Retrospective study of radiotherapy-induced skin reactions in breast cancer patients: reduced incidence of moist desquamation with a hydroactive colloid gel versus dexpanthenol

Topical Ectoin Versus Topical Dexpanthenol for Managing Acute Radiodermatitis Associated With Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: A Randomized Double-Blind Study

Background: Radiodermatitis is a common side effect of breast cancer radiotherapy; however, there is no current consensus regarding an effective standard therapy. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of topical ectoin versus dexpanthenol in the management of acute radiodermatitis after breast cancer radiotherapy. Methods: Fifty patients randomly used dexpanthenol 5% cream (25 patients), or ectoin 7% cream (25 patients), applied twice daily to the irradiated area during and for 2 weeks after radiotherapy. The study was stratified by the radiotherapy schedule and was double-blind. Radiodermatitis grade, radiation-associated symptoms, and adverse events were assessed weekly during radiotherapy and 2 weeks thereafter. Skin-related quality of life (QOL) scores were measured using the Skindex-16 questionnaire. Results: Both agents were effective in preventing severe radiodermatitis (≥G3). Ectoin had a lower radiodermatitis grade level than dexpanthenol, with a significant difference at week 2 (P = 0.008). Radiation-associated pain (P = 0.003) and itching (P = 0.001) were lower with ectoin than dexpanthenol. Side effects were not significantly different between the 2 treatments (P = 0.107). Ectoin showed less QOL impairment than dexpanthenol. The radiation schedule was an independent predictor for radiodermatitis persistence. Conclusion: Ectoin showed some clinical benefit over dexpanthenol in improving radiation dermatitis and the radiation schedule is a predictor of radiodermatitis persistence.

Management of Radiation-induced Tissue Injuries: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies

Although radiation therapy remains an integral component in cancer treatment, the sequela of tissue damage can result in long-term morbidity and mortality for patients. This article aimed to perform a comprehensive review of the current literature for both nonsurgical and surgical management strategies for radiation-induced injuries.

Methods

A literature search was performed on PubMed to review the current described management and treatment options for radiation-induced injuries. Patient demographics, medical diagnoses, complications, strategies of management care, and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

The most commonly described management options and reconstructive techniques of radiation wounds were analyzed and reported.

Conclusions

Consideration of current techniques and outcomes in the management of radiation-induced wounds demonstrates that impaired wound healing remains a major problem. This literature review provides a detailed overview of the most frequently used therapies with recommendations for surgeons.

MASCC clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of acute radiation dermatitis: part 1) systematic review

Acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) commonly develops in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and is often characterized by erythema, desquamation, and pain. A systematic review was conducted to summarize the current evidence on interventions for the prevention and management of ARD. Databases were searched from 1946 to September 2020 to identify all original studies that evaluated an intervention for the prevention or management of ARD, with an updated search conducted in January 2023. A total of 235 original studies were included in this review, including 149 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most interventions could not be recommended due to a low quality of evidence, lack of supporting evidence, or conflicting findings across multiple trials. Photobiomodulation therapy, Mepitel® film, mometasone furoate, betamethasone, olive oil, and oral enzyme mixtures showed promising results across multiple RCTs. Recommendations could not be made solely based on the published evidence due to limited high-quality evidence. As such, Delphi consensus recommendations will be reported in a separate publication.

Comparison of the Thermal Reaction of Patients after Conserving Procedures and after Mastectomy to the Radiation Dose Obtained during Radiotherapy

The main aim of the study was to compare the temperature response of the body to the dose received during breast cancer radiotherapy. The control group consisted of 50 healthy volunteers. They underwent one thermographic examination and compared the temperatures between the left and right breasts. The research group consisted of 50 patients. Based on the treatment plan, the area PTV and isodose was marked on the thermograms. Five thermographs were performed in each patient (before radiotherapy and in each week of treatment). A qualitatively similar increase in mean temperature during treatment was observed in both subgroups in the analyzed areas. The highest increase in temperature was obtained in the third week of treatment. Compared with the value before treatment, the increase in the mean temperature in PTV in patients after partial surgery was 0.78 °C, these values are statistically significant p = 0.000055. In the case of post-mastectomy patients, 0.8 °C was obtained, these values are statistically significant p = 0.00369. In addition, strong correlation was calculated between isodoses read from treatment plans and isotherms obtained from the analysis of thermal images. In post-mastectomy patients for PTV r = 0.77, 30 Gy r = 0.94, 20 Gy r = 0.96, and 10 Gy r = 0.75. For patients after partial surgery for PTV r = 0.74, 30 Gy r = 0.89, 20 Gy r = 0.83, and 10 Gy r = 0.89. Infrared thermography seems to be a useful method of assessing the thermal response of the body to the dose received during radiotherapy of breast cancer and may be a clinically useful method of assessing the early skin response to radiation.

