The effect of radiofrequency ablation on different organs: Ex vivo and in vivo comparative studies

Bioimpedance measurements of fibrotic and acutely injured lung tissues

In injured and diseased tissues, changes in molecular and cellular compositions, as well as tissue architecture, lead to alterations in both physiological and physical characteristics. Notably, the electrical properties of tissues, which can be characterized as bioelectrical impedance (bioimpedance), are closely linked to the health and pathological conditions of the tissues. This highlights the significant role of quantitatively characterizing these electrical properties in improving the accuracy and speed of diagnosis and prognosis. In this study, we investigate how diseases, injuries, and physical conditions can affect the electrical properties of lung tissues, using both rat and human lung tissue samples. Results showed that rat lung and trachea tissues exhibit a frequency-dependent behavior to alternating current (AC) across the frequency range of 0.1-300 kHz. The bioimpedance of the lung tissue increased with the level of aeration of the lung, which was manipulated by altering alveolar pressure (PALV: 1-15 cmH2O; bioimpedance level: 1.2-2.8 kΩ; AC frequency: 2 kHz). This increase is mainly because air is electrically nonconductive. The bioimpedance of rat lungs injured via intratracheal aspiration of hydrochloric acid (HCl; volume: 1 mL; AC frequency: 2 kHz) decreased by at least 82 % compared to that of healthy control lungs due to accumulation of fluids inside the airspace of the injured lungs. Moreover, using decellularized lung tissues, we determined the contributions of cellular components and tissue extracellular matrix (ECM) on the electrical characteristics of the lung tissues. Specifically, we observed a considerable increase in bioimpedance in fibrotic human lung tissues due to excessive ECM deposition (healthy: 70.8 Ω ± 10.2 Ω, fibrotic: 132.1 Ω ± 15.8 Ω, frequency: 2 kHz). Overall, the findings of this study can enhance our understanding of the correlation between electrical properties and pathological lung conditions, thereby improving diagnostic and prognostic capabilities and aiding in the treatment of lung diseases and injuries. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The bioelectrical properties of tissue are closely linked to both its physiological and physical characteristics. This underscores the importance of quantitatively characterizing these properties to improve the accuracy and speed of diagnosis and prognosis. In this study, we investigate how the bioelectrical properties of lung tissues are affected by different physical states and pathological conditions using rat and human lung tissues. As the burden of lung diseases continues to increase, our findings can contribute to improved treatment outcomes by enabling accurate and rapid assessment of lung tissue conditions.

Saline-Infused Radiofrequency Ablation: A Review on the Key Factors for a Safe and Reliable Tumour Treatment

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with saline infusion into tissue is a promising technique to ablate larger tumours. Nevertheless, the application of saline-infused RFA remains at clinical trials due to the contradictory findings as a result of the inconsistencies in experimental procedures. These inconsistencies not only magnify the number of factors to consider during the treatment, but also obscure the understanding of the role of saline in enlarging the coagulation zone. Consequently, this can result in major complications, which includes unwanted thermal damages to adjacent tissues and also incomplete ablation of the tumour. This review aims to identify the key factors of saline responsible for enlarging the coagulation zone during saline-infused RFA, and provide a proper understanding on their effects that is supported with findings from computational studies to ensure a safe and reliable cancer treatment.

Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group

BACKGROUND

The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of cervical spine joint procedures including joint injections, nerve blocks and radiofrequency ablation to treat chronic neck pain, yet many aspects of the procedures remain controversial.

METHODS

In August 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the American Academy of Pain Medicine approved and charged the Cervical Joint Working Group to develop neck pain guidelines. Eighteen stakeholder societies were identified, and formal request-for-participation and member nomination letters were sent to those organizations. Participating entities selected panel members and an ad hoc steering committee selected preliminary questions, which were then revised by the full committee. Each question was assigned to a module composed of 4-5 members, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and the Committee Chairs on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee after revisions. We used a modified Delphi method whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chairs, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached. Before commencing, it was agreed that a recommendation would be noted with >50% agreement among committee members, but a consensus recommendation would require ≥75% agreement.

RESULTS

Twenty questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved in committee on 17 topics. Among participating organizations, 14 of 15 that voted approved or supported the guidelines en bloc, with 14 questions being approved with no dissensions or abstentions. Specific questions addressed included the value of clinical presentation and imaging in selecting patients for procedures, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for blocks, diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks and intra-articular joint injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for designating a block as positive, how many blocks should be performed before radiofrequency ablation, the orientation of electrodes, whether larger lesions translate into higher success rates, whether stimulation should be used before radiofrequency ablation, how best to mitigate complication risks, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and trials, and the indications for repeating radiofrequency ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with medial branch blocks being more predictive than intra-articular injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of false-negatives (ie, lower overall success rate). Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.

Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group

BACKGROUND

The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of cervical spine joint procedures including joint injections, nerve blocks and radiofrequency ablation to treat chronic neck pain, yet many aspects of the procedures remain controversial.

METHODS

In August 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the American Academy of Pain Medicine approved and charged the Cervical Joint Working Group to develop neck pain guidelines. Eighteen stakeholder societies were identified, and formal request-for-participation and member nomination letters were sent to those organizations. Participating entities selected panel members and an ad hoc steering committee selected preliminary questions, which were then revised by the full committee. Each question was assigned to a module composed of 4-5 members, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and the Committee Chairs on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee after revisions. We used a modified Delphi method whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chairs, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached. Before commencing, it was agreed that a recommendation would be noted with >50% agreement among committee members, but a consensus recommendation would require ≥75% agreement.

RESULTS

Twenty questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved in committee on 17 topics. Among participating organizations, 14 of 15 that voted approved or supported the guidelines en bloc, with 14 questions being approved with no dissensions or abstentions. Specific questions addressed included the value of clinical presentation and imaging in selecting patients for procedures, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for blocks, diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks and intra-articular joint injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for designating a block as positive, how many blocks should be performed before radiofrequency ablation, the orientation of electrodes, whether larger lesions translate into higher success rates, whether stimulation should be used before radiofrequency ablation, how best to mitigate complication risks, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and trials, and the indications for repeating radiofrequency ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with medial branch blocks being more predictive than intra-articular injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of false-negatives (ie, lower overall success rate). Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.

Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group

BACKGROUND

The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of lumbar facet blocks and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat low back pain (LBP), yet nearly all aspects of the procedures remain controversial.

METHODS

After approval by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, letters were sent to a dozen pain societies, as well as representatives from the US Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense. A steering committee was convened to select preliminary questions, which were revised by the full committee. Questions were assigned to 4-5 person modules, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and Committee Chair on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee. We used a modified Delphi method, whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chair, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached.

RESULTS

17 questions were selected for guideline development, with 100% consensus achieved by committee members on all topics. All societies except for one approved every recommendation, with one society dissenting on two questions (number of blocks and cut-off for a positive block before RFA), but approving the document. Specific questions that were addressed included the value of history and physical examination in selecting patients for blocks, the value of imaging in patient selection, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for block performance, the diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks (MBB) and intra-articular (IA) injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for a prognostic block, how many blocks should be performed before RFA, how electrodes should be oriented, the evidence for larger lesions, whether stimulation should be used before RFA, ways to mitigate complications, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and clinical trials and the evidence for repeating RFA (see table 12 for summary).

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar medial branch RFA may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with MBB being more predictive than IA injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of more false-negatives. Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.

Finding Optimal Ablation Parameters for Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for primary liver tumors and liver metastases is restricted by a limited ablation size. Multipolar RFA is a technical advancement of RFA, which is able to achieve larger ablations. The aim of this ex vivo study was to determine optimal ablation parameters for multipolar RFA depending on applicator distance and energy input.

METHODS

RFA was carried out ex vivo in porcine livers with three internally cooled, bipolar applicators in multipolar ablation mode. Three different applicator distances were used and five different energy inputs were examined. Ablation zones were sliced along the cross-sectional area at the largest ablation diameter, orthogonally to the applicators. These slices were digitally measured and analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty RFA were carried out. A limited growth of ablation area was seen in all test series. This increase was dependent on ablation time, but not on applicator distance. A steady state between energy input and energy loss was not observed. A saturation of the minimum radius of the ablation zone was reached. Differences in ablation radius between the three test series were seen for lowest and highest energy input ( P < .05). No differences were seen for medium amounts of energy ( P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The ablation parameters applicator distance and energy input can be chosen in such a way, that minor deviations of the preplanned ablation parameters have no influence on the size of the ablation area.

Predictive factors for complete renal tumor ablation using RFA

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be used to treat renal masses in patients where surgery is preferably avoided. As tumor size and location can affect ablation results, procedural planning needs to identify these factors to limit treatment to a single session and increase ablation success.

