Radiation exposure to operating staff during rotational flat-panel angiography and C-arm cone beam computed tomography (CT) applications

Determinants of radiation exposure during mobile cone-beam CT-guided robotic-assisted bronchoscopy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is an emerging modality to sample pulmonary lesions. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can be incorporated into RAB. We investigated the magnitude and predictors of patient and staff radiation exposure during mobile CBCT-guided shape-sensing RAB.

METHODS

Patient radiation dose was estimated by cumulative dose area product (cDAP) and cumulative reference air kerma (cRAK). Staff equivalent dose was calculated based on isokerma maps and a phantom simulation. Patient, lesion and procedure-related factors associated with higher radiation doses were identified by logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 198 RAB cases were included in the analysis. The median patient cDAP and cRAK were 10.86 Gy cm2 (IQR: 4.62-20.84) and 76.20 mGy (IQR: 38.96-148.38), respectively. Among staff members, the bronchoscopist was exposed to the highest median equivalent dose of 1.48 μSv (IQR: 0.85-2.69). Both patient and staff radiation doses increased with the number of CBCT spins and targeted lesions (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Patient obesity, negative bronchus sign, lesion size <2.0 cm and inadequate sampling by on-site evaluation were associated with a higher patient dose, while patient obesity and inadequate sampling by on-site evaluation were associated with a higher bronchoscopist equivalent dose.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of patient and staff radiation exposure during CBCT-RAB is aligned with safety thresholds recommended by regulatory authorities. Factors associated with a higher radiation exposure during CBCT-RAB can be identified pre-operatively and solicit procedural optimization by reinforcing radiation protective measures. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings across multiple institutions and practices.

The efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography-guided transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma survival: A systematic review

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) represents an alternative treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, yet a comprehensive evaluation of CBCT guidance on this procedure and CBCT's impact on patient survival remains lacking. We aimed to assess the efficacy and benefits of CBCT-guided TACE in improving survival outcomes for patients with HCC and show the importance of CBCT in interventional radiology. Meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate CBCT-guided TACE compared to conventional TACE in the treatment of HCC. PubMed and Cochrane library databases were searched for studies published. Outcomes of interest included 1- or 3-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates, overall survival (OS) rates, and tumor response results. A total of eight studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 1176 patients. The analysis showed that CBCT-guided TACE improved 1-year LPFS (odds ratio [OR] = 2.81, P < 0.001), 3-year (OR = 4.42, P = 0.002), and the 3-year OS rates (OR = 3.03, Confidence Interval = 1.65-11.80, P = 0.14) compared to conventional TACE. CBCT-guided TACE enhances survival outcomes for patients with HCC; by addressing this research gap, our study endeavors to encourage clinicians and researchers to pursue this medical technology by providing a robust synthesis of current evidence.

Radiation exposure during angiographic interventions in interventional radiology - risk and fate of advanced procedures

PURPOSE

Advanced angiographic procedures in interventional radiology are becoming more important and are more frequently used, especially in the treatment of several acute life-threatening diseases like stroke or aortic injury. In recent years, technical advancement has led to a broader spectrum of interventions and complex procedures with longer fluoroscopy times. This involves the risk of higher dose exposures, which, in rare cases, may cause deterministic radiation effects, e.g. erythema in patients undergoing angiographic procedures. Against this background, these procedures recently also became subject to national and international regulations regarding radiation protection. At the same time, individual risk assessment of possible stochastic radiation effects for each patient must be weighed up against the anticipated benefits of the therapy itself. Harmful effects of the administered dose are not limited to the patient but can also affect the radiologist and the medical staff. In particular, the development of cataracts in interventionalists is a rising matter of concern. Furthermore, long-term effects of repeated and prolonged x-ray exposure have long been neglected by radiologists but have come into focus in the past years.

CONCLUSIONS

With all this in mind, this review discusses different efforts to reduce radiation exposition levels for patients and medical staff by means of technical, personal as well as organizational measures.

