Conversion factors of effective and equivalent organ doses with the air kerma area product in patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions

Local diagnostic reference levels and effective doses: single institution levels for interventional cardiology procedures for adult patients

Introduction: The current regulations in Poland in the field of interventional radiology only include diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for five procedures, containing only two for cardiological (hemodynamic) procedures, and only for adults. Given the insufficient number of DRLs, the need to introduce local levels based on the intervention procedures performed was identified. The purpose of this research was the evaluation of radiation doses (DRL, effective dose) received by patients in cardiological interventional procedures.

Material and methods: The DRL level was defined as the 75th percentile of the distribution of dosimetric parameters KAP and Kair,ref for each type of cardiological procedure. Data include three different X-ray units and 27 interventional cardiologists, derived from February 2019 to June 2019 and from August 2021 to December 2021. In order to estimate the effective dose, the appropriate conversion factors for cardiological procedures were used. The total number of analyzed procedures was 3818.

Results: The proposed local DRL levels were found to be mostly lower than data found in literature and in the current Polish national requirements (60%-70% lower for coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) procedures). Median equivalent doses for cardiological procedures were estimated at 2.66 mSv, 6.11 mSv and 7.22 mSv for CA, PCI and combined PCI with CA procedure, respectively.

Conclusions: The proposed local/institutional DRLs seem to be suitable for use and could be utilized by other centers for comparison purposes.

A systematic review of conversion factors between kerma-area product and effective/organ dose for cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures performed in adult and paediatric patients

The aim of this systematic review is to undertake a critical appraisal of the evidence in the published literature concerning the conversion factors between kerma-area product (P KA) and effective/organ dose (DCED_PKA, DCHT_PKA) for cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures performed in adults and paediatric patients and to propose reference conversion factors to help standardize dose calculations. A search strategy utilizing MeSH headings in three databases identified 59 (adult) and 37 (paediatric) papers deemed eligible for the review. Exclusion criteria were adopted to select data only from publications which established DCED_PKA in patients using the ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors. A time restriction from January 2007 was introduced in the search to capture the evolving trends of utilization of fluoroscopy-guided intervention technologies only in recent years. The suggested DCED_PKA and DCHT_PKA were synthesized by calculating the weighted averages of the values reported by the authors with weights corresponding to the study sample size. Eighteen studies for both adult (9) and paediatric (9) patients matching the search terms fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The suggested value for DCED_PKA in adult patients amounts to 0.24 mSv Gy−1cm−2. The suggested values for DCHT_PKA ranged from a minimum of 0.15 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the female breast to a maximum of 0.97 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the lungs. The suggested values for DCED_PKA in paediatric patients ranged from 3.45 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the new-born to 0.49 mSv Gy−1cm−2 in the 15 years age class. The suggested values for DCHT_PKA ranged from a minimum of 0.33 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for bone marrow in the 15 years age class to a maximum of 11.49 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the heart in the new-born. To conclude, values of DCED_PKA/DCHT_PKA were provided for calculating effective/organ doses in cardiac interventional procedures. They can be useful for standardizing dose calculations, hence for comparison of the radiation detriment from different imaging procedures and in the framework of epidemiologic studies.

Combining Optimized Image Processing With Dual Axis Rotational Angiography: Toward Low-Dose Invasive Coronary Angiography

Background

Dual axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) reduces radiation exposure during coronary angiography on older x‐ray systems. The purpose of the current study is to quantify patient and staff radiation exposure using DARCA on a modality already equipped with dose‐reducing technology. Additionally, we assessed applicability of 1 dose area product to effective dose conversion factor for both DARCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) procedures.

Methods and Results

Twenty patients were examined using DARCA and were compared with 20 age‐, sex‐, and body mass index–matched patients selected from a prior study using CCA on the same x‐ray modality. All irradiation events are simulated using PCXMC (STUK, Finland) to determine organ and effective doses. Moreover, for DARCA each frame is simulated. Staff dose is measured using active personal dosimeters (DoseAware, Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands). With DARCA, median cumulative dose area product is reduced by 57% (ie, 7.41 versus 17.19 Gy·cm²). Effective dose conversion factors of CCA and DARCA are slightly different, yet this difference is not statistically significant. The occupational dose at physician's chest, leg, and collar level are reduced by 60%, 56%, and 16%, respectively, of which the first 2 reached statistical significance. Median effective dose is reduced from 4.75 mSv in CCA to 2.22 mSv in DARCA procedures, where the latter is further reduced to 1.79 mSv when excluding ventriculography.

