Efficacy of dienogest vs combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial

Therapeutic selection for abnormal uterine bleeding with ovulatory dysfunction: a cross-sectional study in Chinese women

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the therapeutic selection of abnormal uterine bleeding with ovulatory dysfunction (AUB-O) among Chinese women and analyze the impact of various factors.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving 3527 patients with AUB-O diagnosed by local doctor between 14 and 55 years old. Questionnaire compiled according to the Chinese AUB-O treatment guidelines was used to collect the demographic and therapeutic information.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into the juvenile group, the reproductive group, and the senior group. The results showed that irregular menstruation (37.6-46.3%), dysmenorrhea (29.9-44.4%), and heavy menstrual bleeding (16.7-32.2%) were the main symptoms in Chinese AUB-O patients. Most of the patients chose to seek help in the Department of General Gynecology (78.6-90.7%). Among the therapeutic options, combined oral contraceptives (COCs) met the treatment expectations with high acceptance among patients (36.6%-52.2%).

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the crucial need to fortify the endocrine diagnostic proficiency of doctors within the Department of General Gynecology. Furthermore, it also indicates that implementing clinical medication education programs for patients could facilitate their correct selection of appropriate therapeutic strategies for AUB-O.

The efficacy of progestins in managing pain associated with endometriosis, fibroids and pre-menstrual syndrome: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Alongside being contraceptives, progestins have been investigated as potential anti-inflammatory and analgesic therapies for use in painful gynaecological conditions. This review aims to synthesise evidence pertaining to the efficacy of progestins as analgesics for use in endometriosis, fibroids and pre-menstrual syndrome (PMS).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the extant literature investigating the analgesic efficacy of progestins compared to any comparator interventions for individuals with the three specified gynaecological conditions. The search was carried out across the PubMed and CENTRAL databases on 7 April 2024 for randomised control trials (RCTs) published in the peer-reviewed literature from 2000 onwards. Data pertaining to analgesic efficacy, assessed by changes in pain indices/scores before and after treatment, were synthesised narratively. Data pertaining to adverse effect frequency and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) were also synthesised narratively. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool.

RESULTS

The primary search identified 1220 potentially eligible RCTs of which 21 were ultimately included; 19 RCTs related to endometriosis, two related to fibroids and zero related to PMS. Quality assessment identified nine studies to be at a low risk of bias, nine studies with some concerns surrounding bias and three studies to be at a high risk of bias. The included studies represented a total of 2745 participants of whom 1317 were treated with a progestin and 1428 received a comparator intervention. In 18 of the 19 studies concerning endometriosis, progestins produced a statistically significant reduction in pain, further, in five instances progestins were more efficacious in reducing pain than comparator interventions. In both studies on fibroids, progestins produced significant reductions in pain, however, statistically significant differences compared to comparator interventions were not demonstrated. The most frequently cited adverse effect of progestins was spotting/irregular bleeding whilst those receiving comparator interventions most often reported hot flushes; cited in 12 and seven studies respectively. Five studies assessed the impact of progestins and comparators on BMD. Three studies found progestins significantly reduced BMD, however, in these instances reductions were significantly lower than those produced by comparator interventions and in two studies were not statistically significant after 12 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our review demonstrates the potential scope for the use of progestins as analgesics in the management of pain associated with endometriosis. Further research will need to be conducted to identify their efficacy in the management of pain associated with fibroids and PMS.

Management of women with endometriosis in the 21st century

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly affects women's quality of life and fertility. Despite advancements in treatment, many areas of uncertainty persist in clinical management. This review provides a symptom-focused, patient-centered update, addressing cases from asymptomatic to those complicated by pain and infertility.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advancement in imaging technology has increased incidental diagnoses of asymptomatic endometriosis, raising the debate between immediate treatment and watchful waiting. Medical therapy primarily aims to suppress symptoms, with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists and add-back therapy offering promising long-term pain control. Research into local neurogenesis and central sensitization supports complementary approaches, though high-quality evidence is still limited. For pain refractory to medical therapy, conservative surgical strategies can minimize postoperative complications without significantly increasing recurrence rates. In infertility, assisted reproductive technology (ART) provides effective options, although the optimal endometrial preparation and the necessity of pre-ART surgery remain to be fully elucidated.

