Identification of large-for-gestational age fetuses using antenatal customized fetal growth charts: Can we improve the prediction of abnormal labor course?

Bigger babies: what happens in real practice in a non-academic UK center? Detection accuracy and outcomes with induction

BACKGROUND

There is emerging evidence of improved outcomes with induction of labour for pregnancies in which the baby is thought to be large. This trial identifies scan accuracy and the effect of intervention for pregnancies complicated by suspected large for gestational age (LGA) on customized chart outside an academic center.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 3 groups of induced pregnancies; women with a suspected LGA fetus, women with diabetes (DM) and a control group (C) of women that underwent induction of labour on or after 280 days gestation. Data collection and analysis were prespecified. Scan accuracy and outcomes between the cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

Over 1 year there were 845 cases: LGA (128), DM (116) and control cases (601). Mean birthweights differed significantly. PPV of EFW for birthweight >90th centile on GROW chart, WHO chart, and >4 kg was 0.35-0.40. Projected birthweight of >4 kg significantly better predicted itself (AUROC 0.70, 0.74 and 0.80). Mean scan error was -5.2% and +15.6% for DM and LGA. Shoulder dystocia and neonatal morbidity were not increased in LGA despite the significant increase in AVD 28/128, 21.9% vs. 99/601, 16.5%, aOR 2.20 (1.07-4.5). SVD was significantly less likely LGA vs. C at 69/128, 53.9% vs. 413/601, 68.7% aOR 0.38 (95% CI: 0.21-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Third trimester EFW for bigger babies was poorly predictive of macrosomia. Fetal outcomes were good but women selected and induced as LGA had higher rates of hemorrhage and intervention.

The sonographic measurement of the ratio between the fetal head circumference and the obstetrical conjugate is accurate in predicting the risk of labor arrest: results from a multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND

Labor arrest is estimated to account for approximately one-third of all primary cesarean deliveries, and is associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. One of the main causes is the mismatch between the size of the birth canal and that of the fetus, a condition usually referred to as cephalopelvic disproportion.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe a new ultrasound predictor of labor arrest leading to cesarean delivery because of suspected cephalopelvic disproportion.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter prospective study conducted at 3 maternity units from January 2021 to January 2022. A nonconsecutive series of singleton pregnancies with cephalic-presenting fetuses, gestational age of 34 weeks+0 days or above, and no contraindication to vaginal delivery attending at the antenatal clinics of each institution were considered eligible. Between 34+0 and 38+0 weeks of gestation, all eligible patients were submitted to transabdominal 2D ultrasound measurement of the obstetrical conjugate. On admission to the labor ward, the fetal head circumference was measured on the standard transthalamic plane by transabdominal ultrasound. The primary outcome of the study was the accuracy of the ratio between the fetal head circumference and the obstetrical conjugate measurement (ie, head circumference/obstetrical conjugate ratio) in predicting the occurrence of cesarean delivery secondary to labor arrest. The secondary outcome was the relationship between the head circumference/obstetrical conjugate ratio and labor duration.

RESULTS

A total of 263 women were included. Cesarean delivery for labor arrest was performed in 7.6% (20/263) of the included cases and was associated with more frequent use of epidural analgesia (95.0% vs 45.7%; P<.001), longer second stage of labor (193 [120-240] vs 34.0 [13.8-66.5] minutes; P=.002), shorter obstetrical conjugate (111 [108-114] vs 121 [116-125] mm; P<.001), higher head circumference/obstetrical conjugate ratio (3.2 [3.2-3.35] vs 2.9 [2.8-3.0]; P<.001), and higher birthweight (3678 [3501-3916] vs 3352 [3095-3680] g; P=.003) compared with vaginal delivery. At logistic regression analysis, the head circumference/obstetrical conjugate ratio expressed as Z-score was the only parameter independently associated with risk of cesarean delivery for labor arrest (odds ratio, 8.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.6-21.7) and had higher accuracy in predicting cesarean delivery compared with the accuracy of fetal head circumference and obstetrical conjugate alone, with an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 81.7-99.5; P<.001). A positive correlation between the head circumference/obstetrical conjugate ratio and length of the second stage of labor was found (Pearson coefficient, 0.16; P=.018).

