Action of prostanoids on the emetic reflex of Suncus murinus (the house musk shrew)

An assessment of the effects of neurokinin1 receptor antagonism against nausea and vomiting: Relative efficacy, sites of action and lessons for future drug development

A broad-spectrum anti-vomiting effect of neurokinin1 receptor antagonists (NK1 RA), shown in pre-clinical animal studies, has been supported by a more limited range of clinical studies in different indications. However, this review suggests that compared with vomiting, the self-reported sensation of nausea is less affected or possibly unaffected (depending on the stimulus) by NK1 receptor antagonism, a common finding for anti-emetics. The stimulus-independent effects of NK1 RAs against vomiting are explicable by actions within the central pattern generator (ventral brainstem) and the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS; dorsal brainstem), with additional effects on vagal afferent activity for certain stimuli (e.g., highly emetogenic chemotherapy). The central pattern generator and NTS neurones are multifunctional so the notable lack of obvious effects of NK1 RAs on other reflexes mediated by the same neurones suggests that their anti-vomiting action is dependent on the activation state of the pathway leading to vomiting. Nausea requires activation of cerebral pathways by projection of information from the NTS. Although NK1 receptors are present in cerebral nuclei implicated in nausea, and imaging studies show very high receptor occupancy at clinically used doses, the variable or limited ability of NK1 RAs to inhibit nausea emphasizes: (i) our inadequate understanding of the mechanisms of nausea; and (ii) that classification of a drug as an anti-emetic may give a false impression of efficacy against nausea vs. vomiting. We discuss the potential mechanisms for the differential efficacy of NK1 RA and the implications for future development of drugs that can effectively treat nausea, an area of unmet clinical need.

Mechanisms of Nausea and Vomiting: Current Knowledge and Recent Advances in Intracellular Emetic Signaling Systems

Nausea and vomiting are common gastrointestinal complaints that can be triggered by diverse emetic stimuli through central and/or peripheral nervous systems. Both nausea and vomiting are considered as defense mechanisms when threatening toxins/drugs/bacteria/viruses/fungi enter the body either via the enteral (e.g., the gastrointestinal tract) or parenteral routes, including the blood, skin, and respiratory systems. While vomiting is the act of forceful removal of gastrointestinal contents, nausea is believed to be a subjective sensation that is more difficult to study in nonhuman species. In this review, the authors discuss the anatomical structures, neurotransmitters/mediators, and corresponding receptors, as well as intracellular emetic signaling pathways involved in the processes of nausea and vomiting in diverse animal models as well as humans. While blockade of emetic receptors in the prevention of vomiting is fairly well understood, the potential of new classes of antiemetics altering postreceptor signal transduction mechanisms is currently evolving, which is also reviewed. Finally, future directions within the field will be discussed in terms of important questions that remain to be resolved and advances in technology that may help provide potential answers.

The anti-asthmatic drug pranlukast suppresses the delayed-phase vomiting and reverses intracellular indices of emesis evoked by cisplatin in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva)

The introduction of second generation serotonin 5-HT₃ receptor (5-HT₃) antagonist palonosetron combined with long-acting substance P neurokinin NK₁ receptor (NK₁) antagonists (e.g. netupitant) has substantially improved antiemetic therapy against early- and delayed-phases of emesis caused by highly emetogenic chemotherapeutics such as cisplatin. However, the improved efficacy comes at a cost that many patients cannot afford. We introduce a new class of antiemetic, the antiasthmatic leukotriene CysLT1 receptor antagonist pranlukast for the suppression of cisplatin-evoked vomiting. Pranlukast (10mg/kg) by itself significantly reduced the mean frequency of vomits (70%) and fully protected least shrews from vomiting (46%) during the delayed-phase of cisplatin (10mg/kg)-evoked vomiting. Although, pranlukast tended to substantially reduce both the mean frequency of vomits and the number of shrews vomiting during the early-phase, these reductions failed to attain significance. When combined with a first (tropisetron)- or a second (palonosetron)-generation 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist, pranlukast potentiated their antiemetic efficacy during both phases of vomiting. In addition, pranlukast by itself prevented several intracellular signal markers of cisplatin-evoked delayed-vomiting such as phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and PKA. When pranlukast was combined with either palonosetron or tropisetron, these combinations suppressed the evoked phosphorylation of: i) ERK1/2 during both acute- and delayed-phase, ii) PKCα/β at the peak acute-phase, and iii) PKA at the peak delayed-phase. The current and our published findings suggest that overall behavioral and intracellular signaling effects of pranlukast via blockade of CysLT1 receptors generally appear to be similar to the NK₁ receptor antagonist netupitant with some differences.