SUMMARY

The optimal management of endometriosis requires a personalized, multidisciplinary approach within specialized centers. Long-term suppressive medical therapy remains the cornerstone of pain management while emerging targeted agents hold promise for better symptom control with fewer side effects. Surgical intervention should be performed by experienced surgeons as a single definitive procedure when possible. Tailored ART protocols can address infertility challenges. Standardized classification systems and robust randomized trials are crucial to refining treatment pathways, optimizing fertility outcomes, and enhancing quality of life.

Pharmacologic Interventions for Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of various medications for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain through a network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register until July 22, 2024. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov for additional data on recently completed trials or potentially eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but found nothing.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The analysis included randomized RCTs that used pharmacologic interventions for managing endometriosis-related pain. The primary efficacy outcome was endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, which included dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain. The analysis adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

A total of 31 RCTs involving 8,665 patients were included in the analysis. In terms of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, four interventions demonstrated significantly greater efficacy compared with placebo: leuprolide combined with combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.40, 95% CI, -2.41 to -0.38), dienogest (SMD -1.20, 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.61), leuprolide alone (SMD -1.05, 95% CI, -1.64 to -0.45), and combined OCP (SMD -0.67, 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.09). Leuprolide combined with combined OCP emerged as the most effective treatment modality. In addition, elagolix and the combination of vitamin C and vitamin E were identified as the most effective interventions for dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. For nonmenstrual pelvic pain, gestrinone demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo and all other interventions.

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis indicates that leuprolide in combination with combined OCP, elagolix, vitamins C and E, and gestrinone may represent the most effective therapeutic options for alleviating endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain. These findings enhance our understanding of the relative efficacy of treatment strategies for pain associated with endometriosis. Future research should focus on conducting larger-scale and rigorously designed clinical trials within the target patient populations to further validate these results.

Effects of dienogest treatment on endometrioma-related clinical symptoms and endometrioma size: retrospective cohort study

Background

To evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of treatment with dienogest in patients with endometrioma.

Methods

Patients with endometrioma-related chronic pelvic pain were included in this retrospective study from March 2018 to March 2023. Enrolled patients received 2 mg of dienogest once daily. Data from 180 patients were analyzed. Group 2 (n = 104, 57.8%), comprising patients undergoing long-term therapy (>12 months), was compared with group 1 (n = 76, 42.2%), consisting of patients undergoing short-term therapy (<2 months), regarding their response to changes in endometrioma size and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 26.0 software. Non-normally distributed parameters were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. In the evaluation of the data, apart from identifying statistical methods, the t-test was used in comparison of paired groups, and the matched t-test was used in the determination of changes before and after treatment. The Chi-square test and Fisher's precision test were used in the analysis of categorical data. Categorical variables are presents as percentages, and quantitative variables are summarized as mean (95% confidence intervals) and median (minimum-maximum). p-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Findings at T0 (baseline) and T1 (sixth month) visits, in which the entire study cohort could be included, were compared. Then, patients who continued treatment at visits every 6 months after T1 (>12 months) were compared one by one with the findings at T0. The reduced libido was 4.3 times higher in the long-term group, but the weight gain was higher in the short-term group. Analysis within all patients and individual groups (short term vs. long term) showed a significant decrease in endometrioma size and VAS scores between T0 and T1 visit findings. Similarly, the findings of T2 and each subsequent visit of the patients in the long-term group were compared with the initial findings and a significant reduction in endometrioma size and VAS scores was observed.

Conclusion

Although the effectiveness of dienogest treatment for endometrioma seems to begin in the sixth month, its effectiveness maximizes in patients whose treatment duration is over 1 year.

Dienogest vs. combined oral contraceptive: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and side effects to inform evidence-based guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Dienogest is a synthetic fourth-generation progestin that has been approved for the medical treatment of endometriosis, and its efficacy on pain symptoms and quality of life is well established even in the long term. Nowadays, only a few controlled trials evaluating the safety of dienogest compared with other hormonal therapies have been published. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare efficacy and tolerability data between dienogest and combined oral contraceptives (COC) in patients taking hormonal therapy for endometriosis treatment in order to inform evidence-based guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from the inception of each database until October 2024. Selection criteria included any articles comparing efficacy outcomes and at least one tolerability data between dienogest and COC in patients diagnosed with endometriosis. Studies comparing COC containing Dienogest or another type of hormonal treatment were excluded. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted if adequate data were available from at least three studies, reporting pooled mean differences and odds ratios between groups using Review Manager V.7.9.0. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024598455.