High-Dose Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures in Patients: Radiation Management Recommendations for Interventionalists

The article is part of the series of articles on radiation protection. You can find further articles in the special section of the CVIR issue. In addition to the risks from fluoroscopic-guided interventional procedures of tissue injuries, recent studies have drawn attention to the risk of stochastic effects. Guidelines exist for preprocedural planning and radiation management during the procedure. The concept of a substantial radiation dose level (SRDL) is helpful for patient follow-up for tissue injury. The uncommon nature of tissue injuries requires the interventionalist to be responsible for follow-up of patients who receive substantial radiation doses. Dose management systems for recognizing and avoiding higher patient exposures have been introduced. The European Directive provides a legal framework and requirements for equipment, training, dose monitoring, recording and optimization that are helpful in radiation risk management.

Individualized Strategies for Intraoperative Localization of Non-palpable Pulmonary Nodules in a Hybrid Operating Room

Background: Precise preoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules is a key prerequisite to their successful excision. With the advent of hybrid operating rooms (HORs), a patient-tailored approach encompassing simultaneous localization and removal of small pulmonary nodules has become feasible. In this study, we describe our individualized image-guided video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (iVATS) strategies implemented within a HOR environment. Specifically, localization was performed through different marking approaches (single- vs. double-marker) and access routes [percutaneous technique with Dyna-computed tomography (DynaCT) imaging vs. electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)]. Methods: Between April 2017 and November 2018, a total of 159 consecutive patients (harboring 174 pulmonary nodules) were treated with iVATS. The marking approach and access route were individually tailored according to lesion localization and its distance from the pleural surface. The efficacy and safety of our iVATS technique were determined through a retrospective review of clinical charts. Results: All of the localization procedures were performed in a HOR by a single team of thoracic surgeons. The mean tumor size on preoperative CT was 8.28 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6-8.96 mm), whereas their mean distance from the pleural surface was 9.44 mm (95% CI: 8.11-10.77 mm). Of the 174 tumors, 150 were localized through a percutaneous DynaCT-guided approach (single-marker: 139, dual-marker: 11), whereas localization in the remaining 24 was accomplished via the ENB-guided approach (single-marker: 4; dual-marker: 20). The mean localization time was 17.78 min (95% CI:16.17-19.39 min). The overall localization success rate was 95.9%. We failed to localize a total of seven nodules either because of technical complications (pneumothorax, n = 3; microcoil dislodgement; n = 1) or machine failure (n = 3). No operative deaths were observed, and the mean length of postoperative stay was 3.65 days (95% CI: 3.19-4.11 days). Conclusions: The use of tailored marking approaches and access routes allowed us to individualize the iVATS procedure for small pulmonary nodules, ultimately promoting a more patient-centered workflow.

Comparison of Combined Therapy Using Conventional Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Conventional Chemoembolization for Ultrasound-Invisible Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0 or A)

Objective

To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and combined therapy using cTACE and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in ultrasound (US)-invisible early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods

From January 2008 to June 2016, 167 patients with US-invisible early stage HCCs were treated with cTACE alone (cTACE group; n = 85) or cTACE followed by immediate fluoroscopy-guided RFA targeting intratumoral iodized oil retention (combined group; n = 82). Procedure-related complications, local tumor progression (LTP), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.

Results

There was no major complication in either group. The cTACE group showed higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year LTP rates than the combined group; i.e., 12.5%, 31.7%, and 37.0%, respectively, in the cTACE group; compared to 7.3%, 16.5%, and 16.5%, respectively, in the combined group; p = 0.013. The median TTP was 18 months in the cTACE group and 24 months in the combined group (p = 0.037). Cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100%, 93.2%, and 87.7%, respectively, in the cTACE group and 100%, 96.6%, and 87.4%, respectively, in the combined group (p = 0.686). Tumor diameter > 20 mm and cTACE monotherapy were independent risk factors for LTP and TTP.

Conclusion

Combined therapy using cTACE followed by fluoroscopy-guided RFA is a safe and effective treatment in US-invisible early stage HCCs. It provides less LTP and longer TTP than cTACE alone.

