Norethisterone acetate versus norethisterone acetate combined with letrozole for the treatment of ovarian endometriotic cysts: a patient preference study

Norethindrone acetate versus dienogest for pain relief in endometriosis related pain: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine which progestin, norethindrone acetate (NETA) or dienogest, is more effective in alleviating pain associated with endometriosis?

STUDY DESIGN

This single-center, prospective, randomized trial included 70 patients aged 18-40 years attending the Endometriosis Clinic (April 2022-April 2023). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either NETA (5 mg daily) or dienogest (2 mg daily). Pain levels were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Discontinuation rates, dropout reasons, and side effects were also recorded.

RESULTS

The study included 70 patients, with 40 randomized to the dienogest group and 30 to the NETA group. Both groups showed significant reductions in pain scores at all follow-ups, with no significant differences between them. At baseline, dysmenorrhea scores were 7.43 ± 2.9 (NETA) and 7.23 ± 2.87 (dienogest). By 12 months, both groups had a dysmenorrhea score of 0.00 ± 0.00. Chronic pelvic pain scores improved to 1.06 ± 2.43 (NETA) and 0.00 ± 0.00 (dienogest) (p = 0.058). NETA demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in endometrioma size (p = 0.037). At the sixth month, there were 23 patients in the NETA group and 21 patients in the dienogest group, while 16 patients in the NETA group and 18 patients in the dienogest group completed the treatment. Side effect profiles were comparable; however, the dropout rate at six months was higher in the dienogest group (47.5 % vs. 23.3 %; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Both progestins effectively reduced pain scores, but NETA achieved a greater reduction in endometrioma size and had a lower dropout rate, potentially due to its higher dose. These findings suggest NETA 5 mg/day may be a better approach instead of dienogest for the endometriosis treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

International Clinical Trials Registry Platform No. NCT05476172.

Safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapies for pelvic inflammatory disease and endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) are gynecological conditions affecting women of reproductive age and causing pain symptoms. The symptoms caused by these conditions are similar; thus, the differential diagnosis may be challenging. The treatment of these conditions is very different because PID is treated with antibiotic therapy, while endometriosis is treated with hormonal therapies suppressing estrogen levels.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative review was conducted through a comprehensive literature search on endometriosis and PID. The search strategy incorporated relevant keywords and MeSH terms related to these topics.

EXPERT OPINION

The antibiotics used to manage PID have high efficacy and safety profiles. Commonly prescribed regimens include a combination of ceftriaxone, doxycycline, and metronidazole. These antibiotics are generally well-tolerated, with most adverse effects being mild and manageable (gastrointestinal disturbances or hypersensitivity reactions). Hormonal therapies are a cornerstone in the management of endometriosis; they include combined oral contraceptives (COCs), progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, and antagonists. COCs and progestins are generally well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile, though they may cause side effects (breakthrough bleeding and mood changes). Oral GnRH antagonists have emerged as a noteworthy option, offering partial estrogen suppression and thereby overcoming the limitations associated with previously used GnRH agonists.

Effect of norethisterone dose and duration in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding: a narrative review and case report

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is an acute/chronic variation in the normal menstrual cycle that affects adolescents, women of reproductive age and perimenopausal women. AUB affects approximately 3-30% of reproductive-aged women worldwide, and reduces their quality of life and productivity whilst increasing the overall healthcare burden. Its management requires thorough medical evaluation and individualized treatment. Depending on the severity and cause of AUB, its treatment ranges from lifestyle modifications and hormonal therapies to more invasive procedures or surgery. Although hormonal therapy is the preferred first-line measure in AUB, the available pharmacological options have various adverse effects. There exists a need for safer and more efficient treatment regimens with high patient compliance to effectively treat AUB. Norethisterone, also known as norethindrone, is a widely used synthetic analogue of progestogen. Controlled release formulations of norethisterone/ norethisterone acetate help maintain constant drug levels in the blood and exert minimal side-effects; therefore, they are promising therapeutic agents for effective AUB management. The present review summarizes the epidemiology and diagnosis of AUB, with a focus on the safety, efficacy and tolerability of norethisterone/ norethisterone acetate in AUB management. We also report a case of AUB in a 40-year-old woman, who was treated with NETA tablets. The treatment resulted in favourable outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

Bidirectional causality between the levels of blood lipids and endometriosis: a two-sample mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have found a correlation between the levels of blood lipids and the development and progression of endometriosis (EM). However, the causality and direction of this correlation is unclear. This study aimed to examine the bidirectional connection between lipid profiles and the risk of EM using publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics.

METHODS

Eligible exposure variables such as levels of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were selected using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis method following a series of quality control procedures. Data on EM were obtained from the publicly available Finnish database of European patients. Inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods were used to analyze the causal relationship between lipid exposure and EM, exclude confounders, perform sensitivity analyses, and assess the stability of the results. Reverse MR analyses were performed with EM as exposure and lipid results as study outcomes.

RESULTS

IVW analysis results identified HDL as a protective factor for EM, while TG was shown to be a risk factor for EM. Subgroup analyses based on the site of the EM lesion identified HDL as a protective factor for EM of the uterus, while TG was identified a risk factor for the EM of the fallopian tube, ovary, and pelvic peritoneum. Reverse analysis did not reveal any effect of EM on the levels of lipids.

CONCLUSION

Blood lipids, such as HDL and TG, may play an important role in the development and progression of EM. However, EM does not lead to dyslipidemia.

The Effect of Hormonal Treatment on Ovarian Endometriomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of hormonal suppression of endometriosis on the size of endometriotic ovarian cysts.