RESULTS

A total of four randomized control trials and one observational study were included, showing moderate risk at bias assessment. Meta-analysis did not show any statistical difference in improving pelvic pain after treatment [CI 95% (-1.45-1.17); I2 = 86%; p = 0.84]. In contrast, dyspareunia after treatment was significantly lower in the COC group [CI 95% (0.64-1.33); I2 = 0%; p < 0.00001]. No statistical difference was found in terms of vaginal bleeding [OR = 0.88; CI 95% (0.39-1.96); I2 = 41%; p = 0.75], nausea and vomiting [OR = 0.51; CI 95% (0.16-1.63); I2 = 67%; p = 0.26], headache [OR = 0.91; CI 95% (0.38-2.21); I2 = 59%; p = 0.84], hot flushes [OR = 1.16; CI 95% (0.54-2.48); I2 = 0%; p = 0.71], and hair loss [OR = 1.69; CI 95% (0.52-5.53); I2 = 46%; p = 0.39]. Treatment discontinuation rate was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dienogest is comparable to COC in terms of efficacy and tolerability. The therapeutic choice should be based on the patient's preference, clinical history, and experience.

Long-term follow-up of the effect of oral dienogest and dienogest/ethinylestradiol treatment on cell-free DNA levels in patients with deep endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is currently considered a systemic inflammatory disease and different non-invasive inflammatory markers, such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), have recently been evaluated. Hormonal treatments are frequently prescribed as first-line treatments to improve symptoms, reduce lesions and improve the quality of life of patients with endometriosis. The most frequently used hormonal treatments are estroprogestins and progestins due to their effectiveness and well-tolerated clinical profile. However, the impact these hormonal treatments may have on these markers has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to assess whether cfDNA levels are modified under the two main first-line hormonal treatments in patients with deep endometriosis (DE).

METHODS

Ninety patients diagnosed with DE were analyzed in this prospective, observational study. Forty-five received daily oral treatment with dienogest 2 mg, and 45 with 2 mg dienogest/30 μg ethinylestradiol. Plasma cfDNA levels were evaluated by fluorescent assay prior to initiation of treatment and at 6 and 12 months of treatment.

RESULTS

An increase in cfDNA levels was observed during the follow-up at 6 and 12 months. However, these higher levels were only statistically significant at 12 months of treatment. The increase of cfDNA levels was similar with both treatments.

CONCLUSION

Higher cfDNA levels were observed in DE patients at 12 months of oral hormonal treatment showing similar results with dienogest or dienogest/ethinylestradiol. This increase could be explained by apoptosis of the endometriosis foci due to the treatment.

WITHDRAWN: Effects of Deinorgestrel Treatment of Endometriosis on Ovarian Function, Inflammatory Factors, and Pregnancy Rate in Patients

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor due to an error in the publishing process. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/article-withdrawal.

Clinical effectiveness of progestogens compared to combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis involves the growth of endometrium-like cells outside the uterus, affecting reproductive-aged women. Symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility significantly impair quality of life. Among therapeutic options, progestogens have demonstrated efficacy in managing pain and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pills in alleviating pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and associated side effects.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with the last search conducted in October 2024. The review was registered under PROSPERO registration number CRD42024609658. Studies were included regardless of language, publication year, or country. Articles not comparing progestogens and combined oral contraceptives or lacking relevant outcomes were excluded, as were abstracts, theses, case reports, opinion pieces, and correspondence. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for randomized studies.

RESULTS

Seven studies, including 948 patients (476 receiving progestogens), met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis found no significant differences between progestogens and COCPs for pelvic pain (SMD = 0.02; 95 % CI: -0.37 to 0.40; P = 0.04; I2 = 66.7 %), dysmenorrhea (SMD = 0.00; 95 % CI: -0.19 to 0.19), dyspareunia (SMD = 0.21; 95 % CI: -0.42 to 0.85; P = 0.02; I2 = 81.4 %), or psychological health (SMD = 0.01; 95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.23; P = 0.19; I2 = 39.1 %). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in side effects, including breast tenderness, weight gain, amenorrhea, and bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Progestogens and COCPs demonstrate comparable efficacy in managing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and psychological health, with similar side effect profiles. These findings suggest both treatments are equally effective options for symptom management in endometriosis.

Safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapies for pelvic inflammatory disease and endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) are gynecological conditions affecting women of reproductive age and causing pain symptoms. The symptoms caused by these conditions are similar; thus, the differential diagnosis may be challenging. The treatment of these conditions is very different because PID is treated with antibiotic therapy, while endometriosis is treated with hormonal therapies suppressing estrogen levels.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative review was conducted through a comprehensive literature search on endometriosis and PID. The search strategy incorporated relevant keywords and MeSH terms related to these topics.

EXPERT OPINION

The antibiotics used to manage PID have high efficacy and safety profiles. Commonly prescribed regimens include a combination of ceftriaxone, doxycycline, and metronidazole. These antibiotics are generally well-tolerated, with most adverse effects being mild and manageable (gastrointestinal disturbances or hypersensitivity reactions). Hormonal therapies are a cornerstone in the management of endometriosis; they include combined oral contraceptives (COCs), progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, and antagonists. COCs and progestins are generally well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile, though they may cause side effects (breakthrough bleeding and mood changes). Oral GnRH antagonists have emerged as a noteworthy option, offering partial estrogen suppression and thereby overcoming the limitations associated with previously used GnRH agonists.

Comparative Analysis of Medical Interventions to Alleviate Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age, with pain and infertility being its primary symptoms. The most common aspects of pain are overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Our aim was to compare the available medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases to assess available drug options for pain management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating various medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain on different pain scales were included. Results were presented as p-scores and, in cases of placebo controls, as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). From the available data, a network meta-analysis was carried out. Results: The search yielded 1314 records, of which 45 were eligible for data extraction. Eight networks were created, and a total of 16 treatments were analyzed. The highest p-score, meaning greatest pain relief (p-score: 0.618), for the treatment of dysmenorrhea was achieved using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for 3 months on a scale of 0-100. Additionally, a p-score of 0.649 was attained following a 6-month treatment with GnRH agonists combined with hormonal contraceptives (CHCs). In the case of dyspareunia on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, CHCs (p-score: 0.805) were the most effective, and CHCs combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.677) were the best treatment option following 6 months of treatment. In the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs (p-score: 0.751) yielded the highest p-score on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, and progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.873) following 6 months of treatment. Progestins (p-score: 0.901) were most effective in cases of overall pelvic pain on a scale of 0-3 following 3 months of treatment. Conclusions: Our network meta-analysis showed that in cases of dysmenorrhea, GnRH agonists supplemented with CHCs reduced pain the most following 3 months of treatment. Regarding dyspareunia CHCs were most effective, and in the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs or progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors yielded the most desirable results.

A systematic literature review on patient-reported outcome domains and measures in nonsurgical efficacy trials related to chronic pain associated with endometriosis: an urgent call to action

ABSTRACT

Endometriosis, a common cause for chronic pelvic pain, significantly affects quality of life, fertility, and overall productivity of those affected. Therapeutic options remain limited, and collating evidence on treatment efficacy is complicated. One reason could be the heterogeneity of assessed outcomes in nonsurgical clinical trials, impeding meaningful result comparisons. This systematic literature review examines outcome domains and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials. Through comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL up until July 2022, we screened 1286 records, of which 191 were included in our analyses. Methodological quality (GRADE criteria), information about publication, patient population, and intervention were assessed, and domains as well as PROMs were extracted and analyzed. In accordance with IMMPACT domain framework, the domain pain was assessed in almost all studies (98.4%), followed by adverse events (73.8%). By contrast, assessment of physical functioning (29.8%), improvement and satisfaction (14.1%), and emotional functioning (6.8%) occurred less frequently. Studies of a better methodological quality tended to use more different domains. Nevertheless, combinations of more than 2 domains were rare, failing to comprehensively capture the bio-psycho-social aspects of endometriosis-associated pain. The PROMs used showed an even broader heterogeneity across all studies. Our findings underscore the large heterogeneity of assessed domains and PROMs in clinical pain-related endometriosis trials. This highlights the urgent need for a standardized approach to both, assessed domains and high-quality PROMs ideally realized through development and implementation of a core outcome set, encompassing the most pivotal domains and PROMs for both, stakeholders and patients.

