Evaluation of postpartum perineal pain and dyspareunia—A prospective study

Treatment of Postpartum Myofascial Perineal Pain and Dyspareunia Through Local Anaesthetic Infiltrations Compared to Anaesthetic and Corticosteroids: A Randomised Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Background/Objectives: The objective is to assess if transvaginal infiltration with anaesthetic only is non-inferior compared to anaesthetic plus corticosteroid for the treatment of myofascial pelvic pain. Methods: A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group (1:1) clinical trial was set at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario "Príncipe de Asturias" from December 2017 to June 2023. Women presenting myofascial perineal pain ≥ 4 on the visual analogue scale (VAS) 2 months after delivery, with instrumental delivery or prolonged second stage (>3 h) or foetal weight > 4000 g, were randomised into two groups to receive levobupivacaine 5 mg/mL or levobupivacaine 5 mg/mL plus betamethasone 3 mg/mL. For each trigger point detected, a transvaginal infiltration was performed using the corresponding treatment. The patients were followed up to 6 months. The primary endpoint was a change in the VAS score from baseline at 6 months. Results: A total of 114 women were enrolled, with 57 randomly assigned to each group. The median (IQR) VAS 2 weeks after infiltration decreased by a similar magnitude: median (IQR) 2 (1-3) in the levobupivacaine group and 2 (1-4) in the levobupivacaine + betamethasone group (p-value = 0.33). The same trend was observed at 6 months: median (IQR) 1 (1-4) in the levobupivacaine group and 1 (1-2) in the levobupivacaine + betamethasone group (p-value = 0.85). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that the use of anaesthetic-only infiltration is non-inferior compared to anaesthetic plus corticosteroid for the treatment of myofascial perineal pain.

Factors Affecting Follow-up for Specialty Postpartum Care after Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury at a Single U.S. Institution

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Early postpartum specialist care may improve outcomes for birthing people who sustain obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). This study was aimed at describing follow-up rates in a postpartum recovery clinic (PPRC) for patients who sustained OASIS at delivery, and at identifying factors associated with failure to follow up. We hypothesized that providing care in PPRC would result in high rates of access to specialized care for OASIS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with OASIS at a single institution from January 2018 to December 2023. Patients who sustain OASIS receive an automatic referral to PPRC within 3 weeks postpartum. Demographic and follow-up data were extracted from the medical records, including Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) score. The primary outcome was follow-up in PPRC. We examined associations between patient characteristics and failure to follow up using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 659 deliveries with OASIS during the study period, 540 (81.9%) followed up in a PPRC and of those 468 (86.7%) followed up within 3 weeks. Failure to follow up was associated with multiparity, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, having Medicaid or state insurance, and elevated EPDS score on univariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, having Medicaid or state medical assistance and elevated depression screening remained associated with failure to follow up in a PPRC.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high overall attendance rate at a urogynecologist-led postpartum clinic in birthing people who sustained OASIS. An elevated depression screening score and having Medicaid or state medical assistance were associated with failure to follow up.

Evaluating the Benefit of a Urogynecologic Telehealth Consultation after Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

INTRODUCTION

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) are associated with significant risk of complications, including pain, infection, and long-term pelvic floor dysfunction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the utility and acceptability of a postpartum telehealth consultation focused on pelvic floor health for patients after OASI.

METHODS

This prospective study used a pre-post design comparing standard postpartum care versus standard postpartum care plus a telehealth urogynecology consultation focused on pelvic floor recovery. The primary outcome was symptom burden as measured by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) score 16-weeks postpartum. Patient experience was evaluated using the QQ10 and the Patient Enablement Instrument. T-tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare groups.

RESULTS

A total of 119 participants completed study activities (control group n = 62, intervention group n = 57). There was no significant difference between the two groups in PFDI-20 scores (55.6 versus 46.6, p = 0.23). The individual items most likely to be endorsed among all participants were related to flatal incontinence (52.1%) and fecal urgency (49.6%). For the subset analysis of 35 patients with severe OASI (3C or fourth-degree tears), those who had a telehealth consultation had lower PFDI-20 scores (56.6 versus 34.7; p = 0.04). QQ10 estimated a value score of 79/100 and a burden score of 18/100 for the telehealth consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

A postpartum telehealth consultation focused on pelvic floor health may benefit patients with severe OASI who reported reduced symptom burden. Participants rated a telehealth consultation as high value and low burden for this condition.

The Efficacy of Honey for the Treatment of Perineal Wounds Following Vaginal Birth: A Narrative Review

Background/Objectives: During vaginal delivery, the perineum can be damaged either by episiotomy or by a spontaneous perineal tear, leading to several complications. The wound healing process should proceed as quickly and properly as possible without an infection. Medical grade honey (MGH) may be a potent treatment option due to its antimicrobial and pro-healing activities. This literature study investigated the role of honey in the treatment of vaginal wounds after delivery. Methods: Studies published before 17 July 2024 in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO host/CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases about honey, episiotomy wounds, and perineal tears, as well as those investigating wound healing and/or pain, were assessed. Results: Ten studies were included (six RCTs, of which three were double-blind, one was quasi-experimental with a posttest only, and three were observational studies without a control group), with 723 participants in total. Six of the seven controlled studies showed honey significantly improved various outcome measures, such as improved wound healing, and reduced need for pain medication. The three non-controlled studies also had a positive outcome, improving wound healing and decreasing pain intensity and prickling sensation. However, the overall quality of available evidence is limited. Different types of honey concentrations, origins, and additives were used in the included studies. Using a standardized MGH formulation may help to maintain consistent and potent effects. Therefore, additional research is needed to determine the efficacy of MGH in perineal trauma and to establish guidelines for clinical use. Conclusions: Honey potentially has a great effect on wound healing of perineal trauma; however, more research is necessary to substantiate the findings in the current literature.

Hyaluronidase for reducing perineal trauma

BACKGROUND

Perineal trauma after vaginal birth is common and can be associated with short- and long-term health problems. Perineal hyaluronidase (HAase) injection has been widely used to reduce perineal trauma, perineal pain and the need for episiotomy since the 1950s. The administration of HAase is considered to be a simple, low risk, low cost and effective way to decrease perineal trauma without causing adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of perineal HAase injection for reducing perineal trauma, episiotomy and perineal pain during vaginal delivery.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify studies for inclusion in this review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) in November 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing women giving birth to their first baby receiving perineal HAase injection compared to placebo injection or no intervention during vaginal delivery of a single foetus with vertex foetal presentation (foetus with head engaging the maternal pelvis).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted and checked data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the studies. Our primary outcomes were perineal trauma (tears or episiotomy, or both), episiotomy and perineal pain. Our secondary outcomes were first and second degree perineal lacerations, third and fourth degree perineal lacerations, perineal oedema 1 hour after vaginal delivery, perineal oedema 24 hours after vaginal delivery and neonatal Apgar scores of less than 7 at five minutes after birth (Apgar score is a measure of the health status of a newborn). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five randomised controlled trials involving a total of 747 women (data were available for 743 women). The dosage of HAase used in the perineal injection varied from 750 turbidity-reducing units to 5000 international units. The certainty of the evidence was largely low (ranging from very low to moderate). Perineal HAase injection versus placebo injection Data from three trials involving 426 women provided low-certainty evidence that there may be no difference between the HAase and placebo groups in the incidence of perineal trauma (tears or episiotomy, or both) (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.03; 426 participants, 3 studies), episiotomy (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.15; 427 participants, 3 studies), first and second degree perineal lacerations (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.18; 341 participants, 3 studies), third and fourth degree perineal lacerations (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.05; 426 participants, 3 studies), and perineal oedema one hour after vaginal delivery (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.25; 303 participants, 2 studies). Moreover, perineal HAase injection during the second stage of labour likely resulted in a reduction in incidence of perineal oedema 24 hours after vaginal delivery compared with placebo injection (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.70; 303 participants, 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be no difference between groups in Apgar scores less than 7 at five minutes (RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.24 to 105.95; 148 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence). Perineal HAase injection versus no intervention Data from three trials involving 373 women suggested that perineal HAase injection during the second stage of labour may result in a lower incidence of perineal trauma (tears or episiotomy, or both) (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.88; 373 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) compared with no intervention. The evidence is very uncertain for episiotomy (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.42; 373 participants, 3 studies), first and second degree perineal lacerations (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.18; 373 participants, 3 studies) and perineal oedema one hour after vaginal delivery (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.71; 139 participants, 1 study), all very low certainty evidence. No third and fourth degree perineal lacerations, perineal oedema 24 hours after vaginal delivery or Apgar scores less than 7 at five minutes were reported in these three trials. No side effects were reported in the included trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Perineal HAase injection during the second stage of labour may result in a lower incidence of perineal trauma (tears or episiotomy, or both) compared with no intervention, but not compared with placebo injection, in women having a vaginal delivery. Meanwhile, perineal HAase injection likely reduces the incidence of perineal oedema 24 hours after vaginal delivery compared with placebo injection. The potential use of perineal HAase injection as a method to reduce perineal trauma and perineal oedema remains to be determined as the number of high-quality trials and outcomes reported was too limited to draw conclusions on its effectiveness and safety. Further rigorous randomised controlled trials are required to evaluate the role of perineal HAase injection in vaginal deliveries, including evaluating whether there is any differential effect based on the dose, frequency and positioning of HAase injection.

