Lafutidine, a unique histamine H2-receptor antagonist, inhibits distention-induced gastric acid secretion through an H2 receptor-independent mechanism

Research on drug treatment and the novel signaling pathway of chronic atrophic gastritis

BACKGROUND

Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is a global digestive system disease and one of the important causes of gastric cancer. The incidence of CAG has been increasing yearly worldwide.

PURPOSE

This article reviews the latest research on the common causes and future therapeutic targets of CAG as well as the pharmacological effects of corresponding clinical drugs. We provide a detailed theoretical basis for further research on possible methods for the treatment of CAG and reversal of the CAG process.

RESULTS

CAG often develops from chronic gastritis, and its main pathological manifestation is atrophy of the gastric mucosa, which can develop into gastric cancer. The drug treatment of CAG can be divided into agents that regulate gastric acid secretion, eradicate Helicobacter. pylori (H. pylori), protect gastric mucous membrane, or inhibit inflammatory factors according to their mechanism of action. Although there are limited specific drugs for the treatment of CAG, progress is being made in defining the pathogenesis and therapeutic targets of the disease. Growing evidence shows that NF-κB, PI3K/AKT, Wnt/ β-catenin, MAPK, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), Hedgehog, and VEGF signaling pathways play an important role in the development of CAG.

Research Progress for Probiotics Regulating Intestinal Flora to Improve Functional Dyspepsia: A Review

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder. The pathophysiology remains poorly understood; however, alterations in the small intestinal microbiome have been observed. Current treatments for FD with drugs are limited, and there are certain safety problems. A class of active probiotic bacteria can control gastrointestinal homeostasis, nutritional digestion and absorption, and the energy balance when taken in certain dosages. Probiotics play many roles in maintaining intestinal microecological balance, improving the intestinal barrier function, and regulating the immune response. The presence and composition of intestinal microorganisms play a vital role in the onset and progression of FD and serve as a critical factor for both regulation and potential intervention regarding the management of this condition. Thus, there are potential advantages to alleviating FD by regulating the intestinal flora using probiotics, targeting intestinal microorganisms. This review summarizes the research progress of probiotics regarding improving FD by regulating intestinal flora and provides a reference basis for probiotics to improve FD.

Comprehensive insights into the multifaceted roles of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 channel in the digestive system

The transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) channel, a family of calcium transporters comprising six distinct members (TRPV1-6), takes on a paramount role in maintaining intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis in mammalian cells. Notably, TRPV1, among its counterparts, has emerged as the subject of extensive scrutiny, owing to its pervasive presence in diverse cellular, tissue, and organ settings. This ubiquitous distribution underscores its fundamental involvement in the genesis of pain, making it a central focus in pain-related research. However, recent investigations have unveiled that TRPV1's functional significance transcends the realm of pain modulation, extending its influence to encompass a wide spectrum of physiological and pathological processes. The ambit of TRPV1's influence encompasses not only pain responses but also embraces the intricate domains of nervous system disorders, cancer metastasis, as well as afflictions pertaining to the skin and heart. Moreover, compelling evidence now demonstrates that TRPV1 also wields substantial sway in the domain of digestive diseases, further highlighting its versatility and far-reaching impact on human health. Therefore, this comprehensive review endeavors to delve into the multifaceted roles played by TRPV1 in the various organs constituting the digestive system.

