Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign hepatic tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient on 1.5-T MR imaging: a meta analysis

To assess the quantitative features of focal liver lesions in gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI and to determine whether these features can accurately differentiate benign form malignant lesions

PURPOSE

The study aims at assessing the quantitative features which distinguish focal liver lesions (FLLs) in gadoxetic acid (GA) enhanced liver MRI and at determining whether these features can accurately differentiate benign from malignant lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

107 patients with 180 unequivocal FLLs in previous examinations were included in a single-center retrospective study. All patients underwent a MRI test of the liver with GA. 99 benign and 74 malignant lesions were included. The group of benign lesions consisted of 60 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNH), 22 hemangiomas (HMG), 6 hepatic adenomas (HA), and 11 other benign lesions (1 angiomyolipioma, 6 lesions histopathology diagnoses as benign without further specification, or ones lacking features of malignancy, and 4 lesions radiologically diagnosed as benign which remained stable in the follow-up studies). The group of malignant lesions consisted of primary 51 hepatocellular carcinomas, 12 metastases, and 11 metastases from melanoma malignum (MM meta). 7 FLLs were excluded (4 cases of uncertain histopathological diagnosis, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, and 1 regenerative nodule). For the included lesions ROI (region of interest) measurements were taken by two observers in the T2-w, ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) and in the T1-w sequence in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The interobserver agreement was evaluated with the Wilcoxon test. The Kruskal - Wallis, Mann - Whitney U and post hoc Dunn's tests were applied to assess if there were any significant differences in the ROI values between individual lesions. The variables with the p values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We found significant differences in the ROI values between lesions with p < 0.0001. Strikingly high ROI values in the T2-w sequence were found for HMG. The lowest ADC values were encountered for metastases and MM metastases. The highest ROI values in the HBP were found for FNH, and the lowest for metastases. We also found statistically significant differences in the ROI values between benign and malignant lesions with benign lesions presenting statistically higher ROI values compared to malignant lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in the ROI values among different types of FLLs. The predominant quantitative feature in the T2-w sequence was a strikingly high ROI value for HMG. Benign lesions presented statistically higher ROI values in the T2-w, ADC, and HBP sequences compared to malignant lesions. This was true for all lesions except for HA.

Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived by diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI in the characterization of solid benign and malignant liver lesions, and to assess their value in discriminating these lesions in daily routine practice.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to retrieve studies that used ADC values for differentiating solid benign/dysplastic nodules and malignant liver lesions. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. This meta-analysis was performed on the per-lesion basis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) plot and area under curve (AUC) were created.

RESULTS

A total of 14 original articles were retrieved. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating solid benign from malignant lesions were 78% (67-86%) and 74% (64-81%), respectively. The pooled (95% CI) positive and negative LRs were respectively 3 (2.3-3.8) and 0.3 (0.21-0.43). The DOR (95% CI) was 10 (7-15). The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC plot was 82% (78-85%). Reporting bias was negligible (p value of regression test = 0.36). Mean size of malignant lesions and breathing pattern of MRI were found to be sources of heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

ADC measurement independently may not be an optimal diagnostic imaging method for differentiating solid malignant from solid benign hepatic lesions. The meta-analysis showed that ADC measurement had moderate diagnostic accuracy for characterizing solid liver lesions. Further prospective and comparative studies with pre-specified ADC thresholds could be performed to investigate the best MRI protocol and ADC threshold for characterizing solid liver lesions.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

ADC measurement by DW-MRI does not have a good diagnostic performance to differentiate solid malignant from solid benign lesions. Therefore, we suggest not using ADC values in clinical practice to evaluate solid liver lesions.

Magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging-based histogram analyses in predicting glypican 3-positive hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the potential MR imaging findings in predicting glypican-3 (GPC3)-positive hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), with special emphasis on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-based histogram analyses.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with pathologically-confirmed GPC3-negative HCCs and 100 patients with GPC3-positive HCCs were retrospectively evaluated using contrast-enhanced MRI and DWI. Clinical characteristics and MRI features including DWI-based histogram features were assessed and compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the significant clinico-radiologic variables associated with GPC3 expressions that were then incorporated into a predictive nomogram. Nomogram performance was evaluated based on calibration, discrimination, and decision curve analyses.

