Endoanal ultrasound evaluation of anorectal diseases and disorders: technique, indications, results and limitations

Current update on the role of endoanal ultrasound: a primer for radiologists

Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is a valuable imaging modality for the evaluation of anal and perianal pathologies. It provides detailed information about the anatomy and physiology of the anorectal region and has been used in pre-and post-operative settings of anorectal pathologies. EAUS is not only useful in the evaluation of benign pathologies but also in loco-regional staging of anal and rectal tumors. EAUS has several advantages over MRI, including reduced cost, better patient tolerance, and improved scope of application in patients with contraindications to MRI. Despite its benefits, EAUS is not widely performed in many centers across the globe. This article aims to educate radiologists, trainees, and surgeons about the indications, contraindications, patient preparation, imaging technique, and findings of EAUS. We will also highlight the technical difficulties, diagnostic challenges, and procedural complications encountered during EAUS, along with a comparative analysis of EAUS with other imaging approaches.

Morphological differences in the female anal sphincter complex between endoanal and exoanal ultrasound

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This study was aimed at describing the morphological characteristics of the normal female anal sphincter complex (ASC) by high-resolution transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS).

METHODS

Thirty volunteers, including 19 nulliparous and 11 women who had only given birth by Cesarean section, were recruited. The ASC was shown in a set of five slices by EAUS and 8 slices by TPUS. EAUS slices 1 and 5 matched TPUS slices 1 and 8; EAUS slices 2, 3, and 4 were approximately at the levels of TPUS slices 3, 5, and 7. The anterior and lateral EAS and IAS thicknesses were measured and the two methods were compared.

RESULTS

The median age was 29 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 20.6 kg/m². All measured values obtained by TPUS were normally distributed. The EAS thickness on EAUS slice 2 and the IAS thickness on EAUS slices 2 and 3 were not normally distributed. The mean anterior EAS thickness was 2.51 mm, 2.96 mm, and 3.53 mm in slices 3, 5, and 7 on TPUS and was significantly thinner than that in slices 2 (2.62 mm), 3 (3.77 mm), and 4 (4.62 mm) on EAUS. In contrast, the IAS was markedly thicker on TPUS. The ratio of sphincter thickness anteriorly to laterally was similar using the two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The morphological characteristics of EAS shown by TPUS and EAUS were similar. EAS was thinner, and IAS was thicker on TPUS. The IAS seems to be distorted on endoanal imaging.

Practical approach to linear endoscopic ultrasound examination of the rectum and anal canal

Standard endosonographic examination of the rectal area is usually performed with radial endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). However, in recent years, widespread availability of linear EUS for assessing various anatomical regions in the gastrointestinal tract has facilitated its use in the assessment of anorectal disorders. Currently, many rectal and anal diseases, including perianal abscesses, fistulae, polyps, and neoplastic lesions, can be well-visualized and evaluated with linear EUS. The aim of this review is to shed light on the anatomy and systematic examination of the anorectal region with linear EUS and clinical implications for different anorectal pathologies.

Perianal fistulas: A review with emphasis on preoperative imaging

PURPOSE

We aim to present a comprehensive literature review which focuses on the preoperative imaging of perianal fistulas.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) are the two first-line imaging modalities for the preoperative evaluation of patients with perianal fistulas. We conducted a search in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar concerning articles comparing pelvic MRI with EAUS, which were published from 1994 until 2019.

RESULTS

In most articles, pelvic MRI is superior to EAUS for the evaluation of perianal fistulas (especially for supralevator and extrasphincteric ones). Preoperative pelvic MRI is associated with statistically significant better results and prognosis after surgical treatment of the disease. Preoperative EAUS poses high sensitivity and specificity in identifying intersphincteric and transsphincteric perianal fistulas, as well as the internal opening of a fistula-in-ano. There is only one meta-analysis which compares the diagnostic accuracy of the two mentioned imaging modalities in preoperative fistula detection. Sensitivity of both - pelvic MRI and EAUS, is acceptably high (0.87). Specificity of pelvic MRI is 0.69 in comparison to EAUS (0.43), but both values are considered low.