Clinical practices in the management and follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a comprehensive review

OBJECTIVES

To review and compare existing guidelines on the intrapartum management and postpartum follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of clinical guidelines related to OASIS management, focusing on intrapartum care and postpartum follow-up. Searches were performed in July 2024 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Guidelines published after 2010 in English were included.

RESULTS

Nine national guidelines were included. There was a consensus on OASIS classification and immediate management, particularly regarding suture techniques, materials, and the necessity of adequate analgesia. However, notable variations were identified in the timing of repair, specialist involvement, use of prophylactic antibiotics, and post-operative care protocols. Postpartum follow-up practices also varied, especially regarding the role of physiotherapy and the timing of specialist consultations, reflecting inconsistencies in long-term care recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Significant variability existed in the guidelines for the management and follow-up of OASIS, particularly in postpartum care. This study underscored the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care for women affected by OASIS.

Postpartum perineal pain and its association with sub-classified second-degree tears and perineal trauma-A follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Postnatal perineal pain is prevalent following childbirth and can impact women both physically and emotionally. The aim of the study was to study the effect of collegial midwifery assistance on perineal pain and pain medication 1 month after birth and to investigate the associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of intercourse.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A follow-up questionnaire was sent 1 month postpartum to women with a first spontaneous vaginal birth participating in a randomized controlled trial (Oneplus trial). Data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020. Differences in perineal pain between women attended by one or two midwives were analyzed according to intention-to-treat using bivariate analyses. Associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of sexual intercourse were investigated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The category no tear/first-degree tear was compared separately to each of the other tear categories.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03770962.

RESULTS

Out of 2233 women, 1762 responded within 30-60 days postpartum. Of women in the no tear/first-degree tear category, 27.7% reported perineal pain during the past week, in contrast to women with OASI, where 64.2% reported perineal pain. Women with OASI experienced the highest odds of perineal pain (aOR 4.51, 95% CI 2.72-7.47) compared to those with no tear/first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.45-2.41), women with an episiotomy (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11-2.87), and those with minor second-degree tears (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.94). Women with episiotomy reported the highest odds ratios for dissatisfaction with tear healing (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 1.92-6.31). No significant differences in perineal pain and pain medication were observed between women allocated to collegial midwifery assistance and those allocated to standard care.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with OASI reported the highest odds of perineal pain 30-60 days after birth compared to women with no tear or first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears. Women subjected to an episiotomy reported highest odds ratios of dissatisfaction with tear healing.

Epidural injection of hydromorphone for postoperative pain after episiotomy: a randomized controlled trial

Perineal incision resulting in post-partum pain and impact on puerperal life was the focus of our study. We recruited postpartum mothers who had undergone vaginal delivery to receive labor analgesia and episiotomy with an epidural injection of 0.5 mg hydromorphone to assess the therapeutic effects of postpartum analgesia. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the control group (Group NS) received an epidural injection of an equal amount of saline, while the study group (Group HY) received an epidural injection of 0.5 mg hydromorphone. We collected relevant data from electronic medical records to compare the differences between the two groups. The intervention group demonstrated lower pain scores at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Additionally, a higher number of patients in the control group required pain medication (7 (15.9%) compared to 2 (4.7%)). The time to first analgesia request in group NS was earlier than that in group HY (8.94 ± 1.27 h compared to 16.96 ± 3.38 h). The study group experienced higher rates of vomiting (P = 0.002) and itching (P < 0.001). However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of urinary retention, dyskinesia, respiratory depression, dizziness, or neonatal feeding. The epidural injection of 0.5 mg hydromorphone proved to be effective in alleviating pain caused by maternal episiotomy and did not negatively affect neonatal feeding.Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/usercenter.aspx identifier: ChiCTR2200064687.

Minimizing tearing during vaginal delivery with a perineal protection device: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of evidence indicating that second-degree tears cause both short- and long-term consequences. Very few preventative measures have been found to reduce the incidence of these tears.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether the use of a perineal protection device during vaginal birth reduces severe perineal tearing (grade ≥2 tear) in primiparous women compared with routine manual perineal support.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in Sweden from 2019 to 2021. Primiparous women at term were randomly allocated to the intervention group (n=43), where a perineal protection device was used, or to the routine care group (n=49). The primary outcome was grade of perineal tear. The secondary outcomes were vaginal and labial tearing. Continuous data were analyzed using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Dichotomous data were analyzed using the Pearson X2 test, Fisher exact test, and ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

Women in the intervention group had a significantly lower risk of sustaining more extensive perineal tearing than those in the control group. The use of the perineal protection device decreased the risk of grade ≥2 tears in relation to grade 0 to 1 tears (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.94). Ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed an odds ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.81) per incremetn of grade injury using the perineal protection device vs routine care (P=.013). The number needed to treat using the perineal protection device was 4.3 to avoid 1 grade ≥2 tear. Women in the treatment group showed less labial tearing (P=.016). No adverse effect was detected.

CONCLUSION

The use of a perineal protection device reduced the risk of grade ≥2 perineal tearing by 60% and labial tearing. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

The association between waterbirth and perineal injury or other adverse outcomes among low-risk women with physiological birth: Results from the Nordic Home Birth Cohort Study

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND

Immersion in water has known benefits, such as reducing pain and shortening the duration of labour. The relationship between waterbirth and perineal injury remains unclear.

AIM

To compare the incidence of perineal injury in waterbirth and birth on land among low-risk women. Secondary outcomes were postpartum haemorrhage and 5-minute Apgar scores <7.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of 2875 low-risk women who planned a home birth in Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden in 2008-2013 and had a spontaneous vaginal birth without intervention. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed.

FINDINGS

A total of 942 women had a waterbirth, and 1933 gave birth on land. The groups differed in their various background variables. Multiparous women had moderately lower rates of intact perineum (59.3% vs. 63.9%) and primiparous women had lower rates of episiotomies (1.1% vs. 4.8%) in waterbirth than in birth on land. No statistically significant differences were detected in adjusted regression analysis on intact perineum in waterbirth (primiparous women's aOR = 1.03, CI 0.68-1.58; multiparous women's aOR = 0.84, CI 0.67-1.05). The rates of sphincter injuries (0.9% vs. 0.6%) were low in both groups. No significant differences were detected in secondary outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The decreased incidence of intact perineum among multiparous women was modest and inconclusive, and the prevalence of sphincter injury was low.

CONCLUSION

Low-risk women contemplating waterbirth should be advised to weigh the risks and benefits detected in this study against previously established benefits of waterbirth and should make an informed choice based on their values.

Prevalence and associated factors of maternal birth trauma following vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North-West Ethiopia, 2022

BACKGROUND

Maternal injury with any form of perineal trauma following vaginal delivery is very common which ranges globally from 16.2 to 90.4%. The frequency of Obstetric anal sphincter Injuries and the incidence of cervical laceration increases rapidly. However, in Ethiopia, there is limited evidence on the prevalence of maternal birth trauma and its determinant factors after vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the magnitude and associated factors of Maternal Birth Trauma after vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Gondar, North-West Ethiopia, 2022.

METHODS

An Institution based cross-sectional study was conducted among mothers with singleton vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from 9th May to 9th August 2022 among 424 study participants. Pre-tested semi-structured questioner was utilized. Epi-Data version 4.6 was used for data entry and exported to SPSS version 25 for data management and analysis. To identify the determinant factors, binary logistic regression model was fitted and variables with p-value < 0.2 were considered for the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, Variables with P-value < 0.05 were considered to have statistical significant association with the outcome variable. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% CI was reported to declare the statistical significance and strength of association between Maternal Birth Trauma and independent variables.

RESULTS

A total of 424 mothers who delivered vaginally were included. The mean age of participants was 26.83 years (± 5.220 years). The proportion of birth trauma among mothers after vaginal delivery was47.4% (95%CI: 43.1, 51.7). Of different forms of perineal trauma, First degree tear in 42.8%, OASIs in 1.5% and Cervical laceration in 2.5% study participants. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis being primiparous (AOR = 3.00; 95%CI: 1.68, 5.38), Gestational age ≥ 39 weeks at delivery (AOR = 2.96; 95%CI: 1.57, 5.57), heavier birth weight (AOR = 12.3; 95%CI: 7.21, 40.1), bigger head circumference (AOR = 5.45; 95%CI: 2.62, 11.31), operative vaginal delivery (AOR = 6.59; 95%CI: 1.44, 30.03) and delivery without perineum and/or fetal head support (AOR = 6.30; 95%CI: 2.21, 17.94) were significantly associated with the presence of maternal birth trauma.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Maternal birth trauma following vaginal delivery was relatively high in this study. Prim parity, gestational age beyond 39 weeks at delivery, heavier birth weight, bigger head circumference, operative vaginal delivery and delivery without perineum and/or fetal head supported were factors affecting perineal outcome. The Ministry of Health of Ethiopia should provide regular interventional training as to reduce maternal birth trauma.

