Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of aminophylline and topiramate in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure model

Interactions of antiepileptic drugs with drugs approved for the treatment of indications other than epilepsy

Introduction: Comorbidities of epilepsy may significantly interfere with its treatment as diseases in the general population are also encountered in epilepsy patients and some of them even more frequently (for instance, depression, anxiety, or heart disease). Obviously, some drugs approved for other than epilepsy indications can modify the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptics. Areas covered: This review highlights the drug-drug interactions between antiepileptics and aminophylline, some antidepressant, antiarrhythmic (class I-IV), selected antihypertensive drugs and non-barbiturate injectable anesthetics (ketamine, propofol, etomidate, and alphaxalone). The data were reviewed mainly from experimental models of seizures. Whenever possible, clinical data were provided. PUBMED data base was the main search source.Expert opinion: Aminophylline generally reduced the protective activity of antiepileptics, which, to a certain degree, was consistent with scarce clinical data on methylxanthine derivatives and worse seizure control. The only antiarrhythmic with this profile of action was mexiletine when co-administered with VPA. Among antidepressants and non-barbiturate injectable anesthetics, trazodone, mianserin and etomidate or alphaxalone, respectively, negatively affected the anticonvulsant action of some antiepileptic drugs. Clinical data indicate that only amoxapine, bupropion, clomipramine and maprotiline should be used with caution. Possibly, drugs reducing the anticonvulsant potential of antiepileptics should be avoided in epilepsy patients.

Recent synthetic and medicinal perspectives of dihydropyrimidinones: A review

Dihydropyrimidines are the most important heterocyclic ring systems which play an important role in the synthesis of DNA and RNA. Synthetically they were synthesized using Multi-component reactions like Biginelli reaction and Hantzschdihydropyridine. In the past decades, such Biginelli type dihydropyrimidones have received a considerable amount of attention due to the interesting pharmacological properties associated with this heterocyclic scaffold. In this review, we highlight recent developments in this area, with a focus on the DHPMs, recently developed as anti-inflammatory, anti-HIV, anti-tubercular, antifungal anticancer, antibacterial, antifilarial, antihyperglycemic, antihypertensive, analgesic, anti-convulsant, antioxidant, anti-TRPA1, anti-SARS, and anti-cancer activity and α_1a binding affinity.

•

This review is focused on synthetic prospective of dihydropyrimidinones.

•

This review is also focused on medicinal prospective of dihydropyrimidinones.

•

It includes structure-activity relationship study of different activities.

USL255 extended-release topiramate for the treatment of epilepsy

USL255 is a once-daily, extended-release formulation of the well-established antiepileptic drug topiramate that was recently approved by the US FDA. As a capsule formulation, USL255 can be swallowed intact or opened and sprinkled onto soft food for patients with swallowing difficulties, including children (≥2 years old) and older patients. USL255 has been evaluated in seven key Phase I and III studies. Compared with immediate-release topiramate taken twice daily, once-daily USL255 provides equivalent topiramate exposure with a 26% reduction in plasma fluctuations. A multinational, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures (PREVAIL) demonstrated that USL255 (200 mg/day) significantly improved seizure control and clinical outcomes versus placebo. USL255 is generally safe and well-tolerated, with a low incidence of neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive adverse events. These data suggest that USL255 may provide a useful treatment option for seizure control with convenient once-daily dosing.

Impact of aminophylline on the pharmacodynamics of propofol in beagle dogs

This study aimed to characterize pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and aminophylline. Nine beagle dogs were randomly allocated at the propofol rates of 0.75 (group A), 1.00 (group B), and 1.25 (group C) mg/kg/min. During period 1, propofol only was infused, while during period 2, aminophylline only, at the rate of 0.69 (group A), 1.37 (group B), and 2.62 (group C) mg/kg/h. During periods 3-5, the two drugs were co-administered. The aminophylline infusion rate was 0.69 (period 3), 1.37 (period 4), and 2.62 (period 5) mg/kg/h. The aminophylline was infused from 0 to 30 h, and the propofol was infused at 24 h for 20 min. Blood samples and electroencephalograms were obtained at preset intervals. In the linear regression between log-transformed doses of aminophylline and AUC inf, the slope was 0.6976 (95% CI 0.5242-0.8710). Pharmacokinetics of aminophylline was best described by a one-compartment, with enzyme auto-induction, model. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol were best described by a three-compartment model and a sigmoid Emax model, respectively. Pharmacodynamic parameter estimates of propofol were: k(e0) = 0.805/min, E0 = 0.76, Emax = 0.398, Ce(50 na) = 2.38 μg/mL (without aminophylline-exposure), C(e50 wa) = 4.49 μg/mL (with aminophylline-exposure), and γ = 2.21. Propofol becomes less potent when exposed to aminophylline. Pharmacodynamic antagonistic interaction of aminophylline with propofol sedation, may occur, not in a dose-dependent manner, but in an all-or-none response.

Influence of aminophylline on the anticonvulsive action of gabapentin in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure threshold model

Accumulating evidence indicates that aminophylline [theophylline(2) x ethylenediamine] markedly attenuates the anticonvulsant action of conventional antiepileptic drugs in experimental animal models of epilepsy and evokes severe seizure activity in patients treated with this methylxanthine. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of acute (single) and chronic (twice daily for 14 consecutive days) treatments with aminophylline on the anticonvulsant potential of gabapentin (a second-generation antiepileptic drug) in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure threshold model. Additionally, the effects of acute and chronic administration of aminophylline on the adverse effect potential of gabapentin in terms of motor coordination impairment were assessed in the chimney test. To evaluate pharmacokinetic characteristics of interaction between drugs, total brain concentrations of gabapentin and theophylline were estimated with high-pressure liquid chromatography and fluorescence polarization immunoassay, respectively. Results indicated that gabapentin (at doses of 75 and 100 mg/kg, i.p.) increased the threshold for electroconvulsions in mice. Aminophylline in non-convulsive doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg (i.p.), both in acute and chronic experiments, did not attenuate the anticonvulsant potential of gabapentin in the maximal electroshock seizure threshold test in mice. Similarly, aminophylline at a dose of 100 mg/kg had no impact on the adverse effect potential of gabapentin in the chimney test. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of total brain concentrations of gabapentin and theophylline revealed no significant changes in total brain concentrations of the drugs after both, acute and chronic applications of aminophylline in combination with gabapentin. The data show that aminophylline did not alter the ability of gabapentin to protect mice against seizures induced by electroconvulsive shock. The observed interaction between gabapentin and aminophylline in both acute and chronic experiments was pharmacodynamic in nature.