A Comprehensive Review of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Treatment and its Clinical Perspectives

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs by regurgitation of food in the stomach. Aggressive factors increase GERD whereas defensive factors decrease GERD progression. GERD if mild can be put under control by lifestyle modification and giving non-pharmacological treatment methods to patients however if the disease progresses non-pharmacological methods are ineffective. Drugs reduce GERD progression and also maintain the pH of the stomach to a normal level and prevent abnormal acid exposure to the oesophagus. Antacids and alginate protect oesophagus by reducing acidity and increasing viscosity. Proton pump inhibitors and histamine 2 receptor antagonists reduce acid secretion by inhibiting its secretion. Prokinetic agents increase the motility of the stomach and reduce obesity. Metabotropic glutamate receptors, gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor agonists, and cannabinoid receptors are receptor-specific drugs that act on receptors underlying the gastrointestinal tract and alter the function of receptors which increases reflux disease. Combination of antacid and alginate, domperidone and omeprazole, omeprazole and baclofen, aluminum hydroxide, magnesium, and simethicone are frequently given in GERD to expedite the healing rate and reduce acid secretion. Combinations of suitable medications reduce the adverse effects of a single medication and also make it therapeutically more effective than using monotherapy drugs. The pharmacological method is safe and effective and treats GERD completely.

Effects of pirenzepine on vonoprazan-induced gastric acid inhibition and hypergastrinemia

BACKGROUND

Compared to proton pump inhibitors, vonoprazan exerts a greater inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion and is useful for treating acid-related diseases, such as gastro-esophageal reflux disease. However, there is a problem that vonoprazan causes hypergastrinemia, which confers a risk of carcinoid tumor. A previous report demonstrated that pirenzepine, an M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist, enhances the acid inhibitory effects while suppressing hypergastrinemia induced by omeprazole. Here, we examined whether pirenzepine enhances the gastric acid inhibitory effects of vonoprazan without further increasing serum gastrin levels.

METHODS

Eleven healthy volunteers were subjected to 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin measurements on day 7 of three different regimens: pirenzepine 75 mg alone, vonoprazan 10 mg alone, and vonoprazan 10 mg plus pirenzepine 75 mg administered in a randomized crossover fashion.

RESULTS

Median pH 4 holding time ratios (range) achieved with pirenzepine 75 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg, and vonoprazan 10 mg plus pirenzepine 75 mg were 6.9% (2.4-32.8%), 88.4% (54.6-100%), and 84.2% (40.3-100%), respectively. Respective serum gastrin levels were 79 (75-210) pg/ml, 310 (110-870) pg/ml, and 170 (140-930) pg/ml. In cases with hypergastrinemia (gastrin ≥ 200 pg/ml) induced by vonoprazan 10 mg alone, concomitant treatment with pirenzepine significantly reduced serum gastrin levels from 370 to 180 pg/ml (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Although pirenzepine does not enhance acid inhibition, it does improve hypergastrinemia induced by vonoprazan to some extent.

Regioselective Pd-catalyzed α-alkylation of furans using alkyl iodides

A practical and regioselective strategy to synthesize α-alkylfurans via Pd-catalyzed direct C–H alkylation using alkyl iodides was developed.

Repurposing Known Drugs as Covalent and Non-covalent Inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 Papain-Like Protease

In the absence of an approved vaccine, developing effective severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antivirals is essential to tackle the current pandemic health crisis due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread. As any traditional drug discovery program is a time-consuming and costly process requiring more than one decade to be completed, in silico repurposing of existing drugs is the preferred way for rapidly selecting promising clinical candidates. We present a virtual screening campaign to identify covalent and non-covalent inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLpro) showing potential multitarget activities (i.e., a desirable polypharmacology profile) for the COVID-19 treatment. A dataset including 688 phase III and 1,702 phase IV clinical trial drugs was downloaded from ChEMBL (version 27.1) and docked to the recently released crystal structure of PLpro in complex with a covalently bound peptide inhibitor. The obtained results were analyzed by combining protein-ligand interaction fingerprint similarities, conventional docking scores, and MM-GBSA-binding free energies and allowed the identification of some interesting candidates for further in vitro testing. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to repurpose drugs for a covalent inhibition of PLpro and could pave the way for new therapeutic strategies against COVID-19.