Genitourinary syndrome of lactation: a new perspective on postpartum and lactation-related genitourinary symptoms

BACKGROUND

The genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a well-documented condition characterized by a range of genitourinary symptoms in peri- and postmenopausal women. As with GSM, postpartum lactating women experience reduced estrogen and androgen levels. However, there is limited research on the impact of symptoms during the postpartum breastfeeding period.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to review the literature for genitourinary health in the postpartum breastfeeding population and summarize key findings and potential treatments.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature review in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus from inception of database to November 2023 using the following keywords individually and in combination: "physiology of postpartum" or "physiology of lactogenesis" or "vulvovaginal health" or "vaginal atrophy" or "vaginal dryness" or "dyspareunia" or "urinary incontinence" or "lactation" or "breastfeeding" or "vaginal estrogen." All identified articles published in English were considered. Relevant studies were extracted, evaluated, and analyzed. The work presented in this article represents a summative review of the identified literature.

RESULTS

During lactation, high levels of prolactin inhibit estrogen and androgen secretion via negative feedback, which leads to an increased prevalence of vulvovaginal atrophy, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, and urinary incontinence in lactating postpartum women. Despite these highly prevalent and potentially devastating symptoms, there is a lack of consistent screening at postpartum visits and no treatment guidelines available to health care providers.

CONCLUSION

Postpartum breastfeeding women experience similar physiology and symptoms to the postmenopausal phase, as seen in GSM. We propose the introduction of a novel term to describe the genitourinary changes seen in postpartum breastfeeding individuals: genitourinary syndrome of lactation. The diagnostic use of genitourinary syndrome of lactation will equip health care providers with an all-encompassing term to bring awareness to the symptoms experienced by postpartum breastfeeding individuals and lead to improved screening and treatment for the high numbers of individuals experiencing these genitourinary changes.

Childbirth Acquired Perineal Trauma study (CHAPTER): a UK prospective cohort study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Childbirth-related perineal trauma (CRPT) is the most common complication of childbirth affecting 80% of women overall after vaginal birth. There remains a lack of comprehensive evidence relating to the prevalence of subsequent health problems. Current evidence is related to short-term outcomes, for example, pain, but there is less known about longer-term outcomes such as infection, wound dehiscence, pelvic floor function and psychological outcomes. This is a protocol for a cohort study assessing outcomes of women after CRPT.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A multicentre, prospective UK cohort study aiming to include 1000 women. All women who have sustained CRPT will be eligible for inclusion and will be followed-up for 12 months after childbirth. The primary outcome will be perineal infection at 6 weeks post-birth. Secondary outcomes will include antibiotic use for perineal infection, wound breakdown, use of analgesia, the requirement for admission or surgical intervention, urinary and faecal incontinence, anxiety and depressive symptoms, sexual function and impact on daily activities. Outcomes will be measured at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post partum, with some outcomes being measured at all time points and others at selected most appropriate time points only. Outcome data will be obtained from a review of clinical notes and from patient questionnaires. Simple descriptive statistics will be used to summarise characteristics and outcomes, with categorical variables expressed as percentages and continuous variables as mean averages, alongside the corresponding standard deviatons.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been granted by the Research Ethics Council with reference 23/WA/0169. Data collected from the Childbirth Acquired Perineal Trauma (CHAPTER) cohort study will highlight the prevalence and type of complications after CRPT and which women are more at risk. After the conclusion of this study, findings will be used to work with governmental organisations and Royal Colleges to target resources and ultimately improve care.

Recovery from Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in a Prospective Cohort of First Births

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) for primiparous women who gave birth vaginally and to compare recovery by OASIS status in three domains as follows: (1) physical health and functioning, (2) mental health, and (3) healthcare utilization.

STUDY DESIGN

This secondary analysis used data from 2,013 vaginal births in the First Baby Study, a prospective cohort study of women with first births between 2009 and 2011. Interview data at multiple time points were linked to birth certificate and hospital discharge data. The key exposure of interest was OASIS (3rd or 4th degree perineal laceration, identified in the hospital discharge data; n = 174) versus no OASIS (n = 1,839). We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between OASIS and a range of outcomes including physical health and functioning, depression, and health care utilization, assessed at 1 month and 6 months postpartum.

RESULTS

Eight percent of women had OASIS. In adjusted models, there were no differences in general physical health and functioning measures by OASIS (such as fatigue and overall self-rated health), but women with OASIS had higher rates of reporting perineal pain (p < 0.001), accidental stool loss (p = 0.001), and bowel problems (p < 0.001) at 1-month postpartum. By 6-month postpartum, there were no differences in reported physical health and functioning. There were no differences in probable depression at 1- or 6-month postpartum. Women with OASIS were more likely to attend a comprehensive postpartum visit, but there were no other differences in health care utilization by OASIS.

CONCLUSION

Women with OASIS were at increased risk of accidental stool loss, bowel problems, and perineal pain in the immediate postpartum period. Women who had OASIS had similar physical functioning across a range of general health outcomes to women who gave birth vaginally without OASIS.

KEY POINTS

· Higher risk of bowel problems and accidental stool loss 1-month postpartum with OASIS.. · Higher risk of perineal pain 1-month postpartum with OASIS.. · No differences in health outcomes at 6-months postpartum by OASIS..

The severity of second-degree perineal tears and perineal pain during three months postpartum: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Second-degree perineal tears are common and can vary widely in the extent of tissue trauma. Therefore, a better understanding of perineal pain based on tissue trauma severity in second-degree tears is needed.

AIM

The primary aim of this study was to assess differences in perineal pain according to the severity of perineal tears, with a focus on subcategories of second-degree tears, during the first three months postpartum. The secondary aim was to assess the use of pain medication and breastfeeding patterns according to the severity of the second-degree tears.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, nulli- and multiparous women with singleton pregnancies were included during pregnancy. After birth, perineal tears were classified using the latest international classification system. In addition, second-degree tears were subcategorised according to percentage of damage to the perineum (<50 %=2A,>50 % but less than entire perineum=2B, affecting entire perineum, anal sphincter not involved=2C). Perineal pain, use of pain medication and breastfeeding patterns were assessed during a phone interview seven to ten days postpartum and through an electronic questionnaire three months postpartum.

FINDINGS

Out of 880 vaginal births, 852 participants completed the phone interview and 715 answered the electronic questionnaire. During the first three months postpartum, women with 2C-tears reported statistically significantly higher pain scores and more frequent use of pain medication compared to women with 2A-tears. There was no statistically significant difference between the number of participants not breastfeeding between second-degree tear subcategories.

CONCLUSION

Women with 2C-tears reported higher perineal pain scores and more use of pain medication compared to those with less severe tears during three months postpartum.

Obstetric outcomes and uptake of care among 149 non-Swedish speaking migrant women attending a birth preparation visit during pregnancy - An observational study from Sweden

Introduction

In Sweden almost one third of the population is born in another country and a large number of the women who do not speak Swedish are of reproductive age. Women migrating from low-income countries have higher risks for poor obstetric outcomes than receiving country-born citizens. INFOR (a Swedish word for "before" or "ahead of") is an intervention offering language-assisted, individual birth preparation for non-Swedish speaking pregnant women unfamiliar with the maternity care system. The aim of this study was to describe the uptake of care and obstetric outcomes among non-Swedish speaking migrant women attending INFOR.

Methods

A descriptive study of the obstetric outcomes and uptake of care was conducted of the 149 non-Swedish speaking pregnant women who participated in INFOR between 2016 and 2020. The data were accessed retrospectively from the medical record system Obstetrix and the population-based Swedish Pregnancy Registry and analysed descriptively.

Results

Women participating in INFOR originated from 44 countries and spoke 35 different languages. During late pregnancy, 20 percent of the women sought care for decreased fetal movements and 80 percent of the women attended the postpartum visit. While the majority of the participants were offered professional language support during pregnancy, almost none had a professional interpreter present during labour and birth. After birth, 80 percent of the primiparous women were asked to rate their birth experience, but only half of the multiparous women were asked. Further, only half of the primiparous women attending the postpartum visit were asked about their self-rated health.

Conclusion

INFOR may increase uptake of some important aspects of care during pregnancy, birth and postpartum among migrants of diverse backgrounds. The findings raise concerns however about communication support for migrant women, especially during labour and birth. The offer of professional interpreting as part of standard maternity care for women who need it is essential and must be improved in order to provide equitable care for all.

The prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal birth

Perineal trauma after vaginal birth is common, with approximately 9 of 10 women being affected. Second-degree perineal tears are twice as likely to occur in primiparous births, with a incidence of 40%. The incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury is approximately 3%, with a significantly higher rate in primiparous than in multiparous women (6% vs 2%). Obstetrical anal sphincter injury is a significant risk factor for the development of anal incontinence, with approximately 10% of women developing symptoms within a year following vaginal birth. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries have significant medicolegal implications and contribute greatly to healthcare costs. For example, in 2013 and 2014, the economic burden of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in the United Kingdom ranged between £3.7 million (with assisted vaginal birth) and £9.8 million (with spontaneous vaginal birth). In the United States, complications associated with trauma to the perineum incurred costs of approximately $83 million between 2007 and 2011. It is therefore crucial to focus on improvements in clinical care to reduce this risk and minimize the development of perineal trauma, particularly obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Identification of risk factors allows modification of obstetrical practice with the aim of reducing the rate of perineal trauma and its attendant associated morbidity. Risk factors associated with second-degree perineal trauma include increased fetal birthweight, operative vaginal birth, prolonged second stage of labor, maternal birth position, and advanced maternal age. With obstetrical anal sphincter injury, risk factors include induction of labor, augmentation of labor, epidural, increased fetal birthweight, fetal malposition (occiput posterior), midline episiotomy, operative vaginal birth, Asian ethnicity, and primiparity. Obstetrical practice can be modified both antenatally and intrapartum. The evidence suggests that in the antenatal period, perineal massage can be commenced in the third trimester of pregnancy to increase muscle elasticity and allow stretching of the perineum during birth, thereby reducing the risk of tearing or need for episiotomy. With regard to the intrapartum period, there is a growing body of evidence from the United Kingdom, Norway, and Denmark suggesting that the implementation of quality improvement initiatives including the training of clinicians in manual perineal protection and mediolateral episiotomy can reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury. With episiotomy, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics recommends restrictive rather than routine use of episiotomy. This is particularly the case with unassisted vaginal births. However, there is a role for episiotomy, specifically mediolateral or lateral, with assisted vaginal births. This is specifically the case with nulliparous vacuum and forceps births, given that the use of mediolateral or lateral episiotomy has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury in these groups by 43% and 68%, respectively. However, the complications associated with episiotomy including perineal pain, dyspareunia, and sexual dysfunction should be acknowledged. Despite considerable research, interventions for reducing the risk of perineal trauma remain a subject of controversy. In this review article, we present the available data on the prevention of perineal trauma by describing the risk factors associated with perineal trauma and interventions that can be implemented to prevent perineal trauma, in particular obstetrical anal sphincter injury.

A women-centred exploration of postpartum perineal pain when the perineum is diagnosed as intact: A French Gadamerian research study

BACKGROUND

Postpartum perineal pain is a frequent symptom (90%) with consequences on postnatal health regardless of whether the perineum remains intact. The impact of that pain on both short and long-term health has been studied and literature suggests midwives have a role to play in addressing this issue. However, the determinants of perineal pain when no lesions are identified are under researched and there is little understanding of women's views on this topic.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to gain an understanding of postpartum perineal pain when the perineum is considered to be intact. The objectives were •To gain an understanding of postpartum pain and its consequences on health and well-being •To explore women's views and understanding of perineal pain postpartum •To gain an understanding of the determinants of postpartum perineal pain when no anatomic lesion is diagnosed.

METHODS

A Gadamerian hermeneutic approach was used to achieve a shared understanding of the issue. Participants were recruited from two maternity hospitals in the French area of Vaucluse. All women aged 18 to 45 years old, having given birth vaginally to a single live child and diagnosed with an intact perineum, were invited to participate in face-to-face interviews. Eleven participants were interviewed once, six of whom agreed to a second interview which took place over the telephone due to Covid lockdown.

FINDINGS

The findings identified three major themes 1. Can't honestly call it pain, 2. Reassurance in normality, 3. Managing the unexpected. The use of the word pain to describe perineal sensations in postpartum was questioned by the participants, who used inner resources to deal with these sensations. Fostering self-confidence, having the possibility to explain the sensations and qualifying them as normal were some approaches women usedto manage their postpartum perineal sensations in a positive manner.

Persistent Postpartum Pain - A Somatic and Psychologic Perfect Storm

Persistent postpartum pain is common and has a complex etiology. It has both somatic and psychosocial provoking factors and has both functional and psychological ramifications following childbirth. Pain that limits the functional capacity of a person who has the daunting task to take care of all the demands of managing a growing newborn and infant can have debilitating consequences for several people simultaneously. We will review the incidence of persistent postpartum pain, analyze the risk factors, and discuss obstetric, anesthetic, and psychological tools for prevention and management. Based on the current knowledge, early antenatal screening and management is described as the most likely measure to identify patients at risk for persistent postpartum pain. Such antenatal management should be based on the close collaboration between obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and psychologists to tailor peripartum pain management and psychological support-based individual needs.

Complications 8 weeks after an obstetric second-degree perineal laceration in relation to body mass index

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

How body mass index (BMI) affects pelvic floor function after a second-degree perineal laceration is unknown. The hypothesis of this study is that pelvic floor dysfunction and complications after an obstetric second-degree perineal laceration are more common in women with a higher BMI 8 weeks postpartum.

METHODS

This register-based cohort study includes 10,876 primiparous women with an obstetric second-degree perineal laceration between 2014 and 2021. Data were retrieved from the Swedish Perineal Laceration Registry. Outcomes in relation to maternal BMI were urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence (AI) and common complications attributable to the laceration. Uni- and multivariate logistic regressions were used for comparison between normal weight (BMI < 24.9, reference), overweight (25.0-29.9) and obese (≥ 30) women.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses showed an increased risk for UI in both overweight and obese women compared to normal-weight women 8 weeks after a second-degree perineal laceration with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.21 (CI 1.02-1.44) and 1.27 (CI 1.13-1.58) respectively. Overweight and obese women had a decreased risk for AI (aOR 0.81, CI 0.68-0.96; aOR 0.72, CI 0.57-0.90 respectively) compared with normal-weight women. No significant differences were found in the univariate analyses over BMI strata concerning complications after perineal laceration.

CONCLUSIONS

Primiparous overweight and obese women report less AI and more UI than normal-weight women 8 weeks after a second-degree perineal laceration. No differences were found regarding complications. These findings are new and merit further study to find potential preventive factors and interventions after a second-degree perineal laceration.

The Use of Capacitive and Resistive Energy Transfer in Postpartum Pain Management in Women after Perineal Trauma

Perineal pain occurs in 97% of women with episiotomy or first- and second-degree perineal tears on the first day after delivery. The study aimed to assess the impact of capacitive and resistive energy transfer (TECAR) on perineal pain and discomfort in the first two postpartum days. The prospective randomized double-blind study was performed with the pain and discomfort assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale at baseline and after both TECAR interventions. Characteristics data, delivery information, and the number of painkillers taken were collected. The assumed significance level was α < 0.05. The study included 121 women with a mean age of 30.7 ± 4.2 years and a median BMI of 26.1 kg/m2 (24.1; 28.9). Pain reduction at rest, when walking, and discomfort reduction when walking were significantly higher in the TECAR group compared to the sham group (p < 0.05). After the first TECAR intervention, significant reduction in all measured parameters was observed in the study group (p < 0.03), whereas in the control group, it was observed in pain and discomfort while sitting (p < 0.04). The amount of ibuprofen taken on the second day was significantly reduced in the study group compared to the first day (p = 0.004). TECAR has been shown to provide more immediate and significant reduction in perineal pain and discomfort.

The relationship between perineal trauma and postpartum psychological outcomes: a secondary analysis of a population-based survey

BACKGROUND

Perineal trauma, involving either naturally occurring tears or episiotomy, is common during childbirth but little is known about its psychological impact. This study aimed to determine the associations between childbirth related perineal trauma and psychological outcomes reported by women three months after giving birth and to explore factors that could mediate relationships between perineal trauma and maternal psychological outcomes.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of data from a cross-sectional population-based survey of maternal and infant health. A total of 4,578 women responded to the survey, of which 3,307 had a vaginal birth and were eligible for inclusion into the analysis. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress (PTS) symptoms were assessed using validated self- report measures. Physical symptoms were derived from a checklist and combined to produce a composite physical symptoms score. Regression models were fitted to explore the associations.

RESULTS

Nearly three quarters of women experienced some degree of perineal trauma. Women who experienced perineal trauma reported having more postnatal physical symptoms (adjusted proportional odds ratio 1.47, 95%CI 1.38 to 1.57, p-value < 0.001), were more likely to report PTS symptoms (adjusted OR 1.19, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.36, p-value 0.010), and there was strong evidence that each unit increase in the physical symptoms score was associated with between 38 and 90% increased adjusted odds of adverse psychological symptoms. There was no evidence of association between perineal trauma and satisfaction with postnatal care, although there was strong evidence that satisfaction with labour and birth was associated with 16% reduced adjusted odds of depression and 30% reduced adjusted odds of PTS symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who experienced perineal trauma were more likely to experience physical symptoms, and the more physical symptoms a woman experienced the more likely she was to report having postnatal depression, anxiety and PTS symptoms. There was some evidence of a direct association between perineal trauma and PTS symptoms but no evidence of a direct association between perineal trauma and depression or anxiety. Assessment and management of physical symptoms in the postnatal period may play an important role in reducing both physical and psychological postnatal morbidity.