Delineation of vagal emetic pathways: intragastric copper sulfate-induced emesis and viral tract tracing in musk shrews

Signals from the vestibular system, area postrema, and forebrain elicit nausea and vomiting, but gastrointestinal (GI) vagal afferent input arguably plays the most prominent role in defense against food poisoning. It is difficult to determine the contribution of GI vagal afferent input on emesis because various agents (e.g., chemotherapy) often act on multiple sensory pathways. Intragastric copper sulfate (CuSO4) potentially provides a specific vagal emetic stimulus, but its actions are not well defined in musk shrews (Suncus murinus), a primary small animal model used to study emesis. The aims of the current study were 1) to investigate the effects of subdiaphragmatic vagotomy on CuSO4-induced emesis and 2) to conduct preliminary transneuronal tracing of the GI-brain pathways in musk shrews. Vagotomy failed to inhibit the number of emetic episodes produced by optimal emetic doses of CuSO4 (60 and 120 mg/kg ig), but the effects of lower doses were dependent on an intact vagus (20 and 40 mg/kg). Vagotomy also failed to affect emesis produced by motion (1 Hz, 10 min) or nicotine administration (5 mg/kg sc). Anterograde transport of the H129 strain of herpes simplex virus-1 from the ventral stomach wall identified the following brain regions as receiving inputs from vagal afferents: the nucleus of the solitary tract, area postrema, and lateral parabrachial nucleus. These data indicate that the contribution of vagal pathways to intragastric CuSO4-induced emesis is dose dependent in musk shrews. Furthermore, the current neural tracing data suggest brain stem anatomical circuits that are activated by GI signaling in the musk shrew.

Investigating the effect of emetic compounds on chemotaxis in Dictyostelium identifies a non-sentient model for bitter and hot tastant research

Novel chemical entities (NCEs) may be investigated for emetic liability in a range of unpleasant experiments involving retching, vomiting or conditioned taste aversion/food avoidance in sentient animals. We have used a range of compounds with known emetic /aversive properties to examine the possibility of using the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum, for research into identifying and understanding emetic liability, and hence reduce adverse animal experimentation in this area. Twenty eight emetic or taste aversive compounds were employed to investigate the acute (10 min) effect of compounds on Dictyostelium cell behaviour (shape, speed and direction of movement) in a shallow chemotaxic gradient (Dunn chamber). Compound concentrations were chosen based on those previously reported to be emetic or aversive in in vivo studies and results were recorded and quantified by automated image analysis. Dictyostelium cell motility was rapidly and strongly inhibited by four structurally distinct tastants (three bitter tasting compounds--denatonium benzoate, quinine hydrochloride, phenylthiourea, and the pungent constituent of chilli peppers--capsaicin). In addition, stomach irritants (copper chloride and copper sulphate), and a phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor also rapidly blocked movement. A concentration-dependant relationship was established for five of these compounds, showing potency of inhibition as capsaicin (IC(50) = 11.9 ± 4.0 µM) > quinine hydrochloride (IC(50) = 44.3 ± 6.8 µM) > denatonium benzoate (IC(50) = 129 ± 4 µM) > phenylthiourea (IC(50) = 366 ± 5 µM) > copper sulphate (IC(50) = 1433 ± 3 µM). In contrast, 21 compounds within the cytotoxic and receptor agonist/antagonist classes did not affect cell behaviour. Further analysis of bitter and pungent compounds showed that the effect on cell behaviour was reversible and not cytotoxic, suggesting an uncharacterised molecular mechanism of action for these compounds. These results therefore demonstrate that Dictyostelium has potential as a non-sentient model in the analysis of the molecular effects of tastants, although it has limited utility in identification of emetic agents in general.

Discrepancy between strong cephalic arterial dilatation and mild headache caused by prostaglandin D2 (PGD2)

Introduction: Prostaglandins (PGs) are involved in nociception and mast cell degranulation. Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) is a vasodilatator released during mast cell degranulation. The headache-eliciting effect of PGD2 has not been studied in man.

Subjects and methods: Twelve healthy volunteers were randomly allocated to receive intravenous infusion of 384 ng/kg/min PGD2 over 25 min in a placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study. We recorded headache intensity and associated symptoms, velocity in the middle cerebral artery (VMCA) and diameter of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and radial artery (RA) using ultrasonography.

