Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis in Spain: analysis and evaluation of the results obtained from amniotic fluid samples during the last decade

Is intermediate risk really intermediate? Comparison of karyotype and non-invasive prenatal testing results of pregnancies at intermediate risk of trisomy 21 on maternal serum screening

The purpose of this study was to assess the additional contribution of karyotyping compared with genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for pregnancies at intermediate risk for trisomy 21 (T21), calculated using the maternal serum screening without major structural anomalies detected through sonography. Karyotype results of all pregnancies undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing between January 2013 and March 2022 were obtained from a large hospital-based laboratory. Pregnancies with no major structural anomalies on ultrasound (including soft markers) and an intermediate risk for T21 on maternal serum screening were included in this study. The additional contribution of karyotyping for abnormal karyotype results was calculated after excluding results that could theoretically be identified with genome-wide NIPT. Among the 511 pregnancies analyzed, 13 (2.54%) were found to have abnormal karyotype results, 9 (1.76%) of which could theoretically have been detected with genome-wide NIPT. Within the cohort, 6/263 (2.28%) of women aged 35 years and older, and 3/248 (1.20%) of women younger than 35 years had results that could have been detected with genome-wide NIPT. After excluding results detectable using genome-wide NIPT, the additional contribution of karyotyping was found as 4/502 (0.79%) for the entire cohort, 2/257 (0.77%) for women aged 35 years and older, 2/245 (0.81%) for women younger than 35 years. Of the 511 examined pregnancies at intermediate risk for T21 by maternal serum screening, genome-wide NIPT would have failed to detect 4 of 13 abnormal karyotype results. The findings hold importance in guiding couples' informed decision-making processes regarding their choice of genetic screening and diagnostic testing in case of intermediate risk for T21.

Current Status of Genetic Counselling for Rare Diseases in Spain

Genetic Counselling is essential for providing personalised information and support to patients with Rare Diseases (RD). Unlike most other developed countries, Spain does not recognize geneticists or genetic counsellors as healthcare professionals Thus, patients with RD face not only challenges associated with their own disease but also deal with lack of knowledge, uncertainty, and other psychosocial issues arising as a consequence of diagnostic delay. In this review, we highlight the importance of genetic counsellors in the field of RD as well as evaluate the current situation in which rare disease patients receive genetic services in Spain. We describe the main units and strategies at the national level assisting patients with RD and we conclude with a series of future perspectives and unmet needs that Spain should overcome to improve the management of patients with RD.

Cost-effectiveness of cell-free DNA in maternal blood testing for prenatal detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13: a systematic review

The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood, often called the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT), in the prenatal screening of trisomy in chromosomes 21, 18 and 13. MEDLINE, MEDLINE in process, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched in April 2017. We selected: (1) economic evaluations that estimated the costs and detected cases of trisomy 21, 18 or 13; (2) comparisons of prenatal screening with NIPT (universal or contingent strategies) and the usual screening without NIPT, (3) in pregnant women with any risk of foetal anomalies. Studies were reviewed by two researchers. Data were extracted, the methodological quality was assessed and a narrative synthesis was prepared. In total, 12 studies were included, four of them performed in Europe. Three studies evaluated NIPT as a contingent test, three studies evaluated a universal NIPT, and six studies evaluated both. The results are heterogeneous, especially for the contingent NIPT where the results range from NIPT being dominant to a dominated strategy. Universal NIPT was found to be more effective but also costlier than the usual screening, with very high incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. One advantage of screening with NIPT is lower invasive procedure-related foetal losses than with usual screening. In conclusion, the cost-effectiveness of contingent NIPT is uncertain according to several studies, while the universal NIPT is not cost-effective currently.

