CT angiography of various superficial femoral artery stents: An in vitro phantom study

Photon-Counting Detector CT for Femoral Stent Imaging in an Extracorporeally Perfused Human Cadaveric Model

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aims to compare the performance of first-generation dual-source photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) to third-generation dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID-CT) regarding stent imaging in the femoral arterial runoff.

METHODS

Continuous extracorporeal perfusion was established in 1 human cadaver using an inguinal and infragenicular access and peristaltic pump. Seven peripheral stents were implanted into both superior femoral arteries by means of percutaneous angioplasty. Radiation dose-equivalent CT angiographies (high-/medium-/low-dose: 10/5/3 mGy) with constant tube voltage of 120 kVp, matching iterative reconstruction algorithm levels, and convolution kernels were used both with PCD-CT and EID-CT. In-stent lumen visibility, luminal and in-stent attenuation as well as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed via region of interest and diameter measurements. Results were compared using analyses of variance and regression analyses.

RESULTS

Maximum in-stent lumen visibility achieved with PCD-CT was 94.48% ± 2.62%. The PCD-CT protocol with the lowest lumen visibility (BV40: 78.93% ± 4.67%) performed equal to the EID-CT protocol with the best lumen visibility (BV59: 79.49% ± 2.64%, P > 0.999). Photon-counting detector CT yielded superior CNR compared with EID-CT regardless of kernel and dose level ( P < 0.001). Maximum CNR was 48.8 ± 17.4 in PCD-CT versus 31.28 ± 5.7 in EID-CT (both BV40, high-dose). The theoretical dose reduction potential of PCD-CT over EID-CT was established at 88% (BV40), 83% (BV48/49), and 73% (BV59/60), respectively. In-stent attenuation was not significantly different from luminal attenuation outside stents in any protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

With superior lumen visibility and CNR, PCD-CT allowed for noticeable dose reduction over EID-CT while maintaining image quality in a continuously perfused human cadaveric model.

Stent Lumen Visibility in Single-energy CT Angiography: Does Tube Potential Matter?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

There has been a trend toward lowering tube potential in computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations to reduce radiation dose or contrast medium dose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of tube potential on peripheral artery in-stent lumen visibility in CTA examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine different peripheral artery stents were placed in a vessel phantom (inner diameter: 5 mm, surrounded by water) and scanned consecutively using a 128-row CT scanner with 70, 80, 100, 120, and 140 kV and two different concentrations of contrast medium to simulate contrast-enhanced blood. Medium-smooth and ultra-sharp reconstruction kernels with filtered back projection (B30f, B46f) and iterative reconstruction technique (I30f, I46f) were used. Visible in-stent lumen diameter and artifact width were evaluated using a semiautomatic software tool. All stents were scanned with digital angiography, which was regarded as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Averaged over all stents, visible in-stent lumen diameter ranged from 1.30 ± 0.21 mm (CM2/70 kV/I30f) to 3.13 ± 0.32 mm (CM1/120 kV/I46f). In-stent lumen diameters were significantly higher for 120 and 140 kV compared to 70 kV (2.39 ± 0.73 and 2.39 ± 0.66 mm vs 1.99 ± 0.69 mm; P = 0.01 and P = 0.005). Ultra-sharp reconstruction kernels lead to significantly better in-stent lumen visibility than smooth reconstruction kernels (B46f: 2.74 ± 0.34 mm vs B30f: 1.57 ± 0.36 mm; P < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, in-stent lumen visibility was improved for iterative reconstructions compared to filtered back projection (I46f: 2.93 ± 0.30 mm vs B46f: 2.74 ± 0.34 mm; P < 0.001). Contrast medium concentration did not influence in-stent lumen visibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite all known benefits of low kV CTA protocols, the use of a very low tube potential may hamper in-stent lumen visibility. A sharp kernel may be of value when evaluating the inner lumen of vascular stents.