1
|
Reidelbach CS, Goerke SM, Leschka SC, Neubauer C, Soschynski M, Lampert F, Zajonc H, Kotter E, Langer M, Neubauer J. Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiation dose-equivalent radiography, multi-detector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography for finger fractures - A phantom study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0213339. [PMID: 30835766 PMCID: PMC6400385 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic performance and raters´confidence of radiography, radiography equivalent dose multi-detector computed tomography (RED-MDCT) and radiography equivalent dose cone beam computed tomography (RED-CBCT) for finger fractures. METHODS Fractures were inflicted artificially and randomly to 10 cadaveric hands of body donors. Radiography as well as RED-MDCT and RED-CBCT imaging were performed at dose settings equivalent to radiography. Images were de-identified and analyzed by three radiologists regarding finger fractures, joint involvement and confidence with their findings. Reference standard was consensus reading by two radiologists of the fracturing protocol and high-dose multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) images. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared with Cochrane´s Q and post hoc analysis. Rater´s confidence was calculated with Friedman Test and post hoc Nemenyi Test. RESULTS Rater´s confidence, inter-rater correlation, specificity for fractures and joint involvement were higher in RED-MDCT and RED-CBCT compared to radiography. No differences between the modalities were found regarding sensitivity. CONCLUSION In this phantom study, radiography equivalent dose computed tomography (RED-CT) demonstrates a partly higher diagnostic accuracy than radiography. Implementing RED-CT in the diagnostic work-up of finger fractures could improve diagnostics, support correct classification and adequate treatment. Clinical studies should be performed to confirm these preliminary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Sophie Reidelbach
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Simon Carl Leschka
- Department of Radiology, RKK Klinikum—St. Josefskrankenhaus, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Neubauer
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Soschynski
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florian Lampert
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Horst Zajonc
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Kotter
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Langer
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jakob Neubauer
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neubauer J, Benndorf M, Reidelbach C, Krauß T, Lampert F, Zajonc H, Kotter E, Langer M, Fiebich M, Goerke SM. Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiation Dose-Equivalent Radiography, Multidetector Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Fractures of Adult Cadaveric Wrists. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0164859. [PMID: 27788215 PMCID: PMC5082876 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic accuracy of radiography, to radiography equivalent dose multidetector computed tomography (RED-MDCT) and to radiography equivalent dose cone beam computed tomography (RED-CBCT) for wrist fractures. METHODS As study subjects we obtained 10 cadaveric human hands from body donors. Distal radius, distal ulna and carpal bones (n = 100) were artificially fractured in random order in a controlled experimental setting. We performed radiation dose equivalent radiography (settings as in standard clinical care), RED-MDCT in a 320 row MDCT with single shot mode and RED-CBCT in a device dedicated to musculoskeletal imaging. Three raters independently evaluated the resulting images for fractures and the level of confidence for each finding. Gold standard was evaluated by consensus reading of a high-dose MDCT. RESULTS Pooled sensitivity was higher in RED-MDCT with 0.89 and RED-MDCT with 0.81 compared to radiography with 0.54 (P = < .004). No significant differences were detected concerning the modalities' specificities (with values between P = .98). Raters' confidence was higher in RED-MDCT and RED-CBCT compared to radiography (P < .001). CONCLUSION The diagnostic accuracy of RED-MDCT and RED-CBCT for wrist fractures proved to be similar and in some parts even higher compared to radiography. Readers are more confident in their reporting with the cross sectional modalities. Dose equivalent cross sectional computed tomography of the wrist could replace plain radiography for fracture diagnosis in the long run.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Neubauer
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Carolin Reidelbach
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Krauß
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florian Lampert
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Horst Zajonc
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Kotter
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Langer
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Fiebich
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University of Applied Sciences Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M. Goerke
- Department of Radiology, Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Offenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively determine the impact of radiation dose reduction on the image noise and quality of tomosynthesis studies of the wrist. MATERIALS AND METHODS Imaging of six cadaver wrists was performed with tomosynthesis in anteroposterior position at a tube voltage of 60 kV and tube current of 80 mA and subsequently at 60 or 50 kV with different tube currents of 80, 40, or 32 mA. Dose-area products (DAP) were obtained from the electronically logged protocol. Image noise was measured with an ROI. Two independent and blinded readers evaluated all images. Interreader agreement was measured with a Cohen kappa. Readers assessed overall quality and delineation of soft tissue, cortical bone, and trabecular bone on a 4-point Likert scale. RESULTS The highest DAP (3.892 ± 0.432 Gy · cm2) was recorded for images obtained with 60 kV and 80 mA; the lowest (0.857 ± 0.178 Gy · cm2) was recorded for images obtained with 50 kV and 32 mA. Noise was highest when a combination of 50 kV and 32 mA (389 ± 26.6) was used and lowest when a combination of 60 kV and 80 mA (218 ± 12.3) was used. The amount of noise on images acquired using 60 kV and 80 mA was statistically significantly different from the amount measured on all other images (p < 0.0001). Interreader agreement was excellent (κ = 0.93). Delineation of anatomy and overall quality were scored best on images obtained with 60 kV and 80 mA and worst on images obtained with 50 kV and 32 mA. The difference in delineation and quality on images obtained using 50 kV and 40 mA was not statistically significantly different compared with images obtained using 60 kV and 80 mA. CONCLUSION Significant dose reduction for tomosynthesis of the wrist is possible while image quality and delineation of anatomic structures remain preserved.
Collapse
|