The Use of Infrared Thermography in the Assessment of Thermal Reaction of Patients Treated with Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Procedures

The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of the infrared thermography method in the assessment of the body's thermal reaction in patients during radiotherapy. Studies have shown how the temperature distribution changes with the dose of radiation used in each treatment week. Fifty-four patients participated in the study. The control group consisted of healthy patients, among whom the difference in mean temperatures between the breasts was checked. The study group included patients after conserving procedures qualified for radiotherapy. Measurements were taken and analyzed for each patient during each week of treatment. The target area (marked by a doctor) and the 30 Gy, 20 Gy and 10 Gy isodoses (generated from the treatment plan) were transferred on thermograms and then analyzed. This way of defining the observed areas is the most accurate and individually adjusted to each treated patient. The analysis showed an increase in temperature in the tested body surface areas, whereas the highest average temperature value was achieved during the third week of treatment. The observations may be used to evaluate the skin reaction from radiation; however, they require further studies and new quantitative parameters.

Long-Term Skin Temperature Changes after Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

The aim of the study was to use thermal imaging to evaluate long-term chest temperature changes in patients who had previously been treated with radiotherapy. The examination with a thermal imaging camera involved 144 women-48 of them were patients after RT, 48 were females before breast cancer radiotherapy and the last group of participants were 48 healthy women. All patients (before and after radiotherapy) were divided into women after mastectomy and those after conservative surgery. In addition, the first group of women, those who had received radiotherapy, were divided into three other groups: up to 1 year after RT, over 1 year and up to 5 years after RT and over 5 years after RT. Due to this, it was possible to compare the results and analyse the differences between the temperature in the healthy and treated breasts. The comparison of obtained temperature results showed that the area treated by ionizing radiation is characterized by a higher temperature even a few years after the finished treatment. It is worth mentioning that despite the fact that the difference was visible on the thermograms, the patients had no observable skin lesion or change in color at the treatment site. For the results of the study provided for the group of healthy patients, there were no significant differences observed between the average temperatures in the breasts. The use of thermal imaging in the evaluation of skin temperature changes after radiotherapy showed that the average temperature in the treated breast area can change even a long time after treatment.

What is the appropriate skin cleaning method for nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy patients? A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of various cleaning methods for skin with acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

A total of 168 NPC inpatients were randomized, while 152 patients completed the whole trial and the data were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into the non-washing group (Group 1), washing with water alone group (Group 2), and washing with water and soap group (Group 3). All three groups received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with other treatments. Follow-up from recruitment or the initial radiotherapy dose to 1 month after the final radiotherapy dose. CONSORT checklist was applied as the reporting guidelines for this study. The study evaluated a range of endpoints, including incidence, timing, severity of acute RD, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

There were no allergic reactions or aggravating in both washing groups during the whole treatment. The incidence of acute RD was 100% in all three groups, while the incidence of severe RD (grades 2-3) differed among groups (Group 1 vs. Group 2 vs. Group 3: 51% vs. 23.5% vs. 18%; P = 0.001), washing moderately reduced severity compared with patients without washing. Washing also delayed the onset time of acute RD; the incidence of acute RD was significantly lower than non-washing during the first 20 fractions (P < 0.001). What is more, washing reduced the incidence of moist desquamation (25.5% vs. 5.9% vs. 6%; P = 0.003) and helped relieve itching (6.49 ± 2.09 vs. 4.90 ± 1.90 vs. 4.00 ± 1.58; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among groups with respect to pain or burning sensation. Washing improved QOL on physical (64.37 ± 4.08 vs. 67.41 ± 4.05 vs. 71.30 ± 4.87; P < 0.001), emotional (61.47 ± 4.75 vs. 65.75 ± 3.46 vs. 70.80 ± 3.27; P < 0.001), and social functional dimensions (62.64 ± 3.57 vs. 64.87 ± 3.88 vs. 68.04 ± 4.89; P < 0.001) at the end of radiotherapy, and the outcome was similar at 1 month after radiotherapy (P < 0.05). Washing with water and soap was the most effective way to reduce itching and improving QOL among the three groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Washing irradiated skin reduces the occurrence and severity of acute radiation dermatitis.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