PURPOSE

To identify factors that may affect the primary efficacy of complete renal tumor ablation with radiofrequency after a single session.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Percutaneous RFA (using an impedance based system) was performed using computed tomography (CT) guidance. Fifty-two renal tumors (in 44 patients) were retrospectively studied (median follow-up, 7 months). Data collection included patient demographics, tumor data (modified Renal Nephrometry Score, histopathological diagnosis), RFA treatment data (electrode placement), and follow-up results (tumor relapse). Data were analyzed through generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Primary efficacy rate was 83%. Predictors for complete ablation were optimal electrode placement (P = 0.002, OR = 16.67) and increasing distance to the collecting system (P = 0.02, OR = 1.18). Tumor size was not a predictor for complete ablation (median size, 24 mm; P = 0.069, OR = 0.47), but all tumors ≤2 cm were completely ablated. All papillary tumors and oncocytomas were completely ablated in a single session; the most common incompletely ablated tumor type was clear cell carcinoma (6 of 9).

CONCLUSION

Optimal electrode placement and a long distance from the collecting system are associated with an increased primary efficacy of renal tumor RFA. These variables need to be considered to increase primary ablation success. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of RFA on histopathologically different renal tumors.

The interaction between the composition of preinjected fluids and duration of radiofrequency on lesion size

BACKGROUND

Clinical recommendations for the duration of radiofrequency (RF) delivery have been based on no-fluid design, which may not be representative of clinical practice where fluid preinjection occurs. The purpose of this study was to examine the interaction between the preinjection of fluids of differing compositions and duration of RF on lesion size. The variability of lesion development under different preinjection conditions was also examined across the RF lesion duration.

METHODS

Monopolar RF was performed with ex vivo chicken samples for 180 seconds without fluid preinjection or with fluid preinjected. Nonionic and ionic fluids were investigated. Lesion size parameters and and power levels were measured every 10 seconds. The surface area and efficiency index were calculated.

RESULTS

The preinjection of specific fluid increased the maximum mean surface area. Lesion growth continued throughout the entire lesion cycle. When all groups were considered together, the largest mean surface area occurred at 180 seconds. The preinjection of specific fluids altered the rate of lesion growth and the time required to achieve maximum lesion size in a fluid-specific manner. Significant variability was documented in the rate and amount of lesion growth under each condition. Extending lesioning time resulted in reduced lesion variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluid preinjection alters both final lesion size and the time required to achieve maximum lesion size. Extending the duration of RF lesion cycle beyond 90 seconds when fluid is preinjected allows for lesion size to be maximized while limiting lesion size variability, both of which assist in successfully lesioning a targeted nerve.

Dual-energy CT after radiofrequency ablation of liver, kidney, and lung lesions: a review of features

Early detection of residual tumour and local tumour progression (LTP) after radiofrequency (RF) ablation is crucial in the decision whether or not to re-ablate. In general, standard contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is used to evaluate the technique effectiveness; however, it is difficult to differentiate post-treatment changes from residual tumour. Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a relatively new technique that enables more specific tissue characterisation of iodine-enhanced structures because of the isolation of iodine in the imaging data. Necrotic post-ablation zones can be depicted as avascular regions by DECT on greyscale- and colour-coded iodine images. Synthesised monochromatic images from dual-energy CT with spectral analysis can be used to select the optimal keV to achieve the highest contrast-to-noise ratio between tissues. This facilitates outlining the interface between the ablation zone and surrounding tissue. Post-processing of DECT data can lead to an improved characterisation and delineation of benign post-ablation changes from LTP. Radiologists need to be familiar with typical post-ablation image interpretations when using DECT techniques. Here, we review the spectrum of changes after RF ablation of liver, kidney, and lung lesions using single-source DECT imaging, with the emphasis on the additional information obtained and pitfalls encountered with this relatively new technique.

Teaching Points

•Technical success of RF ablation means complete destruction of the tumour.

•Assessment of residual tumour on contrast-enhanced CT is hindered by post-ablative changes.

•DECT improves material differentiation and may improve focal lesion characterisation.

•Iodine maps delineate the treated area from the surrounding parenchyma well.

Real time shear waves elastography monitoring of thermal ablation: in vivo evaluation in pig livers

BACKGROUND

Thermal ablation is a widely used minimally invasive treatment modality for different cancers. However, lack of a real-time imaging system for accurate evaluation of the procedure is one of the reasons of local recurrences. Shear waves elastography (SWE) is a new ultrasound (US) imaging modality to quantify tissue stiffness. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of US elastography for quantitative monitoring of thermal ablation and to determine the elasticity threshold predictive of coagulation necrosis.

