1
|
High-dose salvage re-irradiation in recurrent/progressive adult diffuse gliomas: development of a novel prognostic scoring system. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:994-1001. [PMID: 35715356 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Over the past two decades, high-dose salvage re-irradiation (re-RT) has been used increasingly in the multimodality management of adults with recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma. Several factors that determine outcomes following re-RT have been incorporated into prognostic models to guide patient selection. We aimed to develop a novel four-tiered prognostic model incorporating relevant molecular markers from our single-institutional cohort of patients treated with high-dose salvage re-RT for recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma. MATERIAL AND METHODS Various patient, disease, and treatment-related factors impacting upon survival following salvage re-RT were identified through univariate analysis. Each of these prognostic factors was further subdivided and assigned scores of 0 (low-risk), 1 (intermediate-risk), or 2 (high-risk). Scores from individual prognostic factors were added to derive the cumulative score (ranging from 0 to 16), with increasing scores indicating worsening prognosis. RESULTS A total of 111 adults with recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma treated with salvage high-dose re-RT were included. We could assign patients into four prognostic subgroups (A=15 patients, score 0-3); (B=50 patients, score 4-7); (C=33 patients, score 8-10); and (D=13 patients, score 11-16) with completely non-overlapping survival curves suggesting the good discriminatory ability. Post-re-RT survival was significantly higher in Group A compared to groups B, C, and D, respectively (stratified log-rank p-value <0.0001). CONCLUSION There exists a lack of universally acceptable 'standard-of-care' salvage therapy for recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma. A novel four-tiered prognostic scoring system incorporating traditional factors as well as relevant molecular markers is proposed for selecting patients appropriately for high-dose salvage re-RT that warrants validation in a non-overlapping cohort.
Collapse
|
2
|
Combs SE, Belka C, Niyazi M, Corradini S, Pigorsch S, Wilkens J, Grosu AL, Guckenberger M, Ganswindt U, Bernhardt D. First statement on preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic in large German Speaking University-based radiation oncology departments. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:74. [PMID: 32264908 PMCID: PMC7136995 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01527-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging modern radiation oncology. At University Hospitals, we have a mandate to offer high-end treatments to all cancer patients. However, in times of crisis we must learn to prioritize resources, especially personnel. Compromising oncological outcome will blur all statistics, therefore all measures must be taken with great caution. Communication with our neighboring countries, within societies and between departments can help meet the challenge. Here, we report on our learning system and preparation measures to effectively tackle the COVID-19 challenge in University-Based Radiation Oncology Departments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 München, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany. .,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Claus Belka
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 München, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 München, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 München, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|