DATA SOURCES

The authors searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2012 to December 2022.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included studies of premenopausal women undergoing hormonal treatment of endometriosis for ≥3 months. The authors excluded studies involving surgical intervention in the follow-up period and those using hormones to prevent endometrioma recurrence after endometriosis surgery. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022385612).

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The primary outcome was the mean change in endometrioma volume, expressed as a percentage, from baseline to at least 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the change in volume at 3 months and analyses by class of hormonal therapy. The authors included 16 studies (15 cohort studies, 1 randomized controlled trial) of 888 patients treated with dienogest (7 studies), other progestins (4), combined hormonal contraceptives (2), and other suppressive therapy (3). Globally, the decrease in endometrioma volume became statistically significant at 6 months with a mean reduction of 55% (95% confidence interval, -40 to -71; 18 treatment groups; 730 patients; p <.001; I2 = 96%). The reduction was the greatest with dienogest and norethindrone acetate plus letrozole, followed by relugolix and leuprolide acetate. The volume reduction was not statistically significant with combined hormonal contraceptives or other progestins. There was high heterogeneity, and studies were at risk of selection bias.

CONCLUSION

Hormonal suppression can substantially reduce endometrioma size, but there is uncertainty in the exact reduction patients may experience.

The effect of surgery or medication on pain and quality of life in women with endometrioma. A systematic review and meta-analysis

For patients with endometrioma it is unclear what treatment: surgery and/or medication, is more effective in reducing pain and improving quality of life (QoL). This systematic review and meta- analysis aimed to provide an overview of the existing evidence on the effects of surgery and/or medication (i.e. analgesics and/or hormonal medication) on pain and QoL. A search through CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase was conducted. The study population had to be women treated for endometrioma. Retrospective or prospective studies reporting about QoL and/or the following types of pain were reviewed: dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and pain that was not well defined in the included article (referred to as pain). We performed a meta-analysis on mean visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and proportions of patients experiencing different types of pain over time. QoL was described narratively. Out of 11.515 articles, 76 studies including 7148 patients were included for the systematic review. The meta-analysis consisted of 52 studies including 4556 patients. No studies compared medication with surgery. And there were no studies on analgesics. Meta-analysis showed that surgery and/or medication often reduced VAS scores and proportions of all types of pain over time. Surgery and medication combined seems more effective in reducing VAS scores of pain compared to surgery alone, but not to medication alone (estimated mean difference = 0.17, p < 0.0001 and -0.98, p = 0.0339). QoL improved after medication (follow up ≤ 12 months) and QoL was unchanged or worsened after surgery and medication combined (follow up ≤ 24 months). However, these were results from a total of 5 studies. Both surgery and medication reduce endometriosis-related pain in patients with endometrioma. However, there is lack of uniform, good quality data comparing surgery with medication to draw firm conclusions. For better-informed treatment decisions, further studies including a standardized core-outcome set at fixed follow-up times, are necessary.

Medical Management of Ovarian Endometriomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of medical management on the size of ovarian endometriomas.

DATA SOURCE

Online databases were searched from inception to October 2022, including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov , and Web of Science.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we included all English-language, full-text articles that reported on change in endometrioma size (either diameter or volume) after medical interventions. Studies evaluating surgical interventions or postoperative recurrence were excluded. All screening and data extraction were performed independently by two authors. Risk of bias assessment was performed with either the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials or a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

After removal of duplicates, 9,332 studies were screened, with 33 full-text articles deemed eligible for inclusion. In the meta-analysis, dienogest showed significant reduction in cyst diameter (reduction 1.32 cm, 95% CI, 0.91-1.73, eight studies, n=418 cysts) and volume (mean difference of log-transformed volume 1.35, 95% CI, 0.87-1.83, seven studies, n=282 cysts). Similarly, significant reductions were seen with the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) (1.06 cm, 95% CI, 0.59-1.53, nine studies, n=455), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (1.17 cm, 95% CI, 0.42-1.92, four studies, n=128 cysts), norethindrone acetate (0.6 cm, 95% CI, 0.27-0.94, two studies, n=88 cysts), and danazol (1.95 cm, 95% CI, 1.18-2.73, two studies, n=34 cysts). Norethindrone acetate with aromatase inhibitor was also effective in reducing endometrioma volume (mean difference of log-transformed volume 1.47, 95% CI, 0.16-2.78, two studies, n=34 cysts).

CONCLUSION

Medical management with dienogest, OCPs, GnRH agonists, norethindrone acetate, norethindrone acetate with aromatase inhibitor, or danazol can reduce the size of ovarian endometriomas.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD 42022363319.

A review of phase II and III drugs for the treatment and management of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease that gives rise to pelvic pain and infertility. Although estroprogestins and progestins currently stand as the first-line treatments for this condition, demonstrating efficacy in two-thirds of patients, a significant portion of individuals experience only partial relief or symptom recurrence following the cessation of these therapies. The coexistence of superficial, deep endometriosis, and ovarian endometriomas, as three distinct phenotypes with unique pathogenetic and molecular characteristics, may elucidate the current heterogeneous biological response to available therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to furnish the reader with a comprehensive summary pertaining to phase II-III hormonal treatments for endometriosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Ongoing research endeavors are directed toward the development of novel hormonal options for this benign yet debilitating disease. Among them, oral GnRH antagonists emerge as a noteworthy option, furnishing rapid therapeutic onset without an initial flare-up; these drugs facilitate partial or complete estrogen suppression, and promote prompt ovarian function recovery upon discontinuation, effectively surmounting the limitations associated with previously employed GnRH agonists. Limited evidence supports the use of selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators. Consequently, further extensive clinical research is imperative to garner a more profound understanding of innovative targets for novel hormonal options.

