Effect of levetiracetam on behavioral problems in pervasive developmental disorder children with epilepsy

Usefulness of perampanel as initial monotherapy in children with non-lesional focal epilepsy

This study aimed to compare carbamazepine (CBZ) and perampanel (PER) in terms of the efficacy against clinical seizures and electroencephalographic abnormalities such as interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and safety as initial monotherapy in children with non-lesional focal epilepsies. This retrospective review included participants recruited from among epilepsy outpatients treated at the authors' hospital between January 01, 2000, and December 31, 2019 in the CBZ group and between January 01, 2020, and December 31, 2022 in the PER group. The inclusion criterion in both groups was ≥12 months of follow-up. Responders were identified as participants demonstrating complete disappearance (100 % reduction in seizures or IEDs) or response (>50 % reduction in seizure frequency or IEDs). Safety primary outcome was defined as appearance rate of AEs. The study group comprised 247 participants treated with CBZ and 46 participants treated with PER. Total efficacy rate for clinical seizures was significantly higher with PER than with CBZ (p = 0.0148). Moreover, the rate of complete disappearance was significantly higher with PER than with CBZ (p = 0.0133). Total efficacy rate for IED was again significantly higher with PER than with CBZ (p < 0.0001). The appearance of adverse events was significantly lower with PER than with CBZ (p = 0.023). PER may be useful as initial monotherapy in children with non-lesional focal epilepsies.

Recognition memory deficits detected through eye-tracking in well-controlled children with self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes

OBJECTIVE

Children with self-limited epilepsy characterized by centrotemporal spikes (SeLECTS) exhibit cognitive deficits in memory during the active phase, but there is currently a lack of studies and techniques to assess their memory development after well-controlled seizures. In this study, we employed eye-tracking techniques to investigate visual memory and its association with clinical factors and global intellectual ability, aiming to identify potential risk factors by examining encoding and recognition processes.

METHODS

A total of 26 recruited patients diagnosed with SeLECTS who had been seizure-free for at least 2 years, along with 24 control subjects, underwent Wechsler cognitive assessment and an eye-movement-based memory task while video-electroencephalographic (EEG) data were recorded. Fixation and pupil data related to eye movements were utilized to detect distinct memory processes and subsequently to compare the cognitive performance of patients exhibiting different regression patterns on EEG.

RESULTS

The findings revealed persistent impairments in visual memory among children with SeLECTS after being well controlled, primarily observed in the recognition stage rather than the encoding phase. Furthermore, the age at onset, frequency of seizures, and interictal epileptiform discharges exhibited significant correlations with eye movement data.

SIGNIFICANCE

Children with SeLECTS exhibit persistent recognition memory impairment after being well controlled for the disease. Controlling the frequency of seizures and reducing prolonged epileptiform activity may improve memory cognitive development. The application of the eye-tracking technique may provide novel insights into exploring memory cognition as well as underlying mechanisms associated with pediatric epilepsy.

Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Epilepsy: A Quality-of-Life-Related Perspective

Back ground: Children with epilepsy are affected by several factors, including clinical and social variables. Among these variables, cognitive decline and behavioral disturbances, perceptions of stigma, and fatigue can lead to reductions in quality of life (QOL). Epileptic activities, including seizure severity, frequent seizures, and status epilepticus (SE), have been identified as important predictors of QOL. In addition, the frequency of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) on electroencephalogram (EEG) may also be an important predictor of QOL, because IEDs can lead to cognitive decline and behavioral disturbances. Moreover, frequent seizures and/or IEDs may play a role in emotional mediators, such as stigma and fatigue, in childhood epilepsy. Seizure severity and/or IEDs are, therefore, important QOL-related factors in childhood epilepsy. Seizure severity as a QOL-related factor: Frontal lobe dysfunctions, such as cognitive decline and behavioral disturbances, can result in reduced QOL for both the child and their family. Frontal and prefrontal lobe growth disturbances can be present during active-phase epilepsy in some children with neuropsychological impairments. Recovery from prefrontal lobe growth disturbances may depend on the active seizure period. Children with a shorter active seizure period can recover from disturbances in prefrontal lobe growth more rapidly. In contrast, recovery may be delayed in children with a longer active seizure period. Moreover, frequent seizures can lead to seizure-associated headaches, perceptions of self-stigma and parental stigma, and fatigue. Accordingly, severe seizures can lead to neuropsychological impairments in association with prefrontal lobe growth disturbances in children with epilepsy. EEG abnormalities as QOL-related factors: IEDs on EEG, representing persistent pathological neuronal discharges, may be associated with several pathological aspects. Frontal IEDs can be a risk factor for recurrent seizures, cognitive decline, and behavioral disturbances, and they may also play a role as emotional mediators similar to stigma. In addition, behavioral disturbances may result in the presence of secondary bilateral synchrony (SBS) on EEG. Behavioral disturbances can be improved in association with a reduction in IEDs in children with frontal IEDs and SBS. Therefore, EEG abnormalities, such as frontal IEDs and SBS, can also lead to neuropsychological impairments in children with epilepsy. Therapeutic strategies in children with epilepsy: Seizure severity and IEDs on EEG may be associated with neuropsychological impairments, leading to QOL reduction. Therapeutic management may be desirable to reduce seizures and EEG abnormalities, such as frontal IEDs and SBS, as early as possible to improve QOL in children with epilepsy. During antiseizure medication (ASM) selection and adjustment, physicians should strategize the therapeutic approach to controlling seizures and suppressing EEG abnormalities in children with epilepsy. Among various ASMs, novel ASMs, such as levetiracetam and perampanel, may suppress both clinical seizures and IEDs on EEG; thus, these novel ASMs may represent an important addition to the treatments available for epileptic children presenting with frontal IEDs and SBS.

