A straightforward multiparametric quality control protocol for proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Validation and comparison of various 1.5 T and 3 T clinical scanner systems

A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation

Imaging biomarkers (IBs) have been proposed in medical literature that exploit images in a quantitative way, going beyond the visual assessment by an imaging physician. These IBs can be used in the diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment of several pathologies and are very often used for patient management pathways. In this respect, IBs to be used in clinical practice and clinical trials have a requirement to be precise, accurate, and reproducible. Due to limitations in imaging technology, an error can be associated with their value when considering the entire imaging chain, from data acquisition to data reconstruction and subsequent analysis. From this point of view, the use of IBs in clinical trials requires a broadening of the concept of quality assurance and this can be a challenge for the responsible medical physics experts (MPEs). Within this manuscript, we describe the concept of an IB, examine some examples of IBs currently employed in clinical practice/clinical trials and analyze the procedure that should be carried out to achieve better accuracy and reproducibility in their use. We anticipate that this narrative review, written by the components of the EFOMP working group on "the role of the MPEs in clinical trials"-imaging sub-group, can represent a valid reference material for MPEs approaching the subject.

Clinical translation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers - An overview and gap analysis of current practice

PURPOSE

This overview of the current landscape of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers (qMR IBs) aims to support the standardisation of academic IBs to assist their translation to clinical practice.

METHODS

We used three complementary approaches to investigate qMR IB use and quality management practices within the UK: 1) a literature search of qMR and quality management terms during 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; 2) a database search for clinical research studies using qMR IBs during 2016-2020; and 3) a survey to ascertain the current availability and quality management practices for clinical MRI scanners and associated equipment at research institutions across the UK.

RESULTS

The analysis showed increased use of all qMR methods between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020 and diffusion-tensor MRI and volumetry to be popular methods. However, the "translation ratio" of journal articles to clinical research studies was higher for qMR methods that have evidence of clinical translation via a commercial route, such as fat fraction and T2 mapping. The number of journal articles citing quality management terms doubled between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; although, its proportion relative to all journal articles only increased by 3.0%. The survey suggested that quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) of data acquisition procedures are under-reported in the literature and that QA/QC of acquired data/data analysis are under-developed and lack consistency between institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

We summarise current attempts to standardise and translate qMR IBs, and conclude by outlining the ideal quality management practices and providing a gap analysis between current practice and a metrological standard.

New developments in MRI: System characterization, technical advances and radiotherapy applications

A Special Issue of Physica Medica - European Journal of Medical Physics, focused on some important points of contact between the world of magnetic resonance and that of medical physics, was published during 2021. This Editorial describes and comments on the content of this Focus Issue, which contains articles from leading groups invited by the Guest Editors.

Empirical validation of gradient field models for an accurate ADC measured on clinical 3T MR systems in body oncologic applications

PURPOSE

To empirically corroborate vendor-provided gradient nonlinearity (GNL) characteristics and demonstrate efficient GNL bias correction for human brain apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) across 3T MR systems and spatial locations.

METHODS

Spatial distortion vector fields (DVF) were mapped in 3D using a surface fiducial array phantom for individual gradient channels on three 3T MR platforms from different vendors. Measured DVF were converted into empirical 3D GNL tensors and compared with their theoretical counterparts derived from vendor-provided spherical harmonic (SPH) coefficients. To illustrate spatial impact of GNL on ADC, diffusion weighted imaging using three orthogonal gradient directions was performed on a volunteer brain positioned at isocenter (as a reference) and offset superiorly by 10-17 cm (>10% predicted GNL bias). The SPH tensor-based GNL correction was applied to individual DWI gradient directions, and derived ADC was compared with low-bias reference for human brain white matter (WM) ROIs.

RESULTS

Empiric and predicted GNL errors were comparable for all three studied 3T MR systems, with <1.0% differences in the median and width of spatial histograms for individual GNL tensor elements. Median (±width) of ADC (10-3mm2/s) histograms measured at isocenter in WM reference ROIs from three MR systems were: 0.73 ± 0.11, 0.71 ± 0.14, 0.74 ± 0.17, and at off-isocenters (before versus after GNL correction) were respectively 0.63 ± 0.14 versus 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.53 ± 0.16 versus 0.74 ± 0.18, and 0.65 ± 0.16 versus 0.76 ± 0.18.

CONCLUSION

The phantom-based spatial distortion measurements validated vendor-provided gradient fields, and accurate WM ADC was recovered regardless of spatial locations and clinical MR platforms using system-specific tensor-based GNL correction for routine DWI.

On the dependence of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging on scanner system characteristics and acquisition parameters: A large multicenter and multiparametric phantom study with unsupervised clustering analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this multicenter phantom study was to exploit an innovative approach, based on an extensive acquisition protocol and unsupervised clustering analysis, in order to assess any potential bias in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimation due to different scanner characteristics. Moreover, we aimed at assessing, for the first time, any effect of acquisition plan/phase encoding direction on ADC estimation.

METHODS

Water phantom acquisitions were carried out on 39 scanners. DWI acquisitions (b-value = 0-200-400-600-800-1000 s/mm²) with different acquisition plans (axial, coronal, sagittal) and phase encoding directions (anterior/posterior and right/left, for the axial acquisition plan), for 3 orthogonal diffusion weighting gradient directions, were performed. For each acquisition setup, ADC values were measured in-center and off-center (6 different positions), resulting in an entire dataset of 84 × 39 = 3276 ADC values. Spatial uniformity of ADC maps was assessed by means of the percentage difference between off-center and in-center ADC values (Δ).

RESULTS

No significant dependence of in-center ADC values on acquisition plan/phase encoding direction was found. Ward unsupervised clustering analysis showed 3 distinct clusters of scanners and an association between Δ-values and manufacturer/model, whereas no association between Δ-values and maximum gradient strength, slew rate or static magnetic field strength was revealed. Several acquisition setups showed significant differences among groups, indicating the introduction of different biases in ADC estimation.

CONCLUSIONS

Unsupervised clustering analysis of DWI data, obtained from several scanners using an extensive acquisition protocol, allows to reveal an association between measured ADC values and manufacturer/model of scanner, as well as to identify suboptimal DWI acquisition setups for accurate ADC estimation.