First-line surgery vs first-line ART to manage infertility in women with deep endometriosis without bowel involvement: A multi-centric propensity-score matching comparison

Efficacy of hormone pre-treatment before ART to improve reproductive outcomes in infertile women with endometriosis: Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hormone pre-treatment is still used before assisted reproductive technique (ART) in endometriotic women, but evidence supporting this recommendation is conflicting.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether hormone pre-treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or progestogens could improve fertility in women with endometriosis undergoing ART.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, Scielo.br, PROSPERO, Cochrane at the CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, conference abstracts, and international controlled trials registries were searched without temporal, geographic, and language limitations.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that enrolled infertile women with endometriosis undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection after the application of a stimulation protocol with hormone pre-treatment were selected and included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We conducted a network meta-analysis based on the random-effects model for mixed multiple treatment comparisons to rank the available hormone pre-treatment by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension statement for network meta-analyses. Quality assessment was carried out using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Egger test and funnel plot analysis were used for publication bias assessment. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Secondary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), pregnancy loss rate (PLR), and implantation rate (IR).

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies with 2087 women were included. Ultralong (3 months GnRH agonist) (SUCRA 24.5%) and long protocols (1 month GnRH agonist) (SUCRA 24.9%) as well as progestins (SUCRA 28.8%) showed similar results to no treatment (SUCRA 21.8%) in terms of post-ART CPR. Regarding the LBR, no treatment (SUCRA 50.0%) showed highest rates relative to progestins (SUCRA 7.0%), and long (SUCRA 36.6%) and ultralong (SUCRA 6.4%) protocols. For PLR, no treatment (SUCRA 57.9%), followed by long protocol (SUCRA 18.4%), ultralong protocol (SUCRA 12.3%), and progestins (SUCRA 11.4%) showed the greatest degree of reduction. The long (SUCRA 45.0%) and ultralong (SUCRA 39.5%) protocols seemed more effective in increasing IR than did than progestins (SUCRA 15.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased number of implanted pregnancies using a GnRH agonist protocol does not lead to higher clinical pregnancies or live births. Currently, there is no indication for hormone pre-treatment before ART in women with endometriosis as it does not increase fertility chances.

Effects of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and surgery on pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common gynecological condition in women of childbearing age that causes symptoms such as menstrual changes and dysmenorrhea, and is also a major cause of infertility. Therefore, women with endometriosis usually need to use assisted reproductive technology (ART), such as in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, to increase their chances of conceiving. Numerous clinical observations and studies have indicated that endometriosis can affect the success of ART, such that women with endometriosis who use ART have a lower live-birth rate than those without endometriosis who use ART. Therefore, this article reviews the impact of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and surgery on the pregnancy outcomes of women with endometriosis using ART to explore the selection of individualized treatment.

What's Now and What's Next for Surgical Endometriosis Management in the Infertile Patient? An Evidence-Based Review for the General OB/GYN

Endometriosis is a significant contributor to female infertility, and its complex nature and varied phenotypes lead to questions regarding the value of surgical management. In this manuscript, we summarize current evidence and recommendations regarding surgical treatment for infertility in peritoneal disease, endometriomas, adenomyosis, and deep endometriosis, and highlight recent evidence regarding perinatal outcomes in women with endometriosis. Our purpose is to provide a concise "user's guide" for decisions regarding the surgical management of endometriosis in patients with infertility and generate awareness of recent perinatal outcome data.

