Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T MRI for the evaluation of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer: metastasis is not always seen as a "defect" on the hepatobiliary phase

Hepatobiliary phase manifestations of breast cancer liver metastasis: differentiating molecular types through Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) -enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) across different molecular types.

METHODS

Between August 2014 and July 2021, a cohort of 270 patients histologically diagnosed with BCLM underwent examination through dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). The data collection encompassed clinical information of patients, as well as information on the quantity, shape, boundary, and fusion state of liver metastases. Additionally, MR sequences including T2-weighted imaging with fat suppression (FS), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), MR arterial phase, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) were collected. The chi-squared test was employed to study the correlations between different molecular types of BCLM and imaging features observed in MRI.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in the HBP image features among various subtypes of breast cancer (P = 0.022). The morphology (oval, irregular) and fusion state (converging, separated lesions) of BCLM exhibited statistically significant differences based on breast cancer subtypes (P = 0.022, 0.004). No statistical differences were found in the quantity of BCLM, the boundary of metastasis (clear or vague), and imaging features of the T2WI-FS and DWI concerning the molecular subtypes of BCLM (P = 0.693, 0.161, 0.629, 0.629).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that MRI, particularly Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, they displayed varied enhancement patterns, including the low signal, "target sign", "rim enhancement", and "doughnut-like enhancement". Most basal-like metastases demonstrated a low signal, the other molecular types primarily showing the "target sign". This is invaluable in the imaging diagnosis of BCLM across different molecular type.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Hypointense Findings on Hepatobiliary Phase MR Images

Hepatobiliary (HB) contrast agents are increasingly valuable diagnostic tools in MRI, offering a wider range of applications as their clinical use expands. Normal hepatocytes take up HB contrast agents, which are subsequently excreted in bile. This property creates a distinct HB phase providing valuable insights into liver function and biliary anatomy. HB contrast agents can assist in diagnosing a broad spectrum of HB diseases ranging from diffuse liver disease to focal hepatic lesions and can delineate anatomic details of the biliary tree. Understanding the pharmacodynamics of HB contrast agents is paramount to their appropriate clinical application and troubleshooting. HB phase hypointensity can arise from various diffuse and focal abnormalities that may or may not be associated with biliary excretion. Hypointensity during the HB phase can be broadly grouped into diffuse hypointensity, regional hypointensity, and focal lesions for better evaluation of the underlying cause. Abnormalities may arise from hepatic parenchymal, biliary, or vascular causes, or a combination thereof in each of the broad groups. Recognition of a suboptimal hypointense HB phase is important in the evaluation of focal lesions in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and particularly in those with hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, hypointensity can also suggest the aggressiveness of malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma or colorectal metastases, which may affect the prognosis. It is essential to consider all imaging findings relative to the clinical context and the complete set of the MRI sequences performed for diagnosis of liver abnormalities. This comprehensive approach minimizes the risk of misinterpretation or pitfalls. The authors aim to equip radiologists with key insights for accurately understanding hypointensity in the HB phase, ultimately leading to more accurate diagnoses. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Correction of Arterial-Phase Motion Artifacts in Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MRI Using an Innovative Unsupervised Network

This study aims to propose and evaluate DR-CycleGAN, a disentangled unsupervised network by introducing a novel content-consistency loss, for removing arterial-phase motion artifacts in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI examinations. From June 2020 to July 2021, gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI data were retrospectively collected in this center to establish training and testing datasets. Motion artifacts were semi-quantitatively assessed using a five-point Likert scale (1 = no artifact, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, and 5 = non-diagnostic) and quantitatively evaluated using the structural similarity index (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). The datasets comprised a training dataset (308 examinations, including 58 examinations with artifact grade = 1 and 250 examinations with artifact grade ≥ 2), a paired test dataset (320 examinations, including 160 examinations with artifact grade = 1 and paired 160 examinations with simulated motion artifacts of grade ≥ 2), and an unpaired test dataset (474 examinations with artifact grade ranging from 1 to 5). The performance of DR-CycleGAN was evaluated and compared with a state-of-the-art network, Cycle-MedGAN V2.0. As a result, in the paired test dataset, DR-CycleGAN demonstrated significantly higher SSIM and PSNR values and lower motion artifact grades compared to Cycle-MedGAN V2.0 (0.89 ± 0.07 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09, 32.88 ± 2.11 vs. 30.81 ± 2.64, and 2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.0 ± 0.9, respectively; p < 0.001 each). In the unpaired test dataset, DR-CycleGAN also exhibited a superior motion artifact correction performance, resulting in a significant decrease in motion artifact grades from 2.9 ± 1.3 to 2.0 ± 0.6 compared to Cycle-MedGAN V2.0 (to 2.4 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). In conclusion, DR-CycleGAN effectively reduces motion artifacts in the arterial phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI examinations, offering the potential to enhance image quality.