RESULTS

Features significantly related to GPC3-positive HCCs at univariate analyses were serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels >20 ng/mL (P < 0.0001), absence of enhancing capsule (P = 0.040), peritumoral enhancement appearance on the arterial phase (P = 0.049), as well as lower mean (P = 0.0278), median (P = 0.0372) and 75th percentile (P = 0.0085) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. At multivariate analysis, the AFP levels (odds ratio, 11.236; P < 0.0001) and 75th percentile ADC values (odds ratio, 1.009; P = 0.033) were independent risk factors associated with GPC3-positive HCCs. When both criteria were combined, both sensitivity (79.0 %) and specificity (79.1 %) greater than 75 % were achieved, and satisfactory predictive nomogram performance was obtained with a C-index of 0.804 (95 % confidence interval, 0.729-0.866). Decision curve analysis further confirmed the clinical usefulness of the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated serum AFP levels and lower 75th percentile ADC values were helpful in differentiating GPC3-positive and GPC3-negative HCCs. The combined nomogram achieved satisfactory preoperative risk prediction of GPC3 expression in HCC patients.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Reflects Tumor Grading and Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To date, there are inconsistent data about relationships between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and tumor grading/microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our purpose was to systematize the reported results regarding the role of DWI in prediction of tumor grading/MVI in HCC.

METHOD

MEDLINE library, Scopus, and Embase data bases were screened up to December 2019. Overall, 29 studies with 2,715 tumors were included into the analysis. There were 20 studies regarding DWI and tumor grading, 8 studies about DWI and MVI, and 1 study investigated DWI, tumor grading, and MVI in HCC.

RESULTS

In 21 studies (1,799 tumors), mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (ADC_mean) were used for distinguishing HCCs. ADC_mean of G1-3 lesions overlapped significantly. In 4 studies (461 lesions), minimum ADC (ADC_min) was used. ADC_min values in G1/2 lesions were over 0.80 × 10^-3 mm²/s and in G3 tumors below 0.80 × 10^-3 mm²/s. In 4 studies (241 tumors), true diffusion (D) was reported. A significant overlapping of D values between G1, G2, and G3 groups was found. ADC_mean and MVI were analyzed in 9 studies (1,059 HCCs). ADC_mean values of MIV+/MVI- lesions overlapped significantly. ADC_min was used in 4 studies (672 lesions). ADC_min values of MVI+ tumors were in the area under 1.00 × 10^-3 mm²/s. In 3 studies (227 tumors), D was used. Also, D values of MVI+ lesions were predominantly in the area under 1.00 × 10^-3 mm²/s.

CONCLUSION

ADC_min reflects tumor grading, and ADC_min and D predict MVI in HCC. Therefore, these DWI parameters should be estimated for every HCC lesion for pretreatment tumor stratification. ADC_mean cannot predict tumor grading/MVI in HCC.

Is 18F-FDG PET/CT an Accurate Way to Detect Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aims

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) for detection of lymph node (LN) metastasis of colorectal cancer. Material and Methods. A computerized search was performed to determine the relevant articles, published before October 2019. Stata Statistical Software, version 15.0, and Meta-Disc (version 1.4) were used for the meta-analysis.

Results

the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.65, 0.75, 4.57, and 0.37 respectively. Studies that used SUV_max cut-off value (≤2.5) demonstrated the best accuracy.

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT shows a low sensitivity and high specificity for detecting the metastasis of LNs in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.

Evaluation of ADCratio on liver MRI diffusion to discriminate benign versus malignant solid liver lesions

PURPOSE

The aim of this project is to investigate the usefulness of the absolute liver lesion ADC value and ratio of Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of a liver lesion and liver parenchyma to discriminate between a benign and malignant lesion.

METHODS

Liver MRI scans performed between January 2009 and June 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Scans were performed on either a 1.5 T or 3 T MRI unit. The type of liver lesion (benign or malignant) was determined by its radiological appearance, histology result and clinical management. Lesions with undetermined diagnosis or MRI studies degraded by artifacts were excluded. Liver cysts were also excluded from the analysis. ADC value of a lesion and liver parenchyma was measured and ADC_ratio was calculated. The values were analysed using independent samples t-test Results:Data set contained 39 benign lesions and 36 malignant lesions. Mean ADC value for benign lesions was 1678, and the mean value for malignant lesions was 1097 with a statistically significant difference of p < 0.001. All lesions with ADC value below 955 were malignant, while all lesions with ADC value above 1880 were benign. ADC value of 1260 was identified as the best available cut-off value for differentiating benign and malignant lesions, achieving sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 80% and an overall accuracy of 89%. The mean lesion to liver ADC_ratio for benign lesions was 1.3467 and for malignant lesions was 0.9038 with a statistically significant difference of p < 0.001. All lesions with ADC_ratio measuring <0.9 were malignant while lesions with ADC_ratio>1.5 were benign. ADC_ratio of 1.1 was identified statistically as the best available cut-off value for differentiating benign from malignant lesions, with sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 86% and an overall accuracy of 92%.

