Indirect MR-arthrography in osteochondral autograft and crushed bone graft with a collagen membrane—Correlation with histology

Correlation of the Histological ICRS II Score and the 3D MOCART Score for the Analysis of Aged Osteochondral Regenerates in a Large Animal Model

OBJECTIVE

Reliable outcome measures are essential to predict the success of cartilage repair techniques. Histology is probably the gold standard, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to decrease the need for invasive histological biopsies. The 3D magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score is a reliable yet elaborate tool. Moreover, literature is controversial concerning the correlation of histology and MRI.

DESIGN

To test the applicability of the International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) II and MOCART 3D score for the evaluation of aged osteochondral regenerates in a large animal model, and to identify correlating histological and MRI parameters. Osteochondral defects in medial femoral condyles of n = 12 adult sheep were reconstructed with biodegradable bilayer implants. About 19.5 months postoperation, n = 10 joints were analyzed with MRI (3D MOCART score). Histological samples were analyzed using the ICRS II score; both pre- and post-training. The intraclass correlation coefficient, the inter-rater reliability, and the 95% confidence interval were calculated. Matching histological and MRI parameters were tested for correlation.

RESULTS

We found a statistically significant correlation of all histological parameters. MRI parameters reflecting "overall" assessments had very strong inter-rater correlations. Statistically significant strong correlations were found for the MRI parameters defect filling, cartilage interface, bone interface, and surface. For defect overall (MRI) and overall assessment (ICRS II), we found a significant yet mild correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICRS II and the 3D MOCART score are applicable to aged osteochondral regenerates. Prior training on the scoring systems is essential. Select MRI and histological parameters correlate; however, the only statistically significant correlation was found for overall assessment.

T2 assessment and clinical outcome following autologous matrix-assisted chondrocyte and osteochondral autograft transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Both, matrix-assisted chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) and osteochondral autograft transplantation (OCT), are applied for treatment of articular cartilage defects. While previous clinical studies have compared the respective outcome, there is no such information investigating the ultrastructural composition using T2 mapping comparing cartilage T2 values of the repair tissue (RT).

METHODS

Eighteen patients that underwent MACT or OCT for treatment of cartilage defects at the knee joint (nine MACT, nine OCT) were matched for gender (one female, eight male pairs), age (33.8), body mass index (BMI) (28.3), defect localization, and postoperative interval (41.6 months). T2 assessment was accomplished by T2 maps, while the clinical evaluation included the Lysholm and Cincinnati knee scores, a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the Tegner activity scale, and the Short Form-36.

RESULTS

Global T2 values of healthy femoral cartilage (HC) were similar among groups, while T2 values of the RT following MACT (46.8ms, SD 8.6) were significantly lower when compared to RT T2 values after OCT (55.5ms, SD 6.7) (P=0.048). MACT values were also significantly lower in comparison to HC (52.5ms, SD 7.9) within MACT patients (P=0.046), while OCT values were significantly higher compared to HC (49.9ms, SD 5.1) within OCT patients (P=0.041). The clinical outcome following MACT was consistently superior to that after OCT while only the Lysholm score reached the level of significance (MACT 77.0, OCT 66.8; P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that MACT and OCT result in a different ultrastructural outcome, which is only partially represented by the clinical picture.