Medical management of endometriosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While laparoscopic surgery plays a key role in the management of endometriosis, symptoms commonly recur, and repeat surgery comes with increased risk. Medical management, including hormonal and nonhormonal treatment, is vital in managing painful symptoms. This review summarizes recent evidence regarding various medical management options available to treat pelvic pain associated with endometriosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Efficacy of dienogest vs. combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: randomized clinical trial.Once daily oral relugolix combination therapy vs. placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: two replicate phase 3, randomised, double-blind, studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2).A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of the comparative effects of dienogest and the combined oral contraceptive pill in women with endometriosis.Two-year efficacy and safety of relugolix combination therapy in women with endometriosis-associated pain: SPIRIT open-label extension study.

SUMMARY

All symptomatic women with suspected endometriosis who are not desiring immediate fertility can be offered suppressive treatment to control symptoms and slow the progression of disease. First-line treatments include the combined oral contraceptive pill and progestogens. Second-line treatments include gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists but current guidelines recommend that these should be reserved for people whose symptoms fail to be controlled by first-line agents. The use of complementary and alternative medicines is also increasing in both volume and number of agents used.

Safety assessment of Yasmin: Real-world adverse event analysis using the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to elucidate the scope and nature of adverse events (AEs) associated with Yasmin.

METHODS

Among the 17,035,572 AE reports collected from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between January 2004 and September 2023, 25,949 reports involved Yasmin. The demographic details, clinical outcomes, and sources of reports were extracted, and four algorithms were used to evaluate adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

The majority of the AE reports involved females aged 18-45 years. Hospitalization was the most frequently reported serious outcome (46.84 %), with death occurring in 292 patients (1.82 %). The highest number of reports originated from the United States. Adverse reactions spanned across 24 system organ categories (SOCs), and hepatobiliary, vascular, and psychiatric disorders were the most frequently reported AEs. A total of 229 Preferred Terms (PTs) were identified for adverse reactions, with high signal strength observed for conditions such as post-cholecystectomy syndrome. In addition, fear of disease, which has not been previously identified as an AE related to Yasmin, was also identified as a high signal strength side effect.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study underscore the importance of monitoring and identifying potential AEs in patients receiving Yasmin, including those not currently listed in the medication instructions.

A systematic review and Bayesian analysis of the adverse effects of dienogest

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are two common diseases that impair women's health, and dienogest is one of the pharmacologic treatments which is the first-line therapeutic option for patients with pelvic pain and individuals who have no desire for immediate pregnancy. The goal of this study was to summarize the current evidence of adverse events associated with dienogest as well as the prevalence of these adverse events during treatment with dienogest.

METHODS

Several databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central and Clinicaltrials.gov, etc.) and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard were searched on May 31, 2023, using the topic words alongside free words of dienogest and "adverse reaction". Studies were incorporated into this research if they reported or assessed safety issues or adverse reactions of dienogest during the period of endometriosis treatment or adenomyosis therapy. The extracted information comprised trial design, dienogest and control group demographics, as well as reported side effects.

RESULTS

This systematic review comprehended 39 publications in total. The mean age of patients in the included studies was 34.43 years. The follow-up duration varied from 3 to 60 months. Most adverse reactions were common and not serious, and the most common adverse reactions during dienogest medication were abnormal uterine bleeding (55%, 95% CI 37-73%), amenorrhea (17%, 95% CI 2-42%) and swelling (13%, 95% CI 3-28%). Uncommon adverse reactions included dysmenorrhea (0.2%, n = 1), dyspepsia (0.4%, n = 1), and (lower) abdominal pain (1%, 95% CI 0-3%), urticaria (1%, 95% CI 0-3%) and peritonitis (1%, n = 1). Serious adverse reactions including decreased lumbar spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), depression, peritonitis and so on have been reported. Heterogeneity assessment revealed that patient number and study design are influencing factors to adverse reaction prevalence. Moreover, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, back pain and anemia are side effects reported both in the FAERS database and in the systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Dienogest's most frequent side effects were not severe. Dienogest is generally safe for treating endometriosis and adenomyosis. Nevertheless, people should be aware of serious adverse reactions, such as decreased lumbar spine BMD and hemorrhagic shock.