CONCLUSIONS

Future well-designed prospective studies are needed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of pelvic MRI and EAUS in the preoperative assessment of patients with perianal fistulas. Moreover, the combination of pelvic MRI and EAUS should also be studied, since several published articles suggest that it could lead to improved diagnostic accuracy. A novel treatment algorithm for perianal fistulas could arise from this study.

The accuracy of trans rectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in early-stage rectal cancer or benign adenomas

Background: Screening for colorectal cancer in Denmark has resulted in more patients being diagnosed with benign adenomas and early-stage rectal cancer. In general, TRUS is accepted as a good modality for evaluating the above mentioned before deciding on surgery. Objective: To investigate the accuracy of TRUS in a clinical setting at the Region Hospital in Herning, Denmark. Study design: Retrospective cohort study from January 2016 to June 2018. Methods: Quantitative method. The cohort (117 patients) was recruited by searching for specific procedure codes. Data were collected by going through the electronic patient files. Results: TRUS predicted T0, T1, T2 and T3 with an accuracy of 91%, 35%, 43% and 20% respectively and an overall accuracy of 68%. A weighted Cohens kappa value of 0.30 (p  ≤  .05). TRUS differentiated between T0/T1 with a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 85% and an accuracy of 85% and kappa value of 0.44 (p  ≤  .05). Conclusion: TRUS can with great precision establish whether the tumor is benign so correct local treatment can be instituted.

Correlation between Disease Activity and Endorectal Ultrasound Findings of Chronic Radiation Proctitis

The aim of this study was to summarize the imaging features of chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) on endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and investigate the value of ERUS in the evaluation of disease activity. 40 CRP patients and 30 control patients were investigated by ERUS. Rectal wall thickness and layers, ulcers and rectovaginal fistulas were evaluated by B-mode ultrasound. Power Doppler imaging was used to evaluate the vascularity of the rectal wall using a semiquantitative score. Disease activity was calculated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0). Imaging findings for patients with mild and severe CRP were compared. For 30 patients in the control group, the average maximum thickness of the rectal wall was 3.07 ± 0.73 mm, with all exhibiting typical wall stratification and level 0 vascularity. For the 40 CRP patients, there was marked thickening of the rectal wall (average thickness = 9.42 ± 1.94 mm), which was significantly thicker than in the control group (p < 0.05). The rectal walls of the mild group were significantly thinner than those of the severe group (8.71 ± 1.67 mm vs. 10.00 ± 2.00 mm, p < 0.05). Among the 22 severe cases, 19 cases (19/22, 86.4%) exhibited hyper-vascularity (level IV) or blurred wall stratification (including hypo-echoic submucosa, ulcer and fistula); 12 of the 18 mild cases (166.7%) exhibited a vascularity of level III and typical wall stratification. A significant association (p < 0.05) was observed between stratification and vascularity of the rectal wall and CRP activity. When ERUS findings of blurred rectal wall stratification or increasing vascularity (level IV) were used to evaluate CRP activity, the sensitivity was 86.4% (95% confidence interval: 64.0-96.4) and the specificity was 66.7% (95% confidence interval: 41.2-85.6). Thickening of the rectal wall, blurred wall stratification and increased vascularity are characteristic ERUS findings of CRP. ERUS is helpful in the comprehensive evaluation of disease activity and may provide objective evidence during treatment planning and follow-up.

Sonographic appearance of anal cushions of hemorrhoids

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic value of different sonographic methods in hemorrhoids.

METHODS

Forty-two healthy volunteers and sixty-two patients with grades I-IV hemorrhoids received two different sonographic examinations from January 2013 to January 2016 at the First and Second Hospitals of Xinjiang Medical University in a prospective way. We analyzed the ultrasonographic findings of these participants and evaluated the outcomes. Resected grades III and IV hemorrhoid tissues were pathologically examined. The concordance of ultrasonographic results with pathology results was assessed with the Cohen’s kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