CONCLUSION

Our study, conducted on an unselected low-risk population, demonstrated that the head circumference/obstetrical conjugate ratio is a reliable antenatal predictor of labor arrest leading to cesarean delivery.

The birth weight of macrosomia influence the accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and analyze the accuracy of ultrasound estimation of the fetal weight of Macrosomia at term.

METHOD

The instruments used were α6(Aloka; Japan) color Doppler ultrasound imagers, and vinno 80 (feieno; China) with a frequency of 3.5 MHz. The formula used to calculate the estimated fetal birth weight (EFW) was that proposed by Hadlock et al. (Hadlock 2). The biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) measurements were performed strictly following the practice guidelines. Detailed measurement standards are shown in the figure and the table in the text. Macrosomia is typically defined as a birth weight above the 90th percentile for gestational age or >4000 g.Two indexes were used to calculate the error between EFW and birth weight (BW): Simple error (SE = BW - EFW); Absolute percentage error (APE, which reflects this percentage in absolute value, percentage error [PE = SE/BW] × 100). In order to better evaluate the measurement results, we made the following definitions: 1. When APE > 15%, the measurement deviation is significant. 2. The ratio of those cases with APE > 15% to the total number of cases measured by a sonographer was greater than 20%, indicating that the sonographer was prone to significant measurement deviation.

RESULT

A total of 374 cases were analyzed. The mean maternal age was 31.48 (±15.93) years. Each pregnant woman carries only one fetus. The mean gestational age at delivery was 39.93 (±0.84) weeks. There were 245 male infants (65.5%), 129 female infants (34.5%), 214 cesarean section (57.2%), and 160 vaginal delivery (42.7%). 339 cases (90.64%) were estimated to be lower than the actual BW. The estimated weight was higher than the actual weight in 35 cases, accounting for 9.36%.The APE>15% in 56 cases, accounting for 14.97%. The accuracy of estimated fetal weight was closely related to the BW of the fetus and had no significant correlation with the seniority of the physician, the gender of the fetus, and the fetal position.

CONCLUSION

Studies on macrosomia have shown that the BW of macrosomia tends to be underestimated, which is also reflected in the results of this study. The accuracy of estimated fetal weight still needs to be improved. Our study found that the accuracy of estimated fetal weight was closely related to the BW of the fetus and had no significant correlation with the seniority of the physician, the gender of the fetus, and the fetal position. The correlation between the section and calculation formula on the measurement accuracy needs to be studied. Through systematic data analysis, we can find the doctors whose measurements are relatively inaccurate in our department and carry out targeted quality control to improve the measurement accuracy.

Obstetric consequences of a false-positive diagnosis of large-for-gestational-age fetus

Objective

To compare delivery outcomes between true‐positive (TP) and false‐positive (FP) large‐for‐gestational‐age (LGA) fetuses, appropriate‐for‐gestational‐age (AGA) fetuses, and false‐negative (FN) LGA fetuses.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies at risk for macrosomia without contraindication to vaginal delivery, receiving an ultrasound scan at 34–37 weeks of pregnancy.

Results

In all, 430 pregnancies were included: 155 TP LGA, 87 FP LGA, 177 AGA and 11 FN LGA newborns. Cesarean section rate during labor was significantly higher in FP LGA than in AGA (19% vs. 8.7%) but not significantly different between FP LGA and TP LGA (19% vs. 32.4%). Median birth weight z score was significantly higher in TP LGA (1.9) compared with the FP LGA and AGA (0.91 and 0.84, respectively), whereas no significant differences were found between FP LGA and AGA. Admission to a neonatal intensive care unit was significantly more frequent in TP LGA than AGA, whereas shoulder dystocia, postpartum hemorrhage, and third‐ to fourth‐degree perineal tears were similar between the different groups.

Conclusion

A false‐positive diagnosis of LGA fetus is associated with a significant increase of cesarean section during labor. Therefore, a suspicious ultrasound may result in reduction of the clinical threshold for the diagnosis of abnormal labor.

A false‐positive diagnosis of LGA fetus on ultrasound at 34–37 weeks is associated with a significant increase in cesarean section during labor.