Effect of dienogest treatment on uterine fibroid volume in patients with endometriosis or adenomyosis complicated by uterine fibroids

BACKGROUND

Currently, the use of dienogest in clinical practice has increased significantly, and many studies have focused on its effectiveness and safety in the treatment of endometriosis and adenomyosis; however, the effects of treatment with dienogest on uterine fibroid size in patients with endometriosis or adenomyosis have not been investigated.

AIM

To explore changes in fibroid size in patients with concomitant uterine fibroids undergoing dienogest treatment for endometriosis or adenomyosis and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the drug.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with uterine fibroids treated with dienogest for endometriosis or adenomyosis at Peking University First Hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The maximum uterine fibroid diameter and volume increased after 3 months, 6 months and 1 year of dienogest treatment compared with those before treatment (P < 0.01). The maximum diameter and volume of the uterine adenomyoma increased after 3 months of dienogest treatment but decreased after 6 months and 1 year of treatment compared with those before treatment, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). Endometrial thickness and antigen 125 levels were significantly thinner and decreased, respectively, after dienogest treatment (P < 0.01). Pearson's correlation analysis revealed that the increase in uterine fibroid volume after 3 months of dienogest treatment was positively correlated with the basic uterine fibroid volume (r = 0.792, P < 0.01). Among 64 patients with dysmenorrhea, 63 experienced significant relief of dysmenorrhea after 6 months of treatment with dienogest, and all patients experienced significant relief of dysmenorrhea after 12 months. Patients were able to tolerate the drugs, with an average drug tolerance score of 8.73.

CONCLUSION

The use of dienogest in patients with endometriosis or adenomyosis combined with uterine fibroids can effectively relieve the patient's pain symptoms and significantly reduce the sizes of ovarian endometriotic cysts, but it cannot inhibit uterine fibroid growth.

Comparison of dienogest or combinations with ethinylestradiol/estradiol valerate on the pain score of women with endometriosis: A prospective cohort study

Endometriosis is one of the most frequent gynecologic disorders. The pathognomonic symptom of endometriosis is pelvic pain. The recommended pain medications are oral hormonal contraceptives, progestin therapy, danazol, gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and aromatase inhibitors. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficiency of costing dienogest (DNG) and low-cost oral contraceptives regarding visual analog scores (VAS) score of pelvic pain and also cancer antigen-125 (CA-125), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels, and size of endometrioma in the patients with endometriosis which is a chronic disease that requires a lifelong management plan. In our study, 18 to 45-year-old patients presented to our institution's gynecology and obstetrician department for various complaints over 2 years, and endometriosis diagnoses were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups (20 patients in each medication group) according to the given medication: cyclic DNG (Visanne) or 0.03 mg ethinylestradiol combined with 2 mg DNG (Dienille) or estradiol valerate combined with 2 mg DNG (Qlarista). We recorded all patients' CA-125/AMH values and VAS scores of pelvic pain. All patients gave informed consent. There was no statistically significant difference between pre-medication and post-medication levels of CA-125, AMH, VAS score, and cyst size in all groups. However, statistically, significant decreases were seen in the cyst size and VAS score, indicating response to therapy in all groups. In conclusion, we think it is more reasonable to use cost-effective oral contraceptive medications, which also cause common side effects, instead of costing DNG since all drugs have the same efficiency and success.

Spontaneous recurrent menstrual pneumothorax: a case report

Introduction and importance

Endometriosis is most commonly found in the pelvic area, ~12% of people have it in other areas or organs, which is known as extrapelvic endometriosis. Thoracic endometriosis, which is also classified as extrapelvic endometriosis, manifests with four distinct forms: catamenial pneumothorax, catamenial hemothorax, catamenial hemoptysis, or lung nodules. Catamenial pneumothorax is the most common clinical symptom of these; however, it is frequently neglected by clinicians and goes undiagnosed and untreated. As a result, it is critical to raise awareness of this medical condition among clinicians.

