Low dose 320-row CT for left atrium and pulmonary veins imaging--the feasibility study

Image quality of low-radiation dose left atrial CT using filtered back projection and an iterative reconstruction algorithm: intra-individual comparison in unselected patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation

Background Computed tomography (CT) of the left atrium (LA) is performed prior to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to improve success of circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation. The ablation procedure itself exposes patients to substantial radiation doses, therefore radiation dose reduction in pre-ablational imaging is of concern. Purpose To assess and compare diagnostic performance of low-radiation dose preprocedural CT in patients scheduled for PVI using two types of reconstruction algorithms. Material and Methods Forty-six patients (61 ± 10 years) scheduled for PVI were enrolled in this study irrespective of body-mass-index or cardiac rhythm at examination. An electrocardiographically triggered dual-source CT scan was performed. Filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms were applied. Images were integrated into an electroanatomic mapping (EAM) system. Subjective image quality was scored independently by two readers on a five-point scale for both reconstruction algorithms (1 = excellent to 5 = non-diagnostic). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and effective radiation dose were calculated. Results Data acquisition and EAM integration were successful in all patients. Median image quality score was 1 for both FBP (quartiles = 1, 1.62; range = 1-3) and IR (quartiles = 1, 1.5; range = 1-3). Mean SNR was 7.61 ± 2.14 for FBP and 9.02 ± 2.69 for IR. Mean CNR was 5.92 ± 1.80 for FBP and 6.95 ± 2.29 for IR. Mean effective radiation dose was 0.3 ± 0.1 mSv. Conclusion At a radiation dose of 0.3 ± 0.1 mSv, high-pitch dual-source CT yields LA images of consistently high quality using both FBP and IR. IR raises SNR and CNR without significantly improving subjective image quality.

CT coronary angiography in atrial fibrillation: a comparison of radiation dose and diagnostic confidence with retrospective gating vs prospective gating with systolic acquisition

OBJECTIVE

To compare unmodulated, retrospective electrocardiographic (ECG) gating to prospective ECG gating with systolic acquisition for CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), considering the radiation dose and the diagnostic confidence achieved with each technique.

METHODS

A retrospective service evaluation was conducted before and after prospective gating with systolic acquisition replaced retrospectively gated imaging for patients with AF undergoing CTCA at our institution. 25 consecutive patients were examined in each group. The scan parameters and radiation dose information had been collected in a prospective fashion. The image sets were read by blinded, expert readers who rated their diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

The radiation dose received by patients was significantly greater in the retrospectively gated group than those being scanned using prospective gating (21 vs 5.9 mSv, p < 0.01). The prospective gating technique was also associated with greater diagnostic confidence (mean, per-patient score 3.09 vs 3.78, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Prospective gating with systolic acquisition appears to improve diagnostic confidence at a significantly reduced radiation dose compared with retrospective gating in patients with AF.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The use of prospective gating with systolic triggering significantly reduces the radiation exposure to patients in AF undergoing CTCA. The same protocol also appears to improve diagnostic confidence.

Multi-phase rotational angiography of the left ventricle to assist ablations: feasibility and accuracy of novel imaging

AIMS

Interventional left ventricular (LV) procedures integrating static 3D anatomy visualization are subject to mismatch with dynamic catheter movements due to prominent LV motion. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a recently developed acquisition and post-processing protocol for low radiation dose LV multi-phase rotational angiography (4DRA) in patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

4DRA image acquisition of the LV was performed as investigational acquisition in patients undergoing left-sided ablation (11 men; BMI = 24.7 ± 2.5 kg/m²). Iodine contrast was injected in the LA, while pacing from the RA at a cycle length of 700 ms. 4DRA acquisition and reconstruction were possible in all 11 studies. Reconstructed images were post-processed using streak artefact reduction algorithms and an interphase registration-based filtering method, increasing contrast-to-noise ratio by a factor 8.2 ± 2.1. This enabled semi-automatic segmentation, yielding LV models of five equidistant phases per cardiac cycle. For evaluation, off-line 4DRA fluoroscopy registration was performed, and the 4DRA LV contours of the different phases were compared with the contours of five corresponding phases of biplane LV angiography, acquired in identical circumstances. Of the distances between these contours, 95% were <4 mm in both incidences. Effective radiation dose for 4DRA, calculated by patient-specific Monte-Carlo simulation, was 5.1 ± 1.1 mSv.

CONCLUSION

Creation of 4DRA LV models in man is feasible at near-physiological heart rate and with clinically acceptable radiation dose. They showed high accuracy with respect to LV angiography in RAO and LAO. The presented technology not only opens perspectives for full cardiac cycle dynamic anatomical guidance during interventional procedures, but also for 3DRA without need for very rapid pacing.

Effect of Tube Voltage (100 vs. 120 kVp) on Radiation Dose and Image Quality using Prospective Gating 320 Row Multi-detector Computed Tomography Angiography

Objectives:

The objective of the following study is to evaluate the effect of reducing tube voltage from 120 to 100 kVp using prospective gating 320 row multi-detector computed tomography angiography on image quality and reduction in radiation dose.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 78 sequential patients were scanned with prospective electrocardiogram gating. A total of 45 patients (Group 1) with mean body mass index (BMI) 29 ± 2 and heart rate (HR) 57 ± 7 beats per minute (BPM) were scanned at 120 kVp. 33 patients (Group 2) with mean BMI 23 ± 3 and HR 58 ± 6 bpm were scanned at 100 kVp. Effective dose was calculated using dose length product and factor (k = 0.014). Quantitative assessment of image quality was calculated by measuring signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) in the left ventricle and left main coronary artery. Two experienced cardiac radiologists using a three-point ordinal scale assessed subjectively image quality.