Effect of Lacosamide on Interictal Epileptiform Discharges in Pediatric Patients With Newly Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) on interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and evaluate the relationships between IEDs and seizure outcome in pediatric patients with focal epilepsy.

METHODS

Patient inclusion criteria included (1) newly diagnosed focal epilepsy with unknown etiology; and (2) electroencephalogram recorded twice (before and after starting LCM) under the same conditions. The difference between the highest number of IEDs over five successive minutes (IEDs/5 min) and the location of IEDs was determined. Seizure outcome was evaluated one year after achieving the maintenance dose of LCM. Responders were identified as showing a ≥50% reduction in the pre-LCM seizure frequency.

RESULTS

Of 22 patients, 10 showed an increase in IEDs/5 min after starting LCM. The median IEDs/5 min before and after starting LCM was not significantly different, at 1.5 (interquartile range: 0, 31.75) and 10.5 (0, 80.5), respectively. No relationship was identified between the difference in IEDs/5 min and seizure outcome. Patients with multiple regional or diffuse IEDs had significantly poorer seizure outcome compared with patients without those IEDs (P = 0.036 and P = 0.039, respectively). Of 10 patients with single regional IEDs, a tendency of IEDs to disappear was observed between patients with frontal and non-frontal IEDs.

CONCLUSION

The effects of LCM on the number of IEDs may be unrelated to seizure outcome. LCM may be ineffective at improving seizure outcomes in patients with multiple regional or diffuse IEDs.

Evaluation of the Levetiracetam treatment on reduction of epileptic discharges in electroencephalogram in children with epilepsy

Objectives

Epilepsy is a relatively common disease in childhood. In some patients, the electroencephalogram (EEG) is abnormal despite the clinical control of seizures. Studies have identified the adverse effects of epileptic discharges on cognition, learning, behavior, and seizure recurrence in children. This study investigated the Levetiracetam effect on epileptic discharges in the interictal phase of EEG in epileptic children.

Materials & Methods

This clinical trial was conducted on 54 epileptic children aged 2 to 15 years, whose clinical seizures were controlled by sodium valproate in the last six months but still had epileptic discharges in EEG. The participants were divided into two groups: an intervention group (21 people), for which Levetiracetam was added to sodium valproate, and a control group (33 people), for which treatment with sodium valproate alone was continued. The patients were then followed for one year.

Results

The percent normalization of epileptic discharges in the intervention and control groups was 66.7% and 57.1% (P = 0.500), respectively. Also, the mean time for the normalization of epileptic discharges in the intervention and control groups was 12.60±8.25 and 20.57±12.67 months (P = 0.042), respectively.

Conclusion

In children with controlled seizures whose EEG was still abnormal, sodium valproate therapy alone and combined with Levetiracetam effectively reduced the severity of epileptic discharges. However, the addition of Levetiracetam to sodium valproate normalized EEG more rapidly.

Efficacy of perampanel in epilepsy patients with autism spectrum disorder

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of perampanel (PER), and to identify the relationship between behavioral impairments and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in epilepsy patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

METHODS

Participants were ASD patients with epilepsy recruited between June 1, 2016 and June 30, 2018. Inclusion criteria were: seizures refractory to two appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs); presence of neuropsychological impairments; and ≥12 months of monitoring. PER was administered once daily, starting at a dose of 2 mg/day, increased to 12 mg/day. Seizure/EEG responders were identified as participants showing a >50 % reduction in seizure/interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) frequency (indicated as complete disappearance and response). Behavioral responders were identified as participants with a ≥50 % reduction in scores of the Japanese manuals for the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-J).

