The hidden psychosocial impact of caregiving with chronic haematological cancers: A qualitative study

Examining psychosocial vulnerability in caregivers of individuals with a chronic haematological malignancy: A cross sectional survey

PURPOSE

To investigate psychosocial vulnerability in informal caregivers of chronic haematological cancer patients and determine the level of psychosocial vulnerability among carers of people living with a chronic haematological malignancy (CHM).

METHODS

An international cross - sectional study including caregivers of individuals with a chronic haematological cancer (n = 64) from Ireland (n = 29), Australia (n = 21), the UK (n = 4), the USA (n = 4), and India (n = 6). Caregivers completed scales for loneliness, resilience, stress and caregiver strain using the UCLA Loneliness scale, Brief Resilience scale, Perceived Stress scale and Modified Caregiver Strain Index scale. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric techniques were used.

RESULTS

The results show that younger carers (aged between 18 and 40) report higher levels of loneliness, stress and caregiver strain. Carers who have left their paid employment due to caregiving and are in receipt of carers' allowance or social welfare report high levels of loneliness and caregiver strain. Lower stress levels were reported in those who received paid professional caring support. Finally, higher levels of loneliness in carers were associated with the patient currently being on some form of treatment and higher levels of caregiver strain were associated with caring for someone for more than 8 h per day and having all social, mental, and financial areas of life affected.

CONCLUSION

Caregivers of patients with chronic haematological cancers experience psychosocial vulnerability, which is associated with their age, socioeconomic status, gender and health and wellbeing.

Indolent lymphoma: addressing the needs of survivors

Over the past two decades, there has been a continuous improvement in outcome for patients with indolent lymphoma (iNHL) resulting in a gradual accumulation of survivors. While life expectancy in the current era approaches that of the lymphoma-free population, patients continue to experience lifelong complications of the disease and its treatment affecting general health, emotional, psychological and social wellbeing, relationships, employment, finances, and fitness. Contemporary care models while suited to the management of lymphoma are often lacking when it comes to identification and management of these additional needs. Given improvements in physical survival achieved over the past decades, it is timely for us to focus on other issues affecting patient wellbeing including immunodeficiency and infection, second cancers, cardiovascular disease, bone health, psychological wellbeing, and sexual health. Many of these aspects are in the domain of the primary care physician; however, there is limited guidance on how these issues should be addressed. It is now time for us to engage our patients, their caregivers, and other healthcare providers in care aspects beyond the lymphoma diagnosis, so they can anticipate a rich and full life, free from both direct and indirect consequences of the lymphoma diagnosis.

Family Caregiver Experiences in the Inpatient and Outpatient Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Settings: A Qualitative Study

Caregivers (ie, family and friends) are essential in providing care and support for patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and throughout their recovery. Traditionally delivered in the hospital, HCT is being increasingly provided in the outpatient setting, potentially heightening the burden on caregivers. Extensive work has examined the inpatient HCT caregiving experience, yet little is known about how caregiver experiences may differ based on whether the HCT was delivered on an inpatient or outpatient basis, particularly during the acute recovery period post-HCT. This study explored the similarities and differences in caregiver experiences in the inpatient and outpatient settings during the early recovery from reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT. We conducted semistructured interviews (n = 15) with caregivers of adults undergoing RIC allogeneic HCT as either an inpatient (n = 7) or an outpatient (n = 8). We recruited caregivers using purposeful criterion sampling, based on the HCT setting, until thematic saturation occurred. Interview recordings were transcribed and coded through thematic analysis using Dedoose v.9.0. The study analysis was guided by the transactional model of stress and coping and the model of adaptation of family caregivers during the acute phase of BMT. Three themes emerged to describe similar experiences for HCT caregivers regardless of setting: (1) caregivers reported feeling like they were a necessary yet invisible part of the care team; (2) caregivers described learning to adapt to changing situations and varying patient needs; and (3) caregivers recounted how the uncertainty following HCT felt like existing between life and death while also maintaining a sense of gratitude and hope for the future. Caregivers also reported distinct experiences based on the transplantation setting and 4 themes emerged: (1) disrupted routines: inpatient caregivers reported disrupted routines when caring for the HCT recipient while simultaneously trying to manage non-caregiving responsibilities at home and work, and outpatient caregivers reported having to establish new routines that included frequent clinic visits with the patient while altering or pausing home and work responsibilities; (2) timing of caregiver involvement: inpatient caregivers felt more involved in care after the patient was discharged from the HCT hospitalization, whereas outpatient caregivers were already providing the majority of care earlier in the post-transplantation period; (3) fear of missing vital information: inpatient caregivers worried about missing vital information about the patient's care and progress if not physically present in the hospital, whereas outpatient caregivers feared overlooking vital information that may warrant contacting the care team as they monitored the patient at home; and (4) perceived adequacy of resources to meet psychosocial and practical needs: inpatient caregivers reported having adequate access to resources (ie, hospital-based services), whereas outpatient caregivers felt they had more limited access and needed to be resourceful in seeking out assistance. Inpatient and outpatient HCT caregivers described both similar and distinct experiences during the acute recovery period post-HCT. Specific interventions should address caregiver psychosocial needs (ie, distress, illness uncertainty, communication, and coping) and practical needs (ie, community resource referral, preparedness for home-based caregiving, and transplantation education) of HCT caregivers based on setting.