Results: In the period 0–14 h, 11 subjects reported headache on PGD2 compared to one subject on placebo ( P = 0.002). During the in-hospital phase (0–120 min), the area under the headache curve was larger on PGD2 compared to placebo ( P < 0.05). Median peak headache, 1 (0–1), occurred 10 min after start of PGD2 infusion. There was no difference in incidence of headache in the post-hospital phase between PGD2 ( n = 3) and placebo ( n = 1). There was a decrease in VMCA ( P < 0.001), increase in STA ( P < 0.001) and RA ( P < 0.006) diameter during PGD2 infusion compared to placebo. Peak decrease in VMCA was 28.3% after 10 min and peak increase in STA was 55.7% after 20 min on the PGD2 day. Conclusions: The present study shows that PGD2 is a very strong vasodilator of MCA, STA and RA, but causes only mild headache.

Pranlukast prevents cysteinyl leukotriene-induced emesis in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva)

Many chemotherapeutic agents activate multiple signaling systems, including potentially emetogenic arachidonic acid metabolites. Of these messengers, the emetic role of the leukotriene family has been neglected. The aims of this study were to test the emetic potential of key leukotrienes (LTA(4), LTB(4), LTF(4), and the cysteinyl leukotrienes LTC(4), LTD(4) and LTE(4)), and to investigate whether the leukotriene CysLT(1) receptor antagonist pranlukast or mixed leukotriene CysLT(1/2) receptor antagonist Bay u9773 can prevent the LTC(4)-induced emesis. Least shrews were injected with varying doses of one of the six tested leukotrienes and vomiting parameters were measured for 30min. LTC(4) and LTD(4) were most efficacious, and significantly increased both the frequency and percentage of animals vomiting at doses from 0.1 and 0.05mg/kg, respectively. The other tested leukotrienes were either weakly emetic or ineffective at doses up to 4mg/kg. The relative emetogenic activities of the cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC(4)=LTD(4)>LTE(4)) suggest that leukotriene CysLT(2) receptors have a key role in emesis. However, pranlukast dose-dependently, and at 10mg/kg completely, blocked LTC(4)-induced vomiting, implicating a leukotriene CysLT(1) receptor-mediated emetic effect. Bay u9773 dose-dependently reduced the percentage of animals vomiting, but did not significantly reduce vomiting frequency. Fos immunoreactivity, measured subsequent to LTC(4)-induced vomiting to define its putative anatomical substrates, was significantly increased in the enteric nervous system and medullary dorsal vagal complex following LTC(4) (P<0.05) versus vehicle injections. This study is the first to show that some leukotrienes induce emesis, possibly involving both central and peripheral leukotriene CysLT(1) and/or leukotriene CysLT(2) receptors.

Mechanism of the prostanoid TP receptor agonist U46619 for inducing emesis in the ferret

U46619 is a potent thromboxane A(2) mimetic with emesis-inducing actions that are mediated via prostanoid TP receptors. We investigated its emetic mechanism of action in more detail using the ferret as model animal. The emesis induced by U46619 (30 microg/kg, intraperitoneal) was antagonized significantly by (+)-(2S,3S)-3-(2-methoxybenzylamino)-2-phenylpiperidine hydrochloride (CP-99,994; 1 and 10 mg/kg; P < 0.05) and metoclopramide (0.3 and 3 mg/kg), but not by domperidone (3 mg/kg), sulpiride (0.1 mg/kg), ondansetron (0.1 and 1 mg/kg) alone or combined with droperidol (3 mg/kg), GR125487 (1 mg/kg), promethazine (3 mg/kg), or scopolamine (3 mg/kg); GR 125487 (1 mg/kg) prevented the anti-emetic action of metoclopramide (3 mg/kg). U46619 0.3 microg administered into the fourth ventricle rapidly induced emesis. However, bilateral abdominal vagotomy was ineffective in reducing the emetic response (P > 0.05). Our data suggests that U46619 induces emesis via an extra-abdominal mechanism, probably within the brain. Metoclopramide probably has a mechanism of action to prevent U46619-induced emesis via 5-HT(4) receptor activation and NK(1) tachykinin receptor antagonists could be useful to prevent emesis induced by TP receptor activation in man.

