Bolus timing in high-pitch CT angiography of the aorta

CT angiography of acute aortic syndrome in patients with chronic kidney disease

The term acute aortic syndrome (AAS) refers to a range of different entities, including dissection, intramural haematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Patients with chronic renal disease and particularly those with dominant polycystic kidney disease are susceptible to this pathology, given the underlying renal arteriopathy and hypertension. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosing, grading and guiding management of these patients, with computed tomography angiography (CTA) being on the frontline. Albeit of overlapping of imaging findings between these conditions, specific imaging characteristics help discriminate and guide treatment. Given the nephrotoxic contrast agent involved, tailored CTA protocols or alternative imaging modalities such as MRI or US are necessary in this patient population. This review article discusses the main imaging findings of entities found in the spectrum of AAS, as well as the appropriate use and protocol of imaging modalities, focusing on the appropriate use of nephrotoxic contrast agents, the preservation of renal function and maintenance of optimal diagnostic accuracy.

Low Iodine Contrast Injection for CT Acquisition Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Aorta Assessment and Screening for Coronary Artery Disease

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess both the complete aorta and coronary artery disease (CAD) using low iodine contrast computed-tomography angiography before transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

84 patients underwent computed-tomography angiography before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: 42 with standard iodine injection protocol (P1:120 mL); 42 with a low dose iodine injection protocol (P2:60 mL). Mean attenuation and subjective image quality were rated at different levels of the aorta, iliac and coronary arteries. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values for depiction of CAD were calculated according to the coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Mean attenuation was significantly higher in P1 for the ascending aorta (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed regarding image quality of the aortic valve (p = 0.876), the ascending aorta (p = 0.306), or the abdominal aorta (p = 1.0). Diagnostic image quality of coronary arteries was excellent for P1 and P2 (94.6% vs 96.5%, p = 0.08). Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and accuracy for depiction of CAD were excellent for P1 and P2 (100% vs 100%; 79% vs 86%, 70% vs 87%, 100% vs 100% and 86% vs 93%) without significant differences (p = 0.93; p = 0.58; p = 0.90; p = 1.0; p = 0.74), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite a difference in aortic mean attenuation, a reduced iodine injection protocol showed similar image quality and detection of CAD in comparison with a standard injection protocol.

Double ROI Timing Bolus Technique to Perform Aortic CT Angiography With a 9-Second Contrast Injection Duration

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a double ROI timing bolus technique for performing aortic CT angiography (CTA) with 40 mL of contrast medium over 9 seconds. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A prospective study from February to July 2018 included 106 patients with clinical indications for evaluation of aortic aneurysm or dissection or suspected aortic disease. Forty-seven of these patients had undergone prior aortic CTA by the conventional method. The scanning speed for the double ROI timing bolus technique was calculated from the time-attenuation curves of the ascending and descending aorta by use of the timing bolus data to synchronize aortic flow. The conventional scan was obtained by injection of 1.7 mL of contrast medium per kilogram of body weight for 25 seconds. Enhancement of six points on the aortoiliac arteries and superior vena cava was measured. The t test was used to compare the values. RESULTS. Use of the double ROI timing bolus method significantly reduced the amount of contrast medium injected compared with the amount for the conventional method (40.0 mL vs 88.0 ± 9.4 mL, p < 0.001). Use of the method significantly increased aortoiliac enhancement (403.3 ± 76.0 HU vs 359.7 ± 61.5 HU, p < 0.001) and significantly decreased enhancement of the superior vena cava (118.9 ± 46.2 HU vs 239.2 ± 130.5 HU, p < 0.001) compared with the conventional method. In the group with prior CTA images available, the effective dose was significantly lower with the double ROI timing bolus than with the conventional method (8.3 ± 1.7 mSv vs 12.4 ± 3.2 mSv, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. Use of the double ROI timing bolus method can dramatically reduce the amount of contrast medium used during aortic CTA while improving aortic enhancement and reducing radiation dose.

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of High-Pitch Dual-Source Spiral Cardiothoracic Computed Tomography in Young Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Comparison of Non-Electrocardiography Synchronization and Prospective Electrocardiography Triggering

Objective

To compare image quality and radiation dose of high-pitch dual-source spiral cardiothoracic computed tomography (CT) between non-electrocardiography (ECG)-synchronized and prospectively ECG-triggered data acquisitions in young children with congenital heart disease.

Materials and Methods

Eighty-six children (≤ 3 years) with congenital heart disease who underwent high-pitch dual-source spiral cardiothoracic CT were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into two groups (n = 43 for each; group 1 with non-ECG-synchronization and group 2 with prospective ECG triggering). Patient-related parameters, radiation dose, and image quality were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in patient-related parameters including age, cross-sectional area, body density, and water-equivalent area between the two groups (p > 0.05). Regarding radiation dose parameters, only volume CT dose index values were significantly different between group 1 (1.13 ± 0.09 mGy) and group 2 (1.07 ± 0.12 mGy, p < 0.02). Among image quality parameters, significantly higher image noise (3.8 ± 0.7 Hounsfield units [HU] vs. 3.3 ± 0.6 HU, p < 0.001), significantly lower signal-to-noise ratio (105.0 ± 28.9 vs. 134.1 ± 44.4, p = 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratio (84.5 ± 27.2 vs. 110.1 ± 43.2, p = 0.002), and significantly less diaphragm motion artifacts (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.7 ± 0.4, p < 0.04) were found in group 1 compared with group 2. Image quality grades of cardiac structures, coronary arteries, ascending aorta, pulmonary trunk, lung markings, and chest wall showed no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In high-pitch dual-source spiral pediatric cardiothoracic CT, additional ECG triggering does not substantially reduce motion artifacts in young children with congenital heart disease.