Value of biplane transrectal ultrasonography plus micro-flow imaging in preoperative T staging and rectal cancer diagnosis in combination with CEA/CA199 and MRI

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and has a high incidence rate and fatality rate. Accurate preoperative T staging of rectal cancer is critical for the selection of appropriate rectal cancer treatment. Various pre-operative imaging methods are available, and the identification of the most accurate method for clinical use is essential for patient care. We investigated the value of biplane transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) combined with MFI in preoperative staging of rectal cancer and explored the value of combining TRUS plus MFI with CEA/CA199 and MRI.

METHODS

A total of 87 patients from Daping Hospital with rectal cancer who underwent TRUS examination plus MFI were included. Grades of MFI were determined by Alder classification. Among the total patients, 64 underwent MRI and serum CEA/CA199 tests additionally within one week of TRUS. Pathological results were used as the gold standard for cancer staging. Concordance rates between TRUS, MRI, and CEA/CA199 for tumors at different stages were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the Alder classification and pathological T staging. The concordance rate of TRUS and MFI for rectal cancer T staging was 72.4% (K = 0.615, p < 0.001). Serum CEA and CA199 levels were significantly different in tumors at different stages and increased progressively by pathological stage (p < 0.001); the accuracy rate was 71.88% (K = 0.599, p < 0.001), while that of MRI was 51.56% (K = 0.303, p < 0.001), indicating that TRUS had higher consistency in the preoperative T staging of rectal cancer. The combination of TRUS, MRI, and CEA/CA199 yielded an accuracy rate of 90.6%, which was higher than that of any method alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative T staging of rectal cancer from biplane TRUS plus MFI was highly consistent with postoperative pathological T staging. TRUS combined with MRI and serum CEA/CA199 had a greater value in the diagnosis of rectal cancer and a higher diagnostic rate than any examination alone.

Focal nodular hyperplasia after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: A diagnostic challenge

Chemotherapy could induce benign liver alterations presenting as diffuse or focal lesions mimicking metastases. Oxaliplatin-induced vascular liver injury is described in literature, but the association with FNH-like lesions has been reported in a limited number of cases. We herewith describe the case of a 67-year-old male, who had laparoscopic right-sided hemicolectomy, 8 years ago, because of colonic adenocarcinoma (pT3N0M0) and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine + oxaliplatin), who referred to the ultrasound service of our Radiology Unit because of abdominal pain. Five-years follow-up was negative for metastases. Ultrasound examination showed 2 small hypoechoic hepatic nodules, in segment VIII and VII, confirmed at CT, suspected for metastases. FDG-PET was negative, and blood tumor markers were within normal ranges. For further evaluation we performed gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI that showed hyperintensity of the nodules in the hepatobiliary phase with central small hypointensity due to a central scar. Considering the previous oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy the findings were compatible with FNHlike lesions and the diagnostic suspicion was confirmed at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Knowledge of the possible occurrence of FNH-like lesions in oncologic setting, along with the detection of typical MRI appearance, is important for appropriate management and may avoid unnecessary biopsy or surgery and reduce patients’ anxiety.