Comparison of effect of an increased dosage of vonoprazan versus vonoprazan plus lafutidine on gastric acid inhibition and serum gastrin

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, elicits potent acid inhibition and hypergastrinemia at a dose of 20 mg. Its recommended maintenance dose for gastro-esophageal reflux disease is 10 mg, which is sometimes insufficient for preventing nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB). Concomitant use of a histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) is effective for NAB. However, further acid inhibition by addition of H2RA has concern of hypergastrinemia again. Lafutidine (H2RA) is known to stimulate somatostatin release.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to compare the levels of acid inhibition and serum gastrin attained by addition of lafutidine to vonoprazan 10 mg with levels after a dose increase of vonoprazan from 10 to 20 mg.

METHODS

Thirteen healthy volunteers underwent 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin measurements on day 7 of three different regimens: vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg plus lafutidine 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg.

RESULTS

Median pH 4 holding time ratios (range) by vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg plus lafutidine 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg were 82% (47-88%), 88% (76-93%), and 99% (95-100%) while those at nighttime from 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. were 94% (29-100%), 100% (95-100%), and 100%, respectively. The incidences of NAB with vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan plus lafutidine, and vonoprazan 20 mg were 38, 8, and 0%, respectively. Respective serum gastrin levels were 420 (173-508), 323 (196-521), and 504 (400-812) pg/ml.

CONCLUSION

Addition of lafutidine 10 mg to vonoprazan 10 mg achieved sufficient acid inhibition, especially at nighttime, without further increase of serum gastrin levels.

Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The management of proton pump inhibitor-refractory GERD (rGERD) is a challenge in clinical practice. Since up to one-third of patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) are not satisfied with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, new drug development targeting different pathophysiologies of GERD is imperative. At present, no other drugs serve as a more potent acid suppression agent than PPIs. As an add-on therapy, histamine type-2 receptor antagonists, alginates, prokinetics and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation inhibitors have some impact on the subgroups of rGERD, but greater effectiveness and fewer adverse effects for widespread use are required. Visceral hypersensitivity also contributes to the perception of GERD symptoms, and neuromodulators including antidepressants play a role in this category. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring helps to distinguish functional heartburn from true GERD, and psychologic medication and cognitive behavior therapy are further therapy options instead of PPIs.

Efficacy of Lafutidine Versus Famotidine in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-inferiority Phase III Trial

BACKGROUND

There has been no study on the efficacy of lafutidine for patients with reflux esophagitis in Korea.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of a new-generation histamine-2 receptor antagonist, lafutidine, in comparison with famotidine in patients with reflux esophagitis.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial enrolling patients with erosive esophagitis. The efficacy and safety of 20 mg lafutidine (treatment group) were compared with those of 40 mg famotidine (control group) and 20 mg omeprazole (reference group). The primary endpoint was the complete healing rates of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy after 8 weeks of treatment. The non-inferiority margin was assumed to be -15 %.

RESULTS

The healing rates of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy after 8 weeks of treatment were 70.14 % (101/144) in the lafutidine, 63.45 % (92/145) in the famotidine, and 85.71 % (126/147) in the omeprazole group. The difference in healing rates between the lafutidine and famotidine groups was 6.69 % (95 % confidence interval = [-4.14 to 17.52]). In addition, lafutidine was superior to famotidine in clinical improvement (53.73 % vs. 39.55 %, P = 0.0200).

CONCLUSIONS

Lafutidine was non-inferior to famotidine in healing of reflux esophagitis. Lafutidine, however, was superior to famotidine in terms of symptom relief of reflux esophagitis.