Effect of hormonal treatment on evolution of endometriomas: An observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the evolution of endometriomas with or without medical treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was performed at the Gynaecological Center, Hôpital La Conception (Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille). We reviewed clinical data of patients with at least one endometrioma diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and at least one other MRI exam after more than three months. Patients were divided into groups receiving medical treatment and without medical treatment (high-dose progestins, low-dose progestins or combined contraceptives). The primary objective was to evaluate the evolution of endometriomas with or without hormonal treatment. The primary evaluation criterion was the diameter of the endometriomas, and the secondary evaluation criterion was the number of endometriomas for each patient observed. The secondary objective was to evaluate whether different categories of hormonal treatment have different efficacity in the evolution of endometriomas.

RESULTS

We included 68 patients, 39 (57,4%) with hormonal treatment and 29 (42,6%) without hormonal treatment. There were 105 total endometriomas identified at the first MRI, 52 in patients with hormonal treatment and 53 in patients without treatment. The mean diameter of the endometriomas in patients with hormonal treatment was 31,48 ± 18,1 mm at the first MRI and 23,60 ± 15,3 mm at the second MRI. The mean diameter of the endometriomas in patients without treatment was 33,57 ± 19,7 mm at the first MRI and 40,11 ± 25,7 mm at the second MRI (statistically significant difference, p = 0.01). The mean number of endometriomas in patients with treatment was 1,79 ± 1,1 at the first MRI and 1,18 ± 0,9 at the second MRI, while the mean number of endometriomas in patients without hormonal treatment was 1,38 ± 0,6 at the first MRI and 1,97 ± 1,5 at the second MRI (difference not statistically significant, p = 0.38). The subgroup analysis differentiated by category of hormonal treatment did not show statistically significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that there is a positive effect of hormonal treatment on reducing the diameter of endometriomas and also a significative increase in endometrioma size in the absence of treatment. There is no evidence of an advantage of a single category of hormonal treatment on this effect on endometriomas. Thus, any medical treatment could be proposed as a first-line therapy for endometriomas that would reduce the size of the endometrioma and thereby help to avoid surgical intervention.

Dienogest alone or dienogest combined with estrogens in the treatment of ovarian endometriomas, that is the question. A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

to compare the effects of Dienogest 2 mg (D) alone or combined with estrogens (D + ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg, D + EE; D + estradiol valerate 1-3 mg, D + EV) in terms of symptoms and endometriotic lesions variations.

METHODS

This retrospective study included symptomatic patients in reproductive age with ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian endometriomas. Medical therapy for at least 12 months with D, D + EE or D + EV was required. Women were evaluated at baseline visit (V1) and after 6 (V2) and 12 months (V3) of therapy.

RESULTS

297 patients were enrolled (156 in the D group, 58 in the D + EE group, 83 in the D + EV group). Medical treatment leaded to a significant reduction in size of endometriomas after 12 months, with no differences between the three groups. When comparing D and D + EE/D + EV groups, a significant decrease of dysmenorrhea was detected in the D group than in D + EE/D + EV group. Conversely, the reduction of dysuria was more significative in the D + EE/D + EV groups rather than in the D group. Regarding tolerability, treatment associated side effects were reported by 16.2% patients. The most frequent one was uterine bleeding/spotting, significantly higher in the D + EV group.

CONCLUSION

Dienogest alone or associated with estrogens (EE/EV) seems to be equally effective in reducing endometriotic lesions mean diameter. The reduction of dysmenorrhea was more significative when D was administered alone, while dysuria seems to improve more when D is associated with estrogens.

A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on the Use of Aromatase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Endometriosis: The Evidence to Date

Endometriosis is a chronic gynecologic condition that affects around 6-10% of reproductive age women. This clinical entity is characterized with pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility which are the most often presenting symptoms. Aromatase P450 is the key enzyme for ovarian estrogen biosynthesis and there is evidence that endometriotic lesions express aromatase and are able to synthesize their own estrogens. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are potent drugs that suppress the estrogen synthesis via suppression of aromatase. We performed a systematic review of systematic reviews and narrative reviews on the use of aromatase inhibitors in the medical management of endometriosis. We searched: PubMed (1950-2022), Google Scholar (2004-2022), Cochrane Library (2010-2022) and Researchgate (2010-2022). The search included the following medical subject headings (MeSH) or keywords: "Aromatase Inhibitors" AND "Endometriosis" AND "Systematic reviews" OR "Systematic review" AND "Reviews" OR "Reviews" AND "Endometriosis". The electronic database search yielded initially 12,106 studies from the different databases. Further assessment of the studies resulted in exclusion of (n = 12,015) studies due to duplicates and irrelevance; Finally, 24 studies were selected for inclusion, 5 were Systematic reviews and 19 were Narrative reviews. The 5 systematic reviews were assessed by AMSTAR-2 criteria and were found to have low quality. Narrative reviews were assessed with SANRA criteria and were found to have high-quality aromatase inhibitors are potent drugs that can manage the endometriosis-related symptoms in cases where initial medical management has failed to show positive results. However, their use is limited by the adverse effects that are linked with menopausal symptoms. aromatase inhibitors can be administered as an alternative treatment in patients. Future studies with randomized design are required to reach safer conclusions and further investigation. These studies should define the therapeutic dose, new add-back therapy modalities. Future directions should examine the most-appropriate way of administration and the duration of therapy.