A retrospective exploratory study of fetal genetic invasive procedures at a University Hospital

This is a retrospective analysis of the patient demographics and cytogenetic results of patients who underwent prenatal invasive testing for genetic analysis at the Foetal Medicine Division of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute. The main objective of this study was to characterise the changing trends in indications of pregnant women for foetal karyotyping in a 7-year period. A total of 257 procedures were performed in this period, and there was a significant change in the trend of indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis from an advanced maternal age in 2009 to a positive screen test by 2014. Chromosome abnormalities were observed in 9.8% of the cases, with trisomy 21 being the most frequent finding. The findings demonstrate the changing trends in screening and diagnostic testing in the tertiary care centre, with an acceptance of the first and second trimester maternal serum screening tests as a determinant for high-risk pregnancies. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Despite the fact that India has one of the world's highest birth rates, there is still no public health care policy for the application of cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis. Nevertheless, we have been offering this test in our university teaching hospital since 2008, allowing us to characterise the changing trends in indications of pregnant women who sought invasive diagnostic procedures for foetal genetic studies. What do the results of this study add? The results of our study show that there were major changes in the common indications for prenatal diagnosis during the study period. In 2009, the main indication was an advanced maternal age, referred to in 31% of the cases, which declined steadily to 5% by 2014. In 2014, 51% of cases opted for a prenatal diagnosis because of a first trimester screen positive result, increasing from 12% in 2009. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This data is relevant as it would encourage other tertiary hospitals in developing countries like India to consider extending first trimester screening for all women, regardless of age and educate them on the options of prenatal genetic diagnosis for reassurance.

Valor predictivo positivo del diagnóstico prenatal invasivo para alteraciones cromosómicas

Introducción. El diagnóstico prenatal (DP) invasivo para alteraciones cromosómicas (AC) se realiza según las indicaciones de las pruebas no invasivas y se basa en la probabilidad de encontrar un cariotipo alterado.Objetivos. Identificar las indicaciones para la realización de un procedimiento invasivo con el fin de hacer un DP de AC, calcular el valor predictivo positivo (VPP) de cada indicación y estimar la oportunidad relativa (OR) de encontrar una AC.Materiales y métodos. Estudio transversal que caracterizó las indicaciones de procedimientos invasivos para realizar cariotipos en registros de un centro de diagnóstico genético en Cali, Colombia, en el período 2013-2015.Resultados. De 738 registros de cariotipos analizados, 103 (14.0%) tuvieron AC. Las indicaciones más frecuentes fueron alteración anatómica única en ecografía del segundo trimestre (21.4%) y edad materna (18.8%). Las indicaciones con mayor VPP fueron sonolucencia nucal alterada más otro marcador ecográfico (80.0%) y antecedente de 2 o más abortos (30.8%). Las más altas OR de un cariotipo alterado también fueron la sonolucencia nucal más otro marcador ecográfico (OR=1381.6) y el antecedente de 2 o más abortos (OR=153.5).Conclusiones. La ecografía fue la principal herramienta para indicar procedimientos invasivos de DP. Los marcadores bioquímicos integrados fueron una indicación poco frecuente.

Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis

Objective:

To determine the frequency, indications, and outcomes of diagnostic invasive prenatal procedures (DIPP) performed in a university hospital.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective, observational study included 2185 cases of DIPP (chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and cordocentesis) performed at the department of obstetrics and gynecology of a university hospital between 2010 and 2016. We included all DIPP cases performed between 11 and 24 weeks of gestation. We compared the different types of DIPP performed in our hospital.

Results:

Two thousand one hundred eighty-five procedures were performed (1853 amniocenteses, 326 chorionic villus sampling, and 6 cordocenteses). The main indication for performing invasive procedures was abnormal results of aneuploidy screening for trisomy 21, followed by maternal age, and fetal structural abnormality. The fetal karyotype was altered in 154 (26.1%) cases. Trisomy 21 was the most common aneuploidy followed by trisomy 18, monosomy X, and trisomy 13. Fetal karyotype could not be revealed in 42 (2%) cases due to maternal contamination in 18 cases, inadequate sampling in 4 cases, and failure of cell culture in 27 cases. There were 2 pregnancy losses due to the invasive procedure (only in amniocentesis).