CONCLUSION

Our dataset indicates that lesion to background liver ADC_ratio is superior in discriminating between benign and malignant focal lesions compared to absolute ADC values of the hepatic lesions.

Meta-analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating focal lesions of the liver

INTRODUCTION

Accurate detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, including differentiation between malignant and benign lesions, are particularly important. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure molecular diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion-related diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) in differentiating focal liver lesions.

METHODS

IVIM method employed for focal liver lesion and the quality assessment of diagnostic studies were evaluated. Standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The heterogeneity was quantified with the I statistic.

RESULTS

The difference between groups was analyzed according to the I values from 6 different studies using fixed effects or random effects models. Significant differences in ADC (P < .001) and D (P < .001) were observed between benign and malignant lesions. Moreover, significant differences in ADC (P < .001), D (P < .001), and f (P = .01) were found between hemangioma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In addition, no significant difference was observed between the metastases and HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

D and ADC values were useful for the differentiation between benignity and malignancy; higher values of ADC, D, and f were observed in hemangioma compared to HCC. Nevertheless, IVIM did not result as the optimal approach for differentiation between the metastases and HCC.

Standard-b-Value Versus Low-b-Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Hepatic Lesion Discrimination: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the comparative diagnostic performance of standard-b-value (500-1000s/mm) versus low-b-value (≤500 s/mm) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the discrimination of hepatic lesions.

METHODS

A total of 1775 hepatic malignant lesions and 1120 benign hepatic lesions from 21 studies were included.

RESULTS

(1) The global sensitivity was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.847-0.879), the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.797-0.842), the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 6.234 (95% CI, 4.260-9.123), the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.175 (95% CI, 0.135-0.227), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 42.836 (95% CI, 24.134-76.031). The area under the curve (AUC) and Q* index were 0.93 and 0.87. Publication bias was not present (P > 0.05). (2)The sensitivity of a subgroup meta-analysis of standard-b-value DWI was 0.858 (95% CI, 0.835-0.880), the specificity was 0.836 (95% CI, 0.807-0.863), the PLR was 6.527 (95% CI, 3.857-11.046), the NLR was 0.168 (95% CI, 0.123-0.239), and the DOR was 49.716 (95% CI, 22.897-107.98). The AUC and Q* index were 0.941 and 0.88. (3)The sensitivity of a subgroup meta-analysis of low-b-value DWI was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89), the specificity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), the PLR was 6.22 (95% CI, 3.29-11.76), the NLR was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.12-0.29), and the DOR was 37.14 (95% CI, 14.80-93.18). The AUC and Q* index were 0.922 and 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic DWI is useful in differentiating between malignant and benign hepatic lesions. Standard-b-value DWI displayed an overall superior diagnostic accuracy over low-b-value DWI. Further trials needed to determine whether increasing b values beyond 1000 s/mm affects the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic lesion discrimination.

Could ADC values be a promising diagnostic criterion for differentiating malignant and benign hepatic lesions in Asian populations: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver cancer exhibits geographic and ethnic differences in its prevalence and biology, which implies that it is impractical to develop universal guidelines for all patients. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to identify the accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) for discriminating malignant from benign liver lesions in Asians.

METHODS

Eligible studies published in PubMed, Ovid, and Embase/Medline were updated onto October 2014. STATA 12.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 were used to perform this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eight studies comprising 661 benign liver lesions and 598 malignant liver lesions fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.95), 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-0.97), 12.42 (95% CI 6.09-25.31), 0.13 (95% CI 0.06-0.29), and 95.58 (95% CI 35.29-258.89), respectively. Overall, the area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.98). Heterogeneity was found to originate potentially from the type of benign lesion. A subgroup analysis showed that differentiating between hemangiomas, cysts, and malignant liver lesions produced a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than that of solid liver lesions.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicated that ADC could be promising for characterizing liver lesions among Asians, indicating that the ADC value is a promising diagnostic criterion candidate. Meanwhile, the use of dual b values could be sufficient for liver lesion characterization. However, large-scale, high-quality trials should be conducted to identify specific standards, including cut-off values for further development of diffusion-weighted imaging as a routine clinical application among Asian populations.

