Continuing variation and barriers to nurse-led vaginal dilator education for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy

Diagnostic Methods for Vaginal Stenosis and Compliance to Vaginal Dilator Use: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Vaginal stenosis (VS) is a common side effect of pelvic radiotherapy for gynecological cancer in women. It has a high incidence variability, likely due to unstandardized and subjective assessment methods. Furthermore, even though the worldwide standard treatment for VS is vaginal dilation, low compliance rates have been noted.

AIM

To evaluate the parameters used to diagnose VS and to assess whether the lack of an objective measure of VS hampers vaginal dilator use.

METHODS

A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA reporting guidelines was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched. Randomized trials and prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies published from January 2011 to February 2020 were included.

OUTCOMES

The main outcome of this study was a review of the published literature on assessment methods for VS and compliance to vaginal dilator use.

RESULTS

Of the 28 articles obtained, only 7 used objective methods to measure the vaginal volume. 3 studies have demonstrated patient's concern with VS development and showed a high compliance to dilator use, whereas others reported several barriers to dilator use.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Lack of an objective assessment method can be a predisposing factor for uncertain VS incidence rates and impair compliance to vaginal dilator therapy, leading to long-term VS and sexual dysfunction.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

This is the first systematic review on the heterogeneity of VS evaluation methods and compliance to vaginal dilator use. All studies were comprehensively evaluated by 2 reviewers. The limitations included the heterogeneity of the study designs and the unstandardized criteria used to classify stenosis or to evaluate compliance to dilator use. Although 3 well-known databases were used, the inclusion of more data sources could have increased the number of publications included in this review.

CONCLUSION

VS is frequently diagnosed using subjective parameters. Few unstandardized objective methods are used to evaluate this condition. Regarding compliance to vaginal dilator use, there was a high dropout rate during follow-up and no consensus on starting time or ideal usage. Haddad NC, Soares Brollo LC, Pinho Oliveira MA, et al. Diagnostic Methods for Vaginal Stenosis and Compliance to Vaginal Dilator Use: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med 2021;18:493-514.

Management of radiation therapy-induced vaginal adhesions and stenosis: A New Zealand survey of current practice

INTRODUCTION

Vaginal dilation is often indicated as an intervention for the management of radiation therapy-induced vaginal adhesions and stenosis (RTVAS). However, limited research exists underpinning this intervention and diversity in patient recommendations internationally are reported. In the absence of New Zealand (NZ) national guidelines regarding the management of RTVAS, a survey of NZ radiation therapy departments was conducted to gain an overview of current practice.

METHODS

A two-section online survey was developed to capture RTVAS education and management overview across NZ. Section one focused on departmental resourcing and section two on local standard practice regarding vaginal dilator usage. One RTVAS education representative from each department was invited to complete the survey.

RESULTS

Eight of nine NZ departments completed the survey. Consistent treatment indications were identified for RTVAS patient education with the involvement of diverse staffing groups at various time-points throughout the treatment process. Protocols for RTVAS management existed in each RT department with staff commonly trained by informal peer observation. Dilator usage was recommended regardless of patient sexual activity. Agreement was shown regarding the recommended start time of dilator usage and frequency. The recommended duration of dilator use post-treatment varied from 6 months to greater than 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This work illustrates both concordance and diversity in practice and contributes to the limited body of literature available. Further research is warranted to explore patterns of practice between departmental protocols and individual practitioners in further detail.

Clinical and Psychological Outcomes of the Use of Vaginal Dilators After Gynaecological Brachytherapy: a Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dimensions of the vaginal canal in patients undergoing gynaecological brachytherapy and the effect of the use of vaginal dilators (VD) used in the follow-up of pelvic physiotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients were randomly allocated to the control group (CG) and intervention group (IG). Three evaluations were performed: pre-brachytherapy, post-brachytherapy and follow-up of 3 months. The CG received standard guidance from the health team while the IG was instructed to use VD for 3 months. The dimensions of the vaginal canal (main outcome) were defined by the length of the vagina (centimetres), width (number of full clockwise turns of the opening thread of a gynaecological speculum) and area (defined by the size of the VD). Quality of life and pelvic floor (PF) functionality were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no effect of the VD on vaginal length, width and area among the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. However, in the analysis stratified by adhesion, the CG had a significant decrease in the vaginal area. PF was predominantly hypoactive throughout the follow-up. Quality of life improved in both groups, but the reduction of constipation, vaginal dryness and stress urinary incontinence manifested only in the IG.

CONCLUSION

The use of VD did not alter the dimensions of the vaginal canal within the first 3 months after the end of radiotherapy treatment. However, there was a large sample loss during follow-up so studies with a larger sample number and longer follow-up time need to be conducted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03090217.