Conclusion:

The ideal approach to pregnancies with a detected chromosomal abnormality should be tailored according to the individual choice of the couples regarding whether they decide for or against a child with a known chromosomal abnormality.

A multicenter study of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in Chinese women of advanced maternal age

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the rates of different fetal chromosomal abnormalities among women of advanced maternal age in China and to discuss the possible misdiagnosis risks of newer molecular techniques, for selection of appropriate prenatal screening and diagnostic technologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Second trimester amniocentesis and fetal karyotype results of 46,258 women were retrospectively reviewed. All women were ≥ 35 years old with singleton pregnancies. The rates of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities (CSCAs), incidence of chromosomal abnormalities, and correlations with age were determined.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2010, the proportion of women of advanced maternal age undergoing prenatal diagnosis increased from 20% to 46%. The mean age was 37.4 years (range, 35-46 years). A total of 708 cases of CSCAs, with a rate of 1.53% were found. Trisomy 21 was the most common single chromosome abnormality and accounted for 55.9% of all CSCAs with an incidence of 0.86%. Trisomy 13, trisomy 18, and trisomy 21, the most common chromosome autosomal aneuploidies, accounted for 73.6% of all CSCAs, with a rate of 1.13%. As a group, the most common chromosomal aneuploidies (13/18/21/X/Y) accounted for 93.9% of all abnormalities, with a rate of 1.44%. The incidence of trisomy 21, trisomy 13/18/21 as a group, and 13/18/21/X/Y as a group was significantly greater in women aged 39 years and older (p < 0.001), but was not different between women aged 35 years, 36 years, 37 years, and 38 years.

CONCLUSION

These findings may assist in genetic counseling of advanced maternal age pregnant women, and provide a basis for the selection of prenatal screening and diagnostic technologies.

Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to gain a better understanding of the status of advanced maternal age among criteria for provision of amniocentesis in pregnant women in Taiwan.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Data of 315 670 second-trimester amniocenteses from 28 national certified cytogenetics laboratories were retrospectively analyzed from the Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis Declaring and Database System of the Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan between 2006 and 2013.

RESULTS

The number of pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis in Taiwan between 2006 and 2013 increased, and the most common three indications for amniocentesis were advance maternal age (75.11%), abnormal second trimester maternal serum screening (13.22%) and abnormal sonographic finding (8.00%). Down syndrome was the most common autosomal abnormality identified (25.74%); Turner syndrome was the most common sex chromosome abnormality (7.04%). Of structural rearrangements, 26.93% were balanced translocations and 17.10% were unbalanced translocations. The greatest proportion of fetal chromosomal abnormalities was found in cases where parents were also affected (38.02%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical workers should provide detailed genetic diagnostic information to pregnant women, especially those with the common amniocentesis indications, which will enable them to determine a birth plan.

Dilemmas in Prenatal Chromosomal Diagnosis Revealed Through a Single Center's 30 Years' Experience and 90,000 Cases

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this article is to provide a perspective of prenatal chromosomal diagnosis (PCD) derived from a single center's evolving experience from ∼90,000 consecutive prenatal cases and to highlight important issues and current dilemmas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prenatal cases in this study (1985-2013) were referred for various indications, and PCD was performed by standard karyotype in 84,255 cases, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) panel in 3,010 cases and standalone array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in 3,122 cases.

RESULTS

Classic karyotype revealed 1.7 and 7.9% of pathological cases in amniotic fluid and CVS samples, respectively, with common aneuploidies accounting for 59.6 and 64.3% of the total abnormal. Molecular approaches increased the diagnostic yield by 0.6% for MLPA and 1.6% for aCGH, uncovering pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities undetectable by karyotype analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Current molecular diagnostic capabilities and the recent introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) point to one current major dilemma in PCD, with serious implications in genetic counseling, relating on the one hand to reaping the benefits from the high detection rate afforded through aCGH but accepting an invasive risk, and on the other hand, offering a lower detection rate practically only for Down syndrome, with minimal invasive risk.