Rim enhancement on hepatobiliary phase of pre-treatment 3.0 T MRI: A potential marker for early chemotherapy response in colorectal liver metastases treated with XELOX

PURPOSE

To assess the value of the enhanced features on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of pre-treatment Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI in evaluating response to chemotherapy in colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 65 patients with CRLMs who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI before chemotherapy from October 2015 to November 2017. The diagnosis of liver metastasis was established on the basis of imaging findings. Two radiologists evaluated the size, contrast-enhanced (CE) patterns of the maximum lesion on the HBP. According to the different CE patterns, we quantified area signal intensity (SI) by applying SI ratio (such as SI_center/outer and SI_rim/center). All of the above parameters were analyzed in terms of chemotherapy response.

RESULTS

Rim enhancement on the HBP was more frequent in the responding group of 28 patients (72%) than in the non-responding group of eight patients (31%). Additionally, there was a significant association between chemotherapy response and quantitative parameters: including diameter (P = 0.04), SI_center/outer (P = 0.047) and SI_rim/center (P = 0.012). The HBP CE pattern (P = 0.007) and SI_center/outer (P = 0.022) were independent factors for chemotherapy response. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the above-mentioned parameters were significant associated with response to chemotherapy, in which diameter, HBP CE patterns, SI_center/outer, and SI_rim/center were 0.638, 0.706, 0.712, and 0.673, respectively. Moreover, the combination of these parameters obtained the largest AUC of 0.821.

CONCLUSION

The CE patterns, in particular with rim enhancement, and SI ratio parameters on the HBP are useful indicators for early evaluation of therapeutic response after chemotherapy in patients with CRLMs.

Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging

Objective

To identify diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and conspicuity discrepancies on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) to distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study recruited 31 patients with 43 atypical hepatic abscesses and 32 patients with 35 hepatic metastases who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. All lesions were confirmed by pathological or clinical diagnosis. For the qualitative and quantitative analyses, the signal intensity, DWI pattern, apparent diffusion coefficient, degree of perilesional edema, perilesional hyperemia, perilesional signal on HBPI, conspicuity, size discrepancy between sequences, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative enhancement ratio on dynamic phases were independently assessed by two radiologists. Significant findings for differentiating the two groups were identified via univariate and multivariate analyses with a nomogram for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. The interobserver agreement was also analyzed for each variable.

Results

The multivariate analysis revealed that the conspicuity discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 34.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09–579.47, p = 0.013) and non-peripheral high signal intensity (SI) rim on DWI (OR 67.46, 95% CI 2.64, 1723.20, p = 0.011) were significant independent factors for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. They were also shown to be high predictor points on the nomogram. When any of the set criteria were satisfied, 97.7% of atypical hepatic abscesses were correctly identified, with a specificity of 65.7%. When both criteria were combined, the specificity was up to 100%, with a sensitivity of 44.9%.

Conclusion

Conspicuity discrepancy and a non-peripheral high SI rim on DWI are reliable and meaningful features that can distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases.

Spectrum of liver lesions hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase: an approach by clinical setting

Hepatobiliary MRI contrast agents are increasingly being used for liver imaging. In clinical practice, most focal liver lesions do not uptake hepatobiliary contrast agents. Less commonly, hepatic lesions may show variable signal characteristics on hepatobiliary phase. This pictorial essay reviews a broad spectrum of benign and malignant focal hepatic observations that may show hyperintensity on hepatobiliary phase in various clinical settings. In non-cirrhotic patients, focal hepatic observations that show hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase are usually benign and typically include focal nodular hyperplasia. In patients with primary or secondary vascular disorders, focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions arise as a local hyperplastic response to vascular alterations and tend to be iso- or hyperintense in the hepatobiliary phase. In oncologic patients, metastases and cholangiocarcinoma are hypointense lesions in the hepatobiliary phase; however, occasionally they may show a diffuse, central and inhomogeneous hepatobiliary paradoxical uptake with peripheral rim hypointensity. Post-chemotherapy focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions may be tricky, and their typical hyperintense rim in the hepatobiliary phase is very helpful for the differential diagnosis with metastases. In cirrhotic patients, hepatocellular carcinoma may occasionally appear hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase.