RESULTS

Eleven (64.7 %) of 17 patients were considered to be both seizure and EEG responders. Five (45.5 %) of these 11 patients with seizure/EEG response were considered as behavioral responders. Mean ABC-J scores were significantly decreased at 12 months after PER administration (p = 0.0002). A correlation between decreased IED frequency and ABC-J score was evident in frontal IEDs, but not in non-frontal IEDs. Participants presenting with frontal IEDs showed a significantly higher correlation between seizures/EEG and behavioral improvements (p = 0.023). Moreover, 2 of 6 patients without seizure/EEG improvement were considered as behavioral responders. No patients discontinued PER.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study suggest the utility of PER treatment in reducing clinical seizures and IEDs for ASD patients with intractable epilepsy, at least in some patients. Moreover, the present results also indicate the usefulness of PER in improving neuropsychiatric impairments, including behavioral disturbances in ASD related to improvement of clinical seizures/frontal IEDs, but also unrelated to seizure/EEG improvement in at least some ASD patients.

Usefulness of perampanel with concomitant levetiracetam for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of treatment and the occurrence of aggression-related adverse events among children receiving perampanel (PER) with concomitant levetiracetam (LEV).

METHODS

Patients were selected according to the following criteria: 1) between 12 and 18 years old; 2) seizures refractory to at least 2 first-line drugs; 3) at least 4 seizures a month before PER administration; and 4) at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients were subdivided into groups with and without LEV as concomitant treatment. PER was administered at a dose of 2 mg/day, increasing by 2 mg/day every 2 weeks up to 12 mg/day if seizures appeared. In comparison with the baseline seizure frequency, response to PER treatment was classified as follows: complete cessation (100% seizure control); response (≥50% reduction in seizures); and exacerbation (≥50% increase in seizures). Responders were identified as patients showing complete cessation or response.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 39 outpatients with a mean age of 13.7 years at enrollment. Responder status was seen in 13 of the 19 patients with LEV and 4 of the 20 patients without LEV. PER appeared significantly more effective in patients with LEV than in those without LEV (p = 0.0076). Seizure-free status was significantly more frequent among patients with LEV (47.4%) than among those without LEV (15.0% (p = 0.0407)). Aggression was present in 2 patients without LEV, but none with LEV.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests the utility of PER with concomitant LEV for children with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Mechanisms Underlying Aggressive Behavior Induced by Antiepileptic Drugs: Focus on Topiramate, Levetiracetam, and Perampanel

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are effective against seizures, but their use is often limited by adverse effects, among them psychiatric and behavioral ones including aggressive behavior (AB). Knowledge of the incidence, risk factors, and the underlying mechanisms of AB induced by AEDs may help to facilitate management and reduce the risk of such side effects. The exact incidence of AB as an adverse effect of AEDs is difficult to estimate, but frequencies up to 16% have been reported. Primarily, levetiracetam (LEV), perampanel (PER), and topiramate (TPM), which have diverse mechanisms of action, have been associated with AB. Currently, there is no evidence for a specific pharmacological mechanism solely explaining the increased incidence of AB with LEV, PER, and TPM. Serotonin (5-HT) and GABA, and particularly glutamate (via the AMPA receptor), seem to play key roles. Other mechanisms involve hormones, epigenetics, and “alternative psychosis” and related phenomena. Increased individual susceptibility due to an underlying neurological and/or a mental health disorder may further explain why people with epilepsy are at an increased risk of AB when using AEDs. Remarkably, AB may occur with a delay of weeks or months after start of treatment. Information to patients, relatives, and caregivers, as well as sufficient clinical follow-up, is crucial, and there is a need for further research to understand the complex relationship between AED mechanisms of action and the induction/worsening of AB.

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam for pediatric refractory epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Levetiracetam has a high tolerability and is effective against various seizure types and epilepsy syndromes. However, no study has specifically evaluated the efficacy of levetiracetam in children with refractory epilepsy based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and the presence of intellectual disability (ID).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated levetiracetam efficacy and safety in 49 pediatric patients who met the following inclusion criteria: (1) diagnosis of refractory epilepsy with first-line antiepileptic (AED) treatment ⩾2years, (2) younger than 20years old, and (3) received oral levetiracetam treatment for ⩾6months. We assessed the relationships of these outcomes with MRI findings and ID status.

