Comparison of kinetic and pharmacological profiles of recombinant α1γ2L and α1β2γ2L GABAA receptors - A clue to the role of intersubunit interactions

Structure-function Studies of GABA (A) Receptors and Related computer-aided Studies

The γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA (A) receptor) is a membrane protein activated by the neurotransmitter GABA. Structurally, this major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor in the human central nervous system is a pentamer that can be built from a selection of 19 subunits consisting of α(1,2,3,4,5 or 6), β (1,2 or 3), γ (1,2 or 3), ρ (1,2 or 3), and δ, π, θ, and ε. This creates several possible pentameric arrangements, which also influence the pharmacological and physiological properties of the receptor. The complexity and heterogeneity of the receptors are further increased by the addition of short and long splice variants in several subunits and the existence of multiple allosteric binding sites and expansive ligands that can bind to the receptors. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the structure and function of the receptors is required to gain novel insights into the consequences of receptor dysfunction and subsequent drug development studies. Notably, advancements in computational-aided studies have facilitated the elucidation of residual interactions and exploring energy binding, which may otherwise be challenging to investigate. In this review, we aim to summarize the current understanding of the structure and function of GABA (A) receptors obtained from advancements in computational-aided applications.

Potentiation of the GABAAR reveals variable energetic contributions by etiocholanolone and propofol

The properties of a potentiator are typically evaluated by measuring its ability to enhance the magnitude of the control response. Analysis of the ability of drugs to potentiate responses from receptor channels takes place in the context of particular models to extract parameters for functional effects. In the often-used coagonist model, the agonist generating control activity and the potentiator enhancing the control activity make additive energetic contributions to stabilize the active state of the receptor. The energetic contributions are fixed and, once known, enable calculation of predicted receptor behavior at any concentration combination of agonist and potentiator. Here, we have examined the applicability of the coagonist model by measuring the relationship between the magnitude of receptor potentiation and the level of background activity. Ternary αβγ GABAA receptors were activated by GABA or the allosteric agonist propofol, or by a gain-of-function mutation, and etiocholanolone- or propofol-mediated potentiation of peak responses was measured. We show that the free energy change contributed by the modulators etiocholanolone or propofol is reduced at higher levels of control activity, thereby being in disagreement with basic principles of the coagonist model. Possible mechanisms underlying this discrepancy are discussed.

Mutation of valine 53 at the interface between extracellular and transmembrane domains of the β2 principal subunit affects the GABAA receptor gating

GABA_A receptors (gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors) are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels mediating inhibition in adult mammalian brains. Their static structure has been intensely studied in the past years but the underlying molecular activatory mechanisms remain obscure. The interface between extracellular and transmembrane domains has been recognized as a key player in the receptor gating. However, the role of the valine 53 in the β1-β2 loop of the principal subunit (β₂) remains controversial showing differences compared to homologous residues in some cys-loop counterparts such as nAChR. To address the role of the β₂V53 residue in the α₁β₂γ_2L receptor gating, we performed high resolution macroscopic and single-channel recordings. To explore underlying molecular mechanisms a variety of substituting amino acids were investigated: Glutamate and Lysine (different electric charge), Alanine (aliphatic, larger than Valine) and Histidine (same residue as in homologous α₁H55). We report that mutation of the β₂V53 residue results in alterations of nearly all gating transitions including opening/closing, preactivation and desensitization. A dramatic gating impairment was observed for glutamate substitution (β₂V53E) but β₂V53K mutation had a weak effect. The impact of histidine substitution was also small while β₂V53A markedly affected the receptor but to a smaller extent than β₂V53E. Considering available structures in desensitized and bicuculline blocked shut states we propose that strongly detrimental effect of β₂V53E mutation on receptor activation results from electrostatic interaction between the glutamate and β₂K274 on the loop M2-M3 which stabilizes the receptor in the shut state. We conclude that β₂V53 is strongly involved in mechanisms underlying the receptor gating.