Regional and clinical guidelines for prevention and care of obstetric anal sphincter injuries - A critical frame analysis

OBJECTIVE

Policy documents govern how the prevention and care of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are implemented. Thus, in the absence of Swedish national guidelines on OASIS, differing views may be visible in the regional and local policy documents. Therefore, we aimed to analyse regional and local policies, guidelines, and care programs on the prevention of OASIS and care for OASIS-affected women in a Swedish context by applying a critical frame analysis inspired by Verloo.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A cross-sectional study of existing policy documents from Swedish healthcare regions was performed. The documents were analysed using Verloo's critical frame analysis.

FINDINGS

We found that OASIS was framed as a preventable problem addressed by skilled protective manoeuvres of the healthcare staff. Education, communication, and teamwork were three frames of crucial solutions to minimise the prevalence of OASIS. However, complicating power dimensions between professional groups and between professionals and birthing women were identified. Furthermore, several discursive struggles were found, predominantly regarding the scientific evidence for the suggested prevention and care.

CONCLUSION

The policy documents emphasised that OASIS is preventable, and improved education, communication, and teamwork could diminish the OASIS prevalence. Nevertheless, power dimensions and discursive struggles may challenge the preventive efforts. Furthermore, each Swedish region has the sovereignty to develop its policies, which was reflected in our findings and may imply inequities in care provision. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop comprehensive national high-quality guidelines of high quality for OASIS prevention and care so that all women giving birth have access to equal care and treatment in Sweden.

A novel obstetrical surgical intervention - New episiotomy: Case series study

OBJECTIVES

To establish anatomical structures responsible for creating a resistance force on a fetal head during vaginal delivery at term; to develop a new episiotomy to widen the vaginal outlet.

DESIGN

A prospective observational case series study.

SETTING

International centers.

POPULATION

Eighteen consecutive women at term during vaginal delivery.

METHODS

V-shape excision made on the hymeneal membrane, hymeneal ring, and hymeneal plate without extending an incision to the posterior perineal structures. Outlectorrhaphy (repairing the vaginal outlet to repair the surgical defect. Excisional specimens are subjected to histological examinations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary maternal outcome measures were postpartum posterior perineum pain associated with vaginal outlectomy. The secondary outcomes measured a) complication of vaginal outlectomy; b) occurrence of dyspareunia after vaginal outlectomy; c) applicability of vaginal outlectomy; d) neonatal outcome measured by an APGAR score to show how the neonate tolerated the vaginal delivery process with vaginal outlectomy implementation.

RESULTS

The V-shape excision widened the vaginal outlet sufficiently for a vaginal delivery without a perineal incision. Outlectorrhaphy requires two or three simple interrupted sutures to close surgical defects and eliminate the vaginal gapping appearance. Eleven out of eighteen women were primigravida (61.1 %), and four multiparas (38.9 %) delivered a live newborn vaginally with a newly developed vaginal outlectomy. A median newborn's weight was 350 g ± 250 g, and APGAR scores at 5 min were median of 9 ± 1. One out of eighteen patients experienced extension of the skin, perineal fascia, and bulbospongiosus muscle. Bleeding from the extension tearing of vaginal outlectomy was heavier than from uncomplicated vaginal outlectomy but negligible. Immediately postpartum, patients reported no moderate or severe perineal pain. At a 3-month postpartum, none of the subjects reported superficial or deep dyspareunia. Histology from the vaginal outlectomy specimens described the direct connection of the longitudinal vaginal smooth muscles to the hymeneal plate and compact connective tissues (like cartilage) of the hymeneal ring. Additionally, the histological examination showed the absence of the perineal skeletal muscle within the vaginal outlectomy specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The vaginal outlet is responsible for the most vital resistance force on a fetal head during delivery. Vaginal outlectomy widens the vaginal outlet sufficiently for a fetal vaginal birth with minimal bleeding and is easy to repair. No moderate-severe perineal pain or dyspareunia occurred in this study group.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Vaginal outlectomy eliminates postpartum moderate-to-severe perineal pain and superficial dyspareunia. The posterior perineum creates no resistance force on the fetal head during vaginal delivery to warrant incision.

"Dispatcher, Can You Help Me? A Woman Is Giving Birth". A Pilot Study of Remote Video Assistance with Smart Glasses

Smart glasses (SG) could be a breakthrough in emergency situations, so the aim of this work was to assess the potential benefits of teleassistance with smart glasses (SG) from a midwife to a lifeguard in a simulated, unplanned, out-of-hospital birth (OHB). Thirty-eight lifeguards were randomized into SG and control (CG) groups. All participants were required to act in a simulated imminent childbirth with a maternal−fetal simulator (PROMPT Flex, Laerdal, Norway). The CG acted autonomously, while the SG group was video-assisted by a midwife through SG (Vuzix Blade, New York, NY, USA). The video assistance was based on the OHB protocol, speaking and receiving images on the SG. The performance time, compliance with the protocol steps, and perceived performance with the SG were evaluated. The midwife’s video assistance with SG allowed 35% of the SG participants to perform the complete OHB protocol. No CG participant was able to perform it (p = 0.005). All OHB protocol variables were significantly better in the SG group than in the CG (p < 0.05). Telemedicine through video assistance with SG is feasible so that a lifeguard with no knowledge of childbirth care can act according to the recommendations in a simulated, unplanned, uncomplicated OHB. Communication with the midwife by speaking and sending images to the SG is perceived as an important benefit to the performance.

Classification and evaluation of episiotomy practices from 2004 to 2020 and association with OASIS

OBJECTIVE

To apply a new classification based on 7 clinically relevant subgroups to accurately describe episiotomy practices and evaluate the association between episiotomy and obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) rates according to the classification's subgroups.

METHODS

Observational retrospective cohort study based on a population comprising 39487 women from 01/01/2004 to 31/12/2020 in a level III university maternity unit. The primary outcome was the overall episiotomy rate in the institution, its trend over the time as well as in each subgroup of obstetric population classification. Secondary outcome was the rate of OASIS third and fourth degree, its association with episiotomy practice.

RESULTS

The episiotomy rate decreased significantly from 43,2% to 20% in the total population. The overall OASIS rate was 0,34%, it remained significantly the same during the study period, although the association between OASIS and episiotomy was significant only in group 2 (Nulliparous with instrumental delivery) with a decrease of OASIS rate if using episiotomy (OR 0.5; 95% CI[0,3-0,8]).

CONCLUSION

The episiotomy rate can be decreased without exposing women to an increased risk of OASIS. It encourages restrictive practice of episiotomy, but episiotomy should be considered in case of nulliparous women with instrumental delivery.

Assessment of pain and maternal complications after normal vaginal delivery

Management of postpartum perineal pain is essential because untreated pain can interfere with the motherhood experience and might result in various complications. The study aimed to assess postpartum perineal and postpartum pain intensity, pharmacological management and maternal complications after normal vaginal delivery. A prospective observational study was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynaecology among 300 women who underwent normal vaginal delivery. The severity and intensity of the perineal pain in subjects were relatively high, i.e. severe on Day 1, moderate to mild pain on Day 2 and mild pain on Day 3. The overall postpartum pain was mild on all 3 d. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and analgesic combination drugs were prescribed the most for pain management, which significantly impacted pain reduction. All participants involved in the study had a postpartum haemorrhage and was the most common complication. The study concludes that there was a significant reduction in the overall intensity of pain from Day 1 to Day 3.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Vaginal delivery is a multidimensional process that causes inflammation of cervical tissue and tears in the birth canal, leading to pain perception. Previous studies reported increased pain intensity on the first day after childbirth and a gradual decrease as the days pass.What do the results of this study add? The well-accepted pain scales, such as faces rating scale (FRS) and verbal numeric scale (VNS) were appropriate for assessing the intensity of perineal pain. Self-developed and validated postpartum pain assessment questionnaire (PPAQ) was beneficial for the assessment of postpartum pain. NSAIDs and analgesics combination was effective in managing the pain.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/future research? Accurate pain assessment is essential for humanising patient care since it helps make a correct plan for required intervention, and its evaluation can help provide appropriate medications and reduce complications. Self-developed and validated PPAQ is easy to use and can be used in clinical studies to assess postpartum pain.

European guidelines on perinatal care- Peripartum care Episiotomy

OF RECOMMENDATIONS1. Episiotomy should be performed by indication only, and not routinely (Moderate quality evidence +++-; Strong recommendation). Accepted indications for episiotomy are to shorten the second stage of labor when there is suspected fetal hypoxia (Low quality evidence ++-; Weak recommendation); to prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury in vaginal operative deliveries, or when obstetric sphincter injury occurred in previous deliveries (Moderate quality evidence +++-; Strong recommendation)2. Mediolateral or lateral episiotomy technique should be used (Moderate quality evidence +++-; Strong recommendation). Labor ward staff should be offered regular training in correct episiotomy techniques (Moderate quality evidence +++-; Strong recommendation).3. Pain relief needs to be considered before episiotomy is performed, and epidural analgesia may be insufficient. The perineal skin needs to be tested for pain before an episiotomy is performed, even when an epidural is in place. Local anesthetics or pudendal block need to be considered as isolated or additional pain relief methods (Low quality evidence ++-; Strong recommendation).4. After childbirth the perineum should be carefully inspected, and the anal sphincter palpated to identify possible injury (Moderate quality evidence +++-; Strong recommendation). Primary suturing immediately after childbirth should be offered and a continuous suturing technique should be used when repairing an uncomplicated episiotomy (High quality evidence ++++; Strong recommendation).