Dual-phase Cone-beam CT-based Navigation Imaging Significantly Enhances Tumor Detectability and Aids Superselective Transarterial Chemoembolization of Liver Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of a dual-phase cone-beam computed tomography (DP-CBCT)-based navigation imaging during transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a perspective randomized study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with HCC (39 men, 57 ± 9 years, 13 first-time TACE) underwent TACE using three-dimensional image guidance with automatic detection of tumor-feeding vessels computed from DP-CBCT (early and delayed arterial phases). Forty-nine other patients with HCC (44 men, 55 ± 12 years, 14 first-time TACE) were treated conventionally using digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Tumor detectability in DP-CBCT was compared to DSA and preoperative CT or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Tumor-feeding vessel visibility was rated (good, fair, and poor) intraoperatively by the operators. The superselective embolization success rate, the number of DSA acquisitions, fluoroscopy time, and patient radiation dose were collected and compared using paired t test and the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Tumor detection of DP-CBCT was superior to DSA (100% vs 83%, P = .001) and comparable to CT-MR (96%, P = .456). Tumor and feeder visibilities were significantly enhanced by DP-CBCT (P < .001). Compared to using DSA, more superselective embolization was achieved (60% vs 49%) with less DSA acquisitions (n = 2.6 ± 0.8 vs n = 3.4 ± 0.7, P < .001) and shorter fluoroscopy time (4.1 ± 2.6 vs 7.1 ± 4.2 minutes, P < .001) with a slight increase in patient radiation exposure, that is, air kerma (median: 0.33, first to third quartiles: 0.24-0.48 vs 0.30, 0.24-0.44 Gy; P = .519) and dose-area product (134, 92-181 vs 97, 75-140 Gy⋅cm², P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

DP-CBCT and navigation imaging improve tumor detectability and superselective embolization in TACE.

Clinical Experience with Real-Time 3-D Guidance Based on C-Arm-Acquired Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Stent Shunt (TIPSS) Placement

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based real-time 3-D guidance of TIPSS placement and its positioning compared to standard guiding methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, consecutive study design from 2015 to 2017, we included 21 patients in the CBCT guided group and 15 patients in the ultrasound (US) guided group. The prospective groups were compared in terms of success rate of intervention, portal vein puncture/procedure time, number of puncture attempts and applied dose. We furthermore retrospectively analyzed the last 23 consecutive cases with fluoroscopic guided portal vein puncture in terms of success rate, procedure time and applied dose, as it has been the standard method before US guidance.

RESULTS

The median number of puncture attempts (CBCT: n = 2, US: n = 4, p = 0.249) and the mean puncture time (CBCT: 32 ± 45 min, US: 36 ± 45 min, p = 0.515) were not significantly different. There were furthermore no significant differences in the mean time needed for the total TIPSS procedure (CBCT: 115 ± 52 min, US: 112 ± 41 min, fluoroscopy: 110 ± 33 min, p = 0.996). The mean applied dose of the complete procedure also showed no statistically significant differences (CBCT: 563 ± 289 Gy·cm², US: 322 ± 186 Gy·cm², fluoroscopy: 469 ± 352 Gy·cm², p = 0.069). There were no image guidance related complications.

CONCLUSION

Real-time 3-D needle guidance based on CBCT is feasible for TIPSS placement. In terms of puncture attempts, duration and dose, CBCT guidance was not inferior to the control groups and may be a valuable support for interventionists in TIPSS procedures.

Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system

Objectives

Dosimetric control of staff exposure during interventional procedures under fluoroscopy is of high relevance. In this paper, a novel ray casting approximation of radiation transport is presented and the potential and limitation vs. a full Monte Carlo transport and dose measurements are discussed.

Method

The x‐ray source of a Siemens Axiom Artix C‐arm is modeled by a virtual source model using single Gaussian‐shaped source. A Geant4‐based Monte Carlo simulation determines the radiation transport from the source to compute scatter from the patient, the table, the ceiling and the floor. A phase space around these scatterers stores all photon information. Only those photons are traced that hit a surface of phantom that represents medical staff in the treatment room, no indirect scattering is considered; and a complete dose deposition on the surface is calculated. To evaluate the accuracy of the approximation, both experimental measurements using Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and a Geant4‐based Monte Carlo simulation of dose depositing for different tube angulations of the C‐arm from cranial‐caudal angle 0° and from LAO (Left Anterior Oblique) 0°–90° are realized. Since the measurements were performed on both sides of the table, using the symmetry of the setup, RAO (Right Anterior Oblique) measurements were not necessary.