α1 Proline 277 Residues Regulate GABAAR Gating through M2-M3 Loop Interaction in the Interface Region

Cys-loop receptors are a superfamily of transmembrane, pentameric receptors that play a crucial role in mammalian CNS signaling. Physiological activation of these receptors is typically initiated by neurotransmitter binding to the orthosteric binding site, located at the extracellular domain (ECD), which leads to the opening of the channel pore (gate) at the transmembrane domain (TMD). Whereas considerable knowledge on molecular mechanisms of Cys-loop receptor activation was gathered for the acetylcholine receptor, little is known with this respect about the GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR), which mediates cellular inhibition. Importantly, several static structures of GABA_AR were recently described, paving the way to more in-depth molecular functional studies. Moreover, it has been pointed out that the TMD-ECD interface region plays a crucial role in transduction of conformational changes from the ligand binding site to the channel gate. One of the interface structures implicated in this transduction process is the M2-M3 loop with a highly conserved proline (P277) residue. To address this issue specifically for α₁β₂γ_2L GABA_AR, we choose to substitute proline α₁P277 with amino acids with different physicochemical features such as electrostatic charge or their ability to change the loop flexibility. To address the functional impact of these mutations, we performed macroscopic and single-channel patch-clamp analyses together with modeling. Our findings revealed that mutation of α₁P277 weakly affected agonist binding but was critical for all transitions of GABA_AR gating: opening/closing, preactivation, and desensitization. In conclusion, we provide evidence that conservative α₁P277 at the interface is strongly involved in regulating the receptor gating.

Mutations at the M2 and M3 Transmembrane Helices of the GABAARs α1 and β2 Subunits Affect Primarily Late Gating Transitions Including Opening/Closing and Desensitization

GABA type A receptors (GABA_ARs) belong to the pentameric ligand-gated ion channel (pLGIC) family and play a crucial role in mediating inhibition in the adult mammalian brain. Recently, a major progress in determining the static structure of GABA_ARs was achieved, although precise molecular scenarios underlying conformational transitions remain unclear. The ligand binding sites (LBSs) are located at the extracellular domain (ECD), very distant from the receptor gate at the channel pore. GABA_AR gating is complex, comprising three major categories of transitions: openings/closings, preactivation, and desensitization. Interestingly, mutations at, e.g., the ligand binding site affect not only binding but often also more than one gating category, suggesting that structural determinants for distinct conformational transitions are shared. Gielen and co-workers (2015) proposed that the GABA_AR desensitization gate is located at the second and third transmembrane segment. However, studies of our and others’ groups indicated that other parts of the GABA_AR macromolecule might be involved in this process. In the present study, we asked how selected point mutations (β₂G254V, α₁G258V, α₁L300V, and β₂L296V) at the M2 and M3 transmembrane segments affect gating transitions of the α₁β₂γ₂ GABA_AR. Using high resolution macroscopic and single-channel recordings and analysis, we report that these substitutions, besides affecting desensitization, also profoundly altered openings/closings, having some minor effect on preactivation and agonist binding. Thus, the M2 and M3 segments primarily control late gating transitions of the receptor (desensitization, opening/closing), providing a further support for the concept of diffuse gating mechanisms for conformational transitions of GABA_AR.

α1 Subunit Histidine 55 at the Interface between Extracellular and Transmembrane Domains Affects Preactivation and Desensitization of the GABAA Receptor

The GABA_A receptor is a member of the Cys-loop family and plays a crucial role in the adult mammalian brain inhibition. Although the static structure of this receptor is emerging, the molecular mechanisms underlying its conformational transitions remain elusive. It is known that in the Cys-loop receptors, the interface between extracellular and transmembrane domains plays a key role in transmitting the “activation wave” down to the channel gate in the pore. It has been previously reported that histidine 55 (H55), located centrally at the interfacial β1−β2 loop of the α₁ subunit, is important in the receptor activation, but it is unknown which specific gating steps it is affecting. In the present study, we addressed this issue by taking advantage of the state-of-the-art macroscopic and single-channel recordings together with extensive modeling. Considering that H55 is known to affect the local electrostatic landscape and because it is neighbored by two negatively charged aspartates, a well conserved feature in the α subunits, we considered substitution with negative (E) and positive (K) residues. We found that these mutations markedly affected the receptor gating, altering primarily preactivation and desensitization transitions. Importantly, opposite effects were observed for these two mutations strongly suggesting involvement of electrostatic interactions. Single-channel recordings suggested also a minor effect on opening/closing transitions which did not depend on the electric charge of the substituting amino acid. Altogether, we demonstrate that H55 mutations affect primarily preactivation and desensitization most likely by influencing local electrostatic interactions at the receptor interface.

Interaction between GABAA receptor α1 and β2 subunits at the N-terminal peripheral regions is crucial for receptor binding and gating

Pentameric ligand gated ion channels (pLGICs) are crucial in electrochemical signaling but exact molecular mechanisms of their activation remain elusive. So far, major effort focused on the top-down molecular pathway between the ligand binding site and the channel gate. However, recent studies revealed that pLGIC activation is associated with coordinated subunit twisting in the membrane plane. This suggests a key role of intersubunit interactions but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Herein, we investigated a "peripheral" subunit interface region of GABA_A receptor where structural modeling indicated interaction between N-terminal α₁F14 and β₂F31 residues. Our experiments underscored a crucial role of this interaction in ligand binding and gating, especially preactivation and opening, showing that the intersubunit cross-talk taking place outside (above) the top-down pathway can be strongly involved in receptor activation. Thus, described here intersubunit interaction appears to operate across a particularly long distance, affecting vast portions of the macromolecule.