A 26-Year Experience in Chorionic Villus Sampling Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis

This report describes the trends of chorionic villus sampling (CVS) referred for prenatal genetic diagnosis in the past two and a half decades in a Portuguese Center. Our cohort of 491 CVS was mostly performed by the transcervical method at the 12th gestational week. Data collected within the framework of this study relate to the following: sampling method, referral reason versus abnormality and incidence of procedure-related pregnancy loss, that declined to about 0.5% over the last 15 years. The year 2000 represented a change in referral reasons for chorionic tissue collection, shifting from almost exclusively for cytogenetic testing to an increasing number of molecular tests for monogenic disorders. Herein, success rates as well as cytogenetic and/or molecular DNA results are presented. These latter include not only tests for several monogenic disorders, but also aneuploidy and maternal cell contamination screening. This retrospective analysis reiterates that CVS is a safe and reliable first trimester technique for prenatal diagnosis in high genetic risk pregnancies.

Influence of place of residence on indications for genetic amniocentesis in the Pomeranian region of Poland before and after introduction of the Prenatal Screening Program in 2008

Background

The aim of the study was to analyze differences in the indications for amniocentesis in patients living in urban and rural areas before and after introduction of the Prenatal Screening Program by Polish National Health Insurance agency in the Pomeranian region in 2008.

Material/Methods

Indications for 2578 amniocenteses performed in the Department of Obstetrics of the Medical University of Gdansk between 1996 and 2010 were recorded.

Results

Advanced maternal age accounted for 69% of women in urban areas and 61% of women in rural areas being referred for amniocentesis (p<0.001). There was also a significant difference between locations in chromosomal abnormality in previous pregnancy, accounting for 4% of referrals for amniocentesis in urban areas compared with 7% of referrals in rural areas. In urban areas, advanced maternal age accounted for 73% of referrals between 1996–2007 compared with 60% of referrals for amniocentesis between 2008 and 2010 (p=0.004), and in rural areas it was 66% and 54%, respectively (p<0.001). Abnormal result of biochemical screening surprisingly accounted for 13% of referrals for amniocenteses between 1996–2007 in urban areas compared with 28% after 2008 (p<0.001). In rural areas this indication accounted for 12% referrals before 2008 and for 28% from 2008 onward (p<0.001).

Conclusions

The results of the study suggest that in both urban and rural areas there was a significant decrease in advanced maternal age as a reason for referral for amniocentesis, but a significant increase in abnormal results of biochemical screening as an indication for amniocentesis after 2008.

Analysis of fetal and maternal results from fetal genetic invasive procedures: an exploratory study at a University Hospital

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the indications of pregnant women who sought the Fetal Medicine Services of the Hospital das Clínicas, at the Medical School of the Universidade de São Paulo for performing invasive diagnostic procedures, and to evaluate the results of fetal karyotypes and their pregnancies.

METHODS

A retrospective and observational study on pregnant women who underwent chorionic villus sampling (CVS), amniocentesis, and cordocentesis in the period from February, 2005 to December, 2009. Other diagnostic or therapeutic procedures were not included. The result of pregnancy was obtained by consulting patient electronic records, medical records, and/or telephone call.