Results

The Geant4‐Monte Carlo simulation agreed within 3% with the measured data, which is within the accuracy of measurement and simulation. The ray casting approximation has been compared to TLD measurements and the achieved percentage difference was −7% for data from tube angulations 45°–90° and −29% from tube angulations 0°–45° on the side of the x‐ray source, whereas on the opposite side of the x‐ray source, the difference was −83.8% and −75%, respectively. Ray casting approximation for only LAO 90° was compared to a Monte Carlo simulation, where the percentage differences were between 0.5–3% on the side of the x‐ray source where the highest dose usually detected was mainly from primary scattering (photons), whereas percentage differences between 2.8–20% are found on the side opposite to the x‐ray source, where the lowest doses were detected. Dose calculation time of our approach was 0.85 seconds.

Conclusion

The proposed approach yields a fast scatter dose estimation where we could run the Monte Carlo simulation only once for each x‐ray tube angulation to get the Phase Space Files (PSF) for being used later by our ray casting approach to calculate the dose from only photons which will hit an movable elliptical cylinder shaped phantom and getting an output file for the positions of those hits to be used for visualizing the scatter dose propagation on the phantom surface. With dose calculation times of less than one second, we are saving much time compared to using a Monte Carlo simulation instead. With our approach, larger deviations occur only in regions with very low doses, whereas it provides a high precision in high‐dose regions.

The Role of Cone-Beam CT in Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To review available evidence for use of cone-beam CT during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for detection of tumor and feeding arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature searches were conducted from inception to May 15, 2016, in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Searches included "cone beam," "CBCT," "C-arm," "CACT," "cone-beam CT," "volumetric CT," "volume computed tomography," "volume CT," AND "liver," "hepatic*," "hepatoc*." Studies that involved adults with HCC specifically and treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization that used cone-beam CT were included.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met by 18 studies. Pooled sensitivity of cone-beam CT for detecting tumor was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-95%), whereas pooled sensitivity of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for tumor detection was 67% (95% CI, 51%-80%). Pooled sensitivity of cone-beam CT for detecting tumor feeding arteries was 93% (95% CI, 91%-95%), whereas pooled sensitivity of DSA was 55% (95% CI, 36%-74%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cone-beam CT can significantly increase detection of tumors and tumor feeding arteries during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Cone-beam CT should be considered as an adjunct tool to DSA during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatments of HCC.

Comparison of Radiation Exposure Associated With Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Follow-up Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluating Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs

Purpose: To compare the radiation exposure associated with intraoperative contrast-enhanced cone-beam computed tomography (ceCBCT) acquisitions to standard 3-phase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography used for assessing technical success after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Methods: Effective doses (EDs) were calculated for 66 EVAR patients (mean age 71 years; 61 men) with a mean 27.7-kg/m2 body mass index (range 17–49) who had both intraoperative ceCBCT and postoperative 3-phase MDCT angiography between November 2012 and April 2015. In addition, EDs were directly determined using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) embedded in anthropomorphic phantoms with body mass indexes of 22 and 30 kg/m2. Effective doses were calculated by summing doses recorded by all TLDs corresponding to a specific tissue type before applying the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 60 and 103 weighting factors. EDs were compared with each other for both imaging modalities as well as to TLD measurements. Results: Average EDs of the patient collective were 4.9±1.1 mSv for ceCBCT, 2.6±1.2 mSv for single-phase MDCT (46% decrease, covering solely the area of the implanted endograft), and 13.6±5.5 mSv for comprehensive 3-phase MDCT examinations (178% increase, anatomical coverage from the aortic arch to femoral artery bifurcation). EDs determined in phantom measurements ranged from 3.1 to 4.5 mSv for ceCBCT, amounting to 2.6 mSv for a single MDCT phase (15% to 40% decrease) using ICRP 60 conversion factors. Applying ICRP 103 factors resulted in higher values for ceCBCT and slightly lower ones for MDCT. Conclusion: ceCBCT offers the chance for immediate intraoperative revisions of endograft-related problems. Requiring only a single-phase acquisition, ceCBCT is associated with a considerable reduction in ED (50%–75%) compared to standard 3-phase MDCT angiography after EVAR. On the other hand, MDCT has a larger field of view and is associated with less radiation exposure for a single phase (reduction of 20%–60%) if only the stented region is covered; however, MDCT angiography also uses larger amounts of contrast.