ChiCTR2000038231, date of registration 09.18.2020.

Twelve-Month Evaluation of Temperature Effects of Radiotherapy in Patients after Mastectomy

The aim of this study was to verify the changes in the temperature distribution within the breast at twelve months after the end of radiotherapy for breast cancer. The study included twenty-four women. The first test group consisted of twelve women who underwent breast mastectomy and qualified for radiotherapy according to standard medical treatment procedures. The second group included twelve healthy women. The tests were conducted before treatment with radiation therapy and two months, six months, nine months, and one year after the end of treatment. The mean temperature values changed depending on the time that had elapsed since the end of treatment. The highest temperature increase in all patients was observed six months after the end of radiotherapy. This research has confirmed that the assessment of temperature changes in the breast area after radiotherapy can evaluate the severity and lesions in the time course of the radiation reaction.

What is the appropriate skin cleaning method for nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy patients? A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of various cleaning methods for skin with acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

A total of 168 NPC inpatients were randomized, while 152 patients completed the whole trial and the data were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into the non-washing group (Group 1), washing with water alone group (Group 2), and washing with water and soap group (Group 3). All three groups received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with other treatments. Follow-up from recruitment or the initial radiotherapy dose to 1 month after the final radiotherapy dose. CONSORT checklist was applied as the reporting guidelines for this study. The study evaluated a range of endpoints, including incidence, timing, severity of acute RD, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

There were no allergic reactions or aggravating in both washing groups during the whole treatment. The incidence of acute RD was 100% in all three groups, while the incidence of severe RD (grades 2-3) differed among groups (Group 1 vs. Group 2 vs. Group 3: 51% vs. 23.5% vs. 18%; P = 0.001), washing moderately reduced severity compared with patients without washing. Washing also delayed the onset time of acute RD; the incidence of acute RD was significantly lower than non-washing during the first 20 fractions (P < 0.001). What is more, washing reduced the incidence of moist desquamation (25.5% vs. 5.9% vs. 6%; P = 0.003) and helped relieve itching (6.49 ± 2.09 vs. 4.90 ± 1.90 vs. 4.00 ± 1.58; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among groups with respect to pain or burning sensation. Washing improved QOL on physical (64.37 ± 4.08 vs. 67.41 ± 4.05 vs. 71.30 ± 4.87; P < 0.001), emotional (61.47 ± 4.75 vs. 65.75 ± 3.46 vs. 70.80 ± 3.27; P < 0.001), and social functional dimensions (62.64 ± 3.57 vs. 64.87 ± 3.88 vs. 68.04 ± 4.89; P < 0.001) at the end of radiotherapy, and the outcome was similar at 1 month after radiotherapy (P < 0.05). Washing with water and soap was the most effective way to reduce itching and improving QOL among the three groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Washing irradiated skin reduces the occurrence and severity of acute radiation dermatitis.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

ChiCTR2000038231, date of registration 09.18.2020.

The Use of Thermal Imaging in the Evaluation of Temperature Effects of Radiotherapy in Patients after Mastectomy-First Study

The aim of the study was to evaluate the temperature parameter of the breast area in patients undergoing radiotherapy at various intervals. The relationship between temperature changes on the patient’s skin and the time after the end of radiotherapy was studied. Measurements with a thermal imaging camera were performed in a group of twelve volunteers. Six of them were healthy women who did not have thermal asymmetry between the breasts, whereas six were diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent mastectomy due to the advanced stage of the disease. The patients were qualified for radiation therapy. Thermographic examinations were performed before treatment, two months later and then six months after the end of the treatment. Temperature differences between the healthy breasts and the treated areas were assessed. Additionally, the correlation between a patient’s skin temperature changes and the time after the end of radiotherapy was analyzed. The highest skin temperature increase (1.47 °C) was observed 6 months after the end of RT compared to the measurement before treatment. It seems that thermovision may bring a new tool for quantitative analyses of the temperature effects of radiotherapy.