Quantitative evaluation of focal liver lesions with T1 mapping using a phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequence on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

Purpose

To determine the usefulness of T1 values measured using a phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) sequence for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

Method

The study enrolled 87 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessment of 38 hepatocellular carcinomas, 33 hepatic hemangiomas, 30 metastatic liver tumors, and 14 hepatic cysts. PSIR was performed before and 15 min after contrast agent administration, and then the respective T1 values were measured and the T1 reduction rate was calculated. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to compare T1 values pre- and post-contrast administration in each tumor. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-hoc test were used to compare T1 values among all tumors pre- and post-contrast administration and the T1 reduction rate among all tumors.

Results

The T1 values measured before and after contrast enhancement were 1056 ± 292 ms and 724 ± 199 ms for hepatocellular carcinoma, 1757 ± 723 ms and 1033 ± 406 ms for metastatic liver tumor, 2524 ± 908 ms and 1071 ± 390 ms for hepatic hemangioma, and 3793 ± 207 ms and 3671 ± 241 ms for liver cysts, respectively. The T1 values obtained before and after contrast administration showed significant differences for all tumors except liver cysts (P <  0.0001). T1 reduction rate was not significantly different between hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver tumor, but was significantly different among other tumors (P <  0.05).

Conclusions

T1 mapping using the PSIR sequence is useful to differentiate focal liver lesions.

Hepatobiliary phase enhancement of liver metastases on gadoxetic acid MRI: assessment of frequency and patterns

OBJECTIVES

To assess for and characterize patterns of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) enhancement in hepatic metastases of various malignancies on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

Eighty gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI studies performed between July 2012 and November 2019 in patients with hepatic metastases from 13 different primary malignancies were assessed. Most (n = 60) were from colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), or neuroendocrine tumor (NET) primaries. Two radiologists quantitatively evaluated the dominant lesion on each MRI. A lesion was considered enhancing when HBP enhancement relative to muscle exceeded 20%. Lesions were classified by pattern of enhancement. Quantitative enhancement metrics and patterns of enhancement were compared between CRC, PDAC, and NET using non-parametric statistical tests.

RESULTS

Most dominant metastatic lesions > 1 cm (77%, 54/70) demonstrated HBP enhancement. HBP enhancement was identified in hepatic metastases from 10 different primary malignancies, including CRC, PDAC, and NET. PDAC metastases demonstrated a lower degree of HBP enhancement (26%) than CRC (44%, p_adj = 0.04) and NET (51%, p_adj = 0.01) metastases. Three discrete enhancement patterns were identified: peripheral, central (target), and diffuse heterogeneous. Patterns of HBP enhancement varied between CRC, PDAC, and NET, with secondary analysis demonstrating that PDAC had the highest proportion of peripheral pattern (73%, p_adj < 0.001), CRC the highest proportion of diffuse heterogeneous pattern (32%, p_adj < 0.01), and NET the highest proportion of central pattern (89%, p_adj < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Liver metastases from several primary malignancies, including PDAC, demonstrate mild HBP enhancement in variable patterns. Correlation with OATP1B3 expression and prognosis is required.

KEY POINTS

• Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) enhancement was identified in 77% of hepatic metastases in several different primary malignancies. • Discrete patterns of HBP enhancement exist (peripheral, central, diffuse heterogeneous) and varied between CRC, PDAC, and NET. CRC and PDAC metastases demonstrated mostly non-central patterns (diffuse and peripheral), and NET mostly a central pattern. • Relationship between HBP enhancement, enhancement pattern, OATP1B3 expression, and prognosis requires further dedicated exploration for each malignancy.

Non-contrast liver MRI as an alternative to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides reliable diagnostic performance for detecting liver metastasis but is costly and time-consuming.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of non-contrast liver MRI to whole MRI using gadoxetic acid for detecting liver metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included 175 patients with histologically confirmed 401 liver metastases and 73 benign liver lesions. A non-contrast MRI (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted images) with or without multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and a whole MRI (gadoxetic acid-enhanced and non-contrast MRI) were analyzed independently by two observers to detect liver metastasis using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in Az value (range = 0.914-0.997), sensitivity (range = 95.2-99.6%), specificity (range = 77.3-100%), or positive (range = 92.9-100%) or negative predictive value (range = 87.5-95.7%) between the non-contrast MRI with or without MDCT and the whole MRI for both observers for all lesions as well as lesions ≤1.0 cm and lesions >1.0 cm in size ( P = 0.203-1.000). Combined MDCT and non-contrast MRI led to similar numbers of false-positive diagnosis to the whole MRI (eight for Observers 1 and 4 vs. 3 for Observer 2).

