A novel Hemi-Body Irradiation technique using electron beams (HBIe-)

Nontoxic generalized patient shielding devices for total skin electron therapy

This study evaluates alternative shielding materials to lead for protecting the scalp and nails during total skin electron irradiation. We tested a silicone helmet, tungsten-doped silicone mittens, and planar aluminum and copper shields. The helmet and mittens were created using 3D modeling software and fused filament fabrication printing, while the planar shields were machined and assembled with printed hardware. Transmission measurements showed transmission rates of 4.5%-6.8% for the mittens, 5.8%-9.1% for the helmet, and 7.5% for the planar shields. The silicone-based devices improve comfort and usability, and slight design changes can enhance coverage and application.

Development and Dosimetric Characterization of a Customizable Shield for Subtotal Skin Electron Beam Therapy

Purpose

Purpose: Subtotal skin electron beam therapy may be an option for patients with cutaneous lymphoma receiving radiation therapy to treat large areas of their skin but may benefit from sparing specific areas that may have had previous radiation therapy, are of specific cosmetic concern, and/or show no evidence of disease. We report here on the design, implementation, and dosimetric characteristics of a reusable and transparent customizable shield for use with the large fields used to deliver total skin electron beam therapy at extended distance with a conventional linear accelerator.

Methods and Materials

A shield was designed and manufactured consisting of acrylic blocks that can be mounted on a steel frame to allow patient-specific shielding. The dosimetry of the device was measured using radiochromic film.

Results

The shield is easy to use and well-tolerated for patient treatment, providing minimal electron transmission through the shield with a sharp penumbra at the field edge, with no increase in x-ray dose. We report on the dosimetry of a commercial device that has been used to treat more than 30 patients to date.

Conclusions

The customizable shield is well suited to providing patient-specific shielding for subtotal skin electron beam therapy.

Low dose total skin electron beam therapy for the management of T cell cutaneous lymphomas

Mycosis fungoides (MF) represent the most common type of primary cutaneous lymphomas. Total skin electron beam (TSEB) therapy to a total skin administered dose of 36 Gy represents a very effective treatment regimen and its role in the management of MF is well established. Unfortunately, the issue in MF is that despite the proved effectiveness of radiation therapy, disease regress, and the main goal of TSEB treatment seems to be the prolongation of the overall response duration time. Taking into consideration the high radio-sensitivity of the disease, lower radiation doses have been tested with acceptable and comparable results. We prospectively analyzed low dose TSEB in 14 patients treated at ATTIKON University Hospital from 2011 to 2017. After a median duration of follow up time of 39 months we found that low dose TSEB is an effective treatment option, since therapeutic results are more than acceptable, with minimal toxicity. The fact that it can be repeated safely in the natural course of a "regressive" disease makes it more attractive than the standard full dose scheme of 36 Gy.

Personalized Radiation Therapy in Cancer Pain Management

The majority of advanced cancer patients suffer from pain, which severely deteriorates their quality of life. Apart from analgesics, bisphosphonates, and invasive methods of analgesic treatment (e.g., intraspinal and epidural analgesics or neurolytic blockades), radiation therapy plays an important role in pain alleviation. It is delivered to a growing primary tumour, lymph nodes, or distant metastatic sites, producing pain of various intensity. Currently, different regiments of radiation therapy methods and techniques and various radiation dose fractionations are incorporated into the clinical practice. These include palliative radiation therapy, conventional external beam radiation therapy, as well as modern techniques of intensity modulated radiation therapy, volumetrically modulated arch therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy or radionuclide treatment (e.g., radium-223, strontium-89 for multiple painful osseous metastases). The review describes the possibilities and effectiveness of individual patient-tailored conventional and innovative radiation therapy approaches aiming at pain relief in cancer patients.

Clinical application of Total Skin Electron Beam (TSEB) therapy for the management of T cell cutaneous lymphomas. The evolving role of low dose (12 Gy) treatment schedule

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

Although rare, cutaneous lymphomas represent a separate entity in hematologic oncology. T cell origin lymphomas are most common, with Mycosis Fungoides (MF) accounting for about 50-70% of cases. Sezary Syndrome (SS), which represents the leukemic varian of MF, accounts for 3% of Cutaneous T Cell Lymphomas (CTCL). Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy (TSEB) is included at the mainstream of treatment choices for CTCL. The scope of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of two treatment schedules of TSEB.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We report our experience with TSEB in the management of MF and SS, as of 14 patients treated in our institution from 2011 to 2015. 8 patients received the 12 Gy (low dose) scheme while 6 patients were managed with 36 Gy (standard or full dose scheme) according to six dual field Stanford technique. The endpoints were overall response rate, duration of response and toxicity of treatment.

RESULTS

After a median follow up of 2.5 years we noted excellent treatment outcome, with both schemes being well tolerated and resulting in comparable response rates. The overall response rate for both treatment regimens was over 87.5%. Treatment was well tolerated with mild toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The role of TSEB in the management of MF and SS is well established. The low dose TSEB schedule of 12 Gy is an effective treatment option, since therapeutic results are more than acceptable, compliance is excellent and toxicity is minimal. Moreover, the evidence that it can be repeated safely makes it more attractive than the standard 36 Gy scheme, when a patient is referred to radiation treatment according to treatment guidelines.