental setup warrant further research on surface scanning in the IOERT context owing to the clinical interest of improving the documentation of the actual IOERT scenario.

Dosimetric feasibility of using tungsten-based functional paper for flexible chest wall protectors in intraoperative electron radiotherapy for breast cancer

Intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT), which is an accelerated partial breast irradiation method, has been used for early-stage breast cancer treatment. In IOERT, a protective disk is inserted behind the target volume to minimize the dose received by normal tissues. However, to use such a disk, the surgical incision must be larger than the field size because the disk is manufactured from stiff and unyielding materials. In this study, the applicability of newly developed tungsten-based functional paper (TFP) was assessed as an alternative to the existing protective disk. The radiation-shielding performance of the TFP was verified through experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Percentage depth dose curves and lateral dose profiles with and without TFPs were measured and simulated on a dedicated IOERT accelerator. The number of piled-up TFPs was changed from 1 to 40. In the experimental measurements, the relative doses at the exit plane of the TFPs for 9 MeV were 42.7%, 9.2%, 0.2%, and 0.1% with 10, 20, 30, and 40 TFPs, respectively, whereas those for 12 MeV were 63.6%, 27.1%, 8.6%, and 0.2% with 10, 20, 30, and 40 TFPs, respectively. Slight dose enhancements caused by backscatter radiation from the TFPs were observed at the entrance plane of the TFPs at both beam energies. The results of the Monte Carlo simulation indicated the same tendency as the experimental measurements. Based on the experimental and simulated results, the radiation-shielding performances of 30 TFPs for 9 MeV and 40 TFPs for 12 MeV were confirmed to be acceptable and close to those of the existing protective disk. The findings of this study suggest the feasibility of using TFPs as flexible chest wall protectors in IOERT for breast cancer treatment.

Effects of shielding on pelvic and abdominal IORT dose distributions

PURPOSE

To study the impact of shielding elements in the proximity of Intra-Operative Radiation Therapy (IORT) irradiation fields, and to generate graphical and quantitative information to assist radiation oncologists in the design of optimal shielding during pelvic and abdominal IORT.

METHOD

An IORT system was modeled with BEAMnrc and EGS++ Monte Carlo codes. The model was validated in reference conditions by gamma index analysis against an experimental data set of different beam energies, applicator diameters, and bevel angles. The reliability of the IORT model was further tested considering shielding layers inserted in the radiation beam. Further simulations were performed introducing a bone-like layer embedded in the water phantom. The dose distributions were calculated as 3D dose maps.

RESULTS

The analysis of the resulting 2D dose maps parallel to the clinical axis shows that the bevel angle of the applicator and its position relative to the shielding have a major influence on the dose distribution. When insufficient shielding is used, a hotspot nearby the shield appears near the surface. At greater depths, lateral scatter limits the dose reduction attainable with shielding, although the presence of bone-like structures in the phantom reduces the impact of this effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose distributions in shielded IORT procedures are affected by distinct contributions when considering the regions near the shielding and deeper in tissue: insufficient shielding may lead to residual dose and hotspots, and the scattering effects may enlarge the beam in depth. These effects must be carefully considered when planning an IORT treatment with shielding.

In vivo dosimetry using Gafchromic films during pelvic intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT)

OBJECTIVE

To characterize in vivo dose distributions during pelvic intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) for rectal cancer and to assess the alterations introduced by irregular irradiation surfaces in the presence of bevelled applicators.

METHODS

In vivo measurements were performed with Gafchromic films during 32 IOERT procedures. 1 film per procedure was used for the first 20 procedures. The methodology was then optimized for the remaining 12 procedures by using a set of 3 films. Both the average dose and two-dimensional dose distributions for each film were determined. Phantom measurements were performed for comparison.

RESULTS

For flat and concave surfaces, the doses measured in vivo agree with expected values. For concave surfaces with step-like irregularities, measured doses tend to be higher than expected doses. Results obtained with three films per procedure show a large variability along the irradiated surface, with important differences from expected profiles. These results are consistent with the presence of surface hotspots, such as those observed in phantoms in the presence of step-like irregularities, as well as fluid build-up.

CONCLUSION

Clinical dose distributions in the IOERT of rectal cancer are often different from the references used for prescription. Further studies are necessary to assess the impact of these differences on treatment outcomes. In vivo measurements are important, but need to be accompanied by accurate imaging of positioning and irradiated surfaces.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

These results confirm that surface irregularities occur frequently in rectal cancer IOERT and have a measurable effect on the dose distribution.