Radiological Protection in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). ICRP Publication 129

The objective of this publication is to provide guidance on radiological protection in the new technology of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Publications 87 and 102 dealt with patient dose management in computed tomography (CT) and multi-detector CT. The new applications of CBCT and the associated radiological protection issues are substantially different from those of conventional CT. The perception that CBCT involves lower doses was only true in initial applications. CBCT is now used widely by specialists who have little or no training in radiological protection. This publication provides recommendations on radiation dose management directed at different stakeholders, and covers principles of radiological protection, training, and quality assurance aspects. Advice on appropriate use of CBCT needs to be made widely available. Advice on optimisation of protection when using CBCT equipment needs to be strengthened, particularly with respect to the use of newer features of the equipment. Manufacturers should standardise radiation dose displays on CBCT equipment to assist users in optimisation of protection and comparisons of performance. Additional challenges to radiological protection are introduced when CBCT-capable equipment is used for both fluoroscopy and tomography during the same procedure. Standardised methods need to be established for tracking and reporting of patient radiation doses from these procedures. The recommendations provided in this publication may evolve in the future as CBCT equipment and applications evolve. As with previous ICRP publications, the Commission hopes that imaging professionals, medical physicists, and manufacturers will use the guidelines and recommendations provided in this publication for implementation of the Commission's principle of optimisation of protection of patients and medical workers, with the objective of keeping exposures as low as reasonably achievable, taking into account economic and societal factors, and consistent with achieving the necessary medical outcomes.

How I do it: Cone-beam CT during transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging technique that provides computed tomographic (CT) images from a rotational scan acquired with a C-arm equipped with a flat panel detector. Utilizing CBCT images during interventional procedures bridges the gap between the world of diagnostic imaging (typically three-dimensional imaging but performed separately from the procedure) and that of interventional radiology (typically two-dimensional imaging). CBCT is capable of providing more information than standard two-dimensional angiography in localizing and/or visualizing liver tumors ("seeing" the tumor) and targeting tumors though precise microcatheter placement in close proximity to the tumors ("reaching" the tumor). It can also be useful in evaluating treatment success at the time of procedure ("assessing" treatment success). CBCT technology is rapidly evolving along with the development of various contrast material injection protocols and multiphasic CBCT techniques. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the principles of CBCT imaging, including purpose and clinical evidence of the different techniques, and to introduce a decision-making algorithm as a guide for the routine utilization of CBCT during transarterial chemoembolization of liver cancer.

Cone-beam computed tomography imaging: therapeutic staff dose during chemoembolisation procedure

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging is an important requirement to perform real-time therapeutic image-guided procedures on patients. The purpose of this study is to estimate the personal-doseequivalent and annual-personal-dose from CBCT imaging during transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE). Therapeutic staff doses (therapeutic and assistant physician) were collected during 200 patient (65 ± 15 years, range: 40–86) CBCT examinations over six months. Absorbed doses were assessed using thermo-luminescent dosimeters during patient hepatic TACE therapy. We estimated personal-dose-equivalent (PDE) and annual-personal-dose (APD) from absorbed dose based oninternational atomic energy agency protocol. APD for therapeutic procedure was calculated (therapeutic physician: 5.6 mSv; assistant physician: 5.08 mSv) based on institutional work load. Regarding PDE, the hands of the staff members received a greater dose compared to other anatomical locations (therapeutic physician: 56 mSv, 72 mSv; assistant physician: 12 mSv, 14 mSv). Annual radiation doses to the eyes and hands of the staff members were lower compared to the prescribed limits by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). PDE and APD of both therapeutic staff members were within the recommended ICRP-103 annual limit. Dose to the assistant physician waslower than the dose to the therapeutic physician during imaging. Annual radiation doses to eye-lenses and hands of both staff members were lower than prescribed limits.

C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in interventional oncology: technical aspects and clinical applications

C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a new imaging technology integrated in modern angiographic systems. Due to its ability to obtain cross-sectional imaging and the possibility to use dedicated planning and navigation software, it provides an informed platform for interventional oncology procedures. In this paper, we highlight the technical aspects and clinical applications of CBCT imaging and navigation in the most common loco-regional oncological treatments.