CONCLUSION

Non-contrast liver MRI may serve as an alternative to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting and characterizing liver metastasis from CRC, at least in patients with relatively high risk of liver metastasis who underwent MDCT. Non-contrast liver MRI could be beneficial especially for patients with lesions that are already documented as benign but require additional follow-up MRIs.

Differentiating metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas from simple cysts of the liver using contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the value of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI for differentiating metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas from simple cysts of the liver.

METHODS:

29 patients with 47 metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas and/or 19 simple cysts of the liver who underwent contrast-enhanced and DW MRI were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists assessed the MRI findings by consensus. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted. Significant MRI findings on univariate and multivariate analyses were assessed, and their diagnostic performances for predicting metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas were analyzed.

RESULTS:

The presence of rim enhancement (odds ratio, 28.43; p = 0.008) and intracystic enhancement (oddsratio, 180.15; p = 0.001) were independently significant factors for predicting metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas. The sensitivity and specificity of rim enhancement, intracystic enhancement, and their combination for detecting metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas were 83% (39/47) and 63.2% (12/19), 87.2% (41/47) and 89.5% (17/19), and 72.3% (34/47) and 94.7% (18/19), respectively. Compared to simple cysts, metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas showed significantly lower mean apparent diffusion coefficient (1.92 ± 0.81 vs 2.99 ± 0.75 × 10^-3 mm² s^-1; p = 0.001) and lesion-to-liver apparent diffusion coefficient ratio (1.66 ± 0.75 vs 2.44 ± 0.56 × 10^-3 mm² s^-1; p = 0.004) and higher mean signal intensity (400.3 ± 216.3 vs 222.4 ± 99.3; p = 0.039) and lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratio on hepatobiliary-phase images (0.58 ± 0.16 vs 0.30 ± 0.14; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Contrast-enhanced and DW MRI may be helpful for differentiating metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas from simple cysts of the liver.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

On contrast-enhanced and DW MRI, rim and intracystic enhancement can be helpful for differentiating metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas from simple cysts of the liver.

Delayed tumour enhancement on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI is associated with overall survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether tumour enhancement on preoperative delayed-phase gadoxetate-enhanced MRI can predict long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRCLM) post-hepatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients who received a preoperative gadoxetate-enhanced MRI prior to liver resection for CRCLM from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, were included in this retrospective study. Target tumour enhancement (TuEn) was calculated as the mean percentage increase in SNR from precontrast to 10-min or 20-min delayed phase for up to two target lesions. Per-patient TuEn was stratified into weak and strong enhancement based on the cut-off determined by the Youden Index for 3-year survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine whether tumour enhancement could predict overall survival independent of potential confounders (clinical risk score).

RESULTS

The proportion surviving at 3 years was 85.1% in patients with strong TuEn at 10 min vs. 56.5% in those with weak TuEn at 10 min (p = 0.001). The proportion surviving at 3 years was 79.4% in patients with strong TuEn at 20 min vs. 58.7% in those with weak TuEn at 20 min (p = 0.011). After adjusting for potential confounders, the hazard ratio of death was 0.24 (p = 0.009) in patients who had weak TuEn at 10 min and 0.32 (p = 0.018) in patients who had weak TuEn at 20 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong delayed tumour enhancement seen on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI is associated with overall survival in patients with CRCLM post-hepatectomy and may be useful for preoperative risk stratification.

KEY POINTS

• Delayed tumour enhancement of colorectal liver metastases on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI is associated with survival post-hepatectomy • Delayed tumour enhancement of colorectal liver metastases on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI can be measured at both 10 min and 20 min post-contrast injection.

Aberrant expression of OATP1B3 in colorectal cancer liver metastases and its clinical implication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

Purpose

To investigate the factors associated with hepatobiliary phase (HBP) enhancement at gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to determine whether HBP images could be used to predict prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM).