Standard-b-value vs low-b-value DWI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the comparative diagnostic performance of standard-b-value (≥500 mm(2)) vs low-b-value (<500s mm(-2)) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for discriminating malignant from benign vertebral compression fractures.

METHODS

12 studies with a total of 350 malignant and 312 benign vertebral fractures were included.

RESULTS

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of benign vertebral compression fractures was lower than that of malignant vertebral compression fractures (SMD = 1.81, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.64 Z = 4.27, p < 0.05). ADC value difference was more pronounced in the group of low-b-value DWI (SMD = 2.31, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.60 Z = 3.51, p < 0.05) than in the group of standard-b-value DWI (SMD = 1.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.59 Z = 2.25, p < 0.05). Ethnicity stratified analysis demonstrated higher ADC values in benign vertebral compression fractures in comparison to malignant tissues in both the Asian and Caucasian subgroups (Asians: SMD = 2.400, 95%CI 1.45 to approximately 3.35, p<0.05; Caucasians: SMD = 0.592, 95 % CI -0.848 to approximately 2.032, p < 0.05). And the ADC value difference was more pronounced in the Asian subgroup.

CONCLUSION

ADC value appears to be a reliable method to differentiate benign from malignant fractures. Low-b-value DWI was more a valuable parameter than standard-b-value DWI for discriminating malignant from benign vertebral compression fractures. And the diffusion characteristics of the benign vertebral fractures such as osteoporosis, trauma and infection have rarely been investigated separately.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The use of low-b-value DWI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures is recommended.

Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by single-shot echo-planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic ability of single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate between malignant and benign pancreatic lesions.

METHODS: A computerized search was performed on PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to August 2014. Nine studies (10 sets of data) with a total of 304 malignant pancreatic lesions and 188 benign pancreatic lesions were included. The characteristics of each study included the study name, year of publication, magnetic resonance modalities used, patient population, strength of field, pulse time, repetition time, echo time (TE), maximum b factor, mean age, mean body weight, fat suppression, number of benign and malignant lesions, and true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative results. All analyses were performed using Meta-DiSc and Stata 11.0.

RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity and specificity of single-shot EPI DWI were 0.83 (95%CI: 0.79-0.87) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70-0.83), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 5.09 (95%CI: 2.19-11.84) and 0.23 (95%CI: 0.15-0.36), respectively. The P value for the χ² heterogeneity for all pooled estimates was < 0.05. From the fitted summary receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve and Q* index were 0.89 and 0.82, respectively. Publication bias was not present (t = 0.58, P = 0.58). Meta-regression analysis indicated that fat suppression, mean age, TE, and maximum b factor were not sources of heterogeneity (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Single-shot EPI DWI is useful to differentiate between malignant and benign pancreatic lesions. Lesion size ≥ 2 cm is the limit for the diagnosis of early lesions.

Lesion discrimination with breath-hold hepatic diffusion-weighted imaging: A meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic capability of breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiation between malignant and benign hepatic lesions.

METHODS: A total of 614 malignant liver lesions (132 hepatocellular carcinomas, 468 metastases and 14 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas) and 291 benign liver lesions (102 hemangiomas, 158 cysts, 24 focal nodular hyperplasia, 1 angiomyolipoma and 6 hepatic adenomas) were included from seven studies (eight sets of data).

RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity and specificity of breath-hold DWI were 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-0.95] and 0.87 (95%CI: 0.83-0.91), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 7.28 (95%CI: 4.51-11.76) and 0.09 (95%CI: 0.05-0.17), respectively. The P value for χ² heterogeneity for all pooled estimates was < 0.05. From the fitted summary receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve and Q* index were 0.96 and 0.91, respectively. Publication bias was not present (t = 0.49, P = 0.64). The meta-regression analysis indicated that evaluated covariates including magnetic resonance imaging modality, echo time, mean age, maximum b factor, and number of b factors were not sources of heterogeneity (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Breath-hold DWI is useful for differentiating between malignant and benign hepatic lesions. The diffusion characteristics of benign lesions that mimic malignant ones have rarely been investigated.