Effects of Dienogest Therapy on Endometriosis-Related Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia, and Endometrioma Size

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent chronic inflammatory disease that is defined by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside of the uterus. The most common localization is the ovaries, and endometriosis in this location is then called an endometrioma. According to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) (2022) guidelines, the most commonly prescribed treatments for endometriosis include drugs that alter the hormonal milieu. Dienogest is a new generation of progestin used in the treatment of endometriosis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Dienogest treatment on endometrioma size and endometriosis-related pain symptoms over a six-month follow-up period.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary clinic in Turkey between March 2020 and March 2021. Here, 64 patients aged 17-49 years with unilateral or bilateral endometriomas without any hormone-dependent cancers and any medical conditions contraindicating the onset of hormonal treatment, such as active venous thromboembolism, previous or current cardiovascular disease, diabetes with cardiovascular complications, current severe liver disease, and not being pregnant, were included. Endometrioma sizes were determined by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS). Dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia symptoms were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients received Dienogest 2 mg/day continuously for six months. At the three- and six-month follow-ups, the patients were re-evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean endometrioma size decreased significantly from an initial measurement of 44.0 ± 13 mm to 39.5 ± 15 mm at three months and to 34.4 ± 18 mm at the six-month follow-up. The mean dysmenorrhea VAS scores before treatment, at the three-month follow-up, and at the six-month follow-up were 6.9 ± 2.6, 4.3 ± 2.8, and 3.8 ± 2.7, respectively. Dysmenorrhea VAS scores decreased significantly over the first three months (p<0.01). Similarly, the mean VAS score for dyspareunia decreased at three and six months compared with the pretreatment value (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that dienogest treatment reduced the symptoms of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia and the size of endometriomas. However, the main significant decrease in dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia symptoms was noted in the first three months, making it a good treatment option, especially in young patients with a fertility wish.

Is intracrinology of endometriosis relevant in clinical practice? A systematic review on estrogen metabolism

Endometriosis is a chronic, multifactorial, estrogen-dependent disease. The abnormal endocrine microenvironment of endometriosis lesions is considered a main feature and multiple enzymatic pathways leading to local increased synthesis of estrogens have been identified. However, the relevance of intracrinology in clinical practice is still lacking. Medline, Embase, Scopus database were systematically searched for studies reporting on local estrogens metabolism of endometriotic lesions. The main enzymatic pathways involved in the intracrinology of endometriosis such as aromatase (CYP19A1), 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD17B) type 1, type 2 and type 5, steroid sulfatase (STS), estrogen sulfotransferase (SULT1E1) were assessed with a critical perspective on their role in disease endocrine phenotyping, drug resistance and as therapeutic targets. Overall, studies heterogeneity and missing clinical data affect the interpretation of the clinical role of these enzymes. Although the use of some drugs such as aromatase inhibitors has been proposed in clinical practice for two decades, their potential clinical value is still under investigation as well as their modality of administration. A closer look at new, more realistic drug targets is provided and discussed. Altered expression of these key enzymes in the lesions have far reaching implication in the development of new drugs aimed at decreasing local estrogenic activity with a minimal effect on gonadal function; however, given the complexity of the evaluation of the expression of the enzymes, multiple aspects still remains to be clarified.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022311329, identifier CRD42022311329.

Anastrozole and levonorgrestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of endometriosis: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

To study the effectiveness of an aromatase inhibitor (Anastrozole) associated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD, Mirena®) in the treatment of endometriosis.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University Hospital (single center). Elegibility criteria: Endometriomas > 3 × 4 cm, CA-125 > 35 U/mL and endometriosis symptoms.

PATIENTS

Thirty-one women randomized to anastrozole + Mirena® + Conservative Surgery(CS) (n = 8), anastrozole + Mirena® + transvaginal ultrasound-guided puncture-aspiration (TUGPA) (n = 7), Mirena® + CS (n = 9), or Mirena® + TUGPA (n = 7).

INTERVENTIONS

Anastrozole 1 mg/day and/or only Mirena® for 6 months; CS (ovarian and fertility-sparing) or TUGPA of endometriomas one month after starting medical treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analogic scale for symptoms, CA-125 levels, ultrasound findings of endometriomas and recurrences.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in symptoms during the treatment (difference of 43%, 95% CI 29.9-56.2) occurred, which was maintained at 1 and 2 years. It was more significant in patients including anastrozole in their treatment (51%, 95% CI 33.3-68.7). For CA-125, the most significant decrease was observed in patients not taking anastrozole (73.8%, 95% CI 64.2-83.4 vs. 53.8%, 95% CI 25.7-81.6 under Mirena® + anastrozole). After CS for endometriosis, a reduction of ultrasound findings of endometriomas and long-term recurrence occurred, with or without anastrozole. At 4.2 ± 1.7 years (95% CI 3.57-4.85), 88% of the patients who underwent CS were asymptomatic, without medication or reoperation, compared to only 21% if TUGPA was performed, with or without anastrozole (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing anastrozole for 6 months, starting one month before CS of endometriosis, reduces significantly the painful symptoms and delays recurrence, but has no other significant advantages over the single insertion of LNG-IUD (Mirena®) during the same time. Anastrozole and/or only Mirena® associated with TUGPA are not effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Eudra CT System of the European Medicines Agency (London, 29-Sept-2008) Nº EudraCT: 2008-005744-17 (07/11/2008). Date of enrolment of first patient: 15/01/2009.

Aspiration versus retention ultrasound-guided ethanol sclerotherapy for treating endometrioma: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Background

Endometrioma is a common high-recurrence gynecological disease that affects infertility. Surgical resection using laparotomy or laparoscopy is applied as a standard treatment. Moreover, sclerotherapy is reported to be effective as a non-invasive method for treating endometrioma.

Objective

To evaluate whether the ethanol retention or aspiration after sclerotherapy improve pregnancy outcome in infertile women with endometrioma.