Radiation dermatitis: the evaluation of a new topical therapy for the treatment and prevention of radiation-induced skin damage and moist desquamation: a multicentre UK case cohort study

Introduction:

Radiotherapy is a mainstay of cancer therapy for a wide variety of anatomical areas. An unfortunate side effect of treatment can be radiation damage to the skin which can be a painful and debilitating problem. Previous experience from the experimental use of Flamigel® in two large-scale clinical studies on affected skin has proven sufficiently positive for the addition of a new product in the Flamigel® family (now commercially available in the UK as Flamigel RT®, Flen Health UK). The aim of this investigation is to evaluate the use of this new product to study how effective it is in the prevention and/or treatment of radiation-induced skin damage.

Materials and methods:

A survey was conducted among radiotherapy specialist teams in dedicated UK radiotherapy centres between 1 January 2017 and 31 October 2017. This report is of a preliminary evaluation conducted by UK-based specialists on 108 patients undergoing radiotherapy. The scoring system for skin reactions of the ‘Radiation Therapy Oncology Group’ was used.

Results:

Results show that the use of Flamigel® has the potential to soothe (p = 0·0001), reduce pain (p = 0·0001) and reduce pruritus (p = 0·004). The product met the expectations of the clinicians involved (p < 0·0001) of whom most were happy to continue use or to recommend its use to colleagues (p < 0·0001).

Conclusions:

Flamigel® is an effective treatment in the management of radiation-induced skin reactions. Erythema was unchanged through the study period (p = 0·42). No adverse reactions were reported after the use of Flamigel from twice to six times a day.

Correlation between Isotherms and Isodoses in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy-First Study

The study is focused on correlation of isotherms derived from thermal images with an isodoses describing treatment plan for patients with breast cancer treated by radiotherapy. The irradiated area covered the part of the body after mastectomy. The study included patients diagnosed with breast cancer who were qualified for radiotherapy treatment. All patients were monitored during each treatment week during the entire radiotherapy process. The measurements were made under strictly defined conditions. In the treatment planning system (TPS), the specific plan was created for each patient. Spatial dose distribution in the patient's body was obtained and presented by the isodoses (lines connecting points with the same dose values). The following areas from the treatment planning system were plotted on the thermograms: target (tumor area) and isodose: 45 Gy, 40 Gy, 30 Gy, 20 Gy and 10 Gy. The obtained results indicated a high correlation between magnitude of the dose represented as the isodose and the temperature of the treated skin. Moreover, preliminary analysis showed a repeatable increase of the mean temperature in the irradiated area during the treatment.

Comparative Evaluation of Topical Corticosteroid and Moisturizer in the Prevention of Radiodermatitis in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Background:

Radiodermatitis is a frequent side effect of breast cancer radiotherapy (RT). Treating radiation oncologist should know the prevention and treatment of every grade of radiodermatitis.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to compare the topical corticosteroid and moisturizer usage in breast cancer RT.

Materials and Methods:

Fifty patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery referred to our department for adjuvant RT between October 2009 and October 2016 were compared with regard to topical steroid or moisturizer usage. Patients were followed up weekly after the start of treatment.

Results:

Mean age was 46 years. Twenty-four patients had stage 1 breast cancer and 26 patients had stage 2 disease. KPS (Karnofsky performance score) was 100 for all patients. Five patients (20.8%) had grade 2 and seven (29.1%) patients had grade 1 acute radiodermatitis in the first group. Eleven (42.3%) patients had grade 2 and 12 (46.1%) patients had grade 1 acute radiodermatitis in the second group. Thirteen (54.1%) patients in the first group had no acute radiodermatitis and three (11.5%) patients in the second group had no acute radiodermatitis. No patient in either group experienced grade 3 radiodermatitis.

