Should the modified natural cycle protocol for frozen embryo transfer be modified? A prospective case series proof of concept study

Natural proliferative phase frozen embryo transfer-a new approach which may facilitate scheduling without hindering pregnancy outcomes

STUDY QUESTION

How does a natural proliferative phase (NPP) strategy for frozen embryo transfer (FET) compare with the conventional artificial (AC) and natural (NC) endometrial preparation protocols in terms of live birth rates (LBR)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

This study supports the hypothesis that, just as for NC, NPP-FET may be a superior alternative to AC in terms of LBR.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Although FETs are increasing worldwide, the optimal FET protocol is still largely controversial. Despite recent evidence supporting a possibly higher efficacy and safety of NC FETs, their widespread use is limited by the difficulties encountered during cycle monitoring and scheduling.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

In this single center retrospective cohort study, we describe the NPP-FET protocol, in which vaginal progesterone is initiated during the proliferative phase as soon as an endometrium with a thickness of at least 7 mm is identified and ovulation is ruled out, regardless of mean diameter of the dominant follicle.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

For comparison, we considered all blastocyst stage FET cycles preformed at a private infertility center between January 2010 and June 2022, subdivided according to the following subgroups of endometrial preparation: AC, NPP, and NC. We performed multivariable generalized estimating equations regression analysis to account for the following potential confounding variables: oocyte age at retrieval, oocyte source (autologous without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) versus autologous with PGT-A versus donated), number of oocytes retrieved/donated, embryo developmental stage (Day 5 versus Day 6), number of embryos transferred, quality of the best embryo transferred, and year of treatment. The main outcome measure was LBR. The secondary outcomes included hCG positive, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates, and the following perinatal outcomes: first trimester bleeding, second/third trimester bleeding, preterm rupture of membranes, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertensive disorders (GHD), and gestational age at delivery.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 5791 FET cycles were included in this analysis (2226 AC, 349 NPP, and 3216 NC). The LBR for FET was lower in the AC subgroup when compared to the NPP and NC (38.4%, 49.1%, and 45.2%, respectively; P < 0.01 AC versus NPP and AC versus NC). The rates of miscarriage were also lower in the NPP and NC subgroups when compared to AC (19.7%, 25.0%, and 34.9%, respectively; P < 0.01 NPP versus AC and NC versus AC). Considering perinatal outcomes, NPP-FET and NC were associated with a significantly lower first trimester bleeding compared to AC (17.3%, 14.7%, and 37.6%, respectively; P < 0.01 NPP versus AC and NC versus AC). Additionally, NC was associated with a lower rate of GHD when compared with AC (8.6% versus 14.5%, P < 0.01), while the rate following NPP-FET was 9.4%.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study is limited by its retrospective design. Moreover, there was also a low number of patients in the NPP subgroup, which may have led the study to be underpowered to detect clinically relevant differences between the subgroups.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our study posits that the NPP-FET protocol may be an effective and safe alternative to both NC and AC, while still allowing for enhanced practicality in patient follow-up and FET scheduling. Further investigation on NPP-FET is warranted, with prospective studies including a larger and more homogeneous subsets of patients.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This research was supported by the IVI-RMA-Lisbon (2008-LIS-053-CG). The authors did not receive any funding for this study. The authors have no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Modified natural cycle allows a window of 7 days for frozen embryo transfer planning

RESEARCH QUESTION

Should ovulation be triggered in a modified natural cycle (mNC) with recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (rHCG) as soon as a mean follicle diameter of 17 mm is visible, or is more flexible planning possible?