Materials and Methods

In a retrospective study, hospital records of 43 women with recurrent or bilateral endometrioma who had been undergone transvaginal ultrasound sclerotherapy were reviewed. They were selected to receive either ethanol for 10 min, ethanol injection, irrigation, and then aspiration or total retention without aspiration based on the surgeon's decision. The participants were followed-up for 3, 6 and 12 months for natural or artificial conception as well as for cyst recurrence.

Results

Chemical pregnancy was positive in 52% of the women in the aspiration group and 53.8% in the retention group. Ongoing pregnancy (44% vs 46.2%, p = 0.584) and live birth (40% vs 46.2%, p = 0.490) were reported marginally higher in the retention group compared with the aspiration group, and the differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, the recurrence rate were found to be 48.1% and 37.5% in the aspiration and retention groups, respectively (p = 0.542). The cysts size in the retention group was significantly correlated to the recurrence rate.

Conclusion

Both the aspiration and left in situ of ethanol 95% sclerotherapy have the similar impact on the treatment of ovarian endometrioma regarding pregnancy and recurrence rate. However, larger randomized studies with strict inclusion criteria are needed.

Approaching ovarian endometrioma with medical therapy

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory gynecological disorder associated with pelvic pain symptoms and infertility. Ovarian cysts (endometriomas) are the most common localization of endometriosis in the pelvis. Considering non-invasive methods, transvaginal ultrasound has high sensitivity and specificity for endometrioma diagnosis. Laparoscopic removal of endometrioma is related to a damage to the ovarian reserve and should be limited to patients with suspicious cysts or unresponsive to medical treatment. The main goal of medical therapy of symptomatic endometrioma is the control of pain symptoms, while no benefits have been demonstrated in terms of improving fertility rates of women seeking pregnancy. The aim of medical treatment is the inhibition of ovulation, stop of menstruation and achievement of a stable hypo-hormonal milieu. Estroprogestins and progestins are indicated by guidelines as first line medications for symptomatic patients. Several hormonal treatments have been proposed for the treatment of symptomatic endometriomas. In particular, dienogest, a relatively new progestin, has shown promising results. Medical treatment should be conceived as a long-term treatment. Safety, tolerability, a low percentage of side effects and an easy route of administration are essential for patient acceptance and adherence to therapy.

Aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review about efficacy, safety and early clinical development

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacotherapy has a key role in endometriosis treatment and management, however, a significant proportion of patients have only intermittent or limited benefits with current treatment options. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are necessary.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review provides an overview of the efficacy and safety of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as monotherapies and combination therapies for endometriosis. A systematic literature search was performed from January 1990 to April 2020 in the electronic database MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on the critical role of estrogens and the rate-limiting step in the production of the estrogens represented by the aromatase enzyme, AIs are a potential therapeutic option for women affected by endometriosis. Nevertheless, further research is needed to clarify the efficacy of AIs in this setting. Adverse effects need to be investigated to clarify the preventive role of add-back therapy. On that basis, AIs should be adopted only as second-line therapy in patients who are refractory to standard treatments in the setting of scientific research. Further studies should define best dosages, appropriate add-back therapies, administration routes, treatment length, and which patients may benefit more from AIs.

Progesterone receptor ligands for the treatment of endometriosis: the mechanisms behind therapeutic success and failure

BACKGROUND

Despite intense research, it remains intriguing why hormonal therapies in general and progestins in particular sometimes fail in endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

We review here the action mechanisms of progesterone receptor ligands in endometriosis, identify critical differences between the effects of progestins on normal endometrium and endometriosis and envisage pathways to escape drug resistance and improve the therapeutic response of endometriotic lesions to such treatments.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a systematic Pubmed search covering articles published since 1958 about the use of progestins, estro-progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulators, to treat endometriosis and its related symptoms. Two reviewers screened the titles and abstracts to select articles for full-text assessment.

OUTCOMES

Progesterone receptor signalling leads to down-regulation of estrogen receptors and restrains local estradiol production through interference with aromatase and 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1. Progestins inhibit cell proliferation, inflammation, neovascularisation and neurogenesis in endometriosis. However, progesterone receptor expression is reduced and disrupted in endometriotic lesions, with predominance of the less active isoform (PRA) over the full-length, active isoform (PRB), due to epigenetic abnormalities affecting the PGR gene transcription. Oxidative stress is another mechanism involved in progesterone resistance in endometriosis. Among the molecular targets of progesterone in the normal endometrium that resist progestin action in endometriotic cells are the nuclear transcription factor FOXO1, matrix metalloproteinases, the transmembrane gap junction protein connexin 43 and paracrine regulators of estradiol metabolism. Compared to other phenotypes, deep endometriosis appears to be more resistant to size regression upon medical treatments. Individual genetic characteristics can affect the bioavailability and pharmacodynamics of hormonal drugs used to treat endometriosis and, hence, explain part of the variability in the therapeutic response.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Medical treatment of endometriosis needs urgent innovation, which should start by deeper understanding of the disease core features and diverse phenotypes and idiosyncrasies, while moving from pure hormonal treatments to drug combinations or novel molecules capable of restoring the various homeostatic mechanisms disrupted by endometriotic lesions.