Conclusions:

Daily use of topical betamethasone for breast cancer RT improves dermal sparing, reduces acute radiodermatitis, and may be recommended for patients receiving RT to the breast.

Patients' view of the differences in topical creams for radiation dermatitis prevention. A pilot study of cosmetic properties

Aim

To investigate the feasibility of including patients' reports on the cosmetic properties of topical formulations for acute radiation dermatitis (ARD).

Background

No topical agent tested for acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) has proven to be better than any other, all achieving similar objective outcomes. No clear guidelines have therefore been established in clinics. Because the vehicle for such creams has shown to be an important factor in patient adherence to treatments in other dermatological diseases, patients' opinions are evaluated.

Material and methods

Seventy breast cancer patients referred for postoperative radiotherapy after conservative surgery were enrolled. Patients were assigned to use one of the 7 topical agents that are most-commonly used in the prevention of ARD. Patients' reports were assessed using continuous visual analogue scales (VAS), objective signs and symptoms produced by ARD, and were rated using the RTOG and RISRAS scales.

Results

The creams tested differed in their cosmetic properties significantly (p = 0.044). The performance of the agent, their absorption and any residue left over were also significantly different (p = 0.022, 0.014 and 0.02, respectively).

Conclusions

Topical agents for preventive ARD are reported by patients to show different cosmetic properties. Cosmetic properties are important when choosing topical agents for ARD prevention. Recommending those with better cosmetic profiles would improve patient adherence to treatments.

Radiation-induced skin reactions: mechanism and treatment

Radiotherapy (RT) is a major treatment for malignant tumors. The latest data show that >70% of patients with malignant tumors need RT at different periods. Skin changes can be experienced by up to 95% of patients who underwent RT. Inflammation and oxidative stress (OS) have been shown to be generally associated with radiation-induced skin reactions (RISRs). Inflammatory response and OS interact and promote each other during RISRs. Severe skin reactions often have a great impact on the progress of RT. The treatment of RISRs is particularly critical because advanced RT technology can also lead to skin reactions. RISRs are classified into acute and chronic reactions. The treatment methods for acute RISRs include steroid treatment, creams, ointments, and hydrocolloid dressings, depending on the reaction grading. Chronic RISRs includes chronic ulcerations, telangiectasias, and fibrosis of the skin, and advanced treatments such as mesenchymal stem cells, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, superoxide dismutase, and low-intensity laser therapy can be considered. Here, we review and summarize the important mechanisms that cause RISRs as well as the standard and advanced treatments for RISRs.

Efficacy of a hydroactive colloid gel versus historical controls for the prevention of radiotherapy-induced moist desquamation in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy-induced moist desquamation (RIMD) is a complication that can affect patients' quality of life and jeopardize radiotherapy outcomes. The curative use of a hydroactive colloid gel has previously been shown effective in the management of RIMD in breast cancer patients. This study aimed at investigating the efficacy of this same gel but in the prevention of RIMD.

METHODS

A group of breast cancer patients who applied the hydroactive gel from start to end of post-lumpectomy radiotherapy (Preventive Hydrogel group) were compared with two groups of matched historical controls: a group applying a dexpanthenol cream throughout their therapy and a group applying first the dexpanthenol cream then, after 11-14 fractions of radiotherapy, the hydroactive gel (Curative Hydrogel group). All patients received identical fractionation regimen. The clinical outcomes were the incidence and time to onset of RIMD.

KEY RESULTS

After 25 fractions of radiotherapy (50 Gy), patients in the Preventive Hydrogel group (N = 202) developed RIMD significantly less frequently and later than patients in the Dexpanthenol group (N = 131; incidence = 7% vs 35% respectively, odds ratios = 7.27; probability of RIMD-free survival after 50 Gy = 0.88 vs 0.62). There were no significant differences between the Preventive and the Curative Hydrogel group (N = 87).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm our previous results: applying the hydroactive colloid gel, rather than dexpanthenol, delayed the onset and reduced the incidence of RIMD in breast cancer patients. However, applying the hydrogel preventively offered no statistically significant advantages over applying it curatively.