Noninvasive aortic imaging

Non-invasive imaging of the aorta has undergone considerable advancements in recent times; largely driven by the technological advances in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This review article highlights these recent advancements and discusses the current role of different imaging tools in the management of aortic diseases.

Improving Image Quality of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using Patient Weight and Height-Dependent Scan Trigger Threshold

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We aim to improve the image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) by using personalized weight and height-dependent scan trigger threshold.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was divided into two parts. First, we performed and analyzed the 100 scheduled CCTA data, which were acquired by using body mass index-dependent Smart Prep sequence (trigger threshold ranged from 80 Hu to 250 Hu based on body mass index). By identifying the cases of high quality image, a linear regression equation was established to determine the correlation among the Smart Prep threshold, height, and body weight. Furthermore, a quick search table was generated for weight and height-dependent Smart Prep threshold in CCTA scan. Second, to evaluate the effectiveness of the new individual threshold method, an additional 100 consecutive patients were divided into two groups: individualized group (n = 50) with weight and height-dependent threshold and control group (n = 50) with the conventional constant threshold of 150 HU. Image quality was compared between the two groups by measuring the enhancement in coronary artery, aorta, left and right ventricle, and inferior vena cava. By visual inspection, image quality scores were performed to compare between the two groups.

RESULTS

Regression equation between Smart Prep threshold (K, Hu), height (H, cm), and body weight (BW, kg) was K = 0.811 × H + 1.917 × BW - 99.341. When compared to the control group, the individualized group presented an average overall increase of 12.30% in enhancement in left main coronary artery, 12.94% in proximal right coronary artery, and 10.6% in aorta. Correspondingly, the contrast-to-noise ratios increased by 26.03%, 27.08%, and 23.17%, respectively, and by 633.1% in contrast between aorta and left ventricle. Meanwhile, the individualized group showed an average overall decrease of 22.7% in enhancement of right ventricle and 32.7% in inferior vena cava. There was no significant difference of the image noise between the two groups (P > .05). By visual inspection, the image quality score of the individualized group was higher than that of the control group.

CONCLUSION

Using personalized weight and height-dependent Smart Prep threshold to adjust scan trigger time can significantly improve the image quality of CCTA.

Recommendations for accurate CT diagnosis of suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS)--on behalf of the British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (BSCI)/British Society of Cardiovascular CT (BSCCT)

Accurate and timely assessment of suspected acute aortic syndrome is crucial in this life-threatening condition. Imaging with CT plays a central role in the diagnosis to allow expedited management. Diagnosis can be made using locally available expertise with optimized scanning parameters, making full use of recent advances in CT technology. Each imaging centre must optimize their protocols to allow accurate diagnosis, to optimize radiation dose and in particular to reduce the risk of false-positive diagnosis that may simulate disease. This document outlines the principles for the acquisition of motion-free imaging of the aorta in this context.

ECG-gated Versus Non-ECG-gated High-pitch Dual-source CT for Whole Body CT Angiography (CTA)

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate motion artifacts, image quality, and practical differences in electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated versus non-ECG-gated high-pitch dual-source computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the whole aorta.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two groups, each including 40 patients, underwent either ECG-gated or non-ECG-gated high-pitch dual-source CTA of the whole aorta. The aortic annulus, aortic valve, coronary ostia, and the presence of motion artifacts of the thoracic aorta as well as vascular contrast down to the femoral arteries were independently assessed by two readers. Additional objective parameters including image noise and signal-to-noise ratio were analyzed.

RESULTS

Subjective and objective scoring revealed no presence of motional artifacts regardless of whether the ECG-gated or the non-ECG-gated protocol was used (P > 0.1). Image acquisition parameters (examination length, examination duration, radiation dose) were comparable between the two groups without significant differences. The aortic annulus, aortic valve, and coronary ostia were reliably evaluable in all patients. Vascular contrast was rated excellent in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

High-pitch dual-source CTA of the whole aorta is a robust and dose-efficient examination strategy for the evaluation of aortic pathologies whether or not ECG gating is used.

Low contrast media volume in pre-TAVI CT examinations

PURPOSE

To evaluate image quality using reduced contrast media (CM) volume in pre-TAVI assessment.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients referred for pre-TAVI examination were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 BMI < 28 kg/m(2) (n = 29); and group 2 BMI > 28 kg/m(2) (n = 18). Patients received a combined scan protocol: retrospective ECG-gated helical CTA of the aortic root (80kVp) followed by a high-pitch spiral CTA (group 1: 70 kV; group 2: 80 kVp) from aortic arch to femoral arteries. All patients received one bolus of CM (300 mgI/ml): group 1: volume = 40 ml; flow rate = 3 ml/s, group 2: volume = 53 ml; flow rate = 4 ml/s. Attenuation values (HU) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured at the levels of the aortic root (helical) and peripheral arteries (high-pitch). Diagnostic image quality was considered sufficient at attenuation values > 250HU and CNR > 10.

RESULTS

Diagnostic image quality for TAVI measurements was obtained in 46 patients. Mean attenuation values and CNR (HU ± SD) at the aortic root (helical) were: group 1: 381 ± 65HU and 13 ± 8; group 2: 442 ± 68HU and 10 ± 5. At the peripheral arteries (high-pitch), mean values were: group 1: 430 ± 117HU and 11 ± 6; group 2: 389 ± 102HU and 13 ± 6.

CONCLUSION

CM volume can be substantially reduced using low kVp protocols, while maintaining sufficient image quality for the evaluation of aortic root and peripheral access sites.

KEY POINTS

• Image quality could be maintained using low kVp scan protocols. • Low kVp protocols reduce contrast media volume by 34-67 %. • Less contrast media volume lowers the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.