Impact of surgery on reproductive outcomes in women with deep endometriosis and proven presurgical infertility: Facts and controversies

In women with proven infertility and deep endometriosis (DE), optimal management is controversial. To date, there is no clear evidence on the association between infertility and different stages of rASRM, nor is there clear guidance from leading scientific societies for surgical treatment of DE patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the main databases for English-language trials describing the effectiveness of surgery for DE in patients with proven infertility; 16 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this systematic review (CRD42024498888). Quantitative analysis was not possible because of the heterogeneity of the data. A descriptive summary of the results according to location of pathology, surgical technique used, and whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) was needed or not was provided. A total of 947 infertile women were identified, 486 of whom became pregnant, with an average pregnancy rate of 51.3%. Our review suggests that surgery can be of valuable help in improving reproductive outcomes by improving the results of ART. It has not been possible to reach robust conclusions on the outcomes of surgery based on the location of DE because of the heterogeneity of evidence available to date. Overall, although some data encourage first-line surgical management, further investigation is needed to determine its effective application before or after ART failure.

Bowel endometriosis: Surgical customization is demanding

Bowel endometriosis is the most common form of severe deep endometriosis. Surgery is an option in case of infertility and/or chronic pain or in the presence of a stenotic lesion. Clinical examination and preoperative imaging must provide an identity card of the lesion so that customized surgery can be proposed. The primary objective of this tailor-made surgery will always be to preserve the organ. The surgeon then has three options: shaving, discoid resection and segmental resection. The more extensive the resection, the greater the risk of severe short- and long-term complications. Surgery must therefore be adapted to the patient's specific situation and needs. Moreover, personalized care must extend beyond surgery. It must begin before the operation, preparing the patient for the operation like an athlete before a race, and continue afterwards by adapting the follow-up to the surgery performed.

First-line surgery versus first-line assisted reproductive technology for women with deep infiltrating endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The efficiency of different first-line treatments, such as first-line surgery and assisted reproductive technology (ART), in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is still unclear due to a lack of direct comparative trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to elucidate and compare the efficacies of first-line treatments in patients with DIE, with an emphasis on fertility outcomes.

Methods

An exhaustive search of PubMed Central, SCOPUS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane trial registry, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases was done to identify studies directly comparing first-line surgery and assisted reproductive technology (ART) for DIE, and reporting fertility-related outcomes. Pooled estimates for each of the binary outcomes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results were pooled using a random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel technique.

Results

Our results show that pregnancy rate per patient (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.59 to 3.63), pregnancy rate per cycle (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.99), and live births per patient (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 4.91) were comparable in DIE patients, treated with surgery or ART as a first line of treatment. When both complete and incomplete surgical DIE excision procedures were taken into account, surgery was associated with a significant enhancement in the pregnancy rate per patient (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.40).

Conclusion

The available evidence suggests that both first-line surgery and ART can be effective DIE treatments with similar fertility outcomes. However, further analysis reveals that excluding studies involving endometriomas significantly alters the understanding of treatment efficacy between surgery and ART for DIE-associated infertility.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=426061, identifier CRD42023426061.

Robotic assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis

Deep infiltrative endometriosis is a condition affecting up to 15 % of women of childbearing age, defined by extra uterine location of endometrial like tissues. The symptoms of endometriosis range from severe dysmenorrhea to infertility, chronic pelvic pain, bowel dysfunction and urinary tract involvement to name the most common. Endometriosis has an impact on the quality of life of patients, with personal and social consequences. Although medical treatment is indicated in the first instance, surgery may be necessary. Standard laparoscopy has become the gold standard for this surgery. However, surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis is known to be highly complex, and the significant development of robotic assistance in recent years has had an impact on the evolution of surgical practice. This comprehensive review of the literature provides an overview of the contributions of robotic surgery in the field of endometriosis and gives an insight into the next steps in its development.

Endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis

A narrative review of endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis revealed that this parameter is difficult to assess in natural conception because both disorders alter natural fertility. Recent data emanating from assisted reproductive technology have allowed the study of endometrial receptivity in women affected by adenomyosis and endometriosis. This has upended our views on the effects of these 2 disorders on embryo implantation. Today, the very existence of altered receptivity in assisted reproductive technology is questioned. In this context, we now know that frozen euploid blastocyst transfers in estradiol and progesterone cycles have unaltered outcomes in both adenomyosis and endometriosis.