Definitive chemoradiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer: should it be different in the elderly?

Outcomes with definitive radiotherapy among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer with relative or absolute contraindications to cisplatin: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin, followed by brachytherapy, but is less defined for cisplatin-intolerant patients. We synthesized evidence on treatment outcomes with definitive radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy (ChT) in these patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search and included 20 relevant studies. We extracted data on response, survival, compliance, and toxicity, and performed meta-analyses of outcome rates and risk ratios. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Meta-regression was performed to examine the effects of other variables.

RESULTS

Due to lack of comparative data, most comparisons were indirect and derived from the proportional meta-analyses. Complete response (85%) and survival (62% 5yOS) rates are comparable to those published for LACC without contraindications to cisplatin. Survival rate is better with CRT than RT alone (5yOS, 73% vs 58%), and with nodal boost (NB) than without (5yOS, 71% vs 56%). Carboplatin CRT is associated with lower 5yOS (44%) but better ChT compliance (86%) when compared to other interventions. ChT compliance is better in renal failure than elderly cohorts (89% vs 67%). RT compliance is lower with CRT than RT alone (90% vs 96%), and higher with NB than none (96% vs 93%). NB is associated with lower RT compliance than no NB, when ChT is given. Meta-regression results affirm ChT and NB to be significant positive factors for survival, and NB, which is associated with greater use of advanced RT techniques, for RT compliance.

CONCLUSION

For those with relative contraindications, cisplatin CRT is effective and well-tolerated. For those with absolute contraindications, carboplatin is well-tolerated but with unclear effectiveness. Nodal boost is effective and well-tolerated, but is less tolerated when concurrent ChT is given.

Impact of chemotherapy cycles on oncological outcomes in elders with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the association between chemotherapy (CMT) cycles and oncological outcomes in elders with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) who treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS

We retrospective studied 498 elders with LACC who treated with radiotherapy (RT) or CCRT between 2002 and 2018. Patients were divided into three groups: RT, CCRT with 1-4 and CCRT with 5-6 cycles of CMT. We compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the three groups and explored survival prognostic factors via multivariate analysis and time-varying analysis effect.

RESULTS

There were 453 eligible patients; 222, 119 and 112 patients who received RT, CCRT with 1-4 and CCRT with 5-6 cycles of CMT, respectively. Patients in the RT group had older age, poorer performance status, more treatment with conventional RT technique and earlier treatment year comparing with both CCRT groups. Patients who received 5-6 cycles of CMT were less to have underweight, comorbidities and anaemia compared with the RT group. There were patients with lower FIGO stage in 5-6 cycles than in 1-4 cycles of CMT and RT groups. The 5-year PFS and OS between RT, CCRT with 1-4 and CCRT with 5-6 cycles of the CMT group were significantly different. Performance status, comorbidity, histology, FIGO stage and total received 5-6 CMT cycles were significant prognostic factors of PFS and OS. However, the benefits of receiving 5-6 CMT cycles were evidenced only within the first 2.5 years.

CONCLUSION

Elders with LACC who received 5-6 cycles of CMT concurrently with RT can improve PFS and OS, but the benefit persisted only within the first 2.5 years.

Are Older Patients with Cervical Cancer Managed Differently to Younger Patients? An International Survey

Although a quarter of cervical cancers occur after the age of 65 years, there is no treatment consensus for these patients. The aim of this work was to survey how physicians treat patients with advanced cervical cancer, focusing on treatment adjustments according to age and frailty status. Specialists were invited to an online survey. Data collected included information on respondent and treatment strategy in four cases (FIGO IIb, FIGO IVa, FIGO IVb, metastatic recurrence) with three age scenarios (45-year-old, 75-year-old and fit, 75-year-old and unfit). We received 237 responses of which 117 were fully completed. Thirty-four percent of respondents reported they had available access to a geriatric team and 25% used a frailty screening tool in routine. Therapeutic strategies did not differ between young and old fit patients. However, treatment modalities and intensity were different for old and unfit patients. Physicians answered that they would treat old fit patients as their younger counterparts but would reduce treatment intensity for old unfit patients. However, even if they were willing to adapt their treatment strategy based on frailty status, most of them do not use the tools that would allow distinguishing "fit" and "unfit" older patients, leaving room for improving accurate geriatric evaluation.

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Cervical Cancer Patients: A Multiinstitutional Analysis

Objective

The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic factors for survival and treatment-related toxicities in older (≥65 years) cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. In addition, we sought to compare the outcomes between the older elderly (≥75 years) and their younger old counterparts (age, 65–74 years).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records from 269 biopsy-proven nonmetastatic cervical cancer patients treated with external radiotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy at the departments of radiation oncology in 2 different universities. The prognostic factors for survival, local control, and distant metastasis (DM) were analyzed.

Results

The median follow-up time was 38.8 months (range, 1.5–175.5 months) for the entire cohort and 70.0 months (range, 6.1–175.7 months) for survivors. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cause-specific survival rates were 66% and 42%, 63% and 39%, and 72% and 55%, respectively. Patients 75 years or older showed significantly worse OS compared with patients aged 65 to 74 years but showed no significant difference in DFS. The 2- and 5-year local control rates were 86% and 71%, respectively. The incidences of DMs at 2 and 5 years were 22% and 30%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, vaginal infiltration and lymph node metastasis were predictive of OS, DFS, local recurrence, and DM. Concomitant chemotherapy was predictive of OS, DFS, and local recurrence, and larger tumor (>4 cm) was a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence. None of the patients had toxicity that necessitated the discontinuation of radiotherapy. All patients were evaluable for acute toxicity, and no grade higher than 3 adverse events occurred during external beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy.

Conclusions

Although age limited the delivery of aggressive treatment, concurrent chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients associated with improved outcomes similar as in younger counterparts without increasing serious acute and late toxicities.

Is age a prognostic biomarker for survival among women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of age on completion of and toxicities following treatment of local regionally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Phase I-III trials.

METHODS

An ancillary data analysis of GOG protocols 113, 120, 165, 219 data was performed. Wilcoxon, Pearson, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for univariate and multivariate analysis. Log rank tests were used to compare survival lengths.

RESULTS

One-thousand-three-hundred-nineteen women were included; 60.7% were Caucasian, 15% were age 60-70years and an additional 5% were >70; 87% had squamous histology, 55% had stage IIB disease and 34% had IIIB disease. Performance status declined with age (p=0.006). Histology and tumor stage did not significantly differ. Number of cycles of chemotherapy received, radiation treatment time, nor dose modifications varied with age. Notably, radiation protocol deviations and failure to complete brachytherapy (BT) did increase with age (p=0.022 and p<0.001 respectively). Only all grade lymphatic (p=0.006) and grade≥3 cardiovascular toxicities (p=0.019) were found to vary with age. A 2% increase in the risk of death for every year increase >50 for all-cause mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) was found, but no association between age and disease specific mortality was found.

CONCLUSION

This represents a large analysis of patients treated for LACC with chemo/radiation, approximately 20% of whom were >60years of age. Older patients, had higher rates of incomplete brachytherapy which is not explained by collected toxicity data. Age did not adversely impact completion of chemotherapy and radiation or toxicities.