Evaluation the effect of Silybum marianum ointment on episiotomy wound healing and pain intensity in primiparous women: a randomized triple blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Episiotomy is the most commonn surgical procedure in midwifery which as any other wounds can cause infection or delay in healing. The current study aimed to determine effect of Silybum marianum ointment on pain severity and healing of episiotomy wound in primiparous women referring to Shahid Nourani Hospital at 2019.

METHODS

This research was done as a randomized, triple-blind clinical trial on 87 priiparous women (44 indivdiuals in Silybum marianum ointment group and 43 indivdiuals in placebo group) referred to Shahid Nourani Hospital in Talesh (Guilan Province), Iran at September 2019. After labor and performing episiotomy, twice a day for 10 days as a fingertip size of the ointment was prescribed to be topically used on the episiotomy incision for both groups (Silybum marianum ointment or placebo ointment). Data gathering was done using demographic and midwifery information questionnaire, Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation)REEDA Scale (REEDA Scale: Redness(R); Edema (E), Ecchymosis(E), Discharge from the wound(D); Approximation of the perineal tissues(A))(scale, and visual analogue scale of pain. Examination of healing status of the perinea incision was performed during first 12 h, fifth day and tenth day after labor.Kolmogrov-Smirnov test was used in order to investiagte nomrality of data distribution of quantitative data, and two- independent samples t test, Chi square, repeated measures two factorial analysis of variance and Fischer's exact test were used. SPSS software version 23 was used to analyze data and 0.05 was considered as signifcance level.

RESULTS

Both groups of Silybum marianum and placebo groups did not differ regarding demographic and midwifery characteristics, hygiene status prior to intervention (P > 0.05). Mean difference of pain severity and REEDA scale in Silybum marianum ointment group in 12 h after labor, at fifth day and tenth day after labor was significant comparing to control group which indicates decline in episiotomy pain severity and faster wound healing (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Silybum marianum ointment ointment accelerates episiotomy wound healing rate due to its healing properties and decreases pain severity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials in 10/08/2019 with the IRCT ID: IRCT201811100411603N1.

Peripartal pain perception and pain therapy: introduction and validation of a questionnaire as a quality instrument

BACKGROUND

Labor pain is difficult to measure. The aim of this proof-of-concept study is to implement and test a questionnaire assessing pain sensation during and after vaginal deliveries. Its key aspect is a highly standardized survey of patient-reported outcome (PRO) by staff not involved in routine care.

METHODS

Between January and November 2015 339 women were assessed 24-48 h after spontaneous or operative-vaginal delivery of a singleton. German language skills were a prerequisite to participate. The test-retest reliability was calculated in 38 women 24-36 and 48-72 h postpartum between July and October 2017. Primiparae after spontaneous delivery and multiparae with no history of operative deliveries were compared in a subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Maximum labor pain and post-partum pain were reported a median of 9 [8-10] and 4 [3-6]. Higher ratings were associated with younger age, higher gestational ages, infant's biometrics, and the duration of laboring. Only regional analgesia tended to reduce pain perception (NRS 8 vs. 9). Higher-degree injuries were associated with less pain postpartum. The questionnaire proved to be reliable in most aspects (Cronbach's α > 0.6 for 19/21 questions) and showed an acceptable content and criterion validity (Cohen correlation >  ± 0.3, interrelation between items).

CONCLUSION

Labor is a very painful experience, irrespective of previous obstetric history. Ratings indicate inadequateness of treatment except for patients receiving preventive postoperative pain management. Systematic postpartum pain assessment, hence, is still a pending issue. Adjustments will be made concerning language skills and specific questions on effectiveness of analgesia otherwise good reliability and validity of the questionnaire were proven.

Is mediolateral episiotomy angle associated with postpartum perineal pain in primiparous women?

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim is to elucidate the relationship between mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) angle and postpartum perineal pain.

METHODS:

This study was designed prospectively. Primiparous women with MLE in the postpartum period were included in the study and divided into three groups according to episiotomy angle ranges (Group 1: <40°, Group 2: 40°–60°, and Group 3: >60°). Postpartum perineal pain was quantified with the short-form McGill Pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) consisting of the following three parts: Sensory-affective-verbal descriptions, visual pain scale (VPS), and present pain intensity scale (PPI). Postpartum perineal pain scores on days 1 and 7 were compared among the angle group.

RESULTS:

Overall, 86 eligible women were enrolled in this study. Seventy-three women (85%) scored the perineal pain between 0 and 3 on the VPS and 13 women (15%) rated the pain from 4 to 6 on the 1^st postpartum day. No significant differences were noted among the three groups regarding the total pain scores on SF-MPQ and on the each part of form at the 1^st postpartum day. At 7 days postpartum, total pain score was found significantly high in Group 1 [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 4 (0–5)] compared with Group 2 [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0(0–5)]. The pain scores obtained from the sensory, affective, VPS, and PPI parts of the questionnaire were [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 1 (0–2)], [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 1 (0–1)], [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 2 (0–2)], and [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0.25 (0–1)], respectively, in Group 1. For Group 2, pain scores obtained from the sensory, affective, and PPI were [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0(0-1)]; and VPS was [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0(0-2)]. No significant differences were observed between Groups 1 and 2 for each part of the questionnaire on day 7. Percentage of need for analgesics on day 7 was found significantly higher in Group 1 (42.9%) than Group 2 (31.2%)

CONCLUSION:

MLE at an angle <40° to the midline is associated with a higher score of perineal pain and an increase need for analgesics during the early postpartum days.

Language barrier as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury - A case-control study

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of grade 3-4 perineal tears, also known as obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), is reported to be between 0.5 and 2.5%. Beyond the medico-economic burden, the consequences of OASI on a woman's emotional, psychological, sexual, and physical wellbeing are considerable. Among the various risk factors of OASI, few data are available about the impact of a language barrier on its incidence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a case-control study to evaluate the effect of language barriers on the risk of OASI comparing 171 women with OASI and 163 matched controls. The matched criteria included ethnicity, age, previous vaginal delivery, delivery mode, prophylactic episiotomy and birthweight. Patients' characteristics were compared and crude ORs and 95% CIs estimated using unadjusted logistic models. Multivariate analysis was performed with recognized potential confounders.

RESULTS

All of the cases had grade 3 tears. Language barrier was a determinant factor of OASI with an OR of 3.32 [1.36-8.90], p = 0.01. Other risk factors were occipito-posterior delivery, African origin and prolonged labor duration (OR 6.33, 95% CI: 2.04-27.78, p = 0.004, OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.08-3.19, p = 0.03 and OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, p = 0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that language barrier is an independent risk factor of OASI. Physicians and midwives should attempt to identify patients with a language barrier during prenatal visits. Education about simple terms used during delivery could decrease the incidence of this complication.

Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (single dose) for perineal pain in the early postpartum period