Evaluation of the anti-emetic potential of anti-migraine drugs to prevent resiniferatoxin-induced emesis in Suncus murinus (house musk shrew)

Activation of vanilloid receptors has commonly been used to facilitate neurogenic inflammation and plasma exudation to model components of the pathogenesis of migraine; however, these studies have been performed mainly in species lacking the emetic reflex. In the present studies, therefore, we used Suncus murinus, a species of insectivore capable of emesis, to investigate if the vanilloid receptor agonist resiniferatoxin is capable of modeling the emesis associated with migraine. Resiniferatoxin (100 nmol/kg, s.c.) induced an emetic response that was antagonized significantly (P<0.05) by ruthenium red (1-3 micromol), (2R-trans)-4-[1-[3,5-bis(trifluromethyl)benzoyl]-2-(phenylmethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-1-acetamide (S)-hydroxybutanedioate (R116301; 10-100 micromol/kg), and scopolamine (1 micromol/kg), but not by dihydroergotamine (0.3-3 micromol/kg), sumatriptan (1-10 micromol/kg), methysergide (1-10 micromol/kg), tropanyl 3,5-dichlorobenzoate (MDL72222; 3-30 micromol/kg), ondansetron (0.3-3 micromol/kg), metoclopramide (3-30 micromol/kg), domperidone (3-30 micromol/kg), diphenhydramine (1-10 micromol/kg), or indomethacin (3-30 micromol/kg). The failure of a wide range of representative anti-migraine drugs to reduce retching and vomiting limits the use of this model to identify/investigate novel treatments for the emesis (and nausea) associated with migraine attacks in humans. However, the results provide further evidence for the involvement of a novel vanilloid receptor in resiniferatoxin-induced emesis and implicate both tachykinins and acetylcholine in the pathway(s) activated by resiniferatoxin in S. murinus.

Excitatory action of prostanoids on the ferret isolated vagus nerve preparation

We have investigated the actions of various prostanoid receptor agonists on an isolated preparation of the ferret cervical vagus using a grease-gap extracellular recording technique. The potency ranking for depolarization was BW245C (5-(6-carboxyhexyl)-1-(3-cyclohexyl-3-hydroxypropyl) hydantoin; DP-selective, EC50=0.14 microM)>prostaglandin E2 (nonselective EP agonist)>U-46619 (11alpha, 9alpha-epoxymethano-15S-hydroxyprosta-5Z,13E-dienoic acid; TP agonist)>prostaglandin F2alpha (FP receptor agonist). Sulprostone (EP1/EP3-selective), fluprostenol (FP-selective) and cicaprost and iloprost (both IP-selective) had minimal effects. It is likely that DP, EP2/EP4 and TP receptors are present on the vagal fibres of the ferret.

Emetic action of the prostanoid TP receptor agonist, U46619, in Suncus murinus (house musk shrew)

The emetic action of the prostanoid TP receptor agonist, 11alpha,9alpha-epoxymethano-15S-hydroxyprosta-5Z,13E-dienoic acid (U46619; 300 microg/kg, i.p.), was investigated in Suncus murinus. The emetic response was reduced by 76% following bilateral abdominal vagotomy (P<0.001) and by reserpine (5 mg/kg, i.p., 24 h pretreatment; P<0.05) but U46619 administered i.c.v. (30-300 ng) was not emetic, suggesting a peripheral mechanism involving monoamines. However, fenfluramine (5 mg/kg, repeated treatment) and para-chlorophenylalanine (100-400 mg/kg) and ondansetron (0.3-3 mg/kg) were inactive (P>0.05) to reduce U46619-induced emesis precluding a role of 5-HT and 5-HT(3) receptors in the mechanism. Similarly, phentolamine (0.3-3 mg/kg), propranolol (3 mg/kg), and their combination, and metoclopramide (0.3-3 mg/kg), domperidone (0.3-3 mg/kg), droperidol (0.3-3 mg/kg), scopolamine (0.3-3 mg/kg) and promethazine (0.3-3 mg/kg) were inactive (P>0.05) to reduce the retching and vomiting response. However, the tachykinin NK(1) receptor antagonist, (+)-2S,3S(-3-(2-methoxy-5-trifluoromethoxybenzyl)amino-2-phenylpiperidine) (CP-122,721; 1-10 mg/kg) antagonized emesis (P<0.01). In conclusion, U46619-induced emesis appears to be mediated via a predominant peripheral mechanism sensitive to reserpine and is not likely to involve adrenoceptors, dopamine, 5-HT(3), muscarinic or histamine (H(1)) receptors. The action of CP-122,721 to reduce U46619-induced emesis extends the spectrum of anti-emetic action tachykinin NK(1) receptor antagonists to mechanisms involving TP receptors.