Modification of endometrioma size during hormone therapy containing dienogest

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether hormone therapy containing dienogest is effective in reducing endometrioma size. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 116 women with endometrioma which was evaluated after 6 and 12 months of either no treatment (n = 46), or hormonal therapy containing dienogest (n = 70), without (DNG; n = 34) or with ethinylestradiol (DNG/EE; n = 36). Median (interquartile range) cyst diameter (23.0 mm (21.0 mm)) and volume (9941.2 mm³ (14240.1 mm³)) of untreated were similar to cyst diameter (25.0 mm (14.5 mm) and volume (7587.7 mm³ (13806.2 mm³)) of treated women. After 12 months, endometrioma volume did not vary in untreated women (-34.0 mm³ (55595.0 mm³); -0.77% (93.9%)) while it significantly decreased (-5400 mm³ (15378.7 mm³); -100.0% (27.7%); p<.0001) during hormone therapy. Volume decrease was linearly related to endometrioma volume ([Formula: see text] R² = 0.899, p<.0001). The effect tended to be greater during DNG alone than DNG/EE (-100.0% (0.0%) vs. -87.9% (47.7%); p<.0004). Cyst disappearance was observed in 4.4% of untreated cases and in 57.1% of cases on hormone therapy (p<.0001) (38.9% with DNG/EE and 76.5% with DNG; p<.03). The early diagnosis and treatment of endometrioma with dienogest-based hormone therapy may be effective in controlling cyst growth and in reducing the need for surgery.

The role of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of endometriosis across the lifespan

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is estimated to affect 10% of reproductive-aged women. The gold standard for treatment is surgery; however, surgery carries a significant morbidity and cost burden. There is an ongoing need for safe, effective medical therapies for endometriosis patients, both in conjunction with and independent of surgical interventions. Most conventional therapies for endometriosis work by a similar mechanism, and efficacy is variable. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the development and testing of novel pharmacotherapies for endometriosis.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses both conventional and emerging treatments for endometriosis. The authors present the application of these drugs in different presentations of endometriosis across the lifespan and discuss how emerging therapies might fit into future medical management of endometriosis. Conventional therapies include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, combined oral contraceptives, progestins, GnRH agonists/antagonists, and aromatase inhibitors. Emerging therapies are focused on disease-specific targets such as endothelial growth factor receptors.

EXPERT OPINION

The field of endometriosis therapy is moving toward modifying the immune and inflammatory milieu surrounding endometrial implants. If these drugs show efficacy in clinical trials, combining them with current medical treatment is expected to result in a profound impact on symptom and disease burden for patients who suffer from endometriosis worldwide.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of endometriosis, an update on recent developments

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a hormone-dependent benign chronic disease that requires a chronic medical therapy. Although currently available drugs are efficacious in treating endometriosis-related pain, some women experience partial or no improvement. Moreover, the recurrence of symptoms is expected after discontinuation of the therapies. Currently, new drugs are under intense clinical investigation for the treatment of endometriosis.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to offer the reader a complete and updated overview on new investigational drugs and early molecular targets for the treatment of endometriosis. The authors describe the pre-clinical and clinical development of these agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Among the drugs under investigation, late clinical trials on gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (GnRH-ant) showed the most promising results for the treatment of endometriosis. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are efficacious in treating endometriosis related pain symptoms but they cause significant adverse effects that limit their long-term use. New targets have been identified to produce drugs for the treatment of endometriosis, but the majority of these new compounds have only been investigated in laboratory studies or early clinical trials. Thus, further clinical research is required in order to elucidate their efficacy and safety in human.

Current understanding on pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of progestins for treating pain associated to endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a chronic estrogen and progestogen responsive inflammatory disease associated with pain symptoms and infertility. The medical therapy of endometriosis aims to induce decidualization within the hormonally dependent ectopic endometrium, and it is often administered to ameliorate women' pain symptoms or to prevent post-surgical disease recurrence. A variety of progestins have been used in monotherapy for the medical management of women with endometriosis. Areas covered: This review aims to offer the reader a complete overview of pharmacokinetic (PK) and clinical efficacy of progestins for the treatment of endometriosis. Expert opinion: Each progestin has a distinct PK parameters and pharmacodynamics affinity not only for progesterone receptor, but also for other steroid receptors, such as estrogen, androgen, and glucocorticoid. Moreover, progestins can also be delivered in different formulations. All these characteristics influence their final biological effect. Randomized, controlled, non-blinded studies support the use of oral progestin-only treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Currently, the only two progestins approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of endometriosis are norethindrone acetate (NETA) and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA).

[New medical treatments for painful endometriosis: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work is to evaluate the place of new treatments in the management of endometriosis outside the context of infertility.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted by consulting Medline data until July 2017.

RESULTS

Dienogest is effective compared to placebo in short term (NP2) and long term (NP4) for the treatment of painful endometriosis. In comparison with GnRH agonists, dienogest is also effective in terms of decreased pain and improved quality of life in non-operated patients (NP2) as well as for recurrence of lesions and symptomatology postoperatively (NP2). Data on GnRH antagonists, selective progesterone receptor modulators as well as selective inhibitors (anti-TNF-α, matrix metalloprotease inhibitors, angiogenesis growth factor inhibitors) are insufficient to provide evidence of interest in clinical practice for the management of painful endometriosis (NP3).

CONCLUSION

Dienogest is recommended as second-line therapy for the management of painful endometriosis (Grade B). Because of lack of evidence, aromatase inhibitors, elagolix, SERM, SPRM and anti-TNF-α are not recommended for the management of painful endometriosis (Grade C).

Shifting from Oral Contraceptives to Norethisterone Acetate, or Vice Versa, because of Drug Intolerance: Does the Change Benefit Women with Endometriosis?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Oral contraceptives (OC) and norethisterone acetate (NETA) are among first-line medical therapies for symptomatic endometriosis, but their use is sometimes associated with intolerable side effects. We investigated whether shifting from low-dose OC to NETA (2.5 mg/day), or vice versa, improved tolerability.

METHODS

Sixty-seven women willing to discontinue their treatment because of intolerable side effects despite good pain relief, were enrolled in a self-controlled study, and shifted from OC to NETA (n = 35) or from NETA to OC (n = 32). The main study outcome was satisfaction with treatment 12 months after the change. Tolerability, pain symptoms, health-related quality of life, psychological status, and sexual functioning were also evaluated.