BACKGROUND

Many women experience perineal pain after childbirth, especially after having sustained perineal trauma. Perineal pain-management strategies are an important part of postnatal care. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a commonly-used type of medication in the management of postpartum pain, and their effectiveness and safety should be assessed. This is an update of a review first published in 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of a single dose of an oral NSAID for relief of acute perineal pain in the early postpartum period.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (9 December 2019), OpenSIGLE and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (28 February 2020), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing a single dose of a NSAID versus a single dose of placebo, paracetamol or another NSAID for women with perineal pain in the early postpartum period. We excluded quasi-RCTs and cross-over trials. We included papers in abstract format only if they had sufficient information to determine that they met the review's prespecified inclusion criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (FW and VS) independently assessed all identified papers for inclusion and risks of bias, resolving any discrepancies through discussion. Two review authors independently conducted data extraction, including calculations of pain relief scores, and checked it for accuracy. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 35 studies examining 16 different NSAIDs and involving 5136 women (none were breastfeeding). Studies were published between 1967 and 2013. Risk of bias due to random sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessors was generally unclearly to poorly reported, but participants and caregivers were blinded, and outcome data were generally complete. We downgraded the certainty of evidence due to risk of bias, suspected publication bias, and imprecision for small numbers of participants. NSAID versus placebo Compared to women who receive a placebo, more women who receive a single-dose NSAID may achieve adequate pain relief at four hours (risk ratio (RR) 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64 to 2.23; 10 studies, 1573 women; low-certainty evidence) and at six hours (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.17; 17 studies, 2079 women; very low-certainty evidence), although we are less certain about the effects at six hours. At four hours after administration, women who receive a NSAID are probably less likely to need additional analgesia compared to women who receive placebo (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.58; 4 studies, 486 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and may be less likely to need additional analgesia at six hours after initial administration, although the evidence was less certain at six hours (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.40; 10 studies, 1012 women; very low-certainty evidence). One study reported that no adverse events were observed at four hours post-administration (90 women). There may be little or no difference in maternal adverse effects between NSAIDs and placebo at six hours post-administration (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.70; 13 studies, 1388 women; low-certainty evidence). Fourteen maternal adverse effects were reported in the NSAID group (drowsiness (5), abdominal discomfort (2), weakness (1), dizziness (2), headache (2), moderate epigastralgia (1), not specified (1)) and eight in the placebo group (drowsiness (2), light-headedness (1), nausea (1), backache (1), dizziness (1), epigastric pain (1), not specified (1)), although not all studies assessed adverse effects. Neonatal adverse effects were not assessed in any of the studies. NSAID versus paracetamol NSAIDs may lead to more women achieving adequate pain relief at four hours, compared with paracetamol (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.22; 3 studies, 342 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain if there is any difference in adequate pain relief between NSAIDs and paracetamol at six hours post-administration (RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.47; 2 studies, 99 women; very low-certainty evidence) or in the need for additional analgesia at four hours (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.13; 1 study, 73 women; very low-certainty evidence). NSAIDs may reduce the risk of requiring additional analgesia at six hours compared with paracetamol (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.67; 1 study, 59 women; low-certainty evidence). One study reported that no maternal adverse effects were observed at four hours post-administration (210 women). Six hours post-administration, we are uncertain if there is any difference between groups in the number of maternal adverse effects (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.08; 3 studies, 300 women; very low-certainty evidence), with one case of pruritis in the NSAID group and one case of sleepiness in the paracetamol group. Neonatal adverse effects were not assessed in any of the included studies. Comparisons of different NSAIDs or doses did not demonstrate any differences in effectiveness for any primary outcome measures; however, few data were available on some NSAIDs. None of the included studies reported on any of this review's secondary outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In women who are not breastfeeding and who sustained perineal trauma, NSAIDs (compared to placebo or paracetamol) may provide greater pain relief for acute postpartum perineal pain and fewer women need additional analgesia, but uncertainty remains, as the evidence is rated as low- or very low-certainty. The risk of bias was unclear for many studies, adverse effects were often not assessed and breastfeeding women were not included. While this review provides some indication of the likely effect, there is uncertainty in our conclusions. The main reasons for downgrading were the inclusion of studies at high risk of bias and inconsistency in the findings of individual studies. Future studies could examine NSAIDs' adverse effects, including neonatal effects and the compatibility of NSAIDs with breastfeeding, and could assess other secondary outcomes. Future research could consider women with and without perineal trauma, including perineal tears. High-quality studies could be conducted to further assess the efficacy of NSAIDs versus paracetamol and the efficacy of multimodal treatments.

Paracetamol/acetaminophen (single administration) for perineal pain in the early postpartum period

BACKGROUND

Perineal pain is a common but poorly studied adverse outcome following childbirth. Pain may result from perineal trauma due to bruising, spontaneous tears, surgical incisions (episiotomies), or in association with operative vaginal births (ventouse or forceps-assisted births). This is an update of a review last published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of a single administration of paracetamol (acetaminophen) used in the relief of acute postpartum perineal pain.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (9 December 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster-RCTs, comparing paracetamol to placebo. We excluded quasi-RCTs and cross-over trials. Data from abstracts would be included only if authors had confirmed in writing that the data to be included in the review had come from the final analysis and would not change.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed each study for inclusion and extracted data. One review author reviewed the decisions and confirmed calculations for pain relief scores. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

This update identified no new trials so the results remain unchanged. However, by applying the GRADE assessment of the evidence, the interpretation of main results differed from previous version of this review. We identified 10 studies involving 2044 women, but all these studies involved either three or four groups, looking at differing drugs or doses. We have only included the 1301 women who were in the paracetamol versus placebo arms of the studies. Of these, five studies (482 women) assessed 500 mg to 650 mg and six studies (797 women) assessed 1000 mg of paracetamol. One study assessed 650 mg and 1000 mg compared with placebo and contributed to both comparisons. We used a random-effects meta-analysis because of the clinical variability among studies. Studies were from the 1970s to the early 1990s, and there was insufficient information to assess the risk of bias adequately, hence the findings need to be interpreted within this context. The certainty of the evidence for the two primary outcomes on which data were available was assessed as low, downgraded for overall unclear risk of bias and for heterogeneity (I² statistic 60% or greater). More women may experience pain relief with paracetamol compared with placebo (average risk ratio (RR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59 to 2.89; 10 trials, 1279 women), and fewer women may need additional pain relief with paracetamol compared with placebo (average RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.55; 8 trials, 1132 women). However, the certainty of the evidence was low, downgraded for unclear overall risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity. One study used the higher dose of paracetamol (1000 mg) and reported maternal drug adverse effects. There may be little or no difference in the incidence of nausea (average RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.66; 1 trial, 232 women; low-certainty evidence), or sleepiness (average RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.18 to 4.30; 1 trial, 232 women; low-certainty evidence). No other maternal adverse events were reported. None of the studies assessed neonatal drug adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of paracetamol may improve perineal pain relief following vaginal birth, and may reduce the need for additional pain relief. Potential adverse effects for both women and neonates were not appropriately assessed. Any further trials should also address the gaps in evidence concerning maternal outcomes such as satisfaction with postnatal care, maternal functioning/well-being (emotional attachment, self-efficacy, competence, autonomy, confidence, self-care, coping skills) and neonatal drug adverse effects.

Dispareunia en mujeres después de parto vaginal. Prevalencia en dos clínicas de Armenia, Colombia, 2012-2017

Se realizó un estudio de corte transversal que tuvo como objetivo determinar la prevalencia de la dispareunia en mujeres con parto vaginal, evaluar posibles factores de riesgo y la asociación con la episiotomía. Ingresaron mujeres atendidas por parto vaginal entre 2012 y 2017 en dos clínicas de alta complejidad en Armenia (Colombia). Se utilizó el cuestionario Índice de Función Sexual Femenina (IFFS-6) para evaluar la función sexual. Los resultados reportan una prevalencia de dispareunia del 59,37%, siendo más prevalente en mujeres sometidas a episiotomía (OR: 68,17; IC95 %: 60,57-79,15). Respecto a la asociación de la episiotomía con la presencia de dispareunia se encontró asociación significativa con la episiotomía medio-lateral (OR: 8,17; IC95%: 2,15-56,32), lesión del esfínter (OR: 7,32; IC95%: 4,86-12,75) y dehiscencia de la sutura (OR: 6,48; IC95%: 4,92-14,28). Se observaron como factores de riesgo: antecedente de endometriosis (OR: 11,6; IC95 %: 9,15-17,52), dolor pélvico crónico (OR: 3,56; IC95%: 2,21–6,32) e ITS (OR: 2,67; IC95%: 1,54–5,14), p=0,003). Se concluye que la prevalencia de dispareunia en mujeres con parto vaginal, atendidas en Armenia, varía en función de la realización de episiotomía, asociándose tanto a las complicaciones de esta como a otros antecedentes.

Subspecialty care for peripartum pelvic floor disorders

Obstetrical perineal and anal sphincter lacerations can be associated with considerable sequelae. The diagnosis of short-term bowel, bladder, and healing problems can be delayed if patients are not seen until the traditional postpartum visit at 4 to 6 weeks. Specialized peripartum clinics create a unique opportunity to collaborate with obstetrical specialists to provide early, individualized care for patients experiencing a variety of pelvic floor issues during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Although implementation of these clinics requires thoughtful planning and partnering with care providers at all levels in the obstetrics care system, many of the necessary resources are available in routine gynecologic practice. Using a multidisciplinary approach with pelvic floor physical therapists, nurses, advanced practice providers, and other specialists is important for the success of this service line and enhances the level of care provided. Overall, these clinics provide a structured means by which pregnant and postpartum women with pelvic floor symptoms can receive specialized counseling and treatment.

Women's experience of obstetric anal sphincter injury following childbirth: An integrated review

BACKGROUND

Perineal injury during childbirth is a very common event which affect women during childbirth. Significant morbidities are associated with third-and-fourth degree perineal tears in particular, also referred to as obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). With an increasing global birth rate and rising interventions in birth, the incidence of perineal trauma following vaginal birth is increasing on an international scale, impacted also by more accurate classification and definitions of OASIS and increased pre-existing co morbidities amongst affected women. The consequences of OASIS can be physically and psychologically distressing for affected women and have significant impact on quality of life.

METHODOLOGY

The aim of this integrative review was to examine women's experience of OASIS following childbirth using a systematic approach. This is presented in a five-stage process that includes problem identification, literature search, data extraction and evaluation, data analysis and presentation of results. A number of academic electronic databases were systematically searched and results are presented and analysed. Results of the complete search are presented in PRISMA format. Eight papers, which were assessed for quality using an appropriate appraisal tool, are included in the review and thematic analysis used to identify themes.

FINDINGS

The themes identified were; psychological consequences, the role of the health care professionals and implications for future pregnancies. Psychological consequences included anxiety, loneliness, isolation, shame, fear, many of which were associated with physical ramifications of OASIS and how these feelings affect activities of daily living. The importance of access to and support from health care professionals was highlighted. The impact the experience of OASIS had on women's decisions about future pregnancies was also evident.