All healthy volunteers and all patients had no particular complications related to sonography. There were no statistically significant differences between the participants regarding age (P = 0.5919), gender (P = 0.4183), and persistent symptoms (P > 0.8692). All healthy control participants had no special findings. However, 30 patients with hemorrhoids showed blood signals around the dentate line on ultrasonography. When grades I and II hemorrhoids were analyzed, there were no significant differences between transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), transperianal ultrasound (TPUS), and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) (P > 0.05). Grades III and IV hemorrhoids revealed blood flow with different directions which could be observed as a “mosaic pattern”. In patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids, the number of patients with “mosaic pattern” as revealed by TRUS, TPUS and TVUS was 22, 12, and 4, respectively. Patients with grades III and IV disease presented with a pathologically abnormal cushion which usually appeared as a “mosaic pattern” in TPUS and an arteriovenous fistula in pathology. Subepithelial vessels of resected grades III and IV hemorrhoid tissues were manifested by obvious structural impairment and retrograde and ruptured changes of internal elastic lamina. Some parts of the Trietz’s muscle showed hypertrophy and distortion. Arteriovenous fistulas and venous dilatation were obvious in the anal cushion of hemorhoidal tissues. After pathological results with arteriovenous fistulas were taken as the standard reference, we evaluated the compatibility between the two methods according to the Cohen’s kappa co-efficiency calculation. The compatibility (Cohein kappa co-efficiency value) between “mosaic pattern” in the TPUS and arteriovenous fistula in pathology was very good (ĸ = 0.8939). When compared between different groups, TRUS presented the advantage that the mosaic pattern could be confirmed in more patients, especially for group A. There was a statistical difference when comparing group A with group B or C (P < 0.05 for both). There were obvious statistical differences between group A and group B with regard to the vessel diameter and blood flow velocity measured by TRUS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids present with a pathologically abnormal cushion which usually appears as a “mosaic pattern” in sonography, which is in accord with an arteriovenous fistula in pathology. There are clearly different hemorrhoid structures shown by sonography. “Mosaic pattern” may be a parameter for surgical indication of grades III and IV hemorrhoids.

Efficacy of 3-Dimensional Endorectal Ultrasound for Staging Early Extraperitoneal Rectal Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Adequate oncologic staging of rectal neoplasia is important for treatment and prognostic evaluation of the disease. Diagnostic methods such as endorectal ultrasound can assess rectal wall invasion and lymph node involvement.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to correlate findings of 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasound and pathologic diagnosis of extraperitoneal rectal tumors with regard to depth of rectal wall invasion, lymph node involvement, percentage of rectal circumference involvement, and tumor extension.

DESIGN

Consecutive patients with extraperitoneal rectal tumors were prospectively assessed by 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasound blind to other staging methods and pathologic diagnosis.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent endorectal ultrasound followed by surgery were included in the study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a single academic institution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, area under curve, and κ coefficient between 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasound and pathologic diagnosis were determined. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated for tumor extension and percentage of rectal wall involvement.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (27 women; mean age = 63.5 years) were evaluated between September 2010 and June 2014. Most lesions were malignant (72.7%). For depth of submucosal invasion, 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasound showed sensitivity of 77.3%, specificity of 86.4%, positive predictive value of 85.0%, a negative predictive value of 79.2%, and an area under curve of 0.82. The weighted κ coefficient for depth of rectal wall invasion staging was 0.67, and there was no agreement between 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasound and pathologic diagnosis for lymph node involvement (κ = -0.164). Intraclass correlation coefficient for lesion extension and percentage of rectal circumference involvement were 0.45 and 0.66. A better correlation between 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasound and pathologic diagnosis was observed in tumors <5 cm and with <50% of rectal wall involvement.

LIMITATIONS

The relatively small sample size of patients with early rectal lesions referred directly for surgery could represent a potential selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound was effective for determining rectal wall invasion and lesion extension in tumors <5 cm and with <50% of rectal wall invasion but was limited for detecting lymph node involvement in early rectal lesions.