Pilot study evaluating catheter-directed contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared to catheter-directed computed tomography arteriography as adjuncts to digital subtraction angiography to guide transarterial chemoembolization

AIM

To investigate the feasibility and procedural value of catheter-directed contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CCEUS) compared with catheter-directed computed tomography arteriography (CCTA) in patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) guided by digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 2010 to December 2011, a pilot study was conducted including nine patients (mean age 66.6 years; SD 8.3 years; seven men) undergoing TACE with drug-eluting beads for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Both CCEUS and CCTA were performed in addition to DSA. Alterations of treatment plan based on CCEUS were recorded and compared with CCTA.

RESULTS

CCEUS provided additional information to DSA altering the treatment plan in four out of nine patients (44.4%). In these four patients, CCEUS helped to identify additional tumour feeders (n = 2) or led to a change in catheter position (n = 2). The information provided by CCEUS was similar to that provided by CCTA.

CONCLUSION

CCEUS is a potentially valuable imaging tool in adjunction to DSA when performing TACE and may provide similar information to CCTA.

Comparison of air kerma between C-arm CT and 64-multidetector-row CT using a phantom

PURPOSE

To compare air kerma after scanning a phantom with C-arm CT and with 64-multidetector row CT (64MDCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A phantom was scanned using parameters based on data of ten patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had C-arm CT during hepatic arteriography and 64MDCT during arterial portography. Radiation monitors were used to measure air kerma ten times at each of five points: the center (A), top (B), left side (C), bottom (D), and right side (E).

RESULTS

For C-arm CT vs. 64MDCT, air kerma after scanning was 10.5 ± 0.2 vs. 6.4 ± 0.0 for A, 1.5 ± 0.0 vs. 11.6 ± 0.2 for B, 37.1 ± 0.2 vs. 11.1 ± 0.1 for C, 55.6 ± 1.0 vs. 10.6 ± 0.1 for D, and 40.5 ± 0.5 vs. 11.7 ± 0.1 for E, respectively. Air kerma for A, B, C, D, and E was 1.64, 0.13, 3.34, 5.24, and 3.46 times greater for C-arm CT than for 64MDCT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Using the same scanning parameters as for clinical cases, air kerma values were greater with C-arm CT than with 64MDCT; at the dorsal side of the phantom, they were 5.24 times greater with C-arm CT compared with 64MDCT.

Radiation exposure of the radiologist's eye lens during CT-guided interventions

BACKGROUND

In the past decade the number of computed tomography (CT)-guided procedures performed by interventional radiologists have increased, leading to a significantly higher radiation exposure of the interventionalist's eye lens. Because of growing concern that there is a stochastic effect for the development of lens opacification, eye lens dose reduction for operators and patients should be of maximal interest.

PURPOSE

To determine the interventionalist's equivalent eye lens dose during CT-guided interventions and to relate the results to the maximum of the recommended equivalent dose limit.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During 89 CT-guided interventions (e.g. biopsies, drainage procedures, etc.) measurements of eye lens' radiation doses were obtained from a dedicated dosimeter system for scattered radiation. The sensor of the personal dosimeter system was clipped onto the side of the lead glasses which was located nearest to the CT gantry. After the procedure, radiation dose (µSv), dose rate (µSv/min) and the total exposure time (s) were recorded.

RESULTS

For all 89 interventions, the median total exposure lens dose was 3.3 µSv (range, 0.03-218.9 µSv) for a median exposure time of 26.2 s (range, 1.1-94.0 s). The median dose rate was 13.9 µSv/min (range, 1.1-335.5 µSv/min).

CONCLUSION

Estimating 50-200 CT-guided interventions per year performed by one interventionalist, the median dose of the eye lens of the interventional radiologist does not exceed the maximum of the ICRP-recommended equivalent eye lens dose limit of 20 mSv per year.

Cone beam CT guidance provides superior accuracy for complex needle paths compared with CT guidance

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) guidance and CT guidance in reaching small targets in relation to needle path complexity in a phantom.