RESULTS

713 procedures were performed (113 CVS, 340 amniocenteses, and 260 cordocenteses). The main indication for performing invasive procedures was the presence of structural changes in fetuses, followed by increased values of nuchal translucency, and advanced maternal age. Fetal karyotype was altered in 186 cases (26.1%). The 18 trisomy was the commonest aneuploidy followed by the 21 trisomy, X monosomy, and 13 trisomy. There were 4.9% cases of miscarriage, 25.7% cases of stillborn infants, and 13% cases of neonatal deaths. Eight pregnant women opted for legally induced abortion. 99% of pregnant women whose fetuses did not present abnormalities and presented normal fetal karyotype had infants who were born alive.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosome Abnormalities: A 13-Year Institution Experience

Objective: To analyze trends in screening and invasive prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities (CA) over a 13-year period and correlate them to changes in the national prenatal screening policy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed Down syndrome (DS) screening tests and fetal karyotypes obtained by prenatal invasive testing (IT) in our fetal medicine unit between January 1999 and December 2011. Results: A total of 24,226 prenatal screening tests for DS and 11,045 invasive procedures have been analyzed. Over a 13-year period, utilization of non-invasive screening methods has significantly increased from 57% to 89%. The percentage of invasive procedures has declined from 49% to 12%, although the percentage of IT performed for maternal anxiety has increased from 22% to 55%. The percentage of detected CA increased from 2.5% to 5.9%. Overall, 31 invasive procedures are needed to diagnose 1 abnormal case, being 23 procedures in medical indications and 241 procedures in non-medical indications. Conclusions: Our experience on screening and invasive prenatal diagnostic practice shows a decrease of the number of IT, with a parallel decline in medical indications. There is an increasing efficiency of prenatal screening program to detect CA. Despite the increasing screening policies, our population shows a growing request for prenatal IT. The a priori low risk population shows a not negligible residual risk for relevant CA. This observation challenges the current prenatal screening strategy focused on DS; showing that the residual risk is higher than the current cut-off used to indicate an invasive technique.

Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing-based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11,105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors

OBJECTIVE

To report the performance of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test based on cell-free DNA sequencing from maternal plasma in a routine clinical setting in China.

METHOD

The MPS-based test was offered as a prenatal screening test for trisomies 21 and 18 to pregnant women in 49 medical centers over 2 years. A total of 11,263 participants were recruited and the MPS-based test was performed in 11,105 pregnancies. Fetal outcome data were obtained after the expected date of confinement.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety cases were classified as positive, including 143 cases of trisomy 21 and 47 cases of trisomy 18. With the karyotyping results and the feedback of fetal outcome data, we observed one false positive case of trisomy 21, one false positive case of trisomy 18 and no false negative cases, indicating 100% sensitivity and 99.96% specificity for the detection of trisomies 21 and 18.

CONCLUSION

Our large-scale multicenter study proved that the MPS-based test is of high sensitivity and specificity in detecting fetal trisomies 21 and 18. The introduction of this screening test into a routine clinical setting could avoid about 98% of invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures.

A retrospective analysis of amniocenteses performed for advanced maternal age and various other indications in Turkish women

OBJECTIVE

Prenatal cytogenetic diagnostic methods for the diagnosis of fetal chromosomal anomalies have been used reliably over the last 40 years. Advanced maternal age has become a basic indication for amniocentesis.

METHODS

We examined the results of the chromosome analyses of 3485 women that had amniocentesis for any reason during their antenatal care in our perinatology clinic in 2007-2009. Amniocentesis was performed for advanced maternal age in 1456 women (41.8%) and for other reasons in the remaining 2029 women (58.2%). Chromosomal anomalies were examined numerically and structurally.

RESULTS

When the amniocentesis results of the patients were reviewed as numerically normal or abnormal; 40 (2.7%) of 1456 amniocentesis procedures performed for advanced maternal age, 5 (0.9%) of 531 procedures performed for an increased double-test risk and 14 (1.3%) of 1095 procedures performed for an increased triple test risk were found to have chromosomal aneuploidy.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal age is still the most prevalent indication for genetic amniocentesis other than positive prenatal screening tests. Among women with advanced maternal age, prenatal ultrasonography for soft markers of chromosomal aneuploidy accompanied with maternal serum biochemical screening tests should be evaluated during the decision making process of genetic amniocentesis.