Differential diagnosis between hepatic metastases and benign focal lesions using DWI with parallel acquisition technique: a meta-analysis

We aim to investigate the diagnostic capability of diffusion-weighted imaging using parallel acquisition technique for the differentiation between hepatic metastases and benign focal lesions with a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included a total of 858 hepatic metastases and 440 benign liver lesions from nine studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.93), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 8.50 (95% CI, 4.97-14.52) and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.11-0.26), respectively. The P value for χ (2) heterogeneity for all pooled estimates was <0.05. From the fitted summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC), the area under the curve (AUC) and Q* index were 0.95 and 0.88, respectively. Publication bias is not present (t = -0.76, P = 0.471). The meta-regression analysis indicated that evaluated covariates included patient number, patient population, mean age, maximum of b factor, number of cysts, number of hemangiomas, and field were not sources of heterogeneity (all P value >0.05). Diffusion-weighted imaging was useful for differentiation between hepatic metastases and benign focal lesions. The diffusion characteristics of the benign hepatocellular lesions, including cases of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and adenoma, have rarely been reported and need further studies. The diagnostic capability of DWI with parallel acquisition technique for differentiation between metastases and benign hepatic focal lesions might be overestimated.

Relaxivity-iron calibration in hepatic iron overload: Predictions of a Monte Carlo model

PURPOSE

R2* (1/T2*) and single echo R2 (1/T2) have been calibrated to liver iron concentration (LIC) in patients with thalassemia and transfusion-dependent sickle cell disease at 1.5T. The R2*-LIC relationship is linear, whereas that of R2 is curvilinear. However, the increasing popularity of high-field scanners requires generalizing these relationships to higher field strengths. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that numerical simulation can accurately determine the field dependence of iron-mediated transverse relaxation rates.

METHODS

We previously replicated the calibration curves between R2 and R2* and iron at 1.5T using Monte Carlo models incorporating realistic liver structure, iron deposit susceptibility, and proton mobility. In this paper, we extend our model to predict relaxivity-iron calibrations at higher field strengths. Predictions were validated by measuring R2 and R2* at 1.5T and 3T in six β-thalassemia major patients.

RESULTS

Predicted R2* increased twofold at 3T from 1.5T, whereas R2 increased by a factor of 1.47. Patient data exhibited a coefficient of variation of 3.6% and 7.2%, respectively, to the best-fit simulated data. Simulations over the range 0.25T-7T showed R2* increasing linearly with field strength, whereas R2 exhibited a concave-downward relationship.

CONCLUSION

A model-based approach predicts alterations in relaxivity-iron calibrations with field strength without repeating imaging studies. The model may generalize to alternative pulse sequences and tissue iron distribution.

Functional MR imaging of the abdomen

In this article, functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques in the abdomen are discussed. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) increases the confidence in detecting and characterizing focal hepatic lesions. The potential uses of DWI in kidneys, adrenal glands, bowel, and pancreas are outlined. Studies have shown potential use of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parameters, such as K(trans), in predicting outcomes in cancer therapy. MR elastography is considered to be a useful tool in staging liver fibrosis. A major issue with all functional MR imaging techniques is the lack of standardization of the protocol.

Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions using single-voxel proton MRS: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aim to investigate the diagnostic capability of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy (MRS) for benign/malignant discrimination of focal breast lesions with a meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The meta-analysis included a total of 750 malignant breast lesions and 419 benign breast lesions from eighteen studies.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRS were 0.71 (95 % CI 0.68-0.74) and 0.85 (95 % CI 0.81-0.88), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and negative LR were 4.11 (95 % CI 3.11-5.43) and 0.25 (95 % CI 0.17-0.36), respectively. The P value for χ(2) heterogeneity for all pooled estimates was <0.05. From the fitted summary receiver operating characteristics curve, AUC was 0.89 and Q* was 0.84. Asymmetrical in funnel plots indicated there may be publication bias (t = 2.85, P = 0.012). The meta-regression analysis indicated that neither threshold effect nor evaluated covariates that include strength of field, scanning technique (PRESS or STEAM), repetition time, NSA, and pre- or post-contrast agent were the sources of heterogeneity (all P value >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-voxel proton MRS was useful for differentiation between malignant and benign breast lesions. However, pooled diagnostic measures might be overestimated. The standardization of the acquisition protocol for MRS across the multicenter trials is recommended.