Case presentation

The authors present a case report of a 34-year-old woman of reproductive age who had recurrent episodes of spontaneous pneumothorax during menstruation and underwent treatment with thoracoscopic surgery as well as gynaecological hormonal drugs including oral progesterone and dienogest throughout this time. Based on her symptoms, a catamenial pneumothorax caused by thoracic endometriosis was suspected.

Clinical discussion

The clinical symptoms, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of Catamenial Pneumothorax are analyzed. Furthermore, the usage of gynaecological hormone medications in this condition has been discussed. The mechanisms of oral contraceptives and progestin-based medications are evaluated by comparing the patient's treatment process, highlighting their pros and cons.

Conclusions

Thoracoscopic surgery combined with postoperative gynaecological hormonal medications may be the most effective treatment for this issue. Several gynaecological hormonal medicines are available, each of which has its own set of pros and cons, and must be thoroughly evaluated as well as correctly tailored to the patient's specific circumstances to have a positive therapeutic outcome.

Progesterone resistance in endometriosis: A pathophysiological perspective and potential treatment alternatives

Background

Endometriosis is a common gynecological disease affecting women of reproductive age. Patients with endometriosis frequently experience severe chronic pain and have higher chances to experience infertility. Progesterone resistance is a major problem that develops during the medical treatment of endometriosis, which often leads to treatment failure of hormonal therapies. Previous studies indicated that the dysregulation of progesterone receptors (PR) is the primary factor leading to progesterone resistance in endometriosis.

Methods

This review article systematically reviewed and summarized findings extracted from previously published papers available on PubMed, encompassing both experimental studies and clinical trials.

Main findings

Various determinants influencing PR expression in endometriosis have been identified, including the environmental toxins, microRNAs, cell signaling pathways, genetic mutations, and the pro-inflammatory cytokines. The selective estrogen/progesterone receptor modulators have emerged as novel therapeutic approaches for treating endometriosis, offering potential improvements in overcoming progesterone resistance.

Conclusion

Concerns and limitations persist despite the newly developed drugs. Therefore, studies on unraveling new therapeutic targets based on the molecular mechanisms of progesterone resistance is warranted for the development potential alternatives to overcome hormonal treatment failure in endometriosis.

Update on the management of endometriosis-associated pain in France

The French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF) published guidelines for managing endometriosis-associated pain in 2018. Given the development of new pharmacological therapies and a review that was published in 2021, most national and international guidelines now suggest a new therapeutic approach. In addition, a novel validated screening method based on patient questionnaires and analysis of 109-miRNA saliva signatures, which combines biomarkers and artificial intelligence, opens up new avenues for overcoming diagnostic challenges in patients with pelvic pain and for avoiding laparoscopic surgery when sonography and MRI are not conclusive. Dienogest (DNG) 2 mg has been a reimbursable healthcare expense in France since 2020, and, according to recent studies, it is at least as effective as combined hormonal contraception (CHC) and can be used as an alternative to CHC for first-line treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Since 2018, the literature concerning the use of DNG has grown considerably, and the French guidelines should be modified accordingly. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and other available progestins per os, including DNG, or the subcutaneous implant, can be offered as first-line therapy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists with add-back therapy (ABT) as second-line therapy. Oral GnRH antagonists are promising new medical treatments for women with endometriosis-associated pain. They competitively bind to GnRH receptors in the anterior pituitary, preventing native GnRH from binding to GnRH receptors and from stimulating the secretion of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. Consequently, estradiol and progesterone production is reduced. Oral GnRH antagonists will soon be on the market in France. Given their mode of action, their efficacy is comparable to that of GnRH agonists, with the advantage of oral administration and rapid action with no flare-up effect. Combination therapy with ABT is likely to allow long-term treatment with minimal impact on bone mass. GnRH antagonists with ABT may thus be offered as second-line treatment as an alternative to GnRH agonists with ABT. This article presents an update on the management of endometriosis-associated pain in women who do not have an immediate desire for pregnancy.