Results:

In Group 1, the median radiation dose was 5.31 mSv (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.86-6.09) and for Group 2 (P = 0.009) the mean radiation dose was 3.71 mSv (95% CI: 2.76-4.87), representing 30% decrease in radiation dose. In multivariate analyses, adjusting for age, gender, HR, BMI, tube current and scan length, an absolute median reduction of 2.21 mSv (1.13-3.29 mSv) was noted in patients scanned with 100 kVp (P < 0.0001). The quantitative image quality (SNR and CNR) was not statistically significant between the groups. Subjective image quality was rated as good or excellent in 99% of coronary segments for both groups (P value was considered as non-significant).

Conclusion:

Our study suggests that radiation dose may be lowered from 120 to 100 kVp with preservation of image quality in patient's whose BMI is ≤27.

Preprocedural imaging for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure

Various electrophysiological procedures and device implantation has been shown to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and patients with heart failure (HF). Noninvasive cardiac imaging is used extensively in the preprocedural patient selection and for procedural guidance. In this review, we will discuss the application of preprocedural cardiac imaging in patients with AF prior to pulmonary vein and left atrial ablation as well as insertion of left atrial occluder device. We also discuss the role of noninvasive cardiac imaging in the selection of appropriate HF patients for device therapy as well as their use in guiding implantation of biventricular pacemaker for cardiac resynchronization therapy by assessing left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary venous anatomy, mechanical dyssynchrony and myocardial scar. We describe new research associated with preprocedural imaging in these patient cohorts.

Pulmonary venous anatomy imaging with low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch 128-slice dual-source computed tomography

BACKGROUND

The efforts to reduce radiation from cardiac computed tomography (CT) are essential. Using a prospectively triggered, high-pitch dual-source CT protocol, we aim to determine the radiation dose and image quality in patients undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) imaging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 94 patients (61±9 years; 71% male) who underwent 128-slice dual-source CT (pitch 3.4), radiation dose and image quality were assessed and compared between 69 patients with sinus rhythm and 25 patients with atrial fibrillation. Radiation dose was compared in a subset of 19 patients with prior retrospective or prospectively triggered CT PV scans without high pitch. In a subset of 18 patients with prior magnetic resonance imaging for PV assessment, PV anatomy and scan duration were compared with high-pitch CT. Using the high-pitch protocol, total effective radiation dose was 1.4 (1.3, 1.9) mSv, with no difference between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation (1.4 versus 1.5 mSv; P=0.22). No high-pitch CT scans were nondiagnostic or had poor image quality. Radiation dose was reduced with high-pitch (1.6 mSv) compared with standard protocols (19.3 mSv; P<0.0001). This radiation dose reduction was seen with sinus rhythm (1.5 versus 16.7 mSv; P<0.0001) but was more profound with atrial fibrillation (1.9 versus 27.7 mSv; P=0.039). There was excellent agreement of PV anatomy (κ 0.84; P<0.0001) and a shorter CT scan duration (6 minutes) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (41 minutes; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a high-pitch dual-source CT protocol, PV imaging can be performed with minimal radiation dose, short scan acquisition, and excellent image quality in patients with sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation. This protocol highlights the success of new cardiac CT technology to minimize radiation exposure, giving clinicians a new low-dose imaging alternative to assess PV anatomy.

The effect of heart rhythm on patient radiation dose with dual-source cardiac computed tomography

BACKGROUND

To lower the radiation exposure associated with cardiac CT, it is essential to identify all factors that influence radiation dose.

OBJECTIVES

We explored the effect of heart rhythm during scan acquisition on radiation dose with a 64-slice dual-source cardiac CT.

METHODS

Patient and scan data were collected prospectively in 302 consecutive patients referred for a clinical dual-source cardiac CT. Electrocardiograms recorded during acquisition were interpreted by a cardiologist and categorized as (1) normal sinus rhythm (NSR), (2) premature atrial contraction (PAC) or premature ventricular contraction (PVC), or (3) atrial fibrillation or flutter.

RESULTS

Of the 302 patients, 227 (75.2%) were in NSR and had no ectopy, 55 (18.2%) had PAC/PVC, and 20 (6.6%) had atrial fibrillation or flutter during the scan. Patients with irregular rhythm (PAC/PVC and atrial fibrillation or flutter) were older than patients with regular rhythm (61.0 vs 54.8 years; P = 0.006). Patients with NSR had the lowest estimated radiation dose, followed by PAC/PVC and atrial fibrillation/flutter (9.4, 14.5, 20.9 mSv; P < 0.001). The difference remained significant after adjustments for differences in examination type, tube current and voltage, scan length, pitch, and use of tube current modulation (9.8, 14.1, 17.9 mSv; P < 0.001). No significant association was observed between heart rhythm and subjective image quality although scans with regular rhythm and no ectopy had higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared to patients with NSR, patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter had the highest radiation exposure, followed by those with PAC/PVC. Even after adjustment for factors associated with radiation exposure, a significant difference in radiation dose persisted. These findings can be used to identify patients who are more likely to receive higher radiation dose when undergoing cardiac CT and to develop future more-efficient scanner algorithms for use in patients with arrhythmias.