Diffusion-weighted MRI and optimal b-value for characterization of liver lesions

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is commonly used to distinguish between benign and malignant liver lesions. However, different b-values are recommended.

PURPOSE

To determine the most suitable b-value in DWI for differentiation of benign and malignant liver lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 124 lesions in 89 consecutive patients (43 men, 46 women; age, mean ± standard deviation, 58 ± 14 years) with a pathological or radiological diagnosis of malignant or benign focal liver lesions after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in this study. Routine abdominal MRI and DWI were performed using seven b-values (0, 50, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 s/mm(2)). Lesions were analyzed for benignity/malignity using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with 10 b-value combinations and by measuring the lesion/normal parenchyma ADC ratio.

RESULTS

Mean ADC values were significantly different between malignant and benign lesions for all b-value combinations (P=0.000). The best b-value combination was 0 and 800 (Az=0.935). Using lower b-values such as 0 and 50 together with higher b-values ≥ 600 s/mm(2) was beneficial (Az=0.928 and 0.927). Mean ADC values were approximately 13% (1-15%) higher in total when b=0 and b=50 s/mm(2) were included in multiple b-value combinations.

CONCLUSION

In DWI, we recommend the use of b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm(2) as two b-values, or b=0, 50, 600, 800, and 1000 s/mm(2) as multiple b-values for distinguishing between benign and malignant liver lesions. Mean ADC value is 13% higher in total by additional use of b=0 and b=50 s/mm(2) in multiple b-value combinations.

Impact of field strength and RF excitation on abdominal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

AIM: To retrospectively and prospectively compare diffusion-weighted (DW) images in the abdomen in a 1.5T system and 3.0T systems with and without two-channel functionality for B₁ shimming.

METHODS: DW images of the abdomen were obtained on 1.5T and 3.0T (with and without two-channel functionality for B₁ shimming) scanners on 150 patients (retrospective study population) and 10 volunteers (prospective study population). Eight regions were selected for clinical significance or artifact susceptibility (at higher field strengths). Objective grading quantified signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and subjective evaluation qualified image quality, ghosting artifacts, and diagnostic value. Statistical significance was calculated using χ² tests (categorical variables) and independent two-sided t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests (continuous variables).

RESULTS: The 3.0T using dual-source parallel transmit (dpTX 3.0T) provided the significantly highest SNRs in nearly all regions. In regions susceptible to artifacts at higher field strengths (left lobe of liver, head of pancreas), the SNR was better or similar to the 1.5T system. Subjectively, both dpTX 3.0T and 1.5T systems provided higher image quality, diagnostic value, and less ghosting artifact (P < 0.01, most values) compared to the 3.0T system without dual-source parallel transmit (non-dpTX 3.0T).

CONCLUSION: The dpTX 3.0T scanner provided the highest SNR. Its image quality, lack of ghosting, and diagnostic value were equal to or outperformed most currently used systems.

Implementation of dual-source RF excitation in 3 T MR-scanners allows for nearly identical ADC values compared to 1.5 T MR scanners in the abdomen

Background

To retrospectively and prospectively compare abdominal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained within in a 1.5 T system and 3 T systems with and without dual-source parallel RF excitation techniques.

Methodology/Principal Findings

After IRB approval, diffusion-weighted (DW) images of the abdomen were obtained on three different MR systems (1.5 T, a first generation 3 T, and a second generation 3 T which incorporates dual-source parallel RF excitation) on 150 patients retrospectively and 19 volunteers (57 examinations total) prospectively. Seven regions of interest (ROI) were throughout the abdomen were selected to measure the ADC. Statistical analysis included independent two-sided t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and correlation analysis. In the DW images of the abdomen, mean ADC values were nearly identical with nonsignificant differences when comparing the 1.5 T and second generation 3 T systems in all seven anatomical regions in the patient population and six of the seven in the volunteer population (p>0.05 in all distributions). The strength of correlation measured in the volunteer population between the two scanners in the kidneys ranged from r = 0.64–0.88 and in the remaining regions (besides the spleen), r>0.85. In the patient population the first generation 3 T scanner had different mean ADC values with significant differences (p<0.05) compared to the other two scanners in each of the seven distributions. In the volunteer population, the kidneys shared similar ADC mean values in comparison to the other two scanners with nonsignificant differences.

Conclusions/Significance

A second generation 3 T scanner with dual-source parallel RF excitation provides nearly identical ADC values compared with the 1.5 T imaging system in abdominal imaging.