Targeting YAP1 ameliorates progesterone resistance in endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

Does YAP1 inhibition alleviate progesterone resistance in endometriosis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

YAP1 inhibition reduces progesterone resistance in vitro and in vivo.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Progesterone resistance not only causes treatment failure for endometriosis but also inhibits eutopic endometrial cell proliferation, dysregulates decidualization, and reduces the success rates of pregnancy. Hippo/yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) signaling pathway plays an important role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Paraffin-embedded tissues containing paired endometriotic and endometrial specimens (n = 42) and serum samples isolated from normal controls (n = 15) or endometriotic patients with (n = 25) or without (n = 21) prior dienogest treatment were analyzed. A mouse model of endometriosis was also used to evaluate the effects of YAP1 inhibition on progesterone resistance.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Primary endometriotic and endometrial stromal cells treated with YAP1 inhibitor or miR-21 mimic/inhibitor were used for the in vitro studies including decidualization induction, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), and RNA immunoprecipitation. Tissue specimens and serum from human and mouse were used for immunohistochemistry staining, exosome isolation, and microRNA (miRNA) quantification, respectively.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Herein, we report, by using ChIP-PCR and RNA-IP, that YAP1 inhibits progesterone receptor (PGR) expression through upregulation of miR-21-5p. Upregulation of miR-21-5p not only reduces PGR expression but also inhibits endometrial stromal cell decidualization. Indeed, levels of YAP1 and miR-21-5p are inversely correlated with the level of PGR in human endometrial samples. In contrast, knockdown of YAP1 or treatment with verteporfin (VP), a YAP1 inhibitor, reduces miR-21-5p expression, thus leading to an increase in PGR expression in ectopic endometriotic stromal cells. In the mouse model of endometriosis, treatment with VP increases PGR expression and enhances decidualization. More importantly, VP synergistically increases the treatment effect of progestin in causing the regression of endometriotic lesions and improves the decidualization capability of the endometrium. Interestingly, treatment with dienogest, a synthetic progestin, reduces YAP1 and miR-21-5p expression in human cells and in the mouse model of endometriosis. Patients who received dienogest treatment for 6 months show a significant decrease in serum extracellular vesicle-associated miR-21-5p level.

LARGE SCALE DATA

A public dataset (GSE51981) containing a large cohort of endometriotic tissues is available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

A large cohort of clinical samples is needed to verify the current diagnostic value of miR-21-5p in future studies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The reciprocal regulation of YAP1 and PGR suggests that combined YAP1 inhibitor and progestin may be a better therapeutic approach for treating endometriosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST-111-2636-B-006-012, MOST-111-2314-B-006-075-MY3, and MOST-106-2320-B-006-072-MY3). The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Quality of Life in Japanese Patients with Dysmenorrhea or Endometriosis-Associated Pelvic Pain Treated with Extended Regimen Ethinylestradiol/Drospirenone in a Real-World Setting: A Prospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Dysmenorrhea and endometriosis are common gynecologic disorders among women of reproductive age that significantly impact health-related quality of life (HRQL) as well as productivity. Although there are treatment options listed in Japanese guidelines, a gap remains in unmet medical needs for maximizing treatment outcome. The extended regimen of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone (EE/DRSP) (taken daily for up to 120 consecutive days) has been available in Japan for treating dysmenorrhea and/or endometriosis-associated pain since 2016. Yet, the effectiveness of its usage on HRQL has not been investigated elsewhere to date. Therefore, in this study, we aim to observe changes in HRQL of Japanese women treated with an extended regimen of EE/DRSP for dysmenorrhea and/or endometriosis-associated pain.

METHODS

As part of a 2-year post-marketing surveillance study, women with dysmenorrhea or endometriosis-associated pelvic pain were prescribed extended EE/DRSP during routine clinical practice. Data were collected 1 month before and 3 and 6 months after initiating treatment. Primary outcomes were the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ) (before, during, and after menstruation) in patients with dysmenorrhea, and the Endometriosis Impact Scale (EIS) and European Quality of Life 5-dimensions 5-level instrument (EQ-5D-5L) in patients with endometriosis.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 315 patients (mean age 28.9 years) with dysmenorrhea and 262 patients (mean age 31.3 years) with endometriosis. Mean MDQ total scores before and during menstruation decreased significantly after 6 months with extended EE/DRSP; there was no improvement in after-menstruation MDQ score. Mean EIS domain scores improved significantly by 6 months, with improvement in most EIS individual item scores. Mean EQ-5D-5L scores increased slightly during 6 months of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended EE/DRSP treatment improved HRQL outcomes in Japanese women with dysmenorrhea or endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03126747) on June 2017.