Learning curve for endorectal ultrasound in young and elderly: lights and shades

Aim of the study is to highlight difficulties faced by an inexperienced surgeon in approaching endorectal-ultrasound, trying to define when learning curve can be considered complete. A prospective analysis was conducted on endorectal-ultrasound performed for subperitoneal rectal adenocarcinoma staging in the period from January 2008 to July 2013, reported by a single surgeon of Department of Oncology, Section of General Surgery, "San Luigi Gonzaga" Teaching Hospital, Orbassano (Turin, Italy); the surgeon had no previous experience in endorectal-ultrasound. Fourty-six endorectal-ultrasounds were divided into two groups: early group (composed by 23 endorectal-ultrasounds, made from January 2008 to May 2009) and late group (composed by 23 endorectal-ultrasound, carried out from June 2009 to July 2013). In our experience, the importance of a learning curve is evident for T staging, but no statystical significance is reached for results deal with N stage. We can conclude that ultrasound evaluation of anorectal and perirectal tissues is technically challenging and requires a long learning curve. Our learning curve can not be closed down, at least for N parameter.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer

Since its introduction in the 1980s, total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the standard surgical technique for treating rectal cancer. This procedure involves removing the rectum and the surrounding envelope of fat along the plane of the mesorectal fascia. Resecting this embryological unit reduces the local recurrence rate by removing all local lymph nodes, including those with occult metastatic disease; however, this surgery is associated with mortality and morbidity. Complications include incontinence for patients given an anastomosis, long-term stoma formation, and sexual and bladder dysfunction. Local excision of rectal cancer using the transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) technique is associated with fewer complications, and therefore, is used as an alternative in specific circumstances. We outline the technique, its indications, imaging appearances and complications.

The accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging

Background and aims

The incidence of rectal cancer in the European Union is about 35% of the total colorectal cancer incidence. Staging rectal cancer is important for planning treatment. It is essential for the management of rectal cancer to have adequate preoperative imaging, because accurate staging can influence the therapeutic strategy, type of resection, and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of this work is to evaluate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) in rectal cancer staging.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed to assess the accuracy of ERUS by analyzing patients discharged from Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (IRGH) Cluj-Napoca, Romania, diagnosed with rectal cancer between 01 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. Patients who were preoperatively staged by other imaging methods and those who had ERUS performed in another service were excluded from the analysis. As inclusion criteria remained ERUS performed for patients with rectal cancer in IRGH Cluj-Napoca where they were also operated. We analyzed preoperative T stage obtained by ERUS and it was compared with the histopathology findings.

Results

The number of patients discharged with a diagnosis of rectal cancer were 200 (operated – 157) in 2011, 193 (operated – 151) in 2012, and 198 (operated – 142) in 2013. We analyzed a total of 51 cases diagnosed with rectal cancer who performed ERUS in IRGH Cluj-Napoca. The results according to the T stage obtained by ERUS and histopathology test were:

Conclusions

ERUS is a method of staging rectal cancer which is human dependent. ERUS is less accurate for T staging of stenotic tumours, but the accuracy may still be within acceptable limits. Surgeons use ERUS to adopt a treatment protocol, knowing the risk of under-staging and over-staging of this method. The accuracy of ERUS is higher in diagnosing rectal cancer in stages T1, T2 and even in stage T3 with malignant tumor which is not occlusive. ERUS is less accurate for T staging of locally advanced and stenotic tumours.

Anal cancer: current standards in care and recent changes in practice

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE The management of squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal has evolved from surgery as first-line treatment to curative chemoradiation, with surgery reserved for salvage. Significant progress has been made in understanding how to most effectively deliver chemotherapy and reduce toxicity through advancements in radiation delivery. The purpose of this article is to review the multimodality approach to the diagnosis and management of anal cancer based on a review of the published data and in light of available guidelines.

Transrectal ultrasonography of anorectal diseases: advantages and disadvantages

Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) has been widely accepted as a popular imaging modality for evaluating the lower rectum, anal sphincters, and pelvic floor in patients with various anorectal diseases. It provides excellent visualization of the layers of the rectal wall and of the anatomy of the anal canal. TRUS is an accurate tool for the staging of primary rectal cancer, especially for early stages. Although magnetic resonance imaging is a modality complementary to TRUS with advantages for evaluating the mesorectum, external sphincter, and deep pelvic inflammation, three-dimensional ultrasonography improves the detection and characterization of perianal fistulas and therefore plays a crucial role in optimal treatment planning. The operator should be familiar with the anatomy of the rectum and pelvic structures relevant to the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer and other anal canal diseases, and should have technical proficiency in the use of TRUS combined with an awareness of its limitations compared to magnetic resonance imaging.

