Dual-energy CT-cholangiography in potential donors for living-related liver transplantation: improved biliary visualization by intravenous morphine co-medication

Normal morphometry of the biliary tree in pediatric and adult populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to characterise the normal morphometry of the biliary tree in pediatric and adult populations, through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This study, conducted using the PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO, searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases up to October 2022, and updated to August 2023. Studies that reported extractable data on diameter and length of the right, left and common hepatic ducts (LHD, RHD and CHD), and common bile duct (CBD) were included. Quality of the included studies were assessed using the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) tool. Statistical analysis included subgroup analyses according to sex, age, geographical location, and imaging modality.

RESULTS

In total, 60 studies were included, of which 44 studies reported adequate data for meta-analysis on 23,796 subjects. Overall, the pooled mean diameter of the CBD was 4.69 mm (95 % CI: 4.28-5.11). Significant differences were found between pediatric (1.32 mm, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.61) and adult (4.97 mm, 95 % CI: 4.67-5.27) subjects, as well as US (3.82 mm, 95 % CI: 3.15-4.49) and other imaging modalities, including MRI (6.21 mm, 95 % CI: 4.85-7.57) and ERCP (7.24 mm, 95 % CI: 6.08-8.40). The CBD diameter measured significantly larger distally (5.20 mm, 95 % CI: 4.60-5.80) than proximally (4.01 mm, 95 % CI: 3.51-4.51).

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained from this evidence-based study may guide the establishment of standardised reference values and ranges of the normal biliary tree in pediatric and adult populations and aid clinical understanding.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Overview, Imaging Technique, and Diagnostic Considerations

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to discuss the process of becoming a liver donor, describe the surgical methods used for transplantation, and critically review preoperative and intraoperative imaging techniques. CONCLUSION. Radiologists play a vital role in ensuring the safety of living liver donors; however, consensus guidelines do not exist for imaging protocol or reporting. Standardization would provide more consistent image quality across centers, improve communication with the transplant team, and facilitate data mining for quality assurance and research.