DESIGN

This multicentre, retrospective, observational study of 3087 single frozen blastocyst transfers in mNC was carried out between January 2020 and September 2022. The inclusion criteria included endometrial thickness ≥7 mm and serum progesterone <1.5 ng/ml. The main outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary end-points were pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. The mean follicle size at triggering was stratified into three groups (13.0-15.9, 16.0-18.9 and 19.0-22 mm).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics between the groups did not vary significantly for age, body mass index and the donor's age for egg donation. No differences were found in pregnancy rate (64.5%, 60.2% and 57.4%; P = 0.19), clinical pregnancy rate (60.5%, 52.8% and 50.6%; P = 0.10), implantation rate (62.10%, 52.9% and 51.0%; P = 0.05) or miscarriage rate (15.0%, 22.2%; and 25.0%; P = 0.11). Although ongoing pregnancy rate (54.9%, 46.8% and 43.1%; P = 0.02) varied significantly in the univariable analysis, it was no longer significant after adjustment for the use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and egg donation.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings showed rHCG could be flexibly administered with a mean follicle size between 13 and 22 mm as long as adequate endometrial characteristics are met, and serum progesterone is <1.5 ng/ml. Considering the follicular growth rate of 1-1.5 mm/day, this approach could allow a flexibility for FET scheduling of 6-7 days, simplifying mNC FET planning in clinical practice.

Premature timing of progesterone luteal phase support initiation did not negatively impact live birth rates in modified natural frozen thawed embryo transfer cycles

Study question

In a modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (mNC-FET), does the premature timing of progesterone luteal phase support (LPS) initiation 24 h following human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger impact live birth?

Summary answer

Premature LPS initiation did not negatively affect the live birth rate (LBR) in mNC-FET cycles compared with conventional LPS initiation 48 h after hCG triggering.

What is known already

During natural cycle FET, human chorionic gonadotropin is routinely used to mimic endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge to induce ovulation, which allows more flexibility in embryo transfer scheduling, thus relieving the burden of multiple visits by patients and laboratory workloads, which is also known as mNC-FET. Moreover, recent data demonstrates that ovulatory women undergoing natural cycle FETs have a lower risk of maternal and fetal complications due to the essential role of the corpus luteum in implantation, placentation and pregnancy maintenance. While several studies have confirmed the positive effects of LPS in mNC-FETs, the timing of progesterone LPS initiation is still unclear, as compared with fresh cycles where robust research has been conducted. To the best of our knowledge, no clinical studies comparing different beginning days in mNC-FET cycles have been published.

Study design size duration

This retrospective cohort study involved 756 mNC-FET cycles performed at a university-affiliated reproductive center between January 2019 and August 2021. The primary outcome measured was the LBR.

Participants/materials setting methods

Ovulatory women ≤42 years of age who were referred for their autologous mNC-FET cycles were included in the study. According to the timing of progesterone LPS initiation following the hCG trigger, patients were assigned into two categories: premature LPS group (progesterone initiation 24 h after hCG trigger, n = 182) versus conventional LPS group (progesterone initiation 48 h after hCG trigger, n = 574). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding variables.

Main results and the role of chance

There were no differences in background characteristics between the two study groups, except for the proportion of assisted hatching (53.8% in premature LPS group versus 42.3% in conventional LPS group, p = 0.007). In the premature LPS group, 56 of 182 patients (30.8%) had a live birth, compared to 179 of 574 patients (31.2%) in the conventional LPS group, with no significant difference observed between groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.43, p = 0.913). In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in other secondary outcomes. A sensitivity analysis for LBR according to the serum LH and progesterone levels on hCG trigger day also confirmed the aforementioned findings.

Limitations reasons for caution

In this study, retrospective analysis was conducted in a single center and was therefore prone to bias. Additionally, we did not anticipate monitoring the patient's follicle rupture and ovulation after hCG triggering. Future prospective clinical trials remain necessary to confirm our results.

Wider implications of the findings

While exogenous progesterone LPS was added 24 h after hCG triggering, embryo-endometrium synchrony would not be adversely affected so long as sufficient time was allowed for endometrial exposure to exogenous progesterone. Our data support promising clinical outcomes following this event. As a result of our findings, clinicians and patients will be able to make better informed decisions.

Study funding/competing interests

No specific funding was available for this study. The authors have no personal conflicting interests to declare.

Trial registration number

N/A.