How useful is endorectal ultrasound in the management of early rectal carcinoma?

INTRODUCTION

Endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) is used to T stage early rectal tumours and select patients to whom transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) could be offered. Published papers have shown that EUS can have good accuracy, but there is little literature on how EUS influences patient management. The study aim is to ascertain the value of EUS in the management of early rectal tumours.

METHODS

Patients with adenomas/early rectal carcinoma being considered for TEM were prospectively studied. Each patient underwent EUS. The surgeon recorded the expected T stage, confidence level of the T stage and management plan for each patient on a proforma before and after the ultrasound result was revealed. Comparison was made between the ultrasound stage and final pathological stage where available.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were referred over 2 years. Nine were out of reach of the rigid probe and were excluded. Proformas were completed on 53/87 patients (age range 28-87 years, mean age 66 years, 30 males/23 females). Forty-eight patients had a pathological report to compare with the EUS T stage. Ultrasound agreed with the pathological T staging in 43 patients (90%). Patient management was changed in five patients. In 30% of (16/53) patients, EUS increased the confidence level for T staging.

CONCLUSION

Although EUS has a high accuracy in predicting the T stage of early rectal cancers, it never changes the management plan for lesions thought to be benign. It seldom changes the pre-operative selection process when clinical examination is considered with other imaging modalities (MRI/CT). EUS should be reserved for answering specific questions in difficult cases rather than for all patients.

Endoanal ultrasonography-assisted percutaneous transperineal management of anorectal sepsis

PURPOSE

We aimed to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of a new transperineal access to treat anorectal sepsis (fistulae and abscesses) under endoanal ultrasonography guidance.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients (80% Crohn disease) were included retrospectively. Twenty-one patients had fistulae (perianal, urethroanal, and anovaginal) treated by injection of heterologous fibrin glue and cyanoacrylate. Four patients with abscesses were treated by irrigation-injection of normal saline solution and an aminoglycoside antibiotic.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent 32 treatment sessions. At 4 weeks' evaluation, 19 patients (90.5%) with anal fistulae ultimately achieved a 4-week short-term success. Of these, 5 patients (26%) showed resolution of symptoms and persistent occlusion of the fistula track at long-term follow-up (>6 mo). At 4-week follow-up, the treatment of abscesses was successful in 3 of 4 cases. However, a relapse was observed in 2 cases after a mean period of 3 months. No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoanal ultrasonography-assisted percutaneous transperineal injection represents a sphincter-sparing alternative to the surgical route, with interesting outcomes and excellent tolerability for the treatment of anorectal sepsis.

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry in children with anorectal malformations: new discoveries

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Fecal incontinence and constipation are common problems in follow-up of anorectal malformations (ARMs). We evaluated the anal sphincters using the 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS) and the anorectal manometry after ARMs repair.

METHODS

Seventeen patients, divided into 3 groups according to Wingspread classification, underwent anorectal manometry and 3D-EAUS. Clinical, manometric, and endosonographic scoring systems were used.

RESULTS

The average anal resting pressure (aARP) was significantly higher in low ARMs than in intermediate and high ARMs. The anal squeeze pressure was not statistically different between the 3 groups. Three-dimensional EAUS visualized internal anal sphincter (IAS) disruptions in 7 of 17 patients and absence of IAS in 6 of 17 children with high ARMs. Scars of the external anal sphincter were localized in low ARMs and generalized in the other groups. In the case of IAS disruption with aARP greater than 20 mm Hg, fecal incontinence and constipation improved with biofeedback and/or laxatives, whereas daily enemas were necessary in absence of IAS with aARP less than 20 mm Hg. Statistical correlation was observed between endosonographic and manometric findings and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions of the anal sphincter are common in ARMs. Three-dimensional EAUS and anorectal manometry ensure a complete assessment of the anal sphincter and could provide useful information to define the most appropriate treatments to improve the quality of life.