Results

Of the 96 total nodules, 65 and 31 nodules were in the mixed and clearly hypointense groups, respectively. In the 55 nodules without preoperative chemotherapy, organic anionic transporting polypeptide 1B3 (OATP1B3) expression was a significant factor regarding the HBP enhancement (P=0.042). In this subgroup, nodules with OATP1B3 expression displayed a significantly higher relative intensity ratio on the HBP image (RIR_post) and relative enhancement ratio (RER) than those lacking this marker (P=0.024, 0.003, respectively). No significant factor was associated with the enhancement pattern in the chemotherapy group. The mixed hypointense group displayed worse survival rates (P=0.002).

Materials and Methods

Ninety-six patients who underwent pre-operative liver MRI and surgical resection for CRLM from January 2010 to June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. We qualitatively evaluated the HBP enhancement pattern of CRLMs and classified them into mixed and clearly hypointense groups. For quantitative measurement, the RIR_post and RER were analyzed. To investigate factors associated with HBP enhancement, tumor components (fibrosis, necrosis, and cellularity) and OATP1B3 expression were scored on a 4-point scale. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to determine significant factors for visual enhancement and quantitative parameters.

Conclusions

OATP1B3 expression is associated with mixed hypointense CRLMs without chemotherapy. Signal intensity on HBP has potential usefulness to predict prognosis in CRLMs.

Intrahepatic distant recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: precursor nodules on pre-procedural gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging

Background Intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) after radiofrequency (RF) ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with poor overall survival outcome. Purpose To evaluate the incidence and findings on pre-procedural gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of precursor nodules for IDR after RF ablation for HCC. Material and Methods This study was approved by our institutional review board. Among 343 patients treated with RF ablation for HCC between 2009 and 2011, 141 patients who underwent pre-procedural gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI and experienced IDR were enrolled. The presence of precursor nodules for IDR on pre-procedural imaging was assessed. Nodules were categorized based on hypervascularity in the arterial phase and signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase images. Time to recurrence was compared between patients with and without precursor nodules. Results In 46 (32.7%) of 141 patients (50 HCCs), there were precursor nodules on pre-procedural MRIs (median follow-up period, 4.39 years; range, 0.08-6.08). In three patients, HCCs were missed on imaging. In the remaining 43 patients, the 47 precursor nodules identified were non-hypervascular hypointense (n = 26), non-hypervascular isointense (n = 6), non-hypervascular hyperintense (n = 2), hypervascular hypointense (n = 10), and hypervascular isointense (n = 3). The mean time-to-recurrence was significantly shorter for patients with precursor nodules than for those without (16.6 versus 24.0 months, P = 0.011). Conclusion About one-third of patients with IDR after RF ablation for HCC had precursor nodules on pre-procedural gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, most commonly non-hypervascular hypointense nodules in the hepatobiliary phase.

Use of hepatobiliary phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI of breast cancer hepatic metastasis to predict response to chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prognostic value of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI findings of liver metastasis from breast cancer.

METHODS

29 metastatic lesions from 12 breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated hepatobiliary phase of the lesions and classified them as a "target" or "non-target" appearance. The relationship of appearance or SI ratio with tumor response was analyzed.

RESULTS

A non-target appearance was more frequent in disease control group than in non-control group [14/18 (77.8%) vs. 4/18 (22.2%)], and it was associated with a better response [p=0.048].

CONCLUSION

HBP analysis may be useful to predict the response to chemotherapy and survival.

Non-focal liver signal abnormalities on hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging: a review and differential diagnosis

Gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) is a linear, non-ionic paramagnetic MR contrast agent with combined extracellular and hepatobiliary properties commonly used for several liver indications. Although gadoxetate disodium is commonly used for detection and characterization of focal lesions, a spectrum of diffuse disease processes can affect the hepatobiliary phase of imaging (i.e., when contrast accumulates within the hepatocytes). Non-focal signal abnormalities during the hepatobiliary phase can be seen with multiple disease processes such as deposition disorders, infiltrating tumors, vascular diseases, and post-treatment changes. The purpose of this paper is to review the different processes which result in non-focal signal alteration during the hepatobiliary phase and to describe imaging patterns that may order a differential diagnosis and facilitate patient management.