RESULTS

After treatment change, good tolerability was reported by 37% of participants who shifted to NETA, and by 52% of those who shifted to OC. At 12-month assessment, 51% of women intolerant to OC were satisfied with NETA, and 65% of those intolerant to NETA were satisfied with OC (intention-to-treat analysis). Other study variables did not vary substantially.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected endometriosis patients, shifting from OC to NETA, or vice versa, because of side effects, improved tolerability. Better results were observed when substituting NETA with OC rather than the other way round.

Is Shifting to a Progestin Worthwhile When Estrogen-Progestins Are Inefficacious for Endometriosis-Associated Pain?

The purpose of this study was to assess the proportion of patients satisfied with their treatment after a change from a low-dose oral contraceptive (OC) to norethisterone acetate (NETA) because of inefficacy of OC on pain symptoms. To this end, prospective, self-controlled study was conducted on 153 women using OC as a treatment for endometriosis and with persistence of one or more moderate or severe pain symptoms. At baseline and during 12 months after a shift from OC to oral NETA, 2.5 mg/d, pelvic pain was measured by means of a 0- to 10-point numerical rating scale and a multidimensional categorical rating scale. Variations in health-related quality of life, psychological status, and sexual function were also evaluated with validated scales. At the end of the study period, participants indicated the degree of satisfaction with their treatment according to a 5-degree scale from very satisfied to very dissatisfied. A total of 28 women dropped out of the study, the main reason was intolerable side effects (n = 15). At 12-month assessment, 70% of participants were very satisfied or satisfied with NETA treatment (intention-to-treat analysis). Statistically significant improvements were observed in health-related quality of life, psychological status, and sexual function. At per-protocol analysis, almost half of the patients (58/125) reported suboptimal drug tolerability. However, complaints were not severe enough to cause dissatisfaction, drug discontinuation, or request for surgery. These encouraging results could be used to counsel women with symptomatic endometriosis not responding to OC and to inform their decisions on modifications of disease management.

[Medical treatment of endometriosis: Hormonal treatment of pain, impact on evolution and future perspectives]

CONTEXT

Endometriosis is a chronic painful disease, for which hormone therapy is usually offered as a first line option to women not willing to conceive.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse and synthesize the literature, from 2006 onwards, on pain control, and disease evolution in oemn using combined hormonal contraceptives, progestins and GnRH analogs. Data on other current and future treatment perspectives is included as well.

SOURCES

Medline (Pubmed), the Cochrane Library, and endometriosis treatment recommendations published by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and Société des Obstétriciens et Gynécologues du Canada (SOGC).

STUDY SELECTION

Meta-analysis and clinical trials are included.

RESULTS

Study quality is heterogeneous in general. Hormone therapy inconstantly allows pain relief and prevention of endometrioma and rectovaginal wall nodules recurrence. Available molecules and routes of administration as well as risk benefit balance are evaluated. Data on future perspectives are limited to date and do not allow use in routine.

CONCLUSION

Hormonal treatment of endometriosis relies on combined hormonal contraceptives (using different routes of administration), progestins and particularly the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS, and GnRH analogs as a last option, in combination with an add-back therapy. Promising alternatives are currently under preclinical and clinical evaluation.

Pharmacologic treatment of the ovarian endometrioma

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of ovarian endometriomas is commonly achieved through laparoscopic surgery and this can be effective in eliminating the disease, although a majority of recent trials documented an adverse effect of surgery on ovarian reserve markers. With the advancement in imaging techniques, ovarian endometriomas are increasingly diagnosed at an earlier stage when the endometrioma may be smaller, less fibrotic and more responsive to medical treatment, making an evaluation of medical options critically important.

AREAS COVERED

The review focuses on currently utilized pharmacologic therapies for endometrioma (oral contraceptives, the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS, the hormone-releasing subdermal implant, Implanon); experimental and future treatments are also mentioned (GnRH antagonists, progesterone receptor modulators, antioestrogens, newer subdermal implants and intracystic administration of pharmacologic agents). Finally, the usefulness of post-operative adjuvant medical treatments is discussed Expert opinion: Today, reliable, non-invasive diagnostic procedures of an ovarian endometrioma are available and should be utilized to identify its presence and type of pathology. In a young patient, classic medical therapies such as oral contraceptives and synthetic progestins should be tried first to alleviate symptoms. Only when these regimens fail, should a minimally invasive surgery be envisaged. Following endoscopic surgery, adjuvant medical treatment may reduce recurrence of both symptoms and the lesion.

Advances in pharmacotherapy for treating endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent chronic disease requiring long-term therapy. Therefore, the choice of medical treatment should be based on efficacy, preference of patients, incidence and severity of adverse effects and cost.

AREAS COVERED

This review briefly summarizes the currently available medical treatment for endometriosis. The treatments most recently proposed for endometriosis will be described in detail, including gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and the flexible extended combined oral contraceptive.

EXPERT OPINION

The oral contraceptive pill and progestogens allow for the treatment of the majority of patients with endometriosis. The flexible extended dosing regimen, containing drospirenone and ethinylestradiol, may be particularly useful in patients suffering severe dysmenorrhea and improving the adherence and compliance with treatment. GnRH agonists may be used in patients resistant to first-line therapy; up to now, limited data are available on the use of GnRH antagonist (such as elagolix) in patients with endometriosis. AIs should be regarded as experimental therapies and used only in patients with symptoms resistant to other therapies; however, the use of these drugs is limited by the possibility to administer the treatment for short-term periods only (6 months) and, similarly to GnRH antagonists, by the high incidence of adverse effects, requiring the use of add-back therapy.

