Impact of surgery on fertility among patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis

Bowel Endometriosis: Systematic Approach to Diagnosis with US and MRI

Endometriosis involving the bowel is a severe form of the disease, and the bowel is the most common site of extragenital endometriosis. Surface lesions of the bowel are considered peritoneal disease. Bowel endometriosis (BE) is defined as endometriotic tissue infiltrating the muscularis propria layer of the bowel wall. BE is estimated to affect up to 37% of patients with known deep endometriosis, highlighting its coexistence with genital endometriosis. The rectosigmoid colon is the most common segment of the bowel involved, followed by the distal small bowel. US and MRI are the most common imaging modalities used to detect BE. Depending on which bowel segment is imaged, endometriosis protocols for transvaginal US after bowel preparation with a transabdominal component and MRI and MR enterography are most commonly used. The authors provide a systematic approach to the diagnosis of BE using these imaging modalities. Imaging protocols and techniques for optimization of visualization of the bowel are discussed, the normal bowel wall anatomy with both imaging modalities is described, and the varying degrees of bowel wall involvement in endometriosis are illustrated. The imaging features of infiltration of endometriosis in the bowel muscularis propria are described in detail, along with key imaging findings to be conveyed to surgical colleagues to optimize surgical treatment and decrease complications, thereby improving overall patient outcomes. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

What's Now and What's Next for Surgical Endometriosis Management in the Infertile Patient? An Evidence-Based Review for the General OB/GYN

Endometriosis is a significant contributor to female infertility, and its complex nature and varied phenotypes lead to questions regarding the value of surgical management. In this manuscript, we summarize current evidence and recommendations regarding surgical treatment for infertility in peritoneal disease, endometriomas, adenomyosis, and deep endometriosis, and highlight recent evidence regarding perinatal outcomes in women with endometriosis. Our purpose is to provide a concise "user's guide" for decisions regarding the surgical management of endometriosis in patients with infertility and generate awareness of recent perinatal outcome data.

Surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis: an updated review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize recent literature on the surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The last decade has seen a surge in the number of studies on bowel endometriosis, with a focus on preoperative evaluation, perioperative management, surgical approach, and surgical outcomes. Many of these studies have originated from large-volume referral centers with varying surgical approaches and philosophies. Colorectal surgery for endometriosis seems to have a positive impact on patient symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. However, these benefits must be weighed against a significant risk of postoperative complications and the potential for long-term bowel or bladder dysfunction, especially for more radical procedures involving the lower rectum. Importantly, most studies regarding surgical technique and outcomes have been limited by their observational design.

SUMMARY

The surgical management of bowel endometriosis is complex and should be approached by a multidisciplinary team. Methodical preoperative evaluation, including appropriate imaging, is vital for surgical planning and patient counseling. The decision to perform a more conservative or radical excision is nuanced and remains an area of controversy. High quality studies in the form of multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed before clear recommendations can be made.

Reproductive surgery remains an essential element of reproductive medicine

Background

Reproductive surgery has long been neglected and is perceived to be simple surgery that can be undertaken by all gynaecologists. However, given the ever-expanding knowledge in the field, reproductive surgery now comprises surgical interventions on female reproductive organs that need to be carefully planned and executed with consideration given to the individuals symptoms, function of the organ and fertility concerns.

Objectives

To discuss the different perspectives of reproductive surgeons and other gynaecological surgeons, e.g., gynaecological oncologists, and advanced minimally invasive surgeons, regarding diagnosis and management of pelvic pathology that affects reproductive potential. Furthermore, to highlight the gaps in knowledge and numerous controversies surrounding reproductive surgery, while summarising the current opinion on management.

Materials and Methods

Narrative review based on literature and the cumulative experience of the authors.

Main outcome measures

The paper does not address specific research questions.

Conclusions

Reproductive surgery encompasses all reproductive organs with the aim of alleviating symptoms whilst restoring and preserving function with careful consideration given to alternatives such as expectant management, medical treatments, and assisted reproductive techniques. It necessitates utmost technical expertise and sufficient knowledge of the female genital anatomy and physiology, together with a thorough understanding of and respect to of ovarian reserve, tubal function, and integrity of the uterine anatomy, as well as an up-to-date knowledge of alternatives, mainly assisted reproductive technology.

What is new?

A holistic approach to infertile women is only possible by focusing on the field of reproductive medicine and surgery, which is unattainable while practicing in multiple fields.

First-line surgery versus first-line assisted reproductive technology for women with deep infiltrating endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The efficiency of different first-line treatments, such as first-line surgery and assisted reproductive technology (ART), in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is still unclear due to a lack of direct comparative trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to elucidate and compare the efficacies of first-line treatments in patients with DIE, with an emphasis on fertility outcomes.

Methods

An exhaustive search of PubMed Central, SCOPUS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane trial registry, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases was done to identify studies directly comparing first-line surgery and assisted reproductive technology (ART) for DIE, and reporting fertility-related outcomes. Pooled estimates for each of the binary outcomes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results were pooled using a random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel technique.

Results

Our results show that pregnancy rate per patient (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.59 to 3.63), pregnancy rate per cycle (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.99), and live births per patient (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 4.91) were comparable in DIE patients, treated with surgery or ART as a first line of treatment. When both complete and incomplete surgical DIE excision procedures were taken into account, surgery was associated with a significant enhancement in the pregnancy rate per patient (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.40).

Conclusion

The available evidence suggests that both first-line surgery and ART can be effective DIE treatments with similar fertility outcomes. However, further analysis reveals that excluding studies involving endometriomas significantly alters the understanding of treatment efficacy between surgery and ART for DIE-associated infertility.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=426061, identifier CRD42023426061.

Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis: Impact on spontaneous conception

Deep endometriosis (DE) is the most severe form of endometriosis and is commonly associated with infertility. Surgical treatment of DE appears to increase chances of spontaneous conception in appropriately selected patients wishing to conceive. Identifying, however, the exact impact of DE, and its surgical removal, on natural conception is highly challenging. The surgical approach should be favoured in symptomatic patients with pregnancy intention. Limited data from infertile patients suggest that outcomes may not differ from patients without known infertility. Complex DE surgery carries a risk of serious complications, therefore, it should be performed in centers of expertise. Such complications may, however, not have a significant negative impact on fertility outcomes, according to limited available data. Data on obstetric outcomes of spontaneous conceptions after DE surgery are too scarce. In asymptomatic, infertile patients the debate between primary surgery or Artifial Reproductive Technology is ongoing, until randomized studies report their results.

Surgical management of endometriosis to optimize fertility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgery is an integral element of treatment for infertility caused by endometriosis. This review summarizes the purported mechanisms of infertility in endometriosis, as well as the impacts of surgery for endometriosis on fertility, including pregnancy achieved spontaneously and with assisted reproductive technology (ART).

RECENT FINDINGS

Endometriosis' effect on fertility is multifactorial. The sequela of increased inflammation resulting from endometriosis causes alterations in ovarian, tubal, and uterine function. Removing or destroying these lesions reduces inflammation. Surgical treatment of both early-stage endometriosis and deeply infiltrating endometriosis improves spontaneous pregnancy rates and ART pregnancy rates. Conventional or robotic laparoscopy is the preferred surgical approach.

SUMMARY

Endometriosis has detrimental effects on fertility, including negative impacts on oocyte, tubal, and endometrial function. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis elevates both spontaneous and ART pregnancy rates above those achieved with expectant management alone. The resection or destruction of endometriosis implants reduces inflammation, which likely improves the multifactorial infertility related to endometriosis. This topic is complex and controversial; more research in the form of high-quality randomized control trials is needed.