Para-aortic lymphocele treated with an injection of somatostatine analog (lanreotide)

Lymphatic complications after vascular interventions

Introduction

Lymphorrhea due to classical and mini-invasive surgical interventions on femoral and popliteal arteries is a serious hindrance to patient treatment. Depending on the experience of a particular center, the incidence and frequency of this type of complication may constitute a serious clinical problem. While the level of lymphorrhea intensity and its duration result in certain foreseeable consequences, their treatment can be a time-consuming and multistep procedure.

Aim

To compare different types of vascular interventions with lymphorrhea occurrence.

Material and methods

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of lymphatic complications based on the material collected between 2005 and 2012 at the Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery of the Military Institute of Medicine in Warsaw and in the Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology of the Institute of Cardiology in Anin, Warsaw, in 2009–2012.

Results

Maintaining due thoroughness when dissecting tissues and treating the cutting line in this area with ligatures and tissue puncture are the most reliable methods of minimizing the risk of lymphatic leakage after surgical procedures performed in a classical way. The lymphatic complication under analysis is far less likely to occur when procedures are performed as planned and an endovascular technique is used – statistical significance p < 0.05. Minimally invasive and fully percutaneous procedures performed via needle puncture, including the use of the fascial closure technique to close the femoral artery, eliminate the likelihood of the occurrence of this vascular complication – statistical significance was found with p value less than 0.05.

Conclusions

We concluded that in every case by minimizing the vascular approach we protected the patient against lymphatic complications.

The use of lanreotide in the management of lymphorrhea after an aortic valve replacement

Lymphorrhea is a rare but potentially serious complication following various surgical procedures. Uncontrolled lymph drainage may lead to infection and prolonged hospital stay. Currently, there is no standard effective treatment. Early management usually involves bed rest, drainage and pressure dressings. These methods are associated with prolonged recovery and high recurrence rates. We report a case of lymphorrhea from the groin wound after an aortic valve replacement. The patient presented with significant lymph drainage from the postoperative inguinal wound. Lymphorrhea was successfully treated with a long-acting somatostatin analogue, lanreotide. No recurrence was observed after 1 and 6 months of patient follow-up. This case report demonstrates the successful use of lanreotide in the control of lymphorrhea following groin dissection for vascular access.

[Prevention of lymphoceles and gynaecologic cancers]

Lymphoceles are the most frequent complications following systematic lymphadenectomy in gynaecologic cancers. Some of them may have clinical significance with high morbidity. Through a review of literature, we describe surgical methods (way of surgery, lymphadenectomy type, sentinel lymph node, peritonization, drainages, lymphostasis, surgical patch) and medical methods (somatostatin analogs and nutrition treatment) which could prevent lymphoceles formation after pelvic and lumboaortic lymphadenectomy.