RESULTS

Eighteen (37%) patients achieved a ⩾50% reduction in seizure frequency, and the majority (78%) had no remarkable side effects. Twenty-two (45%) patients had previously been treated with more than seven antiepileptic drugs prior to levetiracetam. Among 18 patients who achieved a ⩾50% reduction in seizure frequency, 13 and 5 had negative and positive MRI findings, and 9 and 9 had and did not have ID, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that even for intractable pediatric cases with symptomatic etiology (i.e., MRI lesion and ID), levetiracetam has favorable efficacy for refractory epilepsy with tolerable adverse effects.

Effect of anticonvulsive treatment on neuropsychological performance in children with BECTS

INTRODUCTION

Benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) is a common epilepsy syndrome in childhood. Besides the occurrence of seizures, mild cognitive impairments and behavioral problems affecting language skills, spatial perception, memory, executive function, and academic achievement might be present. There is no international consensus about the decision whether or not to treat affected children. The influence of treatment on cognitive functions is debated.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with BECTS were assessed in short term auditory memory, long-term verbal memory, intelligence and behavior using the "number recall" test from the Kaufman assessment battery for children, the "verbal learning memory test", the "culture free intelligence test" and the "child behavior checklist" prior to a randomized controlled antiepileptic therapy and after a treatment period of 6 months with either sulthiame or levetiracetam.

RESULTS

43 of 44 randomized patients were analyzed. One patient had to be excluded due to protocol violation. Patients who completed the study showed a non-significant improvement in parent-reported behavioral problems under therapy. Cognitive skills were not affected.

CONCLUSION

The present data suggest that antiepileptic drug treatment of children with BECTS with either sulthiame or levetiracetam does not affect cognitive performance. Behavior improved in a subset of patients though not reaching statistical significance.

Epilepsy, Antiepileptic Drugs, and Aggression: An Evidence-Based Review

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have many benefits but also many side effects, including aggression, agitation, and irritability, in some patients with epilepsy. This article offers a comprehensive summary of current understanding of aggressive behaviors in patients with epilepsy, including an evidence-based review of aggression during AED treatment. Aggression is seen in a minority of people with epilepsy. It is rarely seizure related but is interictal, sometimes occurring as part of complex psychiatric and behavioral comorbidities, and it is sometimes associated with AED treatment. We review the common neurotransmitter systems and brain regions implicated in both epilepsy and aggression, including the GABA, glutamate, serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline systems and the hippocampus, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and temporal lobes. Few controlled clinical studies have used behavioral measures to specifically examine aggression with AEDs, and most evidence comes from adverse event reporting from clinical and observational studies. A systematic approach was used to identify relevant publications, and we present a comprehensive, evidence-based summary of available data surrounding aggression-related behaviors with each of the currently available AEDs in both adults and in children/adolescents with epilepsy. A psychiatric history and history of a propensity toward aggression/anger should routinely be sought from patients, family members, and carers; its presence does not preclude the use of any specific AEDs, but those most likely to be implicated in these behaviors should be used with caution in such cases.

Correlation between perceived stigma and EEG paroxysmal abnormality in childhood epilepsy

AIMS

We investigated the relationship between abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG) findings such as localized EEG paroxysmal abnormality (PA) and the perception of stigma to determine EEG factors associated with perceived stigma in childhood epilepsy.

METHODS

Participants comprised 40 patients (21 boys, 19 girls; mean age, 14.6 years) with epilepsy at enrollment. The criteria for inclusion were as follows: 1) age of 12-18 years, inclusive; 2) ≥6 months after epilepsy onset; 3) the ability to read and speak Japanese; and 4) the presence of EEG PA. Fifteen healthy seizure-free children were included as a control group. Participants were asked to rate how often they felt or acted in the ways described in the items of the Child Stigma Scale using a 5-point scale. Electroencephalogram paroxysms were classified based on the presence of spikes, sharp waves, or spike-wave complexes, whether focal or generalized.

RESULTS

Participants showed significantly higher stigma scores than healthy subjects (p<0.01). A higher score reflects a greater perception of stigma. The average total scores of patients presenting with EEG PA at generalized, frontal, RD, midtemporal, and occipital regions were 2.3, 4.0, 2.4, 3.2, and 2.2, respectively. The scores of all questions were higher in the frontal group than those in other regions (p<0.01). Children presenting with frontal EEG PA perceived a greater stigma than children presenting with nonfrontal EEG PA (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

A relationship was identified between frontal EEG PA and a greater perception of stigma. Further studies are needed to confirm whether frontal EEG PA may function as a mediator of emotional responses such as perceived stigma in childhood epilepsy.