Mutations of α1F45 residue of GABAA receptor loop G reveal its involvement in agonist binding and channel opening/closing transitions

GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) mediate inhibitory neurotransmission in the mammalian brain. Recently, numerous GABA_AR static structures have been published, but the molecular mechanisms of receptor activation remain elusive. Loop G is a rigid β-strand belonging to an extensive β-sheet that spans the regions involved in GABA binding and the interdomain interface which is important in receptor gating. It has been reported that loop G participates in ligand binding and gating of GABA_ARs, however, it remains unclear which specific gating transitions are controlled by this loop. Analysis of macroscopic responses revealed that mutation at the α₁F45 residue (loop G midpoint) resulted in slower macroscopic desensitization and accelerated deactivation. Single-channel analysis revealed that these mutations also affected open and closed times distributions and reduced open probability. Kinetic modeling demonstrated that mutations affected primarily channel opening/closing and ligand binding with a minor effect on preactivation. Thus, α₁F45 residue, in spite of its localization close to binding site, affects late gating transitions. In silico structural analysis suggested an important role of α₁F45 residue in loop G stability and rigidity as well as in general structure of the binding site. We propose that the rigid β-sheet comprising loop G is well suited for long range communication within GABA_AR but this mechanism becomes impaired when α₁F45 is mutated. In conclusion, we demonstrate that loop G is crucial in controlling both binding and gating of GABA_ARs. These data shed new light on GABA_AR activation mechanism and may also be helpful in designing clinically relevant modulators.

Cation-chloride cotransporters and the polarity of GABA signalling in mouse hippocampal parvalbumin interneurons

KEY POINTS

Cation-chloride cotransporters (CCCs) play a critical role in controlling the efficacy and polarity of GABA_A receptor (GABA_A R)-mediated transmission in the brain, yet their expression and function in GABAergic interneurons has been overlooked. We compared the polarity of GABA signalling and the function of CCCs in mouse hippocampal pyramidal neurons and parvalbumin-expressing interneurons. Under resting conditions, GABA_A R activation was mostly depolarizing and yet inhibitory in both cell types. KCC2 blockade further depolarized the reversal potential of GABA_A R-mediated currents often above action potential threshold. However, during repetitive GABA_A R activation, the postsynaptic response declined independently of the ion flux direction or KCC2 function, suggesting intracellular chloride build-up is not responsible for this form of plasticity. Our data demonstrate similar mechanisms of chloride regulation in mouse hippocampal pyramidal neurons and parvalbumin interneurons.

ABSTRACT

Transmembrane chloride gradients govern the efficacy and polarity of GABA signalling in neurons and are usually maintained by the activity of cation-chloride cotransporters, such as KCC2 and NKCC1. Whereas their role is well established in cortical principal neurons, it remains poorly documented in GABAergic interneurons. We used complementary electrophysiological approaches to compare the effects of GABA_A receptor (GABA_A R) activation in adult mouse hippocampal parvalbumin interneurons (PV-INs) and pyramidal cells (PCs). Loose cell-attached, tight-seal and gramicidin-perforated patch recordings all show GABA_A R-mediated transmission is slightly depolarizing and yet inhibitory in both PV-INs and PCs. Focal GABA uncaging in whole-cell recordings reveal that KCC2 and NKCC1 are functional in both PV-INs and PCs but differentially contribute to transmembrane chloride gradients in their soma and dendrites. Blocking KCC2 function depolarizes the reversal potential of GABA_A R-mediated currents in PV-INs and PCs, often beyond firing threshold, showing KCC2 is essential to maintain the inhibitory effect of GABA_A Rs. Finally, we show that repetitive 10 Hz activation of GABA_A Rs in both PV-INs and PCs leads to a progressive decline of the postsynaptic response independently of the ion flux direction or KCC2 function. This suggests intraneuronal chloride build-up may not predominantly contribute to activity-dependent plasticity of GABAergic synapses in this frequency range. Altogether our data demonstrate similar mechanisms of chloride regulation in mouse hippocampal PV-INs and PCs and suggest KCC2 downregulation in the pathology may affect the valence of GABA signalling in both cell types.