Second surgery for recurrent unilateral endometriomas and impact on ovarian reserve: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact on ovarian reserve of second laparoscopic surgery for recurrent unilateral endometriomas.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

This study included patients who underwent stripping of endometriomas (diameter ≥4 cm) and were followed-up at our institution. Case subjects had second surgery for recurrent unilateral endometriomas (n = 18); control subjects had no recurrence and no second surgery (n = 18).

INTERVENTION(S)

This case-control study was based on a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database including patients who underwent surgery for endometriomas at our institution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome of the study was to assess the changes in antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels in each study group and between the two study groups. The secondary outcomes of the study were to assess the changes in basal FSH, antral follicle count (AFC), and ovarian volume in each study group and between the two study groups.

RESULT(S)

In both study groups, primary surgery decreased AMH, increased basal FSH, and decreased the AFC of the operated ovary. Before second surgery, case subjects had AMH, basal FSH, and AFC similar to control subjects. After second surgery, case subjects had lower AMH, higher basal FSH, and lower AFC of the affected ovary than before surgery; the volume of the operated ovary was lower than that of the contralateral ovary.

CONCLUSION(S)

The laparoscopic stripping of recurrent ovarian endometriomas is associated with a high risk of ovarian reserve damage and ovarian failure.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02047838.

Dienogest in women with persistent endometriosis-related pelvic pain during norethisterone acetate treatment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient satisfaction at 6-months dienogest (DNG) treatment in women with symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis who had pain persistence and were unsatisfied after 6-months of norethisterone acetate (NETA) therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

This 24-weeks pilot open-label prospective study enrolled 25 women. The main outcome was the degree of patient satisfaction measured by using a Likert scale. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate differences in endometriosis-related pain, quality of life, sexual function changes and volumetric nodules changes during DNG compared to NETA treatment.

RESULTS

Patient satisfaction improved at 3- and 6-months (p<0.001, respectively) treatment with DNG compared with baseline treatment with NETA. Six months DNG treatment decreased the intensity of all the endometriosis-associated pain (chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dyschezia) compared to baseline (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Quality of life and quality of sexual life evaluated with the EHP-30 and FSFI, respectively, increased after 6 months treatment. The volume of the endometriotic nodules did not significantly change during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the efficacy of DNG in treating symptomatic women with rectovaginal endometriosis even in a particular endometriotic subpopulation of NETA "resistant" patients. Further randomized clinical trials comparing these two progestins both in first than second line are warranted.

Oral contraceptives for functional ovarian cysts

BACKGROUND

Functional ovarian cysts are a common gynecological problem among women of reproductive age worldwide. When large, persistent, or painful, these cysts may require operations, sometimes resulting in removal of the ovary. Since early oral contraceptives were associated with a reduced incidence of functional ovarian cysts, many clinicians inferred that birth control pills could be used to treat cysts as well. This became a common clinical practice in the early 1970s.

OBJECTIVES

This review examined all randomized controlled trials that studied oral contraceptives as therapy for functional ovarian cysts.

SEARCH METHODS

In March 2014, we searched the databases of CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, and POPLINE, as well as clinical trials databases (ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP). We also examined the reference lists of articles. For the initial review, we wrote to authors of identified trials to seek articles we had missed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials in any language that included oral contraceptives used for treatment and not prevention of functional ovarian cysts. Criteria for diagnosis of cysts were those used by authors of trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently abstracted data from the articles. One entered the data into RevMan and a second verified accuracy of data entry. For dichotomous outcomes, we computed the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI). For continuous outcomes, we calculated the mean difference with 95% CI.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight randomized controlled trials from four countries; the studies included a total of 686 women. Treatment with combined oral contraceptives did not hasten resolution of functional ovarian cysts in any trial. This held true for cysts that occurred spontaneously as well as those that developed after ovulation induction. Most cysts resolved without treatment within a few cycles; persistent cysts tended to be pathological (e.g., endometrioma or para-ovarian cyst) and not physiological.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although widely used for treating functional ovarian cysts, combined oral contraceptives appear to be of no benefit. Watchful waiting for two or three cycles is appropriate. Should cysts persist, surgical management is often indicated.

Concurrent estrogen action was essential for maximal progestin effect in oral contraceptives

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of estrogen contained in oral contraceptives (OCs) on the action of progestin on ovarian endometrioma epithelial cells.

DESIGN

Experimental in vitro study and immunohistochemical analysis.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Patients who underwent surgery due to ovarian endometrioma.

INTERVENTION(S)

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Telomerase-immortalized epithelial cells derived from ovarian endometrioma were treated with norethindorone (NET; 80 nmol/L) or levonorgestrel (LNG; 20 nmol/L) with or without 17β-ethynylestradiol (EE; 0.6 nmol/L) for 96 hours, and the cell growth was monitored. Estrogen receptor (ER) α, progesterone receptor (PR) A, and PRB expressions in clinical samples of ovarian endometrioma epithelial cells were analyzed with the use of immunohistochemistry.

RESULT(S)

NET or LNG effectively suppressed cell growth, and addition of EE significantly enhanced the growth suppression. This EE-mediated enhancement of cell growth suppression was observed only in cells that expressed ERα and therefore was ERα dependent. Western blot analysis revealed that expression of PRB was significantly induced by the addition of EE. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that ERα expression and PRB expression are significantly correlated, indicating that progestin-sensitive cells with PRB expression are predisposed to react with estrogen stimulation.

CONCLUSION(S)

These findings suggest that EE contained in OCs plays a supportive role in progestin-induced growth inhibition of ovarian endometrioma epithelial cells. In the absence of estrogen priming, concurrent estrogen action was essential for rapid induction of PR to achieve maximal progestin effect.