CONCLUSION

The association between OASIS and maternal quality of life following childbirth can be substantial as evidenced by this literature review. The review identifies the need for improvement in the care and management of these women to alleviate the physical and psychological consequences of OASIS, including decisions in relation to future pregnancies and childbirth. Health care professionals caring for women in pregnancy and childbirth need to be educated and informed on the sequelae of OASIS, to ensure appropriate information and support is provided to these women and their families. Such knowledge may enable health care professionals to alleviate symptoms associated with OASIS and help women make sense and cope with their experiences.

Oral tramadol versus oral celecoxib for analgesia after mediolateral episiotomy repair in obese primigravidae: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

A variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have been investigated, with the goal of relieving pain after post-episiotomy repair. We aimed to compare the efficacy of tramadol versus celecoxib orally in reducing pain after mediolateral episiotomy repair in obese primigravidae undergoing spontaneous vaginal delivery.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized double-blinded trial in Cairo University hospital, Cairo, Egypt, from October 2018 to December 2019. We randomly assigned 200 women into two groups: group A (n = 100) received one tramadol tablet 100 mg orally whereas group B (n = 100) received one celecoxib tablet 200 mg orally. Our primary outcome was pain score using a 10-cm visual analog scale at different time intervals. Our secondary outcomes were the overall satisfaction score and drug side effects.

RESULTS

After mediolateral episiotomy repair, the pain scores at 1, 2, and 4 h were significantly lower in the tramadol group than in the celecoxib group (p < 0.001). However, there were no significantly differences in pain scores at 8 and 12 h between the two groups (p = 0.50 and 0.48 respectively). Women's satisfaction score was significantly higher in the tramadol group than in the celecoxib group (p < 0.001). Fewer participants in the tramadol group needed additional analgesics than in the celecoxib group; however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.17). Drug adverse effects were comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Primigravid women who received tramadol 100 mg orally after mediolateral episiotomy repair had lower pain scores and were more satisfied than women who received celecoxib 200 mg orally. Both drugs were well tolerated, with few side effects.

Suture type used for perineal injury repair and sexual function: a randomised controlled trial

The type of suture used to repair perineal injury may be associated with this healing process and subsequent sexual function. This study aims to assess whether the suture technique used (continuous or interrupted) has an impact on a woman's sexual function following childbirth. A single-blind randomised clinical trial was conducted with primiparous women who had experienced a perineal injury during childbirth. A computer-generated random number table was applied to allocate women to each group. Data were collected on sociodemographic variables, variables associated with childbirth, and outcomes during the 3 months after childbirth. Mean difference was used to assess the influence of the suture type on outcomes. Multivariate analyses were carried out to adjust for unbalanced variables after randomisation. Seventy women participated in the intervention group (continuous suture) and 64 women in the control group (interrupted suture). The women in the intervention group scored high for sexual desire, adjusted mean difference (aMD) = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1-2.6 (p < 0.001); the same happened with arousal (aMD = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.8-2.5, p < 0.001). In the intervention group, orgasm was more easily reached, aMD = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.4-1.1 (p < 0.001). Women who received a continuous suture indicated they felt less discomfort (p < 0.001). Women who had a continuous suture reported better postpartum sexual function.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03825211 posted 31/01/ 2019.

Influence of Peripartum Expectations, Mode of Delivery, and Perineal Injury on Women's Postpartum Sexuality

BACKGROUND

Sexual health has been identified as an important factor for postpartum quality of life. Although pregnancy-related changes in anatomy and metabolism return to their prepregnancy state, female sexual function may not be at the level it was before birth because of physical and psychological changes.

AIM

The goal of our study was to explore the influence of the mode of delivery, perineal injury, and peripartum expectations on postpartum sexual function.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2018, 522 women were enrolled in this prospective investigation. At time of recruitment during the peripartum hospitalization, patients completed a standardized questionnaire addressing expectations concerning postpartum sexuality with focus on expected influence of the mode of delivery. Sexual function was evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ) at time of recruitment to evaluate baseline sexual function (4 weeks before pregnancy). Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months postpartum.

OUTCOMES

Peripartum expectations, influence of the mode of delivery, and perineal injury were analyzed for their impact on women's sexual function within 12 months postpartum by repetitive FSFI and SAQ assessments.

RESULTS

A total of 522 women with 263 spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 41 operative vaginal deliveries, and 218 cesarean sections were analyzed. Although the data demonstrate a significant postpartum decline in sexual function at 3 and 6 months postpartum, sexual functioning converges to baseline prepregnancy values 12 months postpartum. This observation was independent of the mode of delivery and perineal injuries with no significant between-group differences at any of the analyzed time points. Apart from breastfeeding, for which negative anticipations resulted in impaired sexuality, women's expectations (pertaining to quantity and quality of female orgasm, partner's sexuality, fear of altered sexuality, frequency of intercourse, the mode of delivery) do not influence female sexual function at 12 months postpartum.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Deciphering the potential influence of patient expectations as well as pregnancy- and childbirth-related aspects on female postpartum sexuality will help in the effort to improve women's postpartum sexual health.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

As a strength of this study, postpartum sexuality was independently assessed with 2 different scoring systems (FSFI and SAQ). Limitations include that our follow-up is incomplete and amounts to about 2-thirds of patients who were initially recruited.

CONCLUSION

The mode of delivery and perineal trauma do not influence women's postpartum sexual function. With the exception of breastfeeding, peripartum expectations do not result in altered sexual functioning at 12 months postpartum. Spaich S, Link G, Alvarez SO, et al. Influence of Peripartum Expectations, Mode of Delivery, and Perineal Injury on Women's Postpartum Sexuality. J Sex Med 2020;17:1312-1325.

Analgesic use after vaginal delivery in women with perineal lacerations: a retrospective cohort study

Objective: To evaluate opioid consumption among parturients with varying degrees of perineal lacerations.Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of women who delivered vaginally at our institution from 1 January 2014 to 12 April 2015. We collected information regarding the degree of perineal lacerations (no lacerations, first-/second-degree, third-/fourth-degree), analgesic consumption, and postpartum pain scores. The primary outcome was opioid use from 0-48 h postpartum. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to test for the association of laceration severity with opioid use.Results: We included 5598 women in the analysis; 1948 had no lacerations, 3434 had first-/second-degree lacerations, and 216 had third-/fourth-degree lacerations. In univariate analysis, parturients with third-/fourth-degree lacerations had significantly higher use of opioids within 48 h postpartum (53.2%) compared to women with no lacerations (30.03%) or first-/second-degree lacerations (28.6%) (p < .001). In the multivariable analysis, women with third-/fourth-degree lacerations had higher odds of opioid use than those without laceration [OR (95% CI) = 2.61 (1.75-3.85), p < .001]. In pairwise comparisons, those with third-/fourth-degree lacerations had higher odds of opioid use than those without lacerations [OR (95% CI) = 3.55 (2.20-5.74)], and those with first-/second-degree lacerations [OR (95% CI) = 2.15 (1.49-3.10)] (p < .001). Oxycodone equivalent consumption was significantly different among groups with a median (IQR) of 5.00 mg (0.00-27.50), 0.00 mg (0.00-5.00) and 0.00 mg (0.00-5.00) in women with third-/fourth-degree, first-/second-degree, and no lacerations, respectively, during the 0-48 h postpartum (p < .001).Conclusion: The use of opioids and opioid doses are higher in women with third-/fourth-degree perineal lacerations compared to those with first-/second-degree or no lacerations.

Mediolateral Episiotomy: Technique, Practice, and Training

Episiotomy is one of the most common obstetric procedures. However, restrictive use of episiotomy has led to a decrease in its use in the United States. Historically, mediolateral episiotomy has been performed less often than median episiotomy in the United States, but both have purported advantages and disadvantages. Emerging research on episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injuries has led to an examination of the effects of mediolateral episiotomy. This article describes performance of a mediolateral episiotomy in a situation of fetal bradycardia. Technical aspects of the incision and repair are described, and outcome data and knowledge gaps are summarized. Implications for practice, clinical competency, and education are reviewed.

Effect of Perineal Massage with Ostrich Oil on the Episiotomy and Lacerations in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Perineal lacerations resulting from vaginal delivery may cause short and long complications, which lead to some problems in women after the delivery. Ostrich oil is safe for use in skincare and beauty products. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of perineal massage with Ostrich oil on the episiotomy and lacerations in nulliparous women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 77 nulliparous women referred to Razi Hospital in Qazvin (Iran) from May to December 2018. After screening of potential participants, 80 out of 105 pregnant women were selected by convenience sampling and were assigned into the intervention and control groups by block randomization technique. In the intervention group, participants received a perineal massage with Ostrich oil in the active phase and the second stage of labor. The rates of episiotomy and perineal laceration were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, t-test and Mann-Whitney.

RESULTS

Perineal massage with Ostrich oil in the intervention group significantly decreased the rate of episiotomy compared to the control group (χ2 = 18.32, df = 1, p < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in perineal lacerations between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed that perineal massage with Ostrich oil could be recommended as an effective, safe, and inexpensive method to improve the rate of episiotomy in vaginal delivery. Perineal massage can be performed by midwives in the first and second stages of labor.