GABAA Receptor β2E155 Residue Located at the Agonist-Binding Site Is Involved in the Receptor Gating

GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) play a crucial role in mediating inhibition in the adult brain. In spite of progress in describing (mainly) the static structures of this receptor, the molecular mechanisms underlying its activation remain unclear. It is known that in the α₁β₂γ_2L receptors, the mutation of the β₂E155 residue, at the orthosteric binding site, strongly impairs the receptor activation, but the molecular and kinetic mechanisms of this effect remain elusive. Herein, we investigated the impact of the β₂E155C mutation on binding and gating of the α₁β₂γ_2L receptor. To this end, we combined the macroscopic and single-channel analysis, the use of different agonists [GABA and muscimol (MSC)] and flurazepam (FLU) as a modulator. As expected, the β₂E155C mutation caused a vast right shift of the dose–response (for GABA and MSC) and, additionally, dramatic changes in the time course of current responses, indicative of alterations in gating. Mutated receptors showed reduced maximum open probability and enhanced receptor spontaneous activity. Model simulations for macroscopic currents revealed that the primary effect of the mutation was the downregulation of the preactivation (flipping) rate. Experiments with MSC and FLU further confirmed a reduction in the preactivation rate. Our single-channel analysis revealed the mutation impact mainly on the second component in the shut times distributions. Based on model simulations, this finding further confirms that this mutation affects mostly the preactivation transition, supporting thus the macroscopic data. Altogether, we provide new evidence that the β₂E155 residue is involved in both binding and gating (primarily preactivation).

The C loop at the orthosteric binding site is critically involved in GABAA receptor gating

GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) play a crucial role in mammalian adult brain inhibition. The dysfunction of GABAergic drive is related to such disorders as epilepsy, schizophrenia, and depression. Substantial progress has recently been made in describing the static structure of GABA_ARs, but the molecular mechanisms that underlie the activation process remain elusive. The C loop of the GABA_AR structure shows the largest movement upon ligand binding to the orthosteric binding site, a phenomenon that is referred to as "capping." The C loop is known to be involved in agonist binding, but its role in the gating of Cys-loop receptors is still debated. Herein, we investigated this issue by analyzing the impact of a β₂F200 residue mutation of the C loop on gating properties of α₁β₂γ₂ GABA_ARs. Extensive analyses and the modeling of current responses to saturating agonist application demonstrated that this mutation strongly affected preactivation, opening, closing and desensitization, i.e. all considered gating steps. Single-channel analysis revealed that the β₂F200 mutation slowed all shut time components, and open times were shortened. Model fitting of these single-channel data further confirmed that the β₂F200 mutation strongly affected all of the gating characteristics. We also found that this mutation altered receptor sensitivity to the benzodiazepine flurazepam, which was attributable to a change in preactivation kinetics. In silico analysis indicated that the β₂F200 mutation resulted in distortion of the C loop structure, causing the movement of its tip from the binding site. Altogether, we provide the first evidence that C loop critically controls GABA_AR gating.

Protons modulate gating of recombinant α1β2γ2 GABAA receptor by affecting desensitization and opening transitions

Protons are potent modulators of GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) and α₁Phe64 residue was implicated in their pH sensitivity. Recently, we have demonstrated that this residue is involved in flipping transitions which precede channel opening. We thus re-addressed the mechanism of GABA_AR modulation by protons by considering the gating scheme extended by flipping. The impact of pH changes was examined on currents mediated by wild-type α₁β₂γ₂ receptors or by their α₁Phe64Leu or α₁Phe64Cys mutants and elicited by saturating concentrations of full (GABA) or partial (piperidine-4-sulfonic acid) agonists. To describe the impact of extracellular pH on receptor gating, we combined macroscopic analysis of currents elicited by rapid agonist applications with single-channel studies. Acidification (pH 6.0) increased current amplitudes (in the case of leucine mutants effect was stronger when P4S was used) and decreased the rate and the extent of desensitization whereas alkalization (pH 8.0) had the opposite but weaker effect. Deactivation kinetics for wild-type receptors was slowed down by acidification while in the case of mutants this effect was observed upon alkalization. Moreover, α₁Phe64 mutations enhanced GABA_AR sensitivity to alkaline pH. Single-channel analysis revealed that acidification prolonged burst durations and affected shut but not open time distributions. Model simulations for macroscopic and single-channel activity indicated a novel mechanism in which protons primarily affected opening and desensitization rates but not flipping/unflipping. This evidence for the impact of protons on the receptor gating together with previously demonstrated effect on the agonist binding, point to a complex effect of extracellular pH on GABA_AR macromolecule.

