Fetal dose estimation for Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy whole breast irradiation by optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters

Comparative analysis of fetal dose sparing between a C-arm linac and an O-ring linac in a SIB-VMAT sarcoma treatment for a pregnant patient: A technical note and case report

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of two linacs designs on fetal dose sparing on a pregnant patient, including estimation of the fetal dose, and the effect of a lead apron.

METHODS

A patient with a high-grade sarcoma located in the right knee/lower thigh was prescribed 51 Gy (1.7 Gy/Fx) with a simultaneous-integrated-boost (SIB) of 60 Gy to a smaller volume, starting in the 26th gestational week. Volumetric modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) plans with 6MV-FFF were developed using identical dosimetric constraints on a Varian Truebeam Edge with HD-MLC and a Varian Halcyon with double-stacked MLC. Based on patient dimension measurements, an anthropomorphic phantom was constructed using a Rando phantom and saline bags in the patient's Vac-Lok bag. Phantom measurements were performed using OSLDs and TLDs placed at three different planes, corresponding to the pubis, the umbilicus, and the fundus based on patient measurements and projected gestational age, to estimate the fetal dose. Three experimental scenarios were measured, each with CBCT-based image guidance for an accurate, reproducible setup: Edge, Halcyon, and Halcyon with a tri-folded lead apron (0.5 mm × 3 = 1.5 mm Pb) over the phantom abdomen.

RESULTS

Plan quality and total MUs are comparable between the Edge and Halcyon plans. The OSLD-measured whole-course dose to the pubis, umbilicus, and fundus were 18.8, 13.1, and 11.7 cGy, respectively, on Halcyon, on average 27.8% lower than Edge. The repeatability within either dosimeter was good, although TLD showed systematically lower doses. Importantly, both dosimetry systems showed a lower measured fetal dose for the Halcyon plan compared with the Edge plan. Adding a tri-folded lead apron over the abdomen did not meaningfully lower the measured dose.

CONCLUSION

In this case study, Halcyon demonstrated a better sparing of out-of-field fetal dose compared to TrueBeam Edge. It was shown that lead aprons do not provide additional fetal dose sparing.

Inter-institutional variability of knowledge-based plan prediction of left whole breast irradiation

PURPOSE

Within a multi-institutional project, we aimed to assess the transferability of knowledge-based (KB) plan prediction models in the case of whole breast irradiation (WBI) for left-side breast irradiation with tangential fields (TF).

METHODS

Eight institutions set KB models, following previously shared common criteria. Plan prediction performance was tested on 16 new patients (2 pts per centre) extracting dose-volume-histogram (DVH) prediction bands of heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung and breast. The inter-institutional variability was quantified by the standard deviations (SDint) of predicted DVHs and mean-dose (Dmean). The transferability of models, for the heart and the ipsilateral lung, was evaluated by the range of geometric Principal Component (PC1) applicability of a model to test patients of the other 7 institutions.

RESULTS

SDint of the DVH was 1.8 % and 1.6 % for the ipsilateral lung and the heart, respectively (20 %-80 % dose range); concerning Dmean, SDint was 0.9 Gy and 0.6 Gy for the ipsilateral lung and the heart, respectively (<0.2 Gy for contralateral organs). Mean predicted doses ranged between 4.3 and 5.9 Gy for the ipsilateral lung and 1.1-2.3 Gy for the heart. PC1 analysis suggested no relevant differences among models, except for one centre showing a systematic larger sparing of the heart, concomitant to a worse PTV coverage, due to high priority in sparing the left anterior descending coronary artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed high transferability among models and low inter-institutional variability of 2% for plan prediction. These findings encourage the building of benchmark models in the case of TF-WBI.

A review on fetal dose in Radiotherapy: A historical to contemporary perspective

This paper aims to review on fetal dose in radiotherapy and extends and updates on a previous work¹ to include proton therapy. Out-of-field doses, which are the doses received by regions outside of the treatment field, are unavoidable regardless of the treatment modalities used during radiotherapy. In the case of pregnant patients, fetal dose is a major concern as it has long been recognized that fetuses exposed to radiation have a higher probability of suffering from adverse effects such as anatomical malformations and even fetal death, especially when the 0.1Gy threshold is exceeded. In spite of the low occurrence of cancer during pregnancy, the radiotherapy team should be equipped with the necessary knowledge to deal with fetal dose. This is crucial so as to ensure that the fetus is adequately protected while not compromising the patient treatment outcomes. In this review paper, various aspects of fetal dose will be discussed ranging from biological, clinical to the physics aspects. Other than fetal dose resulting from conventional photon therapy, this paper will also extend the discussion to modern treatment modalities and techniques, namely proton therapy and image-guided radiotherapy, all of which have seen a significant increase in use in current radiotherapy. This review is expected to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of fetal dose in radiotherapy, and to be fully aware of the steps to be taken in providing radiotherapy for pregnant patients.