Conclusions

During invasive coronary angiography, DARCA reduces radiation exposure even further toward low‐dose values on a system already equipped with advanced image processing and noise reduction algorithms. For both DARCA and CCA procedures, using 1 effective dose conversion factor of 0.30 mSv·Gy⁻¹·cm⁻² is feasible.

Conversion factors to estimate effective doses from kerma area product in interventional cardiology. Impact of added filtration

There is a large variation in the factors used to estimate effective doses from kerma area product (KAP) for interventional cardiology. These factors are required to estimate population doses. This paper presents the results for this conversion factor for cardiac procedures using tissue weighting factors of ICRP-103 and the impact of the added copper filtration in the X-ray beam. The data from 925 cardiac procedures and 75,347 radiation events were collected from two angiography laboratories using the DICOM Radiation Dose Structured Reports (RDSR). Effective doses were calculated with Monte Carlo software and the dosimetric, technical and geometrical information included in the RDSR. In one laboratory, with an X-ray system without Cu filtration for the cine runs, a factor of 0.21 ± 0.05 mSv/(Gy·cm²) was obtained. In other laboratory, incorporating a patient dose reduction technique, and 0.4 mm of Cu filtration for cine runs, the conversion factor was 0.29 ± 0.05 mSv/(Gy·cm²). The analysis of the radiation events for the different Cu filtrations (0.0; 0.1; 0.4 and 0.9 mm) resulted in conversion factors of: 0.16; 0.27; 0.34 and 0.40 mSv/(Gy·cm²) respectively. The estimation of effective and population doses from KAP should take into account the Cu filtration in the X-ray beam. For the X-ray system with patient dose reduction technique, using 0.4 mm Cu for cine runs, the global conversion factor increased by 38%, from 0.21 to 0.29 mSv/(Gy·cm²) in comparison to the standard X-ray system with a protocol that did not include copper filtration for cine acquisitions.

Local DRLs and automated risk estimation in paediatric interventional cardiology

Introduction

Cardiac catheterization procedures result in high radiation doses and often multiple procedures are necessary for congenital heart disease patients. However, diagnostic reference levels (DRL) remain scarce. Our first goal was finding the optimal DRL parameter and determining appropriate DRLs. The second goal was to calculate organ doses (OD), effective doses (ED) and lifetime attributable risks (LAR) per procedure and to provide conversion factors based on dose area product (DAP).

Materials and methods

DRLs are calculated for each procedure type, as the 75^th percentile of the cumulative value per procedure from the corresponding parameter. All irradiation events in the DICOM Structured Reports were automatically processed and simulated using PCXMC, resulting in OD, ED and LAR. Using a Kruskal Wallis H test and subsequent pairwise comparisons, differences in median values of the DRL parameter between procedure types were assessed.

Results

Linear regression showed a strong correlation and narrow confidence interval between DAP and product of body weight and fluoroscopy time (BWxFT), even when all procedures (diagnostic and interventional) are combined. Only 15% of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant for DAP normalized to BWxFT (DAP_BWxFT). The latter pairs contained less frequent procedure types with significant outliers. For DAP normalized to BW (DAP_BW), 38% of the pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences. Conversion factors from DAP_BW to OD and ED were reported for various weight groups, due to the higher correlation between DAP_BW and both OD and ED than between DAP and both OD and ED.

Conclusions

The P75 of DAP_BWxFT for all procedures combined serves as an appropriate DRL value. This facilitates local DRL determination in smaller paediatric centres, which often have insufficient data to produce appropriate DRLs for different procedure types. Conversion factors are more reliable starting from DAP_BW instead of DAP and should be used according to the appropriate BW group.