Diffusion-weighted and hepatobiliary phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced quantitative MR imaging for identification of complete pathologic response in colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) with complete pathologic response from those with incomplete response in patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI and DWI were performed after completion of preoperative chemotherapy in patients with CRLM scheduled for liver resection. Metastases were classified as those with complete pathologic response (CR-CRLM) or incomplete response (IR-CRLM) according to postsurgical histopathology. Quantitative analysis was performed on non-contrast-enhanced images and hepatobiliary phase images following gadoxetic acid administration. Apparent diffusion coefficient values (ADC), normalized relative enhancement (NRE), and relative signal intensity difference (RSID) along with their diagnostic measures for detection of CR-CRLM were calculated for all lesions.

RESULTS

In 23 patients, 10 CR-CRLM and 35 IR-CRLM (mean diameter, 21.2 mm) were evaluated. In CR-CRLM, ADC was significantly higher after exclusion of the outliers (p = 0.030); and RSID was significantly lower (p = 0.008). Combined indices range of ADC = 1.25-1.9 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, NRE = 0-35% and RSID <120 had 60% sensitivity and 100% specificity for detection of CR-CRLM.

CONCLUSION

DWI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI appear promising for the detection of CRLM with complete response to preoperative chemotherapy. This could have significant implications for liver resection planning after preoperative chemotherapy.

Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from its various mimickers in liver magnetic resonance imaging: What are the tips when using hepatocyte-specific agents?

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary hepatic malignant tumor. With widespread use of liver imaging, various cirrhosis-related nodules are frequently detected in patients with chronic liver disease, while diverse hypervascular hepatic lesions are incidentally detected but undiagnosed on dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, use of hepatocyte-specific MR contrast agents with combined perfusion and hepatocyte-selective properties have improved diagnostic performance in detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Meanwhile, the enhancement patterns observed during dynamic phases using hepatocyte-specific agents may be different from those observed during MRI using conventional extracellular fluid agents, leading to confusion in diagnosis. Therefore, we discuss useful tips for the differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from similar lesions in patients with and without chronic liver disease using liver MRI with hepatocyte-specific agents.

Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatic head resection using preoperative diffusion-weighted MR imaging

PURPOSE

To determine whether the preoperative pancreatic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to predict the development of postoperative pancreatic anastomotic failure (PAF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined the cases of 79 patients who underwent pancreatic head resection between January 2010 and October 2013. The patients underwent 1.5-T MR imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging before surgery. The main pancreatic duct diameter (MPD), the pancreatic parenchymal thickness (PT), and the ADC of the pancreatic remnant parenchyma were measured. Two radiologists blinded to the patients' outcomes performed the measurements. The imaging parameters were compared between the patients who developed PAF and those who did not. The cut-off ADC for the development of PAF was calculated with a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The imaging parameters were highly correlated between the two observers. The MPD and PT did not differ significantly among the patients. The mean pancreatic ADCs were significantly higher in the patients with PAF than in those without PAF. An ADC higher than 1.50 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (Az = 0.719, observer-1) or 1.35 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (Az = 0.752, observer-2) was optimal for predicting the development of postoperative PAF.

CONCLUSION

Measuring the preoperative non-tumorous pancreatic ADC may be useful for the prediction of a postoperative PAF.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and other hepatic malignancies: MR imaging

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging surpasses all other imaging modalities in characterizing liver lesions by virtue of the exquisite tissue contrast, specificity for various tissue types, and extreme sensitivity to contrast enhancement. In addition to differentiating benign from malignant lesions, MR imaging generally discriminates between the various malignant liver lesions. Hepatocellular carcinoma constitutes most primary malignant liver lesions and usually arises in the setting of cirrhosis. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a distant second and features distinctly different imaging features. Overall, metastases are the most common malignant liver lesions and arise from several primary neoplasms; most commonly gastrointestinal, lung, breast, and genitourinary.