Improvement in T-staging of rectal carcinoma: using a novel endorectal ultrasonography technique with sterile coupling gel filling the rectum

Our purpose was to study the accuracy of using endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) with sterile coupling gels filling the rectum in the preoperative T-staging of rectal carcinoma. A total of 189 patients with confirmed rectal carcinoma were recruited. All underwent ERUS and surgery within the week following sonography. EURS was performed by introducing sterile coupling gel into the rectum. Two radiologists looked at the images at the same time and agreed upon staging. Rectal carcinoma was staged from Tis to T4. The accuracy of T-staging by ERUS was 89.95%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for ERUS at different stages were calculated. For early stage (Tis and T1), these values were 93.62%, 97.89%, 93.62% and 97.89%, respectively. ERUS filling with sterile coupling gel in the rectum overcomes the pressure effect from a water bath and the restriction caused by tumor stenosis, thus, greatly improving the accuracy of T-staging. The examination is real-time, safe and inexpensive.

Three-dimensional anal endosonography in depicting anal-canal anatomy

PURPOSE

This report describes the advantages of 3D anal endosonography in depicting the normal anatomy of the anal canal in relation to sex and age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of 85 patients, 33 men and 52 women, previously examined with 3D anal ultrasound (US) for clinically suspected anorectal disease but found to be negative. The examinations were performed with a Bruel and Kjaer US system with a 2050 transducer, scanning from the anorectal junction to the subcutaneous portion of the external anal sphincter (EAS). The 3D reconstructions provided an estimation of sphincter length in the anterior and posterior planes, and axial 2D images enabled calculation of the thickness of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and EAS in the anterior, posterior and lateral transverse planes.

RESULTS

Distribution of the sphincter complex is asymmetric in both sexes: the EAS and IAS are significantly shorter in females, especially in the anterior longitudinal plane (p=0.005 and p<0.001, respectively). EAS and IAS thickness increases with age, especially the lateral IAS (R(2)=0.37, p<0.001) and the posterior EAS (R(2)=0.29, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A good knowledge of anal-canal anatomy is essential to detect sphincter abnormalities when assessing pelvic floor dysfunction.

How useful is rectal endosonography in the staging of rectal cancer?

It is essential in treating rectal cancer to have adequate preoperative imaging, as accurate staging can influence the management strategy, type of resection, and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy. In the last twenty years, endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) has become the primary method for locoregional staging of rectal cancer. ERUS is the most accurate modality for assessing local depth of invasion of rectal carcinoma into the rectal wall layers (T stage). Lower accuracy for T2 tumors is commonly reported, which could lead to sonographic overstaging of T3 tumors following preoperative therapy. Unfortunately, ERUS is not as good for predicting nodal metastases as it is for tumor depth, which could be related to the unclear definition of nodal metastases. The use of multiple criteria might improve accuracy. Failure to evaluate nodal status could lead to inadequate surgical resection. ERUS can accurately distinguish early cancers from advanced ones, with a high detection rate of residual carcinoma in the rectal wall. ERUS is also useful for detection of local recurrence at the anastomosis site, which might require fine-needle aspiration of the tissue. Overstaging is more frequent than understaging, mostly due to inflammatory changes. Limitations of ERUS are operator and experience dependency, limited tolerance of patients, and limited range of depth of the transducer. The ERUS technique requires a learning curve for orientation and identification of images and planes. With sufficient time and effort, quality and accuracy of the ERUS procedure could be improved.

Transrectal endoscopic retrorectal access (TERA): a novel NOTES approach to the peritoneal cavity

BACKGROUND

As the field of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) expands, new access sites are being investigated. One access site to the peritoneal cavity, which has not been the subject of much investigation, is transrectal access. The aim of this article is to describe a new method to peritoneal access: transrectal endoscopic retrorectal access (TERA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three pigs were placed in the supine position under general anesthesia, and an umbilical port was placed for the pneumoperitoneum, as well as visualization of the pelvic dissection and access. A rectotomy was made under direct vision above the dentate line posteriorly. The flexible endoscope was introduced into the retrorectal space, balloon dilation was used to open and dissect the retrorectal plane, and the peritoneal cavity was entered with a needle knife. After peritoneal exploration, the endoscope was withdrawn and the rectotomy was closed under direct vision.