Randomized controlled trial of effectiveness of lafutidine versus pantoprazole in uninvestigated dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES

Lafutidine is a new H2-blocker in India claimed to be more potent and effective than existing H2-blockers. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), by virtue of their mechanism of action, have greater efficacy than H2-blockers in gastric acid suppression. However, clinical trials comparing H2-blockers directly with PPIs are limited. We carried out a head-to-head comparison of the effectiveness of lafutidine versus the PPI pantoprazole in uninvestigated dyspepsia [CTRI/2013/12/004261].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, open label, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Ambulatory adult patients with dyspepsia, not yet subjected to endoscopy, were recruited if they had at least moderately severe symptoms, defined as a score of ≥ 4 on a 7-point Global Overall Symptom (GOS) Scale. Those with alarm features or significant comorbidity were excluded. Subjects received either once daily lafutidine 10 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg, orally, for 8 weeks. Reflux, dysmotility and pain scores were assessed by Modified Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (mFSSGERD), and quality of life (QoL) by SF-8 scale. The latter had physical and mental components summarized by physical component summary score (PCS) and a mental component summary score (MCS).

RESULTS

Of 122 patients enrolled, data of 57 on lafutidine and 60 on pantoprazole were analyzed. At 4 weeks, proportion of subjects responding (GOS score ≤ 2) in the two arms (lafutidine 45.61% vs. pantoprazole 48.33%, P = 0.854) or showing symptom resolution (GOS score ≤ 1) (lafutidine 12.28% vs. pantoprazole 5.00%; P = 0.197) were comparable. Similarly at 8 weeks, both responder (lafutidine 52.63% vs. pantoprazole 56.67%; P = 0.712) and symptom resolution proportions (lafutidine 33.33% vs. pantoprazole 30%; P = 0.843) were comparable. Total score on mFSSGERD scale, as well as all its three component scores, and PCS and MCS scores on QoL SF-8 scale showed improvement but no statistically significant difference between the two arms. Tolerability of both drugs was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Lafutidine is well-tolerated and there is no clinically worthwhile difference between the two drugs in the empirical treatment of uninvestigated dyspepsia.

Development and validation of stability-indicating UPLC method for the determination of lafutidine and its impurities in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form

Background

A simple and rapid stability-indicating, reversed phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) method was developed for the quantitative determination of lafutidine and its four potential impurities.

Results

Separation was achieved on Acquity BEH-shield RP18 UPLC column (3.0 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm) under the gradient mode of elution by using mobile phase A (0.02M diammonium hydrogen phosphate/acetonitrile, 80:20 v/v) and mobile phase B (0.02M diammonium hydrogen phosphate/acetonitrile, 30:70 v/v). The flow rate was maintained at 0.5 mL min−1. UV detection was carried out at 276 nm.

Conclusions

Stability-indicating capability of the developed method is established by analyzing forced degradation samples in which the spectral purity of lafutidine is ascertained along with the separation of degradation products from analyte peak. The developed UPLC method is validated as per International Conference on Harmonization guidelines with respect to system suitability, specificity, precision, sensitivity, accuracy, linearity, and robustness.

Possible involvement of host defense mechanism in the suppression of rat acute reflux esophagitis by the particular histamine H2 receptor antagonist lafutidine

AIMS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is considered to be caused primarily by gastric juice refluxed into the esophagus. Here, we investigated the possible involvement of host defense mechanisms in the development of acute reflux esophagitis using lafutidine, a histamine H(2) receptor antagonist (H(2)RA) with proven gastric mucosal protective effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ligation of both the pylorus and the forestomach of SD rats under anesthesia caused hemorrhagic lesions in the esophageal mucosa at 6 h. Lesion formation was significantly inhibited by treatment with H(2)RAs, including the conventional H(2)RAs famotidine and cimetidine as well as lafutidine. The maximum suppressive abilities of these agents were similar to that of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole. Interestingly, unlike famotidine, lafutidine at low doses significantly suppressed esophagitis without inhibiting gastric acid secretion. Note that neither lafutidine nor famotidine inhibited hexosamine output in gastric juice samples obtained 3 h after ligation. Additionally, the protective effect of lafutidine, but not of famotidine, was partly attenuated by the denervation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent nerves with a large dose of capsaicin.

CONCLUSION

The present results indicate that esophageal host-defense via capsaicin-sensitive afferent nerves may contribute to the therapeutic action of lafutidine.