Distinct Modulation of Spontaneous and GABA-Evoked Gating by Flurazepam Shapes Cross-Talk Between Agonist-Free and Liganded GABAA Receptor Activity

GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) play a crucial inhibitory role in the CNS. Benzodiazepines (BDZs) are positive modulators of specific subtypes of GABA_ARs, but the underlying mechanism remains obscure. Early studies demonstrated the major impact of BDZs on binding and more recent investigations indicated gating, but it is unclear which transitions are affected. Moreover, the upregulation of GABA_AR spontaneous activity by BDZs indicates their impact on receptor gating but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Herein, we investigated the effect of a BDZ (flurazepam) on the spontaneous and GABA-induced activity for wild-type (WT, α₁β₂γ₂) and mutated (at the orthosteric binding site α₁F64) GABA_ARs. Surprisingly, in spite of the localization at the binding site, these mutations increased the spontaneous activity. Flurazepam (FLU) upregulated this activity for mutants and WT receptors to a similar extent by affecting opening/closing transitions. Spontaneous activity affected GABA-evoked currents and is manifested as an overshoot after agonist removal that depended on the modulation by BDZs. We explain the mechanism of this phenomenon as a cross-desensitization of ligand-activated and spontaneously active receptors. Moreover, due to spontaneous activity, FLU-pretreatment and co-application (agonist + FLU) protocols yielded distinct results. We provide also the first evidence that GABA_AR may enter the desensitized state in the absence of GABA in a FLU-dependent manner. Based on our data and model simulations, we propose that FLU affects agonist-induced gating by modifying primarily preactivation and desensitization. We conclude that the mechanisms of modulation of spontaneous and ligand-activated GABA_AR activity concerns gating but distinct transitions are affected in spontaneous and agonist-evoked activity.

Predicted Biological Activity of Purchasable Chemical Space

Whereas 400 million distinct compounds are now purchasable within the span of a few weeks, the biological activities of most are unknown. To facilitate access to new chemistry for biology, we have combined the Similarity Ensemble Approach (SEA) with the maximum Tanimoto similarity to the nearest bioactive to predict activity for every commercially available molecule in ZINC. This method, which we label SEA+TC, outperforms both SEA and a naïve-Bayesian classifier via predictive performance on a 5-fold cross-validation of ChEMBL’s bioactivity data set (version 21). Using this method, predictions for over 40% of compounds (>160 million) have either high significance (pSEA ≥ 40), high similarity (ECFP4MaxTc ≥ 0.4), or both, for one or more of 1382 targets well described by ligands in the literature. Using a further 1347 less-well-described targets, we predict activities for an additional 11 million compounds. To gauge whether these predictions are sensible, we investigate 75 predictions for 50 drugs lacking a binding affinity annotation in ChEMBL. The 535 million predictions for over 171 million compounds at 2629 targets are linked to purchasing information and evidence to support each prediction and are freely available via https://zinc15.docking.org and https://files.docking.org.

Spontaneous activity, singly bound states and the impact of alpha1Phe64 mutation on GABAAR gating in the novel kinetic model based on the single-channel recordings

GABA_A receptor is the primary mediator of inhibition in the adult mammalian brain. Our recent studies revealed that a classic gating scheme for GABA_AR needed to be updated with an intermediate step (flipping) and that the α₁Phe64 mutation at the GABA binding site affects this transition. However, description of flipping at the single-channel level remains incomplete. In particular, its role in singly-bound and spontaneous activity remains unknown. We have performed thus single-channel recordings over wide range of agonist concentration for wild-type α₁β₂γ_2L receptors and α₁Phe64 mutants. For WT receptors we observed relatively frequent brief spontaneous openings which were also present at low [GABA]. However, closed times distributions for spontaneous activity and at low [GABA] were clearly different indicating that a proportion of short-lived openings were due to liganded, most likely singly bound receptors. Increasing [GABA] resulted in prolongation of bursts and increased occurrence of bursts with long openings and short closures. Mutations of α₁Phe64 residue dramatically affected the open and closed time distributions at high and saturating [GABA], especially in the case of cysteine mutants. However, this mutation weakly affected spontaneous or singly bound activity. Model fitting of our single-channel data led us to propose a novel and, to our knowledge, most complete GABA_AR kinetic model in which flipping occurs in singly and doubly bound states. However, spontaneous activity did not reveal involvement of flipping. Moreover, we report that α₁Phe64 mutation affects not only the flipping but also the opening/closing transitions indicating its generalized impact on the receptor gating.