METHODS

CBCT guidance combines three-dimensional CBCT imaging with fluoroscopy overlay and needle planning software to provide real-time needle guidance. The accuracy of needle positioning, quantified as deviation from a target, was assessed for inplane, angulated and double angulated needle paths. Four interventional radiologists reached four targets along the three paths using CBCT and CT guidance. Accuracies were compared between CBCT and CT for each needle path and between the three approaches within both modalities. The effect of user experience in CBCT guidance was also assessed.

RESULTS

Accuracies for CBCT were significantly better than CT for the double angulated needle path (2.2 vs 6.7 mm, p<0.001) for all radiologists. CBCT guidance showed no significant differences between the three approaches. For CT, deviations increased with increasing needle path complexity from 3.3 mm for the inplane placements to 4.4 mm (p=0.007) and 6.7 mm (p<0.001) for the angulated and double angulated CT-guided needle placements, respectively. For double angulated needle paths, experienced CBCT users showed consistently higher accuracies than trained users [1.8 mm (range 1.2-2.2) vs 3.3 mm (range 2.1-7.2) deviation from target, respectively; p=0.003].

CONCLUSION

In terms of accuracy, CBCT is the preferred modality, irrespective of the level of user experience, for more difficult guidance procedures requiring double angulated needle paths as in oncological interventions.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Accuracy of CBCT guidance has not been discussed before. CBCT guidance allows accurate needle placement irrespective of needle path complexity. For angulated and double-angulated needle paths, CBCT is more accurate than CT guidance.

Radiation dose and image quality of X-ray volume imaging systems: cone-beam computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography and digital fluoroscopy

OBJECTIVE

Radiation dose and image quality estimation of three X-ray volume imaging (XVI) systems.

METHODS

A total of 126 patients were examined using three XVI systems (groups 1-3) and their data were retrospectively analysed from 2007 to 2012. Each group consisted of 42 patients and each patient was examined using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and digital fluoroscopy (DF). Dose parameters such as dose-area product (DAP), skin entry dose (SED) and image quality parameters such as Hounsfield unit (HU), noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were estimated and compared using appropriate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Mean DAP and SED were lower in recent XVI than its previous counterparts in CBCT, DSA and DF. HU of all measured locations was non-significant between the groups except the hepatic artery. Noise showed significant difference among groups (P < 0.05). Regarding CNR and SNR, the recent XVI showed a higher and significant difference compared to its previous versions. Qualitatively, CBCT showed significance between versions unlike the DSA and DF which showed non-significance.

CONCLUSION

A reduction of radiation dose was obtained for the recent-generation XVI system in CBCT, DSA and DF. Image noise was significantly lower; SNR and CNR were higher than in previous versions. The technological advancements and the reduction in the number of frames led to a significant dose reduction and improved image quality with the recent-generation XVI system.

KEY POINTS

• X-ray volume imaging (XVI) systems are increasingly used for interventional radiological procedures. • More modern XVI systems use lower radiation doses compared with earlier counterparts. • Furthermore more modern XVI systems provide higher image quality. • Technological advances reduce radiation dose and improve image quality.

Image fusion of preprocedural CTA with real-time fluoroscopy to guide proper hepatic artery catheterization during transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

To assess feasibility of proper hepatic artery catheterization using a 3D model obtained from preprocedural computed tomographic angiography (CTA), fused with real-time fluoroscopy, during transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization were prospectively enrolled onto the study. The early arterial phase axial images of the preprocedural CTA were postprocessed on an independent workstation connected to the angiographic system (Innova 4100; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI), obtaining a 3D volume rendering image (VR) that included abdominal aorta, splanchnic arteries, and first and second lumbar vertebrae. The VR image was manually registered to the real-time X-ray fluoroscopy, with the lumbar spine used as the reference. The VR image was then used as guidance to selectively catheterize the proper hepatic artery. The procedure was considered successful when performed with no need for intraarterial contrast injections or angiographic acquisitions.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in 19 (95 %) of 20 patients. In one patient, celiac trunk angiography was required for the presence of a significant ostial stenosis that was underestimated at computed tomography. Time for image reconstruction and registration was <10 min in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The use of preprocedural CTA model with fluoroscopy enables confident and direct catheterization of the proper hepatic artery with no need for preliminary celiac trunk angiography, thus reducing radiation exposure and contrast media administration.