RESULTS

Each of the 3 cases was successful with entry into the peritoneal cavity to the right of the sacral promontory. Direct visualization allowed the avoidance of injury to the ureter, vessels, and nervous structures of the pelvis. The flexible endoscope allowed an easy direct visualization of the upper abdominal organs. In addition, retroflexion allowed a view of the pelvic organs. Mean operative time was 40 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

TERA is a novel access route to the peritoneal cavity that can be performed by using readily available instrumentation. When performed under direct view, injury to the adjacent structures can be avoided while obtaining access. Unresolved issues include sterility of the procedure and reproducibility, and future survival studies will delineate long-term safety.

Staging anal cancer: prospective comparison of transanal endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

The staging of anal cancer is extremely important for therapy and prognosis. Transanal endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are routinely applied. The aim of this prospective comparative study is to evaluate whether tumor staging is concordant between these techniques.

METHODS

Forty-five anal cancer patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Histological confirmation was obtained in all patients. The two test methods were compared with the kappa concordance index and sensitivity for the initial method of tumor detection was calculated. For six patients who were operated upon because of tumor progression, the results were evaluated against the histological tumor stage.

RESULTS

High concordance was found in the assessment of tumor size and nodal status (kappa index 0.63 and 0.77). Cancer patients were correctly identified with 100% sensitivity (45/45) by endoscopic ultrasound and with 88.9% (40/45) sensitivity by magnetic resonance imaging. In the six operated patients, T stage was correctly assessed in four of six patients by endoscopic ultrasound and in three of six patients by magnetic resonance imaging.

CONCLUSION

The results of endoscopic ultrasound strongly coincide with those of magnetic resonance imaging. Endoscopic ultrasound may be superior to magnetic resonance imaging for detection of small superficial tumors. However, magnetic resonance imaging is needed for N staging.

Correlative anatomy of the anus and rectum

An overview of the normal anatomy of the anus and rectum is provided with an emphasis on correlative imaging, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound. The major clinically important structures that can be assessed with these imaging modalities are reviewed.

Sonographic assessments of gastrointestinal and biliary functions

Ultrasound has been established as a routine work-up imaging method in abdominal diseases. It assesses the morphology of intra-abdominal organs and depicts the normal and pathological anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract as well as of the biliopancreatic system. Ultrasound is the method of choice for visualisation of motion sequences since it is, in contrast to other imaging methods, a real-time method. The non-invasiveness and the repeatability of the method are important advantages when performing investigations of functional processes. Therefore, ultrasound is most suited for functional studies. Up to now, functional ultrasound and its potential have been undervalued. Functional ultrasound provides a widely available method to increase our understanding of functional processes and motility. The authors review the options of functional ultrasound and discuss its practical relevance.

A simplified method for anal ultrasonography: assessment of patient satisfaction and the simplicity of the procedure

BACKGROUND

Anal endosonography reliably visualizes and identifies anal sphincter abnormalities. However, dedicated probes are quite expensive. We evaluated a simple and less-costly procedure for anal endosonography involving the insertion of the endoscope through a disposable anoscope filled with standard ultrasound gel in terms of patient satisfaction and the simplicity of the procedure in comparison with the standard technique in a unit that already had echoendoscopes available.

METHODS

The two techniques were used in 35 subjects without anal abnormalities and data on the simplicity of the procedures, patient discomfort, the quality of images, and the time needed to perform the procedures were compared.

RESULTS

All the variables under investigation scored significantly better with the modified technique compared to the standard one. No differences in thickness of either the internal or the external anal sphincter were found between the two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple and less-costly adaptation of anal ultrasonography allows good quality examinations to be performed with better patient comfort in units with echoendoscopes already available, avoiding the need for a more expensive dedicated probe.