METHODS

A total of 29 in vivo thermal lesions were performed in pig livers with radiofrequency system. SWE and B-mode images were acquired simultaneously. Liver elasticity was quantified by using SWE data and expressed in kilopascal. After the procedure, pathologic analysis of treated tissues was compared with US images. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of the SWE maps of tissue elasticity were calculated and compared with the boundaries of the pale coagulation necrosis areas found at pathology.

RESULTS

The liver mean elasticity values before and after thermal therapy were 6.4 ± 0.3 and 38.1 ± 2.5 kPa, respectively (P < 0.0001). For a threshold of 20 kPa, sensitivity (i.e., the rate of pixels correctly detected as necrosed tissue) was 0.8, and the positive predictive value (i.e., the rate of pixels in the elastographic map >20 kPa that actually developed coagulation necrosis) was 0.83.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue areas with coagulation necrosis are significantly stiffer than the surrounding tissue. SWE permits the real-time detection of coagulation necrosis produced by radiofrequency and could potentially be used to monitor US-guided thermal ablation.

Radiofrequency coil for the creation of large ablations: ex vivo and in vivo testing

PURPOSE

Various radiofrequency (RF) ablation electrode designs have been developed to increase ablation volume. Multiple heating cycles and electrode positions are often required, thereby increasing treatment time. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of a high-frequency monopolar induction coil designed to produce large thermal lesions (>3 cm) with a single electrode insertion in a treatment time of less than 10 minutes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A monopolar nitinol interstitial coil operated at 27.12 MHz and 200 W was evaluated. Ex vivo performance was tested in excised bovine liver (n = 22). In vivo testing (n = 10) was conducted in livers of seven Yorkshire pigs. Visual inspection, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and pathologic evaluation of ablation zones were performed.

RESULTS

Average ablation volumes in ex vivo and in vivo tests were 60.5 cm(3) ± 14.1 (5.9 × 4.4 × 4.4 cm) and 57.1cm(3) ± 13.8 (6.1 × 4.5 × 4.1cm), with average treatment times of 9.0 minutes ± 3.0 and 8.4 minutes ± 2.7, respectively. Contrast-enhanced CT ablation volume measurements corresponded with findings of gross inspection. Pathologic analysis showed morphologic and enzymatic changes suggestive of tissue death within the ablation zones.

CONCLUSIONS

The RF ablation coil device successfully produced large, uniform ablation volumes in ex vivo and in vivo settings in treatment times of less than 10 minutes. Ex vivo and in vivo lesion sizes were not significantly different (P = .53), suggesting that the heating efficiency of this higher-frequency coil device may help to minimize the heat-sink effect of perfusion.

Interventional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the third most common cause of cancer-related death. In the past few years, staging systems have been developed that enable patients to be stratified into treatment algorithms in a multidisciplinary setting. Several of these treatments involve minimally invasive image-guided therapy that can be performed by radiologists.

Clinical significance of vagus nerve variation in radiofrequency ablation of thyroid nodules

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the types and incidence of vagus nerve variations and to assess factors related to the vulnerability of vagus nerves during the radiofrequency (RF) ablation of thyroid nodules.

METHODS

Bilateral vagus nerves of 304 consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound of the neck were assessed. Two radiologists evaluated vagus nerve type (types 1-4; lateral/anterior/medial/posterior), the shortest distance between the thyroid gland and vagus nerve, and thyroid contour. Vagus nerve vulnerability was defined as a vagus nerve located within 2 mm of the thyroid gland through the ex vivo experiments, and factors associated with vulnerability were assessed.

RESULTS

We were unable to find one vagus nerve. Of the 607 vagus nerves, 467 (76.9%) were type 1, 128 (21.1%) were type 2, 10 (1.6%) were type 3, and 2 (0.3%) were type 4, with 81 (13.3%) being vulnerable. Univariate analysis showed that sex, location, thyroid contour and type were significantly associated with vagus nerve vulnerability. Multivariate analysis showed that bulging contour caused by thyroid nodules (P = 0.001), vagus nerve types 2/4 (P < 0.001) and type 3 (P < 0.001) were independent predictors.

CONCLUSION

The operator should pay attention to anatomical variations and the resulting vagus nerve injury during RF ablation of bulging thyroid nodules.