The impact of time-of-flight, resolution recovery, and noise modelling in reconstruction algorithms in non-solid-state detectors PET/CT scanners: - multi-centric comparison of activity recovery in a 68Ge phantom

Investigating the Impact of Voxel Size and Postfiltering on Quantitative Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study

Aim

This study aims to investigate the influence of voxel size and postfiltering on the quantification of standardized uptake value (SUV) in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images.

Materials and Methods

National Electrical Manufacturers Association phantom with the spheres of different sizes were utilized to simulate the lesions. The phantom was scanned using a PET/CT scanner, and the acquired images were reconstructed using two different matrix sizes, (192 × 192) and (256 × 256), and a wide range of postfiltering values.

Results

The findings demonstrated that postfiltering significantly affected SUV measurements. The changes in postfiltering values can result in overestimation or underestimation of SUV values, highlighting the importance of carefully selecting appropriate filters. Increasing the matrix size improved SUVmax and SUVmean values, particularly for small-sized spheres. Smaller voxel reconstructions slightly reduced partial volume effects and partially enhanced SUV quantification.

Conclusions

Careful consideration of postfiltering values and matrix size selection can lead to better SUV quantification. These findings emphasize the need to optimize the reconstruction parameters to enhance the clinical utility of PET/CT in detecting and evaluating malignant lesions.

Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate Cu-64 PET phantom image quality using Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximum with point-spread function modeling (OSEM-PSF) reconstruction algorithms. In the BPL, the regularization parameterβwas varied to identify the optimum value for image quality. In the OSEM-PSF, the effect of acquisition time was evaluated to assess the feasibility of shortened scan duration.Methods: A NEMA IEC PET body phantom was filled with known activities of water soluble Cu-64. The phantom was imaged on a PET/CT scanner and was reconstructed using BPL and OSEM-PSF algorithms. For the BPL reconstruction, variousβvalues (150, 250, 350, 450, and 550) were evaluated. For the OSEM-PSF algorithm, reconstructions were performed using list-mode data intervals ranging from 7.5 to 240 s. Image quality was assessed by evaluating the signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR), and background variability (BV).Results: The SNR and CNR were higher in images reconstructed with BPL compared to OSEM-PSF. Both the SNR and CNR increased with increasingβ, peaking atβ= 550. The CNR for allβ, sphere sizes and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) satisfied the Rose criterion for image detectability (CNR > 5). BPL reconstructed images withβ= 550 demonstrated the highest improvement in image quality. For OSEM-PSF reconstructed images with list-mode data duration ≥ 120 s, the noise level and CNR were not significantly different from the baseline 240 s list-mode data duration.Conclusions: BPL reconstruction improved Cu-64 PET phantom image quality by increasing SNR and CNR relative to OSEM-PSF reconstruction. Additionally, this study demonstrated scan time can be reduced from 240 to 120 s when using OSEM-PSF reconstruction while maintaining similar image quality. This study provides baseline data that may guide future studies aimed to improve clinical Cu-64 imaging.

A novel figure of merit to investigate 68Ga PET/CT image quality based on patient weight and lesion size using Q.Clear reconstruction algorithm: A phantom study

INTRODUCTION

Q.Clear is a Bayesian penalised-likelihood algorithm that uses a β-value for positron emission tomography(PET)/computed tomography(CT) image reconstruction(IR). Our study proposes a novel figure of merit, named CRBV, to compare the Q.Clear performances using 68Ga PET/CT image with the ordered-subset-expectation-maximization(OSEM) algorithm and to identify the optimal β-values for these images using two phantoms mimicking normal and overweight patients.

METHODS

NEMA IQ phantom with or without a ring of water-filled plastic bags (NEMAstd and NEMAow, respectively) was acquired and reconstructed with OSEM and Q.Clear at various β-values and minutes/bed position(min/bp). Contrast recovery(CR), background variability(BV) and CRBV were calculated. Highest CRBV values were used to identify optimal β-value ranges.

RESULTS

Q.Clear with 250 ≤ β ≤ 800 improved CRBV compared to OSEM for all the investigated spheres and acquisition setups. Outside of this range, Q.Clear still outperformed OSEM with few exceptions depending on spheres diameters and phantoms(e.g.,β-value = 1600 for diameters ≤ 17 mm using the NEMAow phantom). Regarding the CRBV performance for IR optimization, for the 4 min/bp NEMAstd IR, β-values = 300 ÷ 350 allowed to simultaneously optimize all diameters(except for the 10 mm); for the NEMAow IR, β-values = 350 ÷ 500 were needed for diameters > 20 mm, while β-values = 200 ÷ 250 were selected for the remaining diameters. For the 2 min/bp, β-value = 500 was suitable for diameters > 17 mm in both NEMAstd and NEMAow IR, while for smaller diameters β-value = 200 and β-values = 250 ÷ 350 were obtained for NEMAstd and NEMAow, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Almost all tested β-values of Q.Clear improved the CRBV compared to OSEM. In both phantoms, simulating normal and over-weight